Skip to content

Balance Training With tDCS for CAI

Balance Training With Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) for Chronic Ankle Instability (CAI)

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04390048
Enrollment
24
Registered
2020-05-15
Start date
2021-09-20
Completion date
2023-12-20
Last updated
2025-03-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Ankle Injuries and Disorders

Keywords

Chronic Ankle Instability

Brief summary

The purpose of this research study is to examine the efficacy of non-invasive brain stimulation in addition to balance exercise for chronic ankle instability (CAI), a condition that develops following an initial ankle sprain, usually because of loose or unstable ankle joints.

Interventions

DEVICEAnodal tDCS

An anodal surface electrode will be attached to the contralateral motor cortex (M1) of the CAI-involved side and the reference electrode will be placed on the ipsilateral side of the supraorbital ridge. Anodal tDCS will deliver a low electrical current stimulation at 2 milliamps (mA). Participants will undergo 3 sessions per week for a total of 12 sessions and each session will last approximately 20 minutes.

DEVICESham tDCS

An anodal surface electrode will be attached to the contralateral motor cortex (M1) of the CAI-involved side and the reference electrode will be placed on the ipsilateral side of the supraorbital ridge. Sham tDCS will deliver a low electrical current stimulation at 2 mA and will be turned off 30 seconds following the application. Participants will undergo 3 sessions per week for a total of 12 sessions and each session will last approximately 20 minutes.

Sponsors

University of Miami
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 45 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Subjects should be neurologically sound * Subjects should have abilities to maintain a single-leg stance at least for 10 seconds. * A history of ankle sprain * A history of ankle joint giving ways * Current feelings of ankle joint instability

Exclusion criteria

* Individuals with a clinically defined neurological disorder, with an increased risk of seizure for any reason, with a history of treatment with Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS), deep brain stimulation for any disorder will be excluded. * Patients with cardiac pacemakers, implanted medication pumps, intracardiac lines, or acute, unstable cardiac disease, with intracranial implants (e.g. aneurysm clips, shunts, stimulators, cochlear implants, or electrodes) or any other metal object within or near the head, excluding the mouth, that cannot be safely removed will be excluded. * A history of balance or vestibular disorder * A history of previous surgeries to the musculoskeletal structures in either limb of the lower extremity * A history of a fracture in either limb of the lower extremity requiring realignment * A history of acute injuries to the lower extremity joints in the previous 3 months, which impacted joint integrity and function (i.e., sprains, fractures) resulting in at least 1 interrupted day of desired physical activity * A history of herniated disc * Poorly controlled headache * Hypersensitivity to electrical or magnetic stimulation * Adults unable to consent * Individuals who are not yet adults (infants, children, teenagers) * Pregnant women * Prisoner

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Static Postural BalanceBaselineCenter of Pressure (COP) velocity (cm/s)
Active Motor Threshold (AMT)BaselineThe active motor threshold (AMT) was measured by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) using a computation program, Parameter Estimation by Sequential Testing (PEST). AMT was defined as the minimum TMS intensity required to elicit an adequate motor-evoked potential (MEP) in the soleus muscle. A lower AMT reflects greater corticospinal excitability. The unit of measure is Percentage of Maximum Stimulus Output (MSO)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Corticospinal Excitability as Evaluated by the Peak-to-peak Amplitude of Motor Evoked Potential (MEP)BaselineThe soleus active muscle response, due to transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) pulses over the motor cortex, will be used for quantifying the motor evoked potential.
Self-reported Functional ScoresBaselineThe percentage score of the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM). The total percentage score ranges from 0-100. The higher score indicates a better ankle function.
Dynamic Postural Balance as Measured by the Time to Complete the Lateral HopBaselineThe completion time (seconds) for the lateral hop will be measured. Each trial consists of 10 lateral hops. The average completion time of 3 trials will be reported. The completion time will be recorded using a stopwatch in seconds.
Dynamic Postural Control as Measured by the Reach DistanceBaselineThe anterior reach distance (cm) was measured by the Star Excursion Balance Test (SEBT).
Spinal Reflex ExcitabilityBaselineThe maximal peak-to-peak amplitude ratios of the Hoffman reflex (H-reflex) and the motor response (M-wave) of the soleus muscle were calculated by normalizing the maximal H-reflex amplitude to the maximal M-wave amplitude (Hmax/Mmax ratio). A higher Hmax/Mmax indicates a greater spinal reflex excitability.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

