Influenza
Conditions
Brief summary
This was a combination of a single ascending dose (SAD) study to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and PK of 3 oral doses of a MEK inhibitor and a multiple ascending dose (MAD) study of 3 oral doses of a MEK inhibitor. Subjects were to be enrolled in 3 different cohorts in the SAD and 3 different cohorts in the MAD and were to be randomly (blinded) allocated to active treatment or placebo (each cohort consisted of 8 subjects receiving active treatment and 2 subjects receiving placebo).
Detailed description
Each subject in the SAD cohorts was to receive a single dose of the MEK inhibitor ATR-002 (PD0184264), with a starting dose of 100 mg ATR-002 or placebo: * Cohort 1: 100 mg ATR-002 or placebo; * Cohort 2: 100 mg + X mg ATR-002 or placebo; * Cohort 3: 100 mg + X mg + Y mg ATR-002 or placebo. An additional cohort (Cohort 4) of 10 subjects (4:1 active vs placebo) could have been recruited into the SAD Part, if appropriate. Effectively, 4 cohorts were treated: * Cohort 1: 100 mg ATR-002 or placebo; * Cohort 2: 300 mg ATR-002 or placebo; * Cohort 3: 600 mg ATR-002 or placebo; * Cohort 4: 900 mg ATR-002 or placebo. Between each cohort, a blinded interim analysis of PK, safety and tolerability had to be performed. The available data was evaluated by the Investigator and sponsor in a Safety Review Committee (SRC) meeting. Once a dose level was judged to be safe, the SRC determined the dose level for the next cohort considering a maximal increment of 400 mg compared to the previous cohort, and the next dose level could be administered to the next cohort. The maximal dose level could not exceed 900 mg ATR-002. Each subject in the MAD cohorts was to receive once daily (QD) doses (fasted) of the MEK inhibitor ATR-002 for 7 days, starting with a dose of 100 mg ATR-002 or placebo QD. * Cohort 5: 100 mg ATR-002 QD or placebo; * Cohort 6: 100 mg + A mg ATR-002 QD or placebo; * Cohort 7: 100 mg + A mg + B mg ATR-002 QD or placebo. An additional cohort (Cohort 8) of 10 subjects (4:1 active vs placebo) could be recruited into the MAD Part, if appropriate. Effectively, 3 cohorts were treated: * Cohort 5: 100 mg ATR-002 QD or placebo; * Cohort 6: 300 mg ATR-002 QD or placebo; * Cohort 7: 600 mg ATR-002 QD or placebo. Between each cohort, a blinded interim analysis of PK, safety and tolerability had to be performed. The available data was evaluated by the Investigator and sponsor in a SRC meeting. Once a dose level was judged to be safe, the SCR determined the dose level for the next cohort considering a maximal increment of 400 mg compared to the previous cohort, and the next dose level could be administered to the next cohort. The maximal dose level could not exceed 900 mg ATR-002. During the study, no repeated daily dose could exceed the maximum single dose that has been shown to cause no safety concerns. Subjects were resident on the ward from the day (late afternoon/evening) before dosing (Day -1) until completion of procedures at 96h following their final dose of study medication. They were to attend a follow up visit 28 days (± 2 days) following their final dose of study medication. Subjects with AEs that were ongoing at the end of the study were followed up as appropriate until the AEs had resolved or stabilised, up to a maximum of 30 days after the last dose of study drug. Pharmacokinetics were determined predose 30 min, 1h, 2h, 4h, 8h, 12h, and 24h, postdose, and predose on Day 2-4 in the SAD Part, and predose 30 min, 1h, 2h, 4h, 8h, 12h, and 24h, of Day 1 and Day 7, predose on Day 2-6 and 48h, 72h, and 96h post final dose of Day 7 in the MAD Part. The 72h and 96h samples in both SAD and MAD were only to be analysed if deemed informative based on the results of the 48h PK sample.
Interventions
DRUGATR-002 MEK Inhibitor
Drug ATR-002 administered as film-coated tablet via oral route
DRUGPlacebo oral tablet
Placebo film-coated tablet administered via oral route
Sponsors
SGS Life Sciences, a division of SGS Belgium NV
Atriva Therapeutics GmbH
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Masking description
Between each cohort, a blinded interim analysis of PK, safety and tolerability had to be performed. The available data was evaluated by the Investigator and sponsor in a Safety Review Committee (SRC) meeting. Once a dose level was judged to be safe, the SRC determined the dose level for the next cohort considering a maximal increment of 400 mg compared to the previous cohort, and the next dose level could be administered to the next cohort.
Intervention model description
This was a combination of a single ascending dose (SAD) study to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and PK of 3 oral doses of a MEK inhibitor and a multiple ascending dose (MAD) study of 3 oral doses of a MEK inhibitor. Subjects were to be enrolled in 3 different cohorts in the SAD and 3 different cohorts in the MAD and were to be randomly (blinded) allocated to active treatment or placebo (each cohort consisted of 8 subjects receiving active treatment and 2 subjects receiving placebo).
