Skip to content

A Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of ECF843 vs Vehicle in Subjects With Dry Eye Disease

A Randomized, Double-masked, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of ECF843 vs Vehicle in Subjects With Dry Eye Disease

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04391894
Enrollment
718
Registered
2020-05-18
Start date
2020-10-06
Completion date
2021-05-13
Last updated
2025-01-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dry Eye

Keywords

Dry Eye, Sjogrens, dry eye syndrome (DES), Keratoconjunctivitis sicca (KCS), keratitis, Xerophthalmia, Sjögren's Syndrome, Sjogren's Syndrome

Brief summary

The study was planned to be conducted in 2 parts: Part 1 to determine the efficacy and safety of ECF843 vs vehicle, followed by Part 2 with additional exploratory assessments of ECF843 vs Vehicle. Both parts of the study included a double-masked study design, with randomization stratified for subjects with Sjogren's Syndrome.

Detailed description

Part 1 of the study was a double-masked, randomized, parallel design in which participants were assigned to one of the following five treatment arms/groups in a ratio of 1:1:1:1:1. * ECF843 0.45 mg/mL three times daily (TID) or vehicle * ECF843 0.15 mg/mL TID or vehicle * ECF843 vehicle TID * ECF843 0.15 mg/mL twice daily (BID) or vehicle * ECF843 vehicle BID The planned duration of double-masked treatment during Part 1 was 56 days. For subjects randomized to ECF843, the maximum drug exposure was up to 28 days. At some point during Part 1, all participants received vehicle. The study was terminated after completion of Part 1 and Part 2 of the study was not therefore initiated.

Interventions

DRUGECF843

Topical ocular eye drop

OTHERECF843 vehicle

Topical ocular eye drop

Sponsors

Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)

Masking description

Double-masked

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Written informed consent must be obtained before any assessment * Adult male or female subjects 18 years of age or older * At least 6 months history of dry eye disease in both eyes * Must use, or feel the need to use, artificial tears/gels/lubricants on a regular basis * Composite corneal fluorescein staining score \>= 4 (modified National Eye Institute (NEI) scale) in at least one eye * Schirmer score \>= 1 and =\< 10 mm after 5 minutes in at least one eye * Patients with Sjögren's Syndrome must have dry eye

Exclusion criteria

* Ocular infection in either eye within 30 days prior to Screening * Use of artificial tears, gels, lubricants within 4 hours of the Screening Visit * Use of contact lenses in either eye within 14 days of Screening * Uncontrolled ocular rosacea * Clinically significant conjunctivochalasis in either eye * Other Corneal conditions affecting the corneal structure * Severe ocular conditions such as herpes, graft versus host disease, Stephen's Johnson Syndrome, sarcoidosis * Currently active, or history of ocular allergies during the time of year the patient will be participating in the study * Patients with current punctal plugs or punctal cauterization or occlusion * Chronic medications (both over the counter and prescription) that have not been stable for at least 30 days prior to Screening. * Use of Restasis®, Cequa®, or Xiidra® within 30 days prior to Screening * Use of ocular, nasal, inhaled, or systemic corticosteroids within 30 days of Screening * History of malignancy of any organ system within the past five years * Pregnant or nursing women

