Skip to content

Let It Out (LIO) and COVID19: Testing an Online Emotional Disclosure-based Intervention During the COVID19 Pandemic

Let It Out (LIO) and COVID19: a Randomised Controlled Trial of an Online Emotional Disclosure-based Intervention for Adults During the COVID19 Pandemic

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04386668
Acronym
LIO-C
Enrollment
80
Registered
2020-05-13
Start date
2020-05-26
Completion date
2020-08-31
Last updated
2020-10-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

COVID19

Keywords

COVID19, Coronavirus

Brief summary

A randomised controlled trial designed to test whether an online expressive writing intervention (LIO-C) can reduce distress for English-speaking adults during the global COVID19 pandemic. Hypothesis: LIO-C will improve distress (as measured by K10) in adults at 1 week post-intervention compared to a neutral writing control during the COVID19 pandemic.

Detailed description

The world is currently experiencing unprecedented challenges caused by the global coronavirus (COVID19) pandemic. Many countries are enforcing measures to restrict movement of people to reduce the spread of the outbreak, including lock-downs, social distancing and self-isolation. These methods, although necessary to slow the spread of disease, will have negative effects on psychological well-being of large populations. Shortage of health care professionals and measures to restrict interpersonal contact means facilitated psychological interventions will not be feasible for many, at least during the height of the pandemic. There is therefore a need for self-directed psychological interventions that can be practically and quickly implemented online. Emotional disclosure-based therapies, such as expressive writing (EW), hold potential as low-cost, easy to implement means of support, with minimal requirement for facilitation. In its original format, EW involved writing daily for 15-20 minutes for 3-4 days about a traumatic event. Since its development, it has been adapted in many ways, including writing about positive events and writing about stress from a compassionate stance. There is evidence that such interventions can provide significant psychological and physical benefits in healthy populations and reduce the effects of natural disasters on health and well-being. However, to our knowledge this form of psychological intervention has not been tested during a rapidly evolving crisis or pandemic. The aim of this study is to test whether an online self-compassion and EW based intervention (LIO-C) can reduce the negative effects of the COVID19 pandemic on health and well-being. The intervention is based on an existing intervention, LIO, that we previously developed for use in advanced disease populations, in collaboration with clinical and health psychologists, and patient and public representatives. For this study, we have adapted the intervention for people living through the current COVID19 pandemic by altering the writing prompts, and translating the intervention to an online hub. As this is an unfacilitated intervention, the instructions involve writing from a compassionate stance to minimise any potential short term negative effects associated with writing about difficult experiences.

Interventions

OTHERLet It Out (LIO)-C

Participants complete three online 20-minute writing sessions in response to prompts asking them to write about their experiences during the COVID19 pandemic from a self-compassionate perspective

OTHERNeutral writing control

Participants complete three online 20-minute writing sessions in response to neutral writing prompts

Sponsors

University College, London
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* English speaking adults over the age of 18 * Able to read and write clearly in English

Exclusion criteria

* None

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10)1 week post-intervention10-item self-report distress scale

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10)Immediately, 1 week and 8 weeks post-interventionSelf-report stress scale
Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)Immediately, 1 week and 8 weeks post-interventionSelf-report sleep scale
Self-compassion scale (SCS)Immediately, 1 week and 8 weeks post-interventionSelf-report self-compassion scale
Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10)Immediately and 8 weeks post-intervention10-item self-report distress scale
Uptake of existing mental health services (MHS)Immediately, 1 week and 8 weeks post-interventionSelf-report measure of MHS usage
Mood and meaningImmediately after each writing session3-item, 7-point, Likert scale measuring how personal and meaningful participants' felt their writing was and their mood
AcceptabilityImmediately post-interventionVia an online feedback form
UCLA Loneliness Scale (UCLA LS)Immediately, 1 week and 8 weeks post-interventionSelf-report loneliness scale

Countries

United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026