Skip to content

Zilucoplan® in Improving Oxygenation, Short-, Longterm Outcome of COVID19 Patients With Acute Hypoxic Respiratory Failure

A Prospective Randomized Open-label Interventional Study to Investigate the Efficacy of Complement C5 Inhibition With Zilucoplan® in Improving Oxygenation and Short-and Longterm Outcome of COVID19 Patients With Acute Hypoxic Respiratory Failure

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04382755
Acronym
ZILU-COV
Enrollment
81
Registered
2020-05-11
Start date
2020-05-22
Completion date
2021-04-09
Last updated
2023-09-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

COVID-19

Keywords

Acute Lung Injury, Hypoxia, Corona virus, COVID-19, SARS (Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome), Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome, ARDS

Brief summary

The study is a randomized controlled, open-label trial comparing subcutaneous Zilucoplan® with standard of care to standard of care alone. In the active group, Zilucoplan® will be administered subcutaneously once daily for 14 days or till discharge from the hospital, whichever comes first. The hypothesis of the proposed intervention is that Zilucoplan® (complement C5 inhibitor) has profound effects on inhibiting acute lung injury post COVID-19, and can promote lung repair mechanisms, that lead to a 25% improvement in lung oxygenation parameters. This hypothesis is based on experiments performed in mice showing that C5a blockade can prevent mortality and prevent ARDS in mice with post-viral acute lung injury. Eligible patients include patients with confirmed COVID-19 infection suffering from hypoxic respiratory failure defined as O2 saturation below 93% on minimal 2l/min O2 therapy and/or ratio PaO2/FiO2 below 350.

Detailed description

This investigator-initiated trial is a phase 2 academic, prospective, 2:1 randomized, open-label, multicenter interventional study designed to investigate the efficacy of subcutaneous Zilucoplan® in improving oxygenation and short- and long-term outcome of COVID-19 patients with acute hypoxic respiratory failure. The hypothesis of the proposed intervention is that Zilucoplan® has profound effects on inhibiting acute lung injury induced by COVID-19, and can promote lung repair mechanisms, that lead to a 25% improvement in lung oxygenation parameters. This hypothesis is based on experiments performed in mice showing that C5a blockade can prevent mortality and prevent ARDS in mice with post-viral acute lung injury. We will randomize patients with confirmed COVID19 with acute hypoxic respiratory failure (O2 saturation below 93% on minimal 2l/min O2 therapy; and/or PaO2/FiO2 below 350 mmHg) to receive up to 14 days of SC Zilucoplan® on top of standard of care (active group A), or to receive standard of care treatment (control group B). Randomization will be done at a 2:1 ratio active: control group. In the active group A, patients will additionally receive daily antibiotics (daily 3rd generation cephalosporin IV while in hospital, followed by oral ciprofloxacin while discharged) as primary prophylaxis against meningococcal disease until 14 days after the last dose of Zilucoplan®. Control group B will receive standard of care and prophylactic antibiotics (3rd generation cephalosporin IV) for only 1 week (or until hospital discharge whichever comes first), to control for the effects of antibiotics on the clinical course of COVID-19. In case of allergies to these antibiotics, or on clinical indication, these antibiotics may be switched to antibiotics that also cover Neisseria meningitidis. To measure the effectiveness of Zilucoplan® on restoring lung homeostasis, the primary endpoint of this intervention is measuring change in oxygenation parameters comparing baseline values (pretreatment) to values predose day 6 and to values at day 15 (or discharge whichever comes first) post-randomizationin group A and group B and the differences in these values between group A and group B.

Interventions

14 days of SC Zilucoplan® on top of standard of care + prophylactic antibiotics until 14 days after last Zilucoplan®

DRUGPlacebo

standard of care treatment + 1 week of prophylactic antibiotics (or until hospital discharge, whichever comes first)

