Skip to content

Effectiveness of Abdominal Binder Use During Colonoscopy

Does Using Abdominal Binder Really Benefit During Colonoscopy ?: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04383132
Enrollment
346
Registered
2020-05-12
Start date
2020-05-15
Completion date
2020-08-15
Last updated
2020-11-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Performance and Tolerance of Colonoscopy

Keywords

abdominal binder, colonoscopy, loop

Brief summary

Colonoscopy is considered the primary screening test for colorectal cancer screening worldwide. For technical difficulties previously experienced during colonoscopy, especially loop of the colonoscopy device in the colon, many solution methods have been developed and applied (manual pressure and position change, etc.). Although these methods are partially successful, there is no consensus on the optimum solution method. Few studies in the literature have investigated the use of corset during colonoscopy and conflicting results have been reported. In this study, elastic abdominal corset or false corset will be used during colonoscopy. Indeed, the investigators aim to determine whether this method is effective and safe with their own results and contribute to the literature. The primary outcome of this study will be the cecal intubation time. Secondary outcomes include manual pressure and position change during the procedure, length of cecal intubation (length of colonoscope required to reach the cecum from the anus), colonoscopy completion rate, additional anesthesia and / or analgesic requirement, patient pain and comfort level and colonoscopic findings.Efficacy will be assessed on the basis of pairwise comparisons between groups with respect to primary and secondary outcomes.

Interventions

abdominal binder is a kind of elastic abdominal compression device

Sponsors

Sehit Prof. Dr. Ilhan Varank Sancaktepe Training and Research Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Between the ages of 18 - 90 Participants must have completed the full prescribed colonoscopy purgative preparation prior to their procedure, and describe adequate cleansing. Participants with ASA I-III (American Society of Anesthesiologists Class III)

Exclusion criteria

Previous colon resection History of intra-abdominal malignancy Known anesthetic or analgesic drugs allergy Multiple planned procedures (e.g.bidirectional endoscopy) Pregnancy Active inflammatory bowel disease A history of intraabdominal malignancy History of cirrhosis or ascites Known ventral hernia

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Cecal Intubation TimeDuring colonoscopy, from insertion of scope into rectum to point in time when base of cecum is identified,an average of 1-30 minutesCecal intubation time will be defined as the time from insertion of the colonoscope into the rectum to identification of the base of the cecum

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Length of Cecal IntubationFrom inserting the scope into the rectum during the colonoscopy, until the cecum base is determined, an average of 1-30 minutesThe length of the colonoscope required to reach the cecum from the anus will be measured
Number of Participants Who Completed the ProcedureDuring colonoscopy, from time point of insertion of scope into rectum to point in time when scope is removed from rectum,an average of 2-60 minutesDichotomous outcome indicating if the procedure was incomplete or complete.
Number of Participants Who Required Ancillary ManeuversDuring colonoscopy, from insertion of scope into rectum to point in time when base of cecum is identified, an average of 1-30 minutesBinary data indicating individually whether abdominal pressure or patient position change was used during the insertion phase of the procedure will be recorded.
Patient Pain and Comfort Level at DischargeAt single time point occurring after the colonoscopy, just prior to the patient being discharged from facility,an average of 60 minutesStudy assistant will interview patient just prior to discharge and obtain responses for pain according to 10-point visual analog scales ( scores are recorded by making a handwritten mark on a 10-cm line that represents a continuum between no pain =1 (min) and worst pain=10 (max)) and global satisfaction according to a 5-point scale ( scores are recorded by making a handwritten mark on a 5-cm line that represents a continuum between very unsatisfied =1 (min) and very satisfied=5 (max) )
Number of Participants According to Colonoscopy FindingsDuring colonoscopy, from time point of insertion of scope into rectum to point in time when scope is removed from rectum,an average of 2-60 minutesFindings such as polyp, cancer, diverticulum detected during colonoscopy will be recorded.
Number of Participants Who Required Additional Anesthetic and / or Analgesic DrugDuring colonoscopy, from time point of insertion of scope into rectum to point in time when scope is removed from rectum,an average of 2-60 minutesWhether the patient needs an additional dose of anesthetic and / or analgesic drug to complete the colonoscopy

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Abdominal Binder Intervention Group
Patients randomized to Abdominal Binder Intervention Group will have the abdominal binder secured firmly between Spina iliaca anterior superior and subcostal area to the abdomen just prior the colonoscopy. Abdominal Binder: abdominal binder is a kind of elastic abdominal compression device
173
Sham Group
Sham Group will have the abdominal binder secured firmly between Spina iliaca anterior superior and subcostal area to the abdomen just prior the colonoscopy but it will be loosened just prior the procedure Abdominal Binder: abdominal binder is a kind of elastic abdominal compression device
173
Total346

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicSham GroupAbdominal Binder Intervention GroupTotal
Age, Continuous52.57 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.41
50.53 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.3
51.55 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.38
Body Mass Index (BMI)29.62 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.54
28.79 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.02
29.2 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.3
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Turkey
173 Participants173 Participants346 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
108 Participants97 Participants205 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
65 Participants76 Participants141 Participants
waist circumference (WC)103.26 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.84
102.33 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.67
102.8 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.27

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 1730 / 173
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 1730 / 173
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 1730 / 173

Outcome results

Primary

Mean Cecal Intubation Time

Cecal intubation time will be defined as the time from insertion of the colonoscope into the rectum to identification of the base of the cecum

Time frame: During colonoscopy, from insertion of scope into rectum to point in time when base of cecum is identified,an average of 1-30 minutes

