Skip to content

BIOpsychosocial Approach of the CAncer-RElated FAtigue (BIOCARE FActory)

BIOpsychosocial Approach of the CAncer-RElated FAtigue

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04391543
Enrollment
86
Registered
2020-05-18
Start date
2021-11-15
Completion date
2025-02-15
Last updated
2024-04-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Breast Cancer

Brief summary

One of the most common and stressful side effects of the disease and associated treatments is cancer-related fatigue. It deeply disrupts quality of life and can have a negative impact on patient survival. However, cancer-related fatigue is largely underestimated by patients and poorly taken into account by clinicians. One of the reasons for its poor management is a lack of knowledge of the underlying mechanisms and risk factors. Although a multiplicity of factors are associated with the appearance of cancer-related fatigue, we do not know their respective share, nor the nature of their interactions. The phenomenon studied reveals complex and systemic interactions between the biological, psychological and social dimensions. Recent systematic reviews clearly identify 2 locks currently preventing a better understanding of the mechanisms of cancer-related fatigue: i) lack of longitudinal studies, ii) lack of interdisciplinary studies. It is precisely these two challenges that the BIOCARE FActory project wishes to respond to.

Interventions

OTHERExperimental session

* comprehensive interview * cognitive tests * anthropometric measures * postural balance test * critical force test * Astrand-Ryhming test * self-questionnaire (QLQ-C30, FA12, Brief Cope et Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale) * actimetry * clinical and biological characteristics * determination of inflammatory markers * skeletal muscle index

Sponsors

Le Mans Universite
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patient followed at the Victor Hugo Clinic, Le Mans. * Patients aged \>or= 18 and \< 80 years old at the time of inclusion * Patients with a histologically proven primary breast cancer from stage I to IIIc * Naive patient of anti-cancer treatment for this cancer * Agreement to participate in the study by written, informed and signed consent of the patient * Affiliated patients or beneficiaries of a social security scheme * ECOG Performance Status score ≤ 2

Exclusion criteria

* Comorbidity which can explain the symptoms of fatigue (Long-term illness other than cancer, chronic fatigue syndrome) * Breathing difficulties requiring the use of respiratory assistance * Signs of polyneuropathy, amyotrophy or myasthenic syndrome * Contraindications to physical exercise linked to heart failure. * Treatment based on psychostimulants, psychotropics, antidepressants, antiepileptics or benzodiazepines for more than 3 months at the time of the study * Presence or history of psychosis, bipolarity or severe depression * History of stroke * History of chronic fatigue * History of musculoskeletal disorders of the lower limbs * Pregnancy, breastfeeding * Patient unable to undergo protocol monitoring for psychological, social, family or geographic reasons

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Sociability status18 monthsChange from baseline of a Comprehensive interview
Physical characteristics 118 monthsChange from baseline of height (in meters)
Physical characteristics 218 monthsChange from baseline of mass (in kilograms)
Physical characteristics 318 monthsChange from baseline of fat mass (in percentage)
Physical characteristics 418 monthsChange from baseline of leg volum
Postural stability18 monthsChange from baseline of maximum displacement speed of pressure centre at the postural stability test
Cognitive function 118 monthsChange from baseline of Stroop test score (higher score means worse outcome)
Cognitive function 218 monthsChange from baseline of Montreal Cognitive Assessment score (higher score means better outcome)
Cognitive function 318 monthsChange from baseline of Trail Making test score (higher score means worse outcome)
Fatigability18 monthsChange from baseline at critical force test measurement
Functional cardio-respiratory capability18 monthsChange from baseline of the maximum volum of oxygen during Astrand-Rhyming test
Quality of life status18 monthsChange from baseline of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer quality of life C30 questionnaire score (higher score means better outcome)
Fatigue18 monthsChange from baseline of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Fatigue questionnaire score (higher score means worse outcome)
Anxiety18 monthsChange from baseline of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale score (higher score means worse outcome)
Emotional function18 monthsChange from baseline of the Brief Cope test score
Level of activity18 monthsChange from baseline of actimetry mesurement
Inflammatory status (pro-inflammatory cytokines)18 monthsChange from baseline of blood inflammatory markers determined by ELISA test (pro-inflammatory cytokines : IL-6, TNFα, IL-8, IL-1β)
Inflammatory status (anti inflammatory cytokine)18 monthsChange from baseline of blood inflammatory markers determined by ELISA test ( anti inflammatory cytokine : IL-1ra)
Sarcopenia 118 monthsChange from baseline of body masse index
Sarcopenia 218 monthsChange from baseline of musculo-skeletal index measurement on the third lumbar vertebra on scanner

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 20, 2026