Sponsors

UCB Pharma
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
University Hospital, Ghent
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Recent (≥6 days and ≤16 days of flu-like symptoms or malaise prior to randomization) infection with COVID-19. * COVID-19 diagnosis confirmed by antigen detection test and/or PCR and/or positive serology, or any emerging and validated diagnostic laboratory test for COVID-19 within this period. For patients with a negative SARS-CoV-2 PCR and either a positive SARS-CoV-2 antigen or antibody test, the presence of suggestive lesions for COVID-19 on chest-CT scan is mandatory. * In some patients, it may be impossible to get a confident laboratory confirmation of COVID-19 diagnosis after 24h of hospital admission because viral load is low and/or problems with diagnostic sensitivity. In those cases, in absence of an alternative diagnosis, and with highly suspect bilateral ground glass opacities on recent (\<24h) chest-CT scan (confirmed by a radiologist and pulmonary physician as probable COVID-19), and a typical clinical and chemical diagnosis with signs of cytokine release syndrome, a patient can be enrolled as probable SARS-CoV-2-infected. In all cases, this needs confirmation by later seroconversion. * Presence of hypoxia defined as : * O2 saturation below 93% on minimal 2l/min O2 therapy; and/or * PaO2/FiO2 below 350 mmHg (Strongly recommended: patient in upright position, after minimal 3 minutes without supplemental oxygen; In ventilated patients or ECMO patients PaO2 can be taken from invasive arterial line and FiO2 taken directly from mechanical ventilation settings). * Signs of acute lung injury and/or cytokine release syndrome defined as ANY of the following * serum ferritin concentration \>1000 mcg/L and rising since last 24h * single ferritin above 2000 mcg/L in patients requiring immediate high flow oxygen device (Optiflow) or non-invasive or invasive mechanical ventilation * lymphopenia defined as \<800 lymphocytes/microliter and two of the following extra criteria * Ferritin \> 700 mcg/L and rising since last 24h * Increased LDH (above 300 IU/L) and rising since last 24h * D-Dimers \> 1000 ng/mL and rising since last 24h * CRP above 70 mg/L and rising since last 24h and absence of bacterial infection * if three of the above are present at admission, no need to document 24h rise * Low dose Chest CT or HRCT or Angio Chest CT scan showing bilateral infiltrates within last 2 days prior to randomisation * Admitted to specialized COVID-19 ward or an ICU ward taking care of COVID-19 patients * Age ≥ 18 years * Women of childbearing potential must have a negative serum pregnancy test pre-dose on day 1. Women of childbearing potential must consistently and correctly use (during the entire treatment period and 4weeks after last Zilucoplan® administration ) at least 1 highly effective method for contraception. * Willing and able to provide informed consent or legal representative willing to provide informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with known history of serious allergic reactions, including anaphylaxis, to Zilucoplan® or inability to receive antibiotic prophylaxis due to allergy to ALL of the antibiotics that can be given for prophylaxis of meningococcal disease * History of active or past meningococcal disease * Invasive mechanical ventilation \> 24 h at randomization * Patient on ECMO at screening * Clinical frailty scale above 3 before onset of the COVID-19 episode * Weight below 54 kg as measured max 1 week prior to inclusion * Weight above 150 kg as measured max 1 week prior to inclusion * Active bacterial or fungal infection * Unlikely to survive beyond 48h * Neutrophil count below 1500 cells/microliter * Platelets below 50.000/microliter * Patients enrolled in another investigational drug study * Patients on high dose systemic steroids (\> 8 mg methylprednisolone or equivalent for more than 1 month) or other moderately immunosuppressive drugs (in the opinion of the investigator) for COVID19 unrelated disorder * Patients on current complement inhibiting drugs * Serum transaminase levels \>5 times upper limit of normal, unless there are clear signs of cytokine release syndrome defined by LDH \>300 IU/L and ferritin \>700 ng/ml * Pregnant or breastfeeding females (all female subjects deemed of childbearing potential by the investigator must have negative pregnancy test at screening)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Oxygenationat predose, day 6 and day 15 (or at discharge, whichever comes first)defined by Pa02/FiO2 ratio while breathing room air, P(Aa)O2 gradient and a/A pO2 ratio