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Part 1: Change From Baseline in Symptom Assessment in Dry Eye (SANDE) ScoreUp to 28 days (Baseline (BL) to end of randomized treatment)The SANDE uses a 100 mm visual analog scale (VAS) and asks the subject to score frequency and severity of their ocular discomfort over the past 24 hours by putting a vertical mark on two separate horizontal scoring lines. The frequency scoring line utilizes the anchors of 'Rarely' to 'All the Time', while the severity scoring line utilizes the anchors of 'Very Mildly' to 'Very Severely uncomfortable'. The SANDE questionnaire was completed through an electronic diary by the subject at the Screening Visit(s) of Part 1, and thereafter every evening before bedtime during the study. The overall SANDE score was calculated by taking the square root of the product of the frequency of symptoms score and the severity of symptoms score. The SANDE scale ranged from 0 to 100 with 100 being the maximal amount of dry eye symptoms and 0 being the minimal amount of dry eye symptoms. Negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Part 1: Change From Baseline in Composite Corneal Fluorescein Staining ScoreUp to 28 days (Baseline (BL) to end of randomized treatment)The degree of staining was based on the Corneal Fluorescein Modified NEI Scale. Each of the five regions (central (C), superior (S), inferior (I), temporal (T), and nasal (N)) were graded based on a scale of 0 to 4, with higher scores suggestive of higher degrees of corneal staining. After entry of the scores per region, the total or composite (sum) score for each eye was automatically calculated (maximum score = 20/eye). A (+1) was added to the sum score for any eye with the presence of filaments.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Part 1: Change From Baseline in Central Corneal Fluorescein StainingUp to 28 days (Baseline (BL) to end of randomized treatment)The degree of staining was based on the Corneal Fluorescein Modified NEI Scale. Central region was graded based on a scale of 0 to 4, with higher scores suggestive of higher degrees of corneal staining.
Part 1: Change From Baseline in Inferior Corneal Fluorescein StainingUp to 28 days (Baseline (BL) to end of randomized treatment)The degree of staining was based on the Corneal Fluorescein Modified NEI Scale. Inferior region was graded based on a scale of 0 to 4, with higher scores suggestive of higher degrees of corneal staining.
Part 1: Percentage of Participants With Ocular and Non-ocular Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs)Up to 28 days (Baseline (BL) to end of randomized treatment)The number of treatment emergent ocular and non-ocular adverse events was reported categorically: Mild, Moderate, Severe. Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) are adverse events started after the first administration of randomized study treatment or events present prior to start of the randomized treatment but increased in severity based on preferred term.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

This study was conducted in 53 sites in the USA.

Pre-assignment details

Approximately 800 subjects were planned to be screened in Part 1 to have approximately 680 subjects randomized into the 56-day treatment period. A total of 970 subjects were screened, of which 558 subjects received randomized treatment.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
ECF843 0.45 mg/mL TID (Part 1)
ECF843 0.45 mg/mL ter in die/three times a day (TID) (Part 1)
111
ECF843 0.15 mg/mL TID (Part 1)
ECF843 0.15 mg/mL ter in die/three times a day (TID) (Part 1)
112
ECF843 Vehicle TID (Part 1)
ECF843 vehicle ter in die/three times a day (TID) (Part 1)
112
ECF843 0.15 mg/mL BID (Part 1)
ECF843 0.15 mg/mL bis in diem/twice a day (BID) (Part 1)
109
ECF843 Vehicle BID (Part 1)
ECF843 vehicle bis in diem/twice a day (BID) (Part 1)
114
Total558

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003FG004
Overall StudyAdverse Event11111
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up10000
Overall StudyProtocol Violation00010
Overall StudyUnsatisfactory Therapeutic effect00001
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject20301

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalECF843 0.45 mg/mL TID (Part 1)ECF843 0.15 mg/mL TID (Part 1)ECF843 Vehicle TID (Part 1)ECF843 0.15 mg/mL BID (Part 1)ECF843 Vehicle BID (Part 1)
Age, Continuous62.0 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.33
61.7 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.68
60.6 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.64
62.1 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.89
62.9 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.51
62.7 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.04
Age, Customized
< 65 years
279 Participants56 Participants60 Participants55 Participants49 Participants59 Participants
Age, Customized
>= 65 years
279 Participants55 Participants52 Participants57 Participants60 Participants55 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
83 Participants15 Participants20 Participants17 Participants12 Participants19 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
475 Participants96 Participants92 Participants95 Participants97 Participants95 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
20 Participants5 Participants6 Participants3 Participants4 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
84 Participants16 Participants17 Participants24 Participants15 Participants12 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
2 Participants1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
451 Participants89 Participants88 Participants85 Participants90 Participants99 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
423 Participants83 Participants89 Participants86 Participants82 Participants83 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
135 Participants28 Participants23 Participants26 Participants27 Participants31 Participants
Sjogren's Syndrome status
No
539 Participants107 Participants108 Participants108 Participants107 Participants109 Participants
Sjogren's Syndrome status
Yes
19 Participants4 Participants4 Participants4 Participants2 Participants5 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 1110 / 1120 / 1120 / 1090 / 114
other
Total, other adverse events
9 / 11115 / 1125 / 1125 / 10912 / 114
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 1110 / 1121 / 1120 / 1091 / 114

Outcome results

Primary

Part 1: Change From Baseline in Composite Corneal Fluorescein Staining Score

The degree of staining was based on the Corneal Fluorescein Modified NEI Scale. Each of the five regions (central (C), superior (S), inferior (I), temporal (T), and nasal (N)) were graded based on a scale of 0 to 4, with higher scores suggestive of higher degrees of corneal staining. After entry of the scores per region, the total or composite (sum) score for each eye was automatically calculated (maximum score = 20/eye). A (+1) was added to the sum score for any eye with the presence of filaments.

