Osa Syndrome
Conditions
Brief summary
To compare two different clinical strategies in order to evaluate the impact of prophylactic heated humidification on OSA patients' compliance to CPAP therapy.
Detailed description
To compare two different clinical strategies in order to evaluate the impact of prophylactic heated humidification on OSA patients' compliance to CPAP therapy.
Interventions
DEVICEheated humidification
heated humidification system
Sponsors
DOM AIR
ResMed
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Adult Patient * Newly diagnosed OSA Patients eligible to CPAP therapy * Signed informed consent
Exclusion criteria
* CPAP therapy contraindications * Pregnancy * Patient unable to come to study follow up visits or unable to finish the study. * Informed consent not signed * Adults who are subject to a legal protection measure or are unable to express their consent (such as patients under guardianship and patients deprived of judicial or administrative freedom)
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| CPAP mean usage (hours/night) at the 3 month follow up | 3 months | therapy compliance |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Sleep quality | 3 months | pittsburgh sleep questionnaire index. total score |
| sleepiness | 3 months | epworth sleep scale. total score |
Countries
France
Outcome results
None listed