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With SUSAR's (Suspected Unexpected Serious Adverse Reaction)during hospital admission (up to 28 days)A serious adverse reaction, the nature and severity of which is not consistent with the information about the medicinal product in question set out: * in the case of a product with a marketing authorisation, in the summary of product characteristics (SmPC) for that product * in the case of any other investigational medicinal product, in the investigator's brochure (IB) relating to the study in question
Result of 6 Minute Walk Testat 12-22 weeks follow-upDistance in 6 minute walk test. The 6 Minute Walk Test is a sub-maximal exercise test used to assess aerobic capacity and endurance. The distance covered over a time of 6 minutes is used as the outcome by which to compare changes in performance capacity. Total distance in meters. A higher score has a better outcome
All-cause Mortality Rate (Excluding Group That Entered During Ventilation)at day 28
All-cause Mortality Rate (Including Group That Entered During Ventilation)at day 28
All Cause Mortality for the Entire Study Populationat follow up 12-22 weeks
Mean Change in 6-point Ordinal Scale Change for Clinical Improvementbetween day 1 and respectively day 6, day 15 (or discharge, whichever comes first) and day 28 (by phone call).6-point ordinal scale defined as 1. Death 2. Hospitalized, on invasive mechanical ventilation or ECMO; 3. Hospitalized, on non-invasive ventilation 4. Hospitalized, requiring supplemental oxygen 5. Hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen 6. Not hospitalized
Number of Days With Hypoxiaduring hospital admission (up to 28 days)defined as SpO2 \< 93% breathing room air or the dependence on supplemental oxygen
Number of Days of Supplemental Oxygen Useduring hospital admission (up to 28 days)
Time to Absence of Fever (Defined as 37.1°C or More) for More Than 48h Without Antipyreticduring hospital admission (up to 28 days)
Number of Days With Feverduring hospital admission (up to 28 days)defined as 37.1°C or more
Mean Change in CRP Levels Between Day 1 and Day 6day 1, day 6
Mean Change in CRP Levels Between Day 1 and Day 15 (or Discharge Whichever Comes First)day 1, day 15
Mean Change in Ferritin Levels Between Day 1 and Day 6day 1, day 6
Mean Change in Ferritin Levels Between Day 1 and Day 15 (or Discharge, Whichever Comes First)day 1, day 15
Number of Participants With Adverse Eventsduring hospital admission (up to 28 days)Any untoward medical occurrence in a subject to whom a medicinal product has been administered, including occurrences which are not necessarily caused by or related to that product. An AE can therefore be any unfavourable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal (investigational) product, whether or not related to the medicinal (investigational) product.
Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Eventsat 10-20 weeks follow-upA serious adverse event is any untoward medical occurrence that: * results in death * is life-threatening * requires inpatient hospitalisation or prolongation of existing hospitalisation * results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity * consists of a congenital anomaly or birth defect Other 'important medical events' may also be considered serious if they jeopardise the subject or require an intervention to prevent one of the above consequences. NOTE: The term life-threatening in the definition of serious refers to an event in which the subject was at risk of death at the time of the event; it does not refer to an event which hypothetically might have caused death if it were more severe.
Number of Participants With SAR's (Serious Adverse Reaction)during hospital admission (up to 28 days)An adverse event that is both serious and, in the opinion of the reporting Investigator, believed with reasonable probability to be due to one of the study treatments, based on the information provided.
Duration of Hospital Stayat 12-22 weeks follow-up
Duration of Hospital Stay in Survivorsat 12-22 weeks follow-up
Number of Participants With Improvement, No Change, Death or Deterioration in SOFA Score Between Day 1 and Day 6 (or on Discharge, Whichever is First)day 1, day 6 or on discharge, whichever is firstThe Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) Score is a mortality prediction score that is based on the degree of dysfunction of six organ systems (respiratory, cardiovascular, hepatic, coagulation, renal and neurological systems). Score ranges from 0 (best) to 24 (worst) points.
Number of Participants With Improvement, No Change, Death or Deterioration in SOFA Score Between Day 1 and Day 15 (or on Discharge, Whichever is First)day 1, day 15 or on discharge, whichever is firstThe Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) Score is a mortality prediction score that is based on the degree of dysfunction of six organ systems (respiratory, cardiovascular, hepatic, coagulation, renal and neurological systems). Score ranges from 0 (best) to 24 (worst) points.
Number of Participants With Nosocomial Bacterial or Invasive Fungal Infection for 28 Days (Phone Call) After Enrollment in Trialday 28
Median Time to at Least a 2-point Improvement on the 6-point Ordinal Scale or Discharge During the 28-day Assessment Period (Range) - DaysDay 28The 6-point ordinal scale for clinical improvement is defined as 1 = Death; 2 = Hospitalized, on invasive mechanical ventilation or ECMO; 3 = Hospitalized, on non-invasive ventilation or high flow oxygen devices; 4 = Hospitalized, requiring supplemental oxygen; 5 = Hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen; 6 = Not hospitalized. A higher score represent a better outcome
Number of Participants in Each Category of the 6- Point Ordinal Scale for Clinical Improvementat 12-22 weeks follow-upThe 6-point ordinal scale for clinical improvement is defined as 1 = Death; 2 = Hospitalized, on invasive mechanical ventilation or ECMO; 3 = Hospitalized, on non-invasive ventilation or high flow oxygen devices; 4 = Hospitalized, requiring supplemental oxygen; 5 = Hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen; 6 = Not hospitalized. A higher score represent a better outcome
Number of Participants in Each Category of the WHO Performance Scaleduring hospital admission (up to 28 days)The WHO performance status classification categorises patients as: 0: able to carry out all normal activity without restriction 1. restricted in strenuous activity but ambulatory and able to carry out light work 2. ambulatory and capable of all self-care but unable to carry out any work activities; up and about more than 50% of waking hours 3. symptomatic and in a chair or in bed for greater than 50% of the day but not bedridden 4. completely disabled; cannot carry out any self-care; totally confined to bed or chair.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time Since Randomization to Progression to ARDS (Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome)during hospital admission (up to 28 days)criteria-defined ARDS criteria-defined ARDS according to the adapted Berlin criteria as follow: * within 1 week of a known Clinical insult or new or worsening respiratory symptoms * bilateral infiltrates not supposed to be of cardiac origin or fluid overload * PaO2/FiO2 \< 300 mmHg
Number of Participants With Lung Fibrosis on Chest CT Scan at Follow upat 12-22 weeks follow-up
Number of Ventilator-free Daysday 1, day 28 or discharge whichever comes first
Time Since Randomization Until Improvement in Oxygenationduring hospital admission (up to 28 days)defined as independence from supplemental oxygen

