Skip to content

Platelet Rich Plasma Injection vs Percutaneous Tenotomy for Common Extensor Tendinopathy

Comparison of Leukocyte-rich Platelet Rich Plasma Injection to Percutaneous Tenotomy in the Treatment of Chronic Common Extensor Tendinopathy

Status
Withdrawn
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04384809
Enrollment
0
Registered
2020-05-12
Start date
2023-01-01
Completion date
2023-05-01
Last updated
2022-11-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Lateral Epicondylitis (Tennis Elbow)

Keywords

common extensor, lateral epicondyle, tennis elbow

Brief summary

This is a randomized control trial comparing the use of leukocyte rich platelet rich plasma injections to percutaneous tenotomy for the treatment of chronic common extensor tendinopathy.

Detailed description

This is a randomized control trial comparing the use of leukocyte rich platelet rich plasma injections to percutaneous tenotomy for the treatment of chronic common extensor tendinopathy. Patients with a history of common extensor tendinopathy for greater than 3 months, refractory to conservative treatments, are randomized into one of two groups: injection with leukocyte rich platelet rich plasma or percutaneous tenotomy with the Tenex system. Both groups of patients are followed up in clinic at 1 week, 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year following the procedure to examine levels of pain or complications following both procedures.

Interventions

Leukocyte rich platelet rich plasma will be obtained and prepared from a peripheral artery of the subject and then will be injected in the common extensor tendon

DEVICEPercutaneous Tenotomy

Patients will undergo percutaneous tenotomy of the common extensor tendon using the Tenex tenotomy device

Sponsors

University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Non-blinded, parallel randomized control trial

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 89 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* At least 3 months of lateral elbow pain * Subjectively failed trial of physical therapy and counterbracing * Identifiable pathology on ultrasound (one or more of the following: thickened or disorganized tendon origin, microtearing, edema, neovascularization

Exclusion criteria

* Steroid injection within the last 3 months * Previous surgery for common extensor tendinopathy * Current treatment with analgesics * Pregnant, non-English speaking, or illiterate individuals * History of anemia * History of bleeding disorder * Anticoagulant use * History of cervical radiculopathy * Hemoglobin less than 11 grams per deciliter * Hematocrit less than 33% * Platelet count outside of normal range of 150-400 x 1000 microliter

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in pain: visual analogue scaleup to 12 months post-procedureChange in pain will be measured using a 10 point visual analogue scale where 0 represents no pain and 10 indicates the worst pain possible.
Change in functionup to 12 months post-procedureChange in function will be measured using the Oxford Elbow score using a 48 point scale where a score of 0 indicates severe functional impairment and a score of 48 indicates no functional impairment

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026