A total of 24 participants signed informed consent and were enrolled in the study; however, 5 participants withdrew due to scheduling conflicts that occurred after participant enrollment, but prior to assignment of participants to an arm or group; therefore, the enrollment number in the protocol section will differ from the results section as 5 participants did not receive the intervention. The unit assignment are whole participants that have been assigned to the arms/groups.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Anodal tDCS and Balance Training (BT) Group
Participants will undergo 4 weeks of BT under anodal tDCS treatment. Anodal tDCS: An anodal surface electrode will be attached to the contralateral motor cortex (M1) of the CAI-involved side and the reference electrode will be placed on the ipsilateral side of the supraorbital ridge. Anodal tDCS will deliver a low electrical current stimulation at 2 milliamps (mA). Participants will undergo 3 sessions per week for a total of 12 sessions and each session will last approximately 20 minutes.
9
Sham tDCS and BT Group
Participants will undergo 4 weeks of BT under sham tDCS. Sham tDCS: An anodal surface electrode will be attached to the contralateral motor cortex (M1) of the CAI-involved side and the reference electrode will be placed on the ipsilateral side of the supraorbital ridge. Sham tDCS will deliver a low electrical current stimulation at 2 mA and will be turned off 30 seconds following the application. Participants will undergo 3 sessions per week for a total of 12 sessions and each session will last approximately 20 minutes.
6
Total15

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject13

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAnodal tDCS and Balance Training (BT) GroupSham tDCS and BT GroupTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
2 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
7 Participants6 Participants13 Participants
Age, Continuous23.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.2
22.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.7
22.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.4
Height173.6 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.8
170.6 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.7
172.4 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.5
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
9 participants6 participants15 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
5 Participants4 Participants9 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
4 Participants2 Participants6 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 100 / 9
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 100 / 9
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 100 / 9

Outcome results

Primary

Active Motor Threshold (AMT)

The active motor threshold (AMT) was measured by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) using a computation program, Parameter Estimation by Sequential Testing (PEST). AMT was defined as the minimum TMS intensity required to elicit an adequate motor-evoked potential (MEP) in the soleus muscle. A lower AMT reflects greater corticospinal excitability. The unit of measure is Percentage of Maximum Stimulus Output (MSO)

Time frame: Baseline

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Anodal tDCS and Balance Training (BT) GroupActive Motor Threshold (AMT)43.6 Percentage of MSOStandard Deviation 9
Sham tDCS and BT GroupActive Motor Threshold (AMT)39.4 Percentage of MSOStandard Deviation 13.1
Primary

Active Motor Threshold (AMT)

The active motor threshold (AMT) was measured by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) using a computation program, Parameter Estimation by Sequential Testing (PEST). AMT was defined as the minimum TMS intensity required to elicit an adequate motor-evoked potential (MEP) in the soleus muscle. A lower AMT reflects greater corticospinal excitability. The unit of measure is Percentage of Maximum Stimulus Output (MSO)

Time frame: 4 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Anodal tDCS and Balance Training (BT) GroupActive Motor Threshold (AMT)43.9 Percentage of MSOStandard Deviation 12.1
Sham tDCS and BT GroupActive Motor Threshold (AMT)39.4 Percentage of MSOStandard Deviation 13
Primary

Static Postural Balance

Center of Pressure (COP) velocity (cm/s)

Time frame: Week 4

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Anodal tDCS and Balance Training (BT) GroupStatic Postural Balance3.4 CM/SStandard Deviation 0.7
Sham tDCS and BT GroupStatic Postural Balance3.4 CM/SStandard Deviation 0.7
Primary

Static Postural Balance

Center of Pressure (COP) velocity (cm/s)

Time frame: Baseline

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Anodal tDCS and Balance Training (BT) GroupStatic Postural Balance57.0 CM/SStandard Deviation 3.6
Sham tDCS and BT GroupStatic Postural Balance55.9 CM/SStandard Deviation 3.7
Secondary

Corticospinal Excitability as Evaluated by the Peak-to-peak Amplitude of Motor Evoked Potential (MEP)

The soleus active muscle response, due to transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) pulses over the motor cortex, will be used for quantifying the motor evoked potential.

Time frame: Baseline

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Anodal tDCS and Balance Training (BT) GroupCorticospinal Excitability as Evaluated by the Peak-to-peak Amplitude of Motor Evoked Potential (MEP)0.68 mVStandard Deviation 0.33
Sham tDCS and BT GroupCorticospinal Excitability as Evaluated by the Peak-to-peak Amplitude of Motor Evoked Potential (MEP)0.63 mVStandard Deviation 0.25
Secondary

Corticospinal Excitability as Evaluated by the Peak-to-peak Amplitude of Motor Evoked Potential (MEP)

The soleus active muscle response, due to transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) pulses over the motor cortex, will be used for quantifying the motor evoked potential.