Countries

Belgium

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

81 patients were randomized at the 9 participating centers.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Group A (Active)
Standard of Care (SoC) + subcutaneous Zilucoplan® + prophylactic antibiotics until 14 days after last Zilucoplan® Zilucoplan®: 14 days of SC Zilucoplan® on top of standard of care + prophylactic antibiotics until 14 days after last Zilucoplan®
54
Group B (Control)
Standard of Care (SoC) + 1 week of prophylactic antibiotics (or until hospital discharge, whichever comes first) Placebo: standard of care treatment + 1 week of prophylactic antibiotics + 1 week of prophylactic antibiotics (or until hospital discharge, whichever comes first)
24
Total78

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall Studydid not meet inclusion criteria but was randomized without receiving the allocated intervention01
Overall Studydid not receive allocated intervention due to clinical error01
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject10

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicGroup A (Active)Group B (Control)Total
A-a gradient at baseline271.8 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 211.1
237.2 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 207.8
260.6 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 209.2
Admitted to ICU at randomisation30 Participants12 Participants42 Participants
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
25 Participants12 Participants37 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
29 Participants12 Participants41 Participants
Age, Continuous62 years64.8 years63 years
Antibiotics at randomisation
no
38 Participants22 Participants60 Participants
Antibiotics at randomisation
yes
16 Participants2 Participants18 Participants
Anticoagulants at randomisation
no
5 Participants3 Participants8 Participants
Anticoagulants at randomisation
yes
49 Participants21 Participants70 Participants
Arterial hypertension
no
28 Participants14 Participants42 Participants
Arterial hypertension
yes
26 Participants10 Participants36 Participants
Cardiovascular disease
no
45 Participants14 Participants59 Participants
Cardiovascular disease
yes
9 Participants10 Participants19 Participants
Chronic kidney disease
no
50 Participants24 Participants74 Participants
Chronic kidney disease
yes
4 Participants0 Participants4 Participants
Days of hospitalization at randomisation3 days2 days2 days
Days of symptoms at randomisation10 days10 days10 days
Diabetes mellitus
no
28 Participants14 Participants42 Participants
Diabetes mellitus
yes
26 Participants10 Participants36 Participants
Ethnicity
African
4 Participants0 Participants4 Participants
Ethnicity
Arabian
3 Participants1 Participants4 Participants
Ethnicity
Asian
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Ethnicity
Caucasian
46 Participants22 Participants68 Participants
Ethnicity
Other
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
54 Participants23 Participants77 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Glucocorticoids at randomisation
no
5 Participants6 Participants11 Participants
Glucocorticoids at randomisation
yes
49 Participants18 Participants67 Participants
glucocorticoid use during first 28 days
no
2 Participants3 Participants5 Participants
glucocorticoid use during first 28 days
yes
52 Participants21 Participants73 Participants
Ordinal scale for clinical improvement
2. on invasive mechanical ventilation of ECMO
8 Participants2 Participants10 Participants
Ordinal scale for clinical improvement
3. on non-invasive ventilation of high flow oxygen devices
19 Participants8 Participants27 Participants
Ordinal scale for clinical improvement
4. hospitalized, requiring supplemental oxygen
26 Participants14 Participants40 Participants
Ordinal scale for clinical improvement
5. hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
PaO2/FiO2 ratio at baseline169.2 mmHG
STANDARD_DEVIATION 93.8
175.1 mmHG
STANDARD_DEVIATION 92.5
171.1 mmHG
STANDARD_DEVIATION 92.8
Remdesivir at randomisation
no
47 Participants22 Participants69 Participants
Remdesivir at randomisation
yes
7 Participants2 Participants9 Participants
Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA score)
score 1-2
29 Participants14 Participants43 Participants
Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA score)
score 3-4
14 Participants7 Participants21 Participants
Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA score)
score 5-6
1 Participants2 Participants3 Participants
Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA score)
score 7-8
7 Participants0 Participants7 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
5 Participants5 Participants10 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
49 Participants19 Participants68 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
7 / 545 / 24
other
Total, other adverse events
39 / 5417 / 24
serious
Total, serious adverse events
10 / 545 / 24

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Oxygenation

defined by Pa02/FiO2 ratio while breathing room air, P(Aa)O2 gradient and a/A pO2 ratio

