Leukemia, Childhood, Solid Tumor, Childhood
Conditions
Keywords
Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO), electronic Patient-Reported Outcome (ePRO), Patient-Reported Outcome Measure (PROM), Palliative Care for Children, Supportive Care for Children, Serious Game, eHealth, Mobile Applications, Observative Study
Brief summary
The main aim of the study is the evaluation of the feasibility of comprehensive service which has been developed while considering patient-orientated needs. With regard to the study, apps have been developed for both groups of participants, parents and their child which suffers from cancer. These apps aim at supporting the documentation and communication of the own condition. This includes for example a video game which can be played via tablet or smartphone in which questions appear addressing the personally perceived burden by children amongst other things. Participants of the study are children between 6 and 17 years of age which suffer from leukemia or tumors. Further participants of the study are at least one of the patient's parents. It is an observational study. Within the course of the study, the usual treatment is not altered actively by the study, it is, however, supplemented by questionnaires which will be analyzed being anonymized after the end of the study running time.
Detailed description
The study is designed as observational prospective feasibility study. The main objective is to assess the feasibility of a comprehensive, patient-centred service for palliative care in children with cancer by adapting and advancing ePRO systems, which aim at supporting the communication between the patients, their parents and the treating medical healthcare professionals. Participants of the study are pediatric oncology patients between 6 and 17 years of age and at least one of their parents, receiving treatment at one of the participating clinical centers due to leukemia or solid tumors. With regard to the study, apps have been developed for both groups of participants, which includes inter alia a game in which questions about burden considering symptoms can be answered by the children.
Interventions
None listed
Sponsors
Universität des Saarlandes
Brno University Hospital
Hannover Medical School
Centre for Research and Technology Hellas
Study design
Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
6 Years to 17 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
for Children: * 6-17 years of age * Diagnosed with paediatric leukaemia or solid cancer in the past 12 months * Receiving anti-cancer treatment at one of the participating clinical site * Have age-appropriate speaking, reading and comprehension skills in either the German or the Czech language * Provide signed + informed consent from parents or legal representative and the assent form by all children from the age of 14 years. These documents had been evaluated positively by IEC. * Access to an internet connection and mobile device (e.g. smartphone or tablet) Inclusion Criteria for Parents: * Parent(s) with a child eligible for the study, as per the inclusion and exclusion-criteria * Ability to speak, read and understand German or Czech language * Provide signed informed consent by parent(s). These documents had been evaluated positively by IEC. * Access to an internet connection and mobile device (e.g. smartphone or tablet)
Exclusion criteria
for Children: • Anyone who is not able to participate in the study according to the clinical judgment of the site chief investigator or any other authorized person of the research team. This judgment has to be documented for each child not being enrolled.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Structured Interviews and Focus Groups | At the end of the 6-month course of study enrollment | Qualitative data to assess the feasibility and acceptability of a comprehensive, patient-centred service for palliative care in children with cancer by adapting and advancing ePRO systems. Further to identify differences between the participating clinical medical centers. This outcome measure also contributes to the secondary objective which is to determine the usage and evaluation of the MyPal apps including the gamified ePRO by children with cancer. |
| Recruitment rate, defined as percentage of patients eligible for the study from all patients who were screened for the study. | Regularly each month in the course of 6-month course of study enrollment. | This contributes to the primary study objective: to assess the feasibility and acceptability of a comprehensive, patient-centred service for palliative care and pediatric oncology by adapting and advancing ePRO systems. Further to identify differences between the participating clinical medical centers. This outcome measure also contributes to the secondary objective which is to determine the usage and evaluation of the MyPal apps including the gamified ePRO by children with cancer. |
| Participation rate, defined as percentage of recruited patients who completed at least 70% of the scheduled questionnaires for 6 months out of all patients eligible for the study | Regularly each month in the course of 6-month course of study enrollment | This contributes to the primary study objective: to assess the feasibility and acceptability of a comprehensive, patient-centred service for palliative care in children with cancer by adapting and advancing ePRO systems. Further to identify differences between the participating clinical medical centers. This outcome measure also contributes to the secondary objective which is to determine the usage and evaluation of the MyPal apps including the gamified ePRO by children with cancer. |