Population: 9 patients were excluded from analysis CIT and CIL because the incompleted procedure (intervention group n 4, sham group n 5). Because the procedure must be completed for CIT and CIL analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Abdominal Binder Intervention GroupMean Cecal Intubation Time240 secStandard Deviation 110
Sham GroupMean Cecal Intubation Time250 secStandard Deviation 115
Comparison: In sample size calculation, CIT and SD were used. It was found that 326 patients (163 per group) were required to detect a 60-second difference in CIT (SD 192 secs), with 80% power and two-sided alpha 0.05. The frequency of the auxiliary maneuvers was calculated that 324 patients were required for a 20% reduction in the auxiliary maneuvers. In case of becoming lost to follow up and withdrawal, the number of patients was expanded by 5%, and a total of 346 patients, were included in the study.p-value: 0.388t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Length of Cecal Intubation

The length of the colonoscope required to reach the cecum from the anus will be measured

Time frame: From inserting the scope into the rectum during the colonoscopy, until the cecum base is determined, an average of 1-30 minutes

Population: 9 patients were excluded from analysis CIT and CIL because the incompleted procedure (intervention group n 4, sham group n 5). Because the procedure must be completed for CIT and CIL analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Abdominal Binder Intervention GroupLength of Cecal Intubation89 cmStandard Deviation 18
Sham GroupLength of Cecal Intubation88.5 cmStandard Deviation 15
p-value: 0.487t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Number of Participants According to Colonoscopy Findings

Findings such as polyp, cancer, diverticulum detected during colonoscopy will be recorded.

Time frame: During colonoscopy, from time point of insertion of scope into rectum to point in time when scope is removed from rectum,an average of 2-60 minutes

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Abdominal Binder Intervention GroupNumber of Participants According to Colonoscopy FindingsPolyps72 Participants
Abdominal Binder Intervention GroupNumber of Participants According to Colonoscopy FindingsIBD or colitis0 Participants
Abdominal Binder Intervention GroupNumber of Participants According to Colonoscopy FindingsNo mucosal pathology38 Participants
Abdominal Binder Intervention GroupNumber of Participants According to Colonoscopy Findingscolon cancer3 Participants
Abdominal Binder Intervention GroupNumber of Participants According to Colonoscopy FindingsDiverticulosis60 Participants
Sham GroupNumber of Participants According to Colonoscopy Findingscolon cancer0 Participants
Sham GroupNumber of Participants According to Colonoscopy FindingsPolyps70 Participants
Sham GroupNumber of Participants According to Colonoscopy FindingsNo mucosal pathology42 Participants
Sham GroupNumber of Participants According to Colonoscopy FindingsIBD or colitis2 Participants
Sham GroupNumber of Participants According to Colonoscopy FindingsDiverticulosis59 Participants
p-value: 0.184Fisher Exact
Secondary

Number of Participants Who Completed the Procedure

Dichotomous outcome indicating if the procedure was incomplete or complete.

Time frame: During colonoscopy, from time point of insertion of scope into rectum to point in time when scope is removed from rectum,an average of 2-60 minutes

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Abdominal Binder Intervention GroupNumber of Participants Who Completed the Procedure169 Participants
Sham GroupNumber of Participants Who Completed the Procedure168 Participants
p-value: 0.822Chi-squared
Secondary

Number of Participants Who Required Additional Anesthetic and / or Analgesic Drug

Whether the patient needs an additional dose of anesthetic and / or analgesic drug to complete the colonoscopy

Time frame: During colonoscopy, from time point of insertion of scope into rectum to point in time when scope is removed from rectum,an average of 2-60 minutes

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Abdominal Binder Intervention GroupNumber of Participants Who Required Additional Anesthetic and / or Analgesic Drug43 Participants
Sham GroupNumber of Participants Who Required Additional Anesthetic and / or Analgesic Drug64 Participants
p-value: 0.016Chi-squared
Secondary

Number of Participants Who Required Ancillary Maneuvers

Binary data indicating individually whether abdominal pressure or patient position change was used during the insertion phase of the procedure will be recorded.

Time frame: During colonoscopy, from insertion of scope into rectum to point in time when base of cecum is identified, an average of 1-30 minutes

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Abdominal Binder Intervention GroupNumber of Participants Who Required Ancillary Maneuvers65 Participants
Sham GroupNumber of Participants Who Required Ancillary Maneuvers85 Participants
p-value: 0.069Chi-squared
Secondary

Patient Pain and Comfort Level at Discharge

Study assistant will interview patient just prior to discharge and obtain responses for pain according to 10-point visual analog scales ( scores are recorded by making a handwritten mark on a 10-cm line that represents a continuum between no pain =1 (min) and worst pain=10 (max)) and global satisfaction according to a 5-point scale ( scores are recorded by making a handwritten mark on a 5-cm line that represents a continuum between very unsatisfied =1 (min) and very satisfied=5 (max) )

Time frame: At single time point occurring after the colonoscopy, just prior to the patient being discharged from facility,an average of 60 minutes

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Abdominal Binder Intervention GroupPatient Pain and Comfort Level at DischargeVAS score1.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.6
Abdominal Binder Intervention GroupPatient Pain and Comfort Level at Dischargepatient satisfaction score1.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9
Sham GroupPatient Pain and Comfort Level at DischargeVAS score3.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.8
Sham GroupPatient Pain and Comfort Level at Dischargepatient satisfaction score1.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9
p-value: 0.001t-test, 2 sided

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026