Time frame: at predose, day 6 and day 15 (or at discharge, whichever comes first)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Group A (Active)Change in Oxygenationchange from baseline in PaO2/FiO2 day 656.4 mmHg
Group A (Active)Change in Oxygenationchange from baseline in PaO2/FiO2 day 15123.5 mmHg
Group A (Active)Change in Oxygenationchange from baseline in a/A PO2 day 60.10 mmHg
Group A (Active)Change in Oxygenationchange from baseline in a/A PO2 day 150.25 mmHg
Group B (Control)Change in Oxygenationchange from baseline in a/A PO2 day 150.17 mmHg
Group B (Control)Change in Oxygenationchange from baseline in PaO2/FiO2 day 620.6 mmHg
Group B (Control)Change in Oxygenationchange from baseline in a/A PO2 day 60.04 mmHg
Group B (Control)Change in Oxygenationchange from baseline in PaO2/FiO2 day 1583.7 mmHg
Primary

Change in Oxygenation

defined by Pa02/FiO2 ratio while breathing room air, P(Aa)O2 gradient and a/A pO2 ratio

Time frame: at predose, day 6 and day 15 (or at discharge, whichever comes first)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Group A (Active)Change in Oxygenation(A-a) gradient day 6114.6 mmHg
Group A (Active)Change in Oxygenation(A-a) gradient day 1558.6 mmHg
Group B (Control)Change in Oxygenation(A-a) gradient day 6146.7 mmHg
Group B (Control)Change in Oxygenation(A-a) gradient day 1586.9 mmHg
Secondary

All Cause Mortality for the Entire Study Population

Time frame: at follow up 12-22 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Group A (Active)All Cause Mortality for the Entire Study Population7 Participants
Group B (Control)All Cause Mortality for the Entire Study Population5 Participants
Secondary

All-cause Mortality Rate (Excluding Group That Entered During Ventilation)

Time frame: at day 28

Population: Population excluding patients that required invasive mechanical ventilation or ECMO within 24 hours prior to or after randomization.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Group A (Active)All-cause Mortality Rate (Excluding Group That Entered During Ventilation)3 Participants
Group B (Control)All-cause Mortality Rate (Excluding Group That Entered During Ventilation)5 Participants
Secondary

All-cause Mortality Rate (Including Group That Entered During Ventilation)

Time frame: at day 28

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Group A (Active)All-cause Mortality Rate (Including Group That Entered During Ventilation)5 Participants
Group B (Control)All-cause Mortality Rate (Including Group That Entered During Ventilation)5 Participants
Secondary

Duration of Hospital Stay

Time frame: at 12-22 weeks follow-up

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Group A (Active)Duration of Hospital Stay15 days
Group B (Control)Duration of Hospital Stay13 days
Secondary

Duration of Hospital Stay in Survivors

Time frame: at 12-22 weeks follow-up

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Group A (Active)Duration of Hospital Stay in Survivors15 days
Group B (Control)Duration of Hospital Stay in Survivors12 days
Secondary

Mean Change in 6-point Ordinal Scale Change for Clinical Improvement

6-point ordinal scale defined as 1. Death 2. Hospitalized, on invasive mechanical ventilation or ECMO; 3. Hospitalized, on non-invasive ventilation 4. Hospitalized, requiring supplemental oxygen 5. Hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen 6. Not hospitalized

Time frame: between day 1 and respectively day 6, day 15 (or discharge, whichever comes first) and day 28 (by phone call).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Group A (Active)Mean Change in 6-point Ordinal Scale Change for Clinical Improvementmean change in 6-point ordinal scale change day 60.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
Group A (Active)Mean Change in 6-point Ordinal Scale Change for Clinical Improvementmean change in 6-point ordinal scale change day 151.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.4
Group A (Active)Mean Change in 6-point Ordinal Scale Change for Clinical Improvementmean change in 6-point ordinal scale change day 281.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.5
Group B (Control)Mean Change in 6-point Ordinal Scale Change for Clinical Improvementmean change in 6-point ordinal scale change day 60.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9
Group B (Control)Mean Change in 6-point Ordinal Scale Change for Clinical Improvementmean change in 6-point ordinal scale change day 151 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.5
Group B (Control)Mean Change in 6-point Ordinal Scale Change for Clinical Improvementmean change in 6-point ordinal scale change day 281.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.8
Secondary

Mean Change in CRP Levels Between Day 1 and Day 15 (or Discharge Whichever Comes First)

Time frame: day 1, day 15

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Group A (Active)Mean Change in CRP Levels Between Day 1 and Day 15 (or Discharge Whichever Comes First)-91.0 mg/mLStandard Deviation 106.3
Group B (Control)Mean Change in CRP Levels Between Day 1 and Day 15 (or Discharge Whichever Comes First)-96.2 mg/mLStandard Deviation 98.4
Secondary

