Atrial Fibrillation
Conditions
Brief summary
After surgery on the lungs or esophagus, 12-46% of patients experience an irregular heart rhythm called atrial fibrillation. Although usually transient, post-operative atrial fibrillation is associated with longer stay in hospital, greater complications, and increased risk of death. Several medications have been shown to be effective at reducing the risk of atrial fibrillation after their surgery with the greatest effectiveness and safety demonstrated with amiodarone. Nevertheless, amiodarone has potential side effects, and so it is only recommended in patients with increased risk of developing atrial fibrillation. A tool has been developed and validated to identify high-risk patients but no clinical trial has looked at the effectiveness of administering amiodarone in this high-risk group. This study aims to assess the feasibility and safety of conducting a clinical trial where patients are randomized to receive amiodarone or placebo. This is critical before considering a full-scale trial to assess the effectiveness of amiodarone in reducing atrial fibrillation after surgery on the lungs or esophagus.
Interventions
DRUGAmiodarone
Patients will undergo one of the two regimens of amiodarone, based on their ability to tolerate po (per os) intake in the post-operative period: • All patient will receive 1050mg of amiodarone in 100mL of 5% dextrose administered intravenously initiated at the time of anesthesia induction at a rate of 0.73mg/min or 43.75mg/h and continued over 24 hours followed by: * If able to tolerate po intake: 400mg po BID for post-operative days 1 to 5 or until the day of discharge (whichever occurs first). * If unable to tolerate po intake: daily infusion of 1050mg in 100mL of 5% dextrose for postoperative days 1 to 5 or until the day of discharge (whichever occurs first).
DRUGPlacebo
Patients will undergo one of the two schedules or intravenous infusion, based on their ability to tolerate po intake in the post-operative period: * All patients will receive 100mL of 5% dextrose administered intravenously initiated at the time of anesthesia induction at a rate of 0.73mg/min or 43.75mg/h and continued over 24 hours followed by: o If able to tolerate po intake: 400mg po BID for post-operative days 1 to 5 or until the day of discharge (whichever occurs first). * Esophagectomy patient will receive 100mL of 5% dextrose at the time of anesthesia induction at a rate of what would be 0.73mg/min or 43.75mg/h if it contained 1050mg of amiodarone, followed by daily infusion of 100mL of 5% dextrose for 4 days or until the day of discharge (whichever occurs first).
Sponsors
Ottawa Hospital Research Institute
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)
Intervention model description
Prospective, single-centre, double arm pragmatic randomized controlled feasibility trial
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Aged 18 years or greater * Undergoing major non-cardiac pulmonary or esophageal surgery (including esophagectomy, pulmonary wedge resection, lobar resection, pneumonectomy, or gastrectomy) * POAF prediction score greater than or equal to 4
Exclusion criteria
* Aged less than 18 years * History of atrial arrhythmia (paroxysmal or persistent), or Wolf-Parkinson-White syndrome (WPW), or 2nd or 3rd degree heart block without a pacemaker * Current antiarrythmic therapy (including amiodarone, propafenone, sotalol, flecainide, and dronedarone) * Previous severe adverse reaction or contraindication to amiodarone (including pre-existing interstitial lung disease, or history of hepatotoxicity from amiodarone) * QTc interval longer than 450ms * Serum alanine transaminase or aspartate transaminase over 3 times the upper limit of normal, or Child-Pugh class C * Allergy to amiodarone
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Resources | Upon study completion, 1 year following study initiation | Resources required to conduct a future multi-centre PREP-AF trial will be assessed by evaluating the administrative capacity of the POAF research team, including the required number of hours of research assistant time, as well as the feasibility of the designated study budget |
| Intervention delivery | Upon study completion, 1 year following study initiation | Intervention delivery will be assessed by determining if protocol adherence rates exceed \>90% and recording observational data on the quality of intervention delivery using a data collection sheet |
| Protocol compliance | Upon study completion, 1 year following study initiation | Monitoring of protocol compliance will be measured by the frequency, rate, and rationale of events when study activities diverge from the REB-approved protocol |
| Adherence to safety protocol | Upon study completion, 1 year following study initiation | Monitoring of safety will be assessed by determining the rate and efficiency of reporting adverse events if they occur and monitoring adherence rates to safety and monitoring protocols |
| Proportion of patients for which data could be abstracted | Upon study completion, 1 year following study initiation | Feasibility of data extraction analysis will be evaluated by the proportion of patients for which the required data could be abstracted: medication use, incidence of post-operative atrial fibrillation, post-operative outcomes, etc. |
| Capability for enrolment | Upon study completion, 1 year following study initiation | Capacity for enrolment will be assessed, in order to determine recruitment potential and an optimal sample size estimated for a full-scale RCT, by measuring the following outcomes: proportion of patients risk stratified and screened, proportion of eligible individuals consenting to involvement in the study, proportion of recruited individuals who are enrolled in the study. |
| Proportion of patients randomized who receive the intervention | Upon study completion, 1 year following study initiation | Feasibility of the randomization process will be evaluated including the proportion of patients randomized who receive the intervention |
| Knowledge of which patients received intervention and placebo | Upon study completion, 1 year following study initiation | Feasibility of blinding of participant, care provider, investigator, and outcomes assessor to the intervention allocation of participants will be evaluated by administering a survey to assess their knowledge of which patients received the intervention and placebo |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Severity of postoperative atrial fibrillation | Within 30 days post-surgery | Severity of postoperative atrial fibrillation, as classified by the Clavien-Dindo classification schema, defined for thoracic surgery using the published Ottawa Thoracic Morbidity and Mortality system |
| Hospital length of stay | Within 30 days post-surgery | Hospital length of stay, as defined as the number of days inclusive between the day of surgery, and the day of discharge |
| Other postoperative complications | Within 30 days post-surgery | Other postoperative complications using the taxonomy of the Ottawa Thoracic Morbidity and Mortality definitions. All complications are recorded with incidence, date, and severity. Of note, post-operative mortality is a grade V complication and is recorded along with its cause as well |
| Incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation | Within 30 days post-surgery | Incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation, as defined by atrial fibrillation proved by electrocardiogram with an irregular narrow complex tachycardia without p waves |
Countries
Canada
Contacts
Primary ContactAndrew JE Seely, MD, PhD
Outcome results
None listed