Skip to content

Aggressive Versus Non-aggressive Goal-directed Fluid Resuscitation in Acute Pancreatitis

Effect of Early Weight-based Aggressive Versus Non-aggressive Goal-directed Fluid Resuscitation in the Early Phase of Acute Pancreatitis: an Open-label Multicenter Randomized-controlled Trial

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04381169
Acronym
WATERFALL
Enrollment
249
Registered
2020-05-08
Start date
2020-05-28
Completion date
2021-09-25
Last updated
2022-03-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acute Pancreatitis

Keywords

Acute pancreatitis; fluid resuscitation; therapy; outcomes; randomized controlled trial; Ringer lactate; Lactated Ringer's solution

Brief summary

WATERFALL is an investigator-initiated international multicenter open-label randomized clinical trial comparing aggressive versus moderate fluid resuscitation in acute pancreatitis. The main outcome variable will be the proportion of patients with moderate-to-severe AP. Aggressive fluid resuscitation will consist in Lactated Ringer Solution (LR) 20 ml/kg bolus (administered over 2 hours) followed by LR 3 ml/kg/h and moderate a LR bolus 10 ml/kg in case of hypovolemia or no bolus in patients with normal volemia, followed by LR 1.5 ml/kg/h. The patients will be assessed at 3 (±1), 12 (±4), 24 (±4), 48 (±4) and 72 (±4) hours from recruitment, and fluid resuscitation will be adjusted to the patient´s clinical and analytical status according to a protocol. Subgroup analysis will include patients with systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) at admission, with persistent (\>48h) SIRS and with hypovolemia at admission. Based on available data (Sternby et al, Ann Surg 2019) we expect a 35% incidence of moderate to severe AP in the moderate arm. Sample sizes of 372 per arm of treatment (744 patients) achieve 80% power to detect a difference of 10% between the treatