Peripheral Vascular Disease
Conditions
Brief summary
Clinical study to investigate the safety and the efficacy of the URECA CTO Device during recanalization and mechanical re-entry into the true lumen after passing the occlusions/calcifications (chronic total occlusions) in the peripheral vasculature.
Detailed description
Peripheral Arterial Disease (PAD) restricts blood supply to the lower limbs. The disease causes obstructions that can affect blood vessels in both the proximal and distal regions. When these vessel obstructions exist for more than 3- 6 Months they are classed as chronic total occlusions. Without sufficient collateral formation this can lead to to chronic limb-treatening ischemia (CLTI), which is characterized by chronic pain and tissue loss. Without revascularization this frequently leads to amputation. The purpose of this clinical study is to investigate the safety and the efficacy of the URECA CTO Device during recanalization and mechanical re-entry into the true lumen after passing the occlusions/calcifications (chronic total occlusions) in the peripheral vasculature.
Interventions
DEVICEURECA CTO device
facilitating guidewire re-entry into the true lumen after passing occlusion(s) in the peripheral vasculature with the URECA CTO device.
Sponsors
Ureca BV
Study design
Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Intervention model description
facilitating guidewire re-entry into the true lumen after passing occlusion(s) in the peripheral vasculature with the URECA CTO device.
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Subject must be \>= 18 and \<= 85 years old * Clinically diagnosed for endovascular treatment of peripheral vascular disease and chronic total occlusion in the iliac artery, superficial femoral artery or in the proximal popliteal artery determined by duplex, CTA, MRA and/or DSA. * Patient has been assessed by an independent vascular surgeon and an interventional radiologist. * Written and signed informed consent
Exclusion criteria
* 1\. Concomitant hepatic insufficiency, thrombophlebitis, deep venous thrombus, coagulation disorder or receiving immunosuppressant therapy; 2. Severe infection or soft tissue loss that may preclude any meaningful attempt at limb salvage; 3. Known or suspected allergies or contraindications to contrast agents; 4. Any significant medical condition which, in the investigator's opinion, may interfere with the subject's optimal participation in the study; 5. The subject is currently participating in another investigational drug or device study that has not completed the primary endpoint or that clinically interferes with the endpoints of this study; 6. Patient unable to give consent; 7. Pregnant and breastfeeding women; 8. Patients who recently suffered from a stroke and/or a myocardial infarct (Within 2 months) 9. Patients with an uncontrollable diabetes; 10. Severe intercurrent illness that, in the opinion of the investigator, may put the subject at risk when participating in the study 11. Patients with hypercoagulopathy; 12. Stent in place in the to be treated artery
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| device success, | during surgery | the successful placement of a guidewire in the true lumen distal of the CTO using the URECA CTO Device without the occurrence of device related complications that involve a Serious Adverse Event. |
| safety of device | 6 weeks after surgery | absence of device related Serious Adverse Events. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Adverse Events | 6 weeks after surgery | device related complications that involve a Adverse Event. |
| procedure time | during surgery | time whole procedure takes using the URECA CTO device |
| Total Fluoroscopy Time and | during surgery | The amount of time of fluoroscopy between the time of introducer sheath puncture up to the moment of sheath removal |
| Total Contrast Load | during surgery | the amount of contrast load between the time of introducer sheath puncture up to the moment of sheath removal |
Countries
Netherlands
Outcome results
None listed