Time frame: Up to 28 days (Baseline (BL) to end of randomized treatment)

Population: Full Analysis Set 1 including subjects with a value at both Baseline and post-baseline visit. Baseline is defined as the last available value collected prior to or on the first administration of randomized study treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
ECF843 0.45 mg/mL TID (Part 1)Part 1: Change From Baseline in Composite Corneal Fluorescein Staining Score-1.1 Score on scaleStandard Error 0.3
ECF843 0.15 mg/mL TID (Part 1)Part 1: Change From Baseline in Composite Corneal Fluorescein Staining Score-1.0 Score on scaleStandard Error 0.3
ECF843 Vehicle TID (Part 1)Part 1: Change From Baseline in Composite Corneal Fluorescein Staining Score-0.9 Score on scaleStandard Error 0.3
ECF843 0.15 mg/mL BID (Part 1)Part 1: Change From Baseline in Composite Corneal Fluorescein Staining Score-1.0 Score on scaleStandard Error 0.31
ECF843 Vehicle BID (Part 1)Part 1: Change From Baseline in Composite Corneal Fluorescein Staining Score-1.1 Score on scaleStandard Error 0.3
p-value: 0.60595% CI: [-0.8, 0.4]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.64695% CI: [-0.7, 0.5]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.84795% CI: [-0.5, 0.7]Mixed Models Analysis
Primary

Part 1: Change From Baseline in Symptom Assessment in Dry Eye (SANDE) Score

The SANDE uses a 100 mm visual analog scale (VAS) and asks the subject to score frequency and severity of their ocular discomfort over the past 24 hours by putting a vertical mark on two separate horizontal scoring lines. The frequency scoring line utilizes the anchors of 'Rarely' to 'All the Time', while the severity scoring line utilizes the anchors of 'Very Mildly' to 'Very Severely uncomfortable'. The SANDE questionnaire was completed through an electronic diary by the subject at the Screening Visit(s) of Part 1, and thereafter every evening before bedtime during the study. The overall SANDE score was calculated by taking the square root of the product of the frequency of symptoms score and the severity of symptoms score. The SANDE scale ranged from 0 to 100 with 100 being the maximal amount of dry eye symptoms and 0 being the minimal amount of dry eye symptoms. Negative change from baseline indicates improvement.

Time frame: Up to 28 days (Baseline (BL) to end of randomized treatment)

Population: Full Analysis Set 1 including subjects with a value at both Baseline and post-baseline visit. Baseline is defined as the last available value collected prior to or on the first administration of randomized study treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
ECF843 0.45 mg/mL TID (Part 1)Part 1: Change From Baseline in Symptom Assessment in Dry Eye (SANDE) Score-6.0 Score on scaleStandard Error 1.86
ECF843 0.15 mg/mL TID (Part 1)Part 1: Change From Baseline in Symptom Assessment in Dry Eye (SANDE) Score-8.1 Score on scaleStandard Error 1.85
ECF843 Vehicle TID (Part 1)Part 1: Change From Baseline in Symptom Assessment in Dry Eye (SANDE) Score-4.9 Score on scaleStandard Error 1.85
ECF843 0.15 mg/mL BID (Part 1)Part 1: Change From Baseline in Symptom Assessment in Dry Eye (SANDE) Score-1.8 Score on scaleStandard Error 1.91
ECF843 Vehicle BID (Part 1)Part 1: Change From Baseline in Symptom Assessment in Dry Eye (SANDE) Score-6.1 Score on scaleStandard Error 1.84
p-value: 0.58595% CI: [-5, 2.8]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.10795% CI: [-7.01, 0.7]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.03395% CI: [0.3, 8.3]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Part 1: Change From Baseline in Central Corneal Fluorescein Staining

The degree of staining was based on the Corneal Fluorescein Modified NEI Scale. Central region was graded based on a scale of 0 to 4, with higher scores suggestive of higher degrees of corneal staining.