Time frame: 4 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Anodal tDCS and Balance Training (BT) GroupCorticospinal Excitability as Evaluated by the Peak-to-peak Amplitude of Motor Evoked Potential (MEP)0.46 mVStandard Deviation 0.16
Sham tDCS and BT GroupCorticospinal Excitability as Evaluated by the Peak-to-peak Amplitude of Motor Evoked Potential (MEP)0.46 mVStandard Deviation 17
Secondary

Dynamic Postural Balance as Measured by the Time to Complete the Lateral Hop

The completion time (seconds) for the lateral hop will be measured. Each trial consists of 10 lateral hops. The average completion time of 3 trials will be reported. The completion time will be recorded using a stopwatch in seconds.

Time frame: 4 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Anodal tDCS and Balance Training (BT) GroupDynamic Postural Balance as Measured by the Time to Complete the Lateral Hop5.3 secondStandard Deviation 1.3
Sham tDCS and BT GroupDynamic Postural Balance as Measured by the Time to Complete the Lateral Hop6.7 secondStandard Deviation 3.8
Secondary

Dynamic Postural Balance as Measured by the Time to Complete the Lateral Hop

The completion time (seconds) for the lateral hop will be measured. Each trial consists of 10 lateral hops. The average completion time of 3 trials will be reported. The completion time will be recorded using a stopwatch in seconds.

Time frame: Baseline

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Anodal tDCS and Balance Training (BT) GroupDynamic Postural Balance as Measured by the Time to Complete the Lateral Hop7.4 secondStandard Deviation 2.9
Sham tDCS and BT GroupDynamic Postural Balance as Measured by the Time to Complete the Lateral Hop7.2 secondStandard Deviation 2.7
Secondary

Dynamic Postural Control as Measured by the Reach Distance

The anterior reach distance (cm) was measured by the Star Excursion Balance Test (SEBT).

Time frame: Baseline

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Anodal tDCS and Balance Training (BT) GroupDynamic Postural Control as Measured by the Reach Distance57.0 cmStandard Deviation 3.6
Sham tDCS and BT GroupDynamic Postural Control as Measured by the Reach Distance55.9 cmStandard Deviation 3.7
Secondary

Dynamic Postural Control as Measured by the Reach Distance

The anterior reach distance (cm) was measured by the Star Excursion Balance Test (SEBT).

Time frame: 4 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Anodal tDCS and Balance Training (BT) GroupDynamic Postural Control as Measured by the Reach Distance61.7 cmStandard Deviation 4.5
Sham tDCS and BT GroupDynamic Postural Control as Measured by the Reach Distance62.2 cmStandard Deviation 9.1
Secondary

Self-reported Functional Scores

The percentage score of the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM). The total percentage score ranges from 0-100. The higher score indicates a better ankle function.

Time frame: 4 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Anodal tDCS and Balance Training (BT) GroupSelf-reported Functional Scores90.3 Percentage of FAAMStandard Deviation 15.4
Sham tDCS and BT GroupSelf-reported Functional Scores98.4 Percentage of FAAMStandard Deviation 1.2
Secondary

Self-reported Functional Scores

The percentage score of the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM). The total percentage score ranges from 0-100. The higher score indicates a better ankle function.

Time frame: Baseline

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Anodal tDCS and Balance Training (BT) GroupSelf-reported Functional Scores82.8 Percentage of FAAMStandard Deviation 15.2
Sham tDCS and BT GroupSelf-reported Functional Scores89.5 Percentage of FAAMStandard Deviation 13.8
Secondary

Spinal Reflex Excitability

The maximal peak-to-peak amplitude ratios of the Hoffman reflex (H-reflex) and the motor response (M-wave) of the soleus muscle were calculated by normalizing the maximal H-reflex amplitude to the maximal M-wave amplitude (Hmax/Mmax ratio). A higher Hmax/Mmax indicates a greater spinal reflex excitability.

Time frame: Baseline

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Anodal tDCS and Balance Training (BT) GroupSpinal Reflex Excitability0.40 RatioStandard Deviation 0.21
Sham tDCS and BT GroupSpinal Reflex Excitability0.39 RatioStandard Deviation 0.1
Secondary

Spinal Reflex Excitability

The maximal peak-to-peak amplitude ratios of the Hoffman reflex (H-reflex) and the motor response (M-wave) of the soleus muscle were calculated by normalizing the maximal H-reflex amplitude to the maximal M-wave amplitude (Hmax/Mmax ratio). A higher Hmax/Mmax indicates a greater spinal reflex excitability.

Time frame: 4 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Anodal tDCS and Balance Training (BT) GroupSpinal Reflex Excitability0.40 RatioStandard Deviation 0.16
Sham tDCS and BT GroupSpinal Reflex Excitability0.40 RatioStandard Deviation 0.18

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026