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 55 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
1. Male or female, between 18 and 55 years old, extremes included; 2. Weighed at least 50 kg and had a body mass index (BMI) within normal range: 18.0≤ BMI \<31.0 kg/m2; 3. In good physical and mental health as determined on the basis of medical history and general physical examination performed at screening; 4. Haematology and chemistry parameters, pulse rate and/or blood pressure, and ECG within the reference range for the population studied, or showing no clinically relevant deviations, as judged by the Investigator; 5. Negative urine test for selected drugs of abuse at screening and upon check-in at the clinical site; Note: Subjects could not consume poppy-seeds within 24h before screening and before each urine drug screening because this could falsify the results of the opiate urine drug test. 6. Negative alcohol breath test at screening and upon check-in at the clinical site; 7. Negative hepatitis panel (including hepatitis B surface antigen \[HBsAg\] and anti hepatitis C virus \[HCV\] antibodies) and negative human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) antibody screens; 8. Female subjects had to be of non-childbearing potential, as follows: 1. At least 1 year post-menopausal (amenorrhea \>12 months in the absence of an alternative medical cause and follicle-stimulating hormone \>30 mIU/mL in women not using hormonal contraception or hormonal replacement therapy) prior to screening; 2. Surgically sterile (bilateral oophorectomy, hysterectomy, bilateral salpingectomy, or bilateral tubal ligation); 9. To protect partners from possible exposure to study medication in semen, male subjects had to use a condom during the study, even if they had a vasectomy or their partner was not of childbearing potential. Note: medically acceptable methods of contraception that could be used by the partner included combined oral contraceptive, contraceptive vaginal ring, contraceptive injection, intrauterine device, and etonogestrel implant; 10. Willing to adhere to the prohibitions and restrictions specified in the protocol (see Appendix 16.1.1); 11. Ability to comprehend the nature of the study and any hazards of participating in it. Ability to communicate satisfactorily with the Investigator and to participate in, and comply with the requirements of, the entire study; 12. Informed Consent Form (ICF) signed voluntarily before any study-related procedure was performed, indicating that the subject understood the purpose of and procedures required for the study and was willing to participate in the study.
Exclusion criteria
1. Clinically relevant abnormal history, physical findings, ECG, or laboratory values at the pre-study screening assessment that could interfere with the objectives of the study or the safety of the subject; 2. Presence of acute or chronic illness or history of chronic illness sufficient to invalidate the subject's participation in the study or make it unnecessarily hazardous; 3. A condition that, in the opinion of the Investigator, could compromise the well being of the subject or course of the study, or prevent the subject from meeting or performing any study requirements; 4. Impaired endocrine, thyroid, hepatic, respiratory or renal function, diabetes mellitus, coronary heart disease, cancer, or history of any psychotic mental illness; 5. Respiratory tract infection within 4 weeks before the screening visit; 6. History of surgery or medical intervention, or planned surgery or medical intervention, that could interfere with the objectives of the study or the safety of the subject; 7. Presence or history of severe adverse reaction to any drug, or sensitivity to components of the study medication; 8. Use of a prescription or over-the-counter medicine, with the exception of acetaminophen (paracetamol), during the 7 days (or 5 half-lives, whichever is longer) before the first dose of study medication; 9. Participation in another clinical study of a new chemical entity, new device, or a prescription medicine within the 3 months before dosing, or participation within 5 half-lives of receiving an experimental drug (whichever is longer); 10. Presence or history of drug or alcohol abuse, or intake of more than 21 units (14 units for women) of alcohol weekly; 11. Use of a prohibited therapy; 12. Current smoker; or ex-smokers who (a) gave up less than 1 year ago, or (b) who had a history of more than 10 pack-years; Pack-years = cigarettes per day x number of years smoked/20 13. Blood pressure and heart rate at the screening examination outside the ranges 90 150 mmHg systolic, 40-90 mmHg diastolic; heart rate 40-100 bpm; 14. Loss of more than 400 mL blood, e.g. as a blood donor, or donation of blood products, during the 3 months before the study; 15. History of tuberculosis infection; 16. Receipt of a living vaccine within the 3 months before dosing; 17. Active or latent parasitic infection, visit to a country with a high prevalence of parasitic infections within 3 months before receiving study medication; 18. Positive faecal blood test at screening; 19. Employee of the Investigator or the Sponsor, who was directly involved in the study, or a first-degree relative of such person;
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE) - SAD | Day 1- Day 5 | TEAEs in SAD groups |
| Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE) - MAD | Day 1 - Day 11 | TEAEs in MAD groups |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Time to maximum plasma concentration tmax (SAD) | Day 1- Day 5 | Tmax in SAD groups |
| Area under plasma concentration AUC0-t (SAD) | Day 1- Day 5 | AUC0-t in SAD groups |
| Area under plasma concentration AUC0-inf (SAD) | Day 1- Day 5 | AUC0-inf in SAD groups |
| Elimination half-life t1/2 (SAD) | Day 1- Day 5 | t1/2 in SAD groups |
| Maximum plasma concentration - Cmax (MAD) | Day 1 - Day 11 | Cmax in MAD groups |
| Time to maximum plasma concentration tmax (MAD) | Day 1 - Day 11 | Tmax in MAD groups |
| Area under plasma concentration AUC0-inf (MAD) | Day 1 - Day 11 | AUC0-inf in MAD groups |
| Area under plasma concentration AUC0-tau (MAD) | Day 1 - Day 11 | AUC0-tau in MAD groups |
| Minimum plasma concentration Ctrough (MAD) | Day 1 - Day 11 | Ctrough in MAD groups |
| Elimination half-life t1/2 (MAD) | Day 1 - Day 11 | T1/2 in MAD groups |
| Accumulation ratio Cmax (MAD) | Day 1 - Day 11 | Cmax Accumulation in MAD groups |
| Accumulation ratio AUC0-tau (MAD) | Day 1 - Day 11 | AUC0-tau accumulation ratio in MAD groups |
| Accumulation ratio Ctrough (MAD) | Day 1 - Day 11 | Ctrough accumulation ratio in MAD groups |
| Area under plasma concentration AUC0-t (MAD) | Day 1 - Day 11 | AUC0-t in MAD groups |
| Maximum plasma concentration - Cmax (SAD) | Day 1- Day 5 | Cmax in SAD groups |
Countries
Belgium
Outcome results
None listed