Mean Change in CRP Levels Between Day 1 and Day 6

Time frame: day 1, day 6

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Group A (Active)Mean Change in CRP Levels Between Day 1 and Day 6-89.6 mg/mLStandard Deviation 91.5
Group B (Control)Mean Change in CRP Levels Between Day 1 and Day 6-100 mg/mLStandard Deviation 61.9
Secondary

Mean Change in Ferritin Levels Between Day 1 and Day 15 (or Discharge, Whichever Comes First)

Time frame: day 1, day 15

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Group A (Active)Mean Change in Ferritin Levels Between Day 1 and Day 15 (or Discharge, Whichever Comes First)-201.0 µg/LStandard Deviation 6204.5
Group B (Control)Mean Change in Ferritin Levels Between Day 1 and Day 15 (or Discharge, Whichever Comes First)-303.9 µg/LStandard Deviation 948.4
Secondary

Mean Change in Ferritin Levels Between Day 1 and Day 6

Time frame: day 1, day 6

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Group A (Active)Mean Change in Ferritin Levels Between Day 1 and Day 6-544.4 µg/LStandard Deviation 1489.9
Group B (Control)Mean Change in Ferritin Levels Between Day 1 and Day 6-282.3 µg/LStandard Deviation 517
Secondary

Median Time to at Least a 2-point Improvement on the 6-point Ordinal Scale or Discharge During the 28-day Assessment Period (Range) - Days

The 6-point ordinal scale for clinical improvement is defined as 1 = Death; 2 = Hospitalized, on invasive mechanical ventilation or ECMO; 3 = Hospitalized, on non-invasive ventilation or high flow oxygen devices; 4 = Hospitalized, requiring supplemental oxygen; 5 = Hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen; 6 = Not hospitalized. A higher score represent a better outcome

Time frame: Day 28

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Group A (Active)Median Time to at Least a 2-point Improvement on the 6-point Ordinal Scale or Discharge During the 28-day Assessment Period (Range) - Days15 days
Group B (Control)Median Time to at Least a 2-point Improvement on the 6-point Ordinal Scale or Discharge During the 28-day Assessment Period (Range) - Days12 days
Secondary

Number of Days of Supplemental Oxygen Use

Time frame: during hospital admission (up to 28 days)

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Group A (Active)Number of Days of Supplemental Oxygen Use13 days
Group B (Control)Number of Days of Supplemental Oxygen Use10 days
Secondary

Number of Days With Fever

defined as 37.1°C or more

Time frame: during hospital admission (up to 28 days)

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Group A (Active)Number of Days With Fever7 days
Group B (Control)Number of Days With Fever4 days
Secondary

Number of Days With Hypoxia

defined as SpO2 \< 93% breathing room air or the dependence on supplemental oxygen

Time frame: during hospital admission (up to 28 days)

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Group A (Active)Number of Days With Hypoxia13 days
Group B (Control)Number of Days With Hypoxia10 days
Secondary

Number of Participants in Each Category of the 6- Point Ordinal Scale for Clinical Improvement

The 6-point ordinal scale for clinical improvement is defined as 1 = Death; 2 = Hospitalized, on invasive mechanical ventilation or ECMO; 3 = Hospitalized, on non-invasive ventilation or high flow oxygen devices; 4 = Hospitalized, requiring supplemental oxygen; 5 = Hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen; 6 = Not hospitalized. A higher score represent a better outcome

Time frame: at 12-22 weeks follow-up

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Group A (Active)Number of Participants in Each Category of the 6- Point Ordinal Scale for Clinical Improvementcategory 30 Participants
Group A (Active)Number of Participants in Each Category of the 6- Point Ordinal Scale for Clinical Improvementcategory 50 Participants
Group A (Active)Number of Participants in Each Category of the 6- Point Ordinal Scale for Clinical Improvementcategory 41 Participants
Group A (Active)Number of Participants in Each Category of the 6- Point Ordinal Scale for Clinical Improvementcategory 643 Participants
Group A (Active)Number of Participants in Each Category of the 6- Point Ordinal Scale for Clinical Improvementcategory 20 Participants
Group B (Control)Number of Participants in Each Category of the 6- Point Ordinal Scale for Clinical Improvementcategory 619 Participants
Group B (Control)Number of Participants in Each Category of the 6- Point Ordinal Scale for Clinical Improvementcategory 20 Participants
Group B (Control)Number of Participants in Each Category of the 6- Point Ordinal Scale for Clinical Improvementcategory 30 Participants
Group B (Control)Number of Participants in Each Category of the 6- Point Ordinal Scale for Clinical Improvementcategory 40 Participants
Group B (Control)Number of Participants in Each Category of the 6- Point Ordinal Scale for Clinical Improvementcategory 50 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants in Each Category of the WHO Performance Scale

The WHO performance status classification categorises patients as: 0: able to carry out all normal activity without restriction 1. restricted in strenuous activity but ambulatory and able to carry out light work 2. ambulatory and capable of all self-care but unable to carry out any work activities; up and about more than 50% of waking hours 3. symptomatic and in a chair or in bed for greater than 50% of the day but not bedridden 4. completely disabled; cannot carry out any self-care; totally confined to bed or chair.