Time frame: Up to 28 days (Baseline (BL) to end of randomized treatment)

Population: Full Analysis Set 1 including subjects with a value at both Baseline and post-baseline visit. Baseline is defined as the last available value collected prior to or on the first administration of randomized study treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ECF843 0.45 mg/mL TID (Part 1)Part 1: Change From Baseline in Central Corneal Fluorescein Staining-0.2 Score on scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
ECF843 0.15 mg/mL TID (Part 1)Part 1: Change From Baseline in Central Corneal Fluorescein Staining-0.3 Score on scaleStandard Deviation 0.78
ECF843 Vehicle TID (Part 1)Part 1: Change From Baseline in Central Corneal Fluorescein Staining-0.2 Score on scaleStandard Deviation 0.83
ECF843 0.15 mg/mL BID (Part 1)Part 1: Change From Baseline in Central Corneal Fluorescein Staining-0.2 Score on scaleStandard Deviation 0.65
ECF843 Vehicle BID (Part 1)Part 1: Change From Baseline in Central Corneal Fluorescein Staining-0.2 Score on scaleStandard Deviation 0.74
95% CI: [-0.2, 0.2]
95% CI: [-0.3, 0.1]
95% CI: [-0.2, 0.2]
Secondary

Part 1: Change From Baseline in Inferior Corneal Fluorescein Staining

The degree of staining was based on the Corneal Fluorescein Modified NEI Scale. Inferior region was graded based on a scale of 0 to 4, with higher scores suggestive of higher degrees of corneal staining.

Time frame: Up to 28 days (Baseline (BL) to end of randomized treatment)

Population: Full Analysis Set 1 including subjects with a value at both Baseline and post-baseline visit. Baseline is defined as the last available value collected prior to or on the first administration of randomized study treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ECF843 0.45 mg/mL TID (Part 1)Part 1: Change From Baseline in Inferior Corneal Fluorescein Staining-0.2 Score on scaleStandard Deviation 0.75
ECF843 0.15 mg/mL TID (Part 1)Part 1: Change From Baseline in Inferior Corneal Fluorescein Staining-0.3 Score on scaleStandard Deviation 0.85
ECF843 Vehicle TID (Part 1)Part 1: Change From Baseline in Inferior Corneal Fluorescein Staining-0.2 Score on scaleStandard Deviation 0.89
ECF843 0.15 mg/mL BID (Part 1)Part 1: Change From Baseline in Inferior Corneal Fluorescein Staining-0.2 Score on scaleStandard Deviation 0.98
ECF843 Vehicle BID (Part 1)Part 1: Change From Baseline in Inferior Corneal Fluorescein Staining-0.6 Score on scaleStandard Deviation 1.06
95% CI: [-0.2, 0.2]
95% CI: [-0.3, 0.1]
95% CI: [0.1, 0.6]
Secondary

Part 1: Percentage of Participants With Ocular and Non-ocular Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs)

The number of treatment emergent ocular and non-ocular adverse events was reported categorically: Mild, Moderate, Severe. Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) are adverse events started after the first administration of randomized study treatment or events present prior to start of the randomized treatment but increased in severity based on preferred term.

Time frame: Up to 28 days (Baseline (BL) to end of randomized treatment)