| Adherence rate to the different components of the MyPal services by documentation of user behavior and qualitative analysis | Regularly each month in the course of 6-month course of study enrollment | This contributes to the primary study objective: to assess the feasibility and acceptability of a comprehensive, patient-centred service for palliative care in children with cancer by adapting and advancing ePRO systems. Further to identify differences between the participating clinical medical centers. This outcome measure also contributes to the secondary objective which is to determine the usage and evaluation of the MyPal apps including the gamified ePRO by children with cancer. |
| Premature discontinuation rate, defined as percentage of recruited patients who have not been followed-up until the end of 6-month course of study enrollment (withdrawal, death or less than 70% completed questionnaires) | Regularly each month in the course of 6-month course of study enrollment | This contributes to the primary study objective: to assess the feasibility and acceptability of a comprehensive, patient-centred service for palliative care in children with cancer by adapting and advancing ePRO systems. Further to identify differences between the participating clinical medical centers. This outcome measure also contributes to the secondary objective which is to determine the usage and evaluation of the MyPal apps including the gamified ePRO by children with cancer. |
| System Usability Scale | At the end of the 6-month course of study enrollment | Min Value: 0, Max Value: 100, higher scores indicate a better outcome. Quantitative data to assess the feasibility and acceptability of a comprehensive, patient-centred service for palliative care in children with cancer by adapting and advancing ePRO systems. Further to identify differences between the participating clinical medical centers. This outcome measure also contributes to the secondary objective which is to determine the usage and evaluation of the MyPal apps including the gamified ePRO by children with cancer. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Digital adaption of the Mini-SSpedi / SSPedi questionnaires as ePRO. | Once at baseline and several times a week during the 6-month course of study enrollment. The frequency of single questions depends on severity of reported symptom burden. | Min Value: 0, Max Value: 5, higher scores indicate a worse outcome. To assess children's symptom burden through an in-game ePRO and optionally as standalone ePRO which can be completed outside the serious game.Further, this contributes to the evidence-base of the effectiveness of ePROs in palliative and supportive care for children with cancer. |
| PedsQL(TM) Cancer Module questionnaire as ePRO. | Once at baseline and each month during the 6-month course of study enrollment. | Min Value: 0, Max Value: 100, higher scores indicate a better outcome. To demonstrate the appropriateness and acceptability of measures of quality of life of children with cancer. |
| EORTC PATSAT C-33 questionnaire, adapted appropriately as ePRO to consider parents' perception. | Once at baseline and each month during the 6-month course of study enrollment. | Min Value: 0, Max Value: 100, higher scores indicate a better outcome. To demonstrate the appropriateness and acceptability of measures of parents' satisfaction with cancer care, i.e. the parents' perception of the quality of medical and nursing care as well as the evaluation of the care's organization and the oncology department services. Furthermore to determine usage and evaluation of the MyPal apps including the gamified ePRO for children with cancer. |
| Impact on Family Scale questionnaire as ePRO. | Once at baseline and each month during the 6-month course of study enrollment. | Higher scale scores indicate a worse outcome. To demonstrate the appropriateness and acceptability of measures of the impact of pediatric illness on the family, specifically with regards to financial impact, family-social impact and personal strain. |
| EQ-5D-3L questionnaire as ePRO. | Once at baseline and each month during the 6-month course of study enrollment. | Min Value: 11111, Max Value: 33333, higher scores indicate a worse outcome. To demonstrate the appropriateness and acceptability of measures of parents' quality of life having children with cancer. It will be evaluated with regard to the five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. |
| Uniquely developed web-based online questionnaire. | Once at the end of the overall course of the study or earlier given the case of changing study staff. | Higher scores indicate a worse outcome. To determine the impact on health care professionals across Europe due to the integration of ePROs in palliative care by measuring strain parameters etc. caused by the usage of the service which is subject of the study. Furthermore, to contribute to the evidence-base of the effectiveness of ePROs for palliative care for children with cancer |
Countries
Czechia, Germany
Contacts
Primary ContactNorbert Graf, Professor MD
Backup ContactMarcel Meyerheim, M.Sc.
Outcome results
None listed