Time frame: during hospital admission (up to 28 days)

Population: For 1 participant of group A and 1 participant of group B, the WHO performance scale was not recorded.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Group A (Active)Number of Participants in Each Category of the WHO Performance Scalecategory 023 Participants
Group A (Active)Number of Participants in Each Category of the WHO Performance Scalecategory 118 Participants
Group A (Active)Number of Participants in Each Category of the WHO Performance Scalecategory >=22 Participants
Group B (Control)Number of Participants in Each Category of the WHO Performance Scalecategory 010 Participants
Group B (Control)Number of Participants in Each Category of the WHO Performance Scalecategory 17 Participants
Group B (Control)Number of Participants in Each Category of the WHO Performance Scalecategory >=21 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Adverse Events

Any untoward medical occurrence in a subject to whom a medicinal product has been administered, including occurrences which are not necessarily caused by or related to that product. An AE can therefore be any unfavourable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal (investigational) product, whether or not related to the medicinal (investigational) product.

Time frame: during hospital admission (up to 28 days)

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Group A (Active)Number of Participants With Adverse Events39 Participants
Group B (Control)Number of Participants With Adverse Events17 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Improvement, No Change, Death or Deterioration in SOFA Score Between Day 1 and Day 15 (or on Discharge, Whichever is First)

The Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) Score is a mortality prediction score that is based on the degree of dysfunction of six organ systems (respiratory, cardiovascular, hepatic, coagulation, renal and neurological systems). Score ranges from 0 (best) to 24 (worst) points.

Time frame: day 1, day 15 or on discharge, whichever is first

Population: Change of SOFA score between day 1 and day 15

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Group A (Active)Number of Participants With Improvement, No Change, Death or Deterioration in SOFA Score Between Day 1 and Day 15 (or on Discharge, Whichever is First)improvement or discharge33 Participants
Group A (Active)Number of Participants With Improvement, No Change, Death or Deterioration in SOFA Score Between Day 1 and Day 15 (or on Discharge, Whichever is First)no change5 Participants
Group A (Active)Number of Participants With Improvement, No Change, Death or Deterioration in SOFA Score Between Day 1 and Day 15 (or on Discharge, Whichever is First)death or deterioration5 Participants
Group B (Control)Number of Participants With Improvement, No Change, Death or Deterioration in SOFA Score Between Day 1 and Day 15 (or on Discharge, Whichever is First)improvement or discharge12 Participants
Group B (Control)Number of Participants With Improvement, No Change, Death or Deterioration in SOFA Score Between Day 1 and Day 15 (or on Discharge, Whichever is First)no change1 Participants
Group B (Control)Number of Participants With Improvement, No Change, Death or Deterioration in SOFA Score Between Day 1 and Day 15 (or on Discharge, Whichever is First)death or deterioration4 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Improvement, No Change, Death or Deterioration in SOFA Score Between Day 1 and Day 6 (or on Discharge, Whichever is First)

The Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) Score is a mortality prediction score that is based on the degree of dysfunction of six organ systems (respiratory, cardiovascular, hepatic, coagulation, renal and neurological systems). Score ranges from 0 (best) to 24 (worst) points.

Time frame: day 1, day 6 or on discharge, whichever is first

Population: Change of SOFA score between day 1 and day 6

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Group A (Active)Number of Participants With Improvement, No Change, Death or Deterioration in SOFA Score Between Day 1 and Day 6 (or on Discharge, Whichever is First)improvement or discharge21 Participants
Group A (Active)Number of Participants With Improvement, No Change, Death or Deterioration in SOFA Score Between Day 1 and Day 6 (or on Discharge, Whichever is First)no change11 Participants
Group A (Active)Number of Participants With Improvement, No Change, Death or Deterioration in SOFA Score Between Day 1 and Day 6 (or on Discharge, Whichever is First)death or deterioration11 Participants
Group B (Control)Number of Participants With Improvement, No Change, Death or Deterioration in SOFA Score Between Day 1 and Day 6 (or on Discharge, Whichever is First)improvement or discharge10 Participants
Group B (Control)Number of Participants With Improvement, No Change, Death or Deterioration in SOFA Score Between Day 1 and Day 6 (or on Discharge, Whichever is First)no change6 Participants
Group B (Control)Number of Participants With Improvement, No Change, Death or Deterioration in SOFA Score Between Day 1 and Day 6 (or on Discharge, Whichever is First)death or deterioration5 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Nosocomial Bacterial or Invasive Fungal Infection for 28 Days (Phone Call) After Enrollment in Trial