Population: Safety Set 1

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
ECF843 0.45 mg/mL TID (Part 1)Part 1: Percentage of Participants With Ocular and Non-ocular Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs)Ocular treatment emergent adverse eventsModerate0 Participants
ECF843 0.45 mg/mL TID (Part 1)Part 1: Percentage of Participants With Ocular and Non-ocular Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs)Non-ocular treatment emergent adverse eventsSevere0 Participants
ECF843 0.45 mg/mL TID (Part 1)Part 1: Percentage of Participants With Ocular and Non-ocular Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs)Ocular treatment emergent adverse eventsSevere0 Participants
ECF843 0.45 mg/mL TID (Part 1)Part 1: Percentage of Participants With Ocular and Non-ocular Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs)Non-ocular treatment emergent adverse eventsModerate1 Participants
ECF843 0.45 mg/mL TID (Part 1)Part 1: Percentage of Participants With Ocular and Non-ocular Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs)Non-ocular treatment emergent adverse eventsMild4 Participants
ECF843 0.45 mg/mL TID (Part 1)Part 1: Percentage of Participants With Ocular and Non-ocular Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs)Ocular treatment emergent adverse eventsMild5 Participants
ECF843 0.15 mg/mL TID (Part 1)Part 1: Percentage of Participants With Ocular and Non-ocular Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs)Ocular treatment emergent adverse eventsSevere0 Participants
ECF843 0.15 mg/mL TID (Part 1)Part 1: Percentage of Participants With Ocular and Non-ocular Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs)Non-ocular treatment emergent adverse eventsSevere0 Participants
ECF843 0.15 mg/mL TID (Part 1)Part 1: Percentage of Participants With Ocular and Non-ocular Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs)Ocular treatment emergent adverse eventsModerate0 Participants
ECF843 0.15 mg/mL TID (Part 1)Part 1: Percentage of Participants With Ocular and Non-ocular Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs)Ocular treatment emergent adverse eventsMild10 Participants
ECF843 0.15 mg/mL TID (Part 1)Part 1: Percentage of Participants With Ocular and Non-ocular Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs)Non-ocular treatment emergent adverse eventsMild5 Participants
ECF843 0.15 mg/mL TID (Part 1)Part 1: Percentage of Participants With Ocular and Non-ocular Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs)Non-ocular treatment emergent adverse eventsModerate1 Participants
ECF843 Vehicle TID (Part 1)Part 1: Percentage of Participants With Ocular and Non-ocular Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs)Ocular treatment emergent adverse eventsModerate1 Participants
ECF843 Vehicle TID (Part 1)Part 1: Percentage of Participants With Ocular and Non-ocular Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs)Ocular treatment emergent adverse eventsSevere0 Participants
ECF843 Vehicle TID (Part 1)Part 1: Percentage of Participants With Ocular and Non-ocular Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs)Ocular treatment emergent adverse eventsMild4 Participants
ECF843 Vehicle TID (Part 1)Part 1: Percentage of Participants With Ocular and Non-ocular Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs)Non-ocular treatment emergent adverse eventsModerate1 Participants
ECF843 Vehicle TID (Part 1)Part 1: Percentage of Participants With Ocular and Non-ocular Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs)Non-ocular treatment emergent adverse eventsMild0 Participants
ECF843 Vehicle TID (Part 1)Part 1: Percentage of Participants With Ocular and Non-ocular Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs)Non-ocular treatment emergent adverse eventsSevere0 Participants
ECF843 0.15 mg/mL BID (Part 1)Part 1: Percentage of Participants With Ocular and Non-ocular Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs)Non-ocular treatment emergent adverse eventsModerate2 Participants
ECF843 0.15 mg/mL BID (Part 1)Part 1: Percentage of Participants With Ocular and Non-ocular Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs)Non-ocular treatment emergent adverse eventsMild1 Participants
ECF843 0.15 mg/mL BID (Part 1)Part 1: Percentage of Participants With Ocular and Non-ocular Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs)Ocular treatment emergent adverse eventsSevere0 Participants
ECF843 0.15 mg/mL BID (Part 1)Part 1: Percentage of Participants With Ocular and Non-ocular Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs)Ocular treatment emergent adverse eventsMild2 Participants
ECF843 0.15 mg/mL BID (Part 1)Part 1: Percentage of Participants With Ocular and Non-ocular Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs)Non-ocular treatment emergent adverse eventsSevere0 Participants
ECF843 0.15 mg/mL BID (Part 1)Part 1: Percentage of Participants With Ocular and Non-ocular Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs)Ocular treatment emergent adverse eventsModerate0 Participants
ECF843 Vehicle BID (Part 1)Part 1: Percentage of Participants With Ocular and Non-ocular Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs)Non-ocular treatment emergent adverse eventsSevere0 Participants
ECF843 Vehicle BID (Part 1)Part 1: Percentage of Participants With Ocular and Non-ocular Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs)Ocular treatment emergent adverse eventsMild7 Participants
ECF843 Vehicle BID (Part 1)Part 1: Percentage of Participants With Ocular and Non-ocular Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs)Ocular treatment emergent adverse eventsModerate0 Participants
ECF843 Vehicle BID (Part 1)Part 1: Percentage of Participants With Ocular and Non-ocular Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs)Ocular treatment emergent adverse eventsSevere0 Participants
ECF843 Vehicle BID (Part 1)Part 1: Percentage of Participants With Ocular and Non-ocular Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs)Non-ocular treatment emergent adverse eventsMild3 Participants
ECF843 Vehicle BID (Part 1)Part 1: Percentage of Participants With Ocular and Non-ocular Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs)Non-ocular treatment emergent adverse eventsModerate1 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026