Time frame: day 28

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Group A (Active)Number of Participants With Nosocomial Bacterial or Invasive Fungal Infection for 28 Days (Phone Call) After Enrollment in Trial12 Participants
Group B (Control)Number of Participants With Nosocomial Bacterial or Invasive Fungal Infection for 28 Days (Phone Call) After Enrollment in Trial4 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With SAR's (Serious Adverse Reaction)

An adverse event that is both serious and, in the opinion of the reporting Investigator, believed with reasonable probability to be due to one of the study treatments, based on the information provided.

Time frame: during hospital admission (up to 28 days)

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Group A (Active)Number of Participants With SAR's (Serious Adverse Reaction)0 Participants
Group B (Control)Number of Participants With SAR's (Serious Adverse Reaction)0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events

A serious adverse event is any untoward medical occurrence that: * results in death * is life-threatening * requires inpatient hospitalisation or prolongation of existing hospitalisation * results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity * consists of a congenital anomaly or birth defect Other 'important medical events' may also be considered serious if they jeopardise the subject or require an intervention to prevent one of the above consequences. NOTE: The term life-threatening in the definition of serious refers to an event in which the subject was at risk of death at the time of the event; it does not refer to an event which hypothetically might have caused death if it were more severe.

Time frame: at 10-20 weeks follow-up

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Group A (Active)Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events10 Participants
Group B (Control)Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events5 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With SUSAR's (Suspected Unexpected Serious Adverse Reaction)

A serious adverse reaction, the nature and severity of which is not consistent with the information about the medicinal product in question set out: * in the case of a product with a marketing authorisation, in the summary of product characteristics (SmPC) for that product * in the case of any other investigational medicinal product, in the investigator's brochure (IB) relating to the study in question

Time frame: during hospital admission (up to 28 days)

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Group A (Active)Number of Participants With SUSAR's (Suspected Unexpected Serious Adverse Reaction)0 Participants
Group B (Control)Number of Participants With SUSAR's (Suspected Unexpected Serious Adverse Reaction)0 Participants
Secondary

Result of 6 Minute Walk Test

Distance in 6 minute walk test. The 6 Minute Walk Test is a sub-maximal exercise test used to assess aerobic capacity and endurance. The distance covered over a time of 6 minutes is used as the outcome by which to compare changes in performance capacity. Total distance in meters. A higher score has a better outcome

Time frame: at 12-22 weeks follow-up

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Group A (Active)Result of 6 Minute Walk Test539.7 metersStandard Deviation 107.7
Group B (Control)Result of 6 Minute Walk Test490.6 metersStandard Deviation 0.18
Secondary

Time to Absence of Fever (Defined as 37.1°C or More) for More Than 48h Without Antipyretic

Time frame: during hospital admission (up to 28 days)

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Group A (Active)Time to Absence of Fever (Defined as 37.1°C or More) for More Than 48h Without Antipyretic7 days
Group B (Control)Time to Absence of Fever (Defined as 37.1°C or More) for More Than 48h Without Antipyretic3 days
Other Pre-specified

Number of Participants With Lung Fibrosis on Chest CT Scan at Follow up

Time frame: at 12-22 weeks follow-up

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Group A (Active)Number of Participants With Lung Fibrosis on Chest CT Scan at Follow up0 Participants
Group B (Control)Number of Participants With Lung Fibrosis on Chest CT Scan at Follow up0 Participants
Other Pre-specified

Number of Ventilator-free Days

Time frame: day 1, day 28 or discharge whichever comes first

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Group A (Active)Number of Ventilator-free Days7 days
Group B (Control)Number of Ventilator-free Days9 days
Other Pre-specified

Time Since Randomization to Progression to ARDS (Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome)

criteria-defined ARDS criteria-defined ARDS according to the adapted Berlin criteria as follow: * within 1 week of a known Clinical insult or new or worsening respiratory symptoms * bilateral infiltrates not supposed to be of cardiac origin or fluid overload * PaO2/FiO2 \< 300 mmHg

Time frame: during hospital admission (up to 28 days)

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Group A (Active)Time Since Randomization to Progression to ARDS (Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome)1 days
Group B (Control)Time Since Randomization to Progression to ARDS (Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome)3 days
Other Pre-specified

Time Since Randomization Until Improvement in Oxygenation

defined as independence from supplemental oxygen

Time frame: during hospital admission (up to 28 days)

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Group A (Active)Time Since Randomization Until Improvement in Oxygenation13 days
Group B (Control)Time Since Randomization Until Improvement in Oxygenation10 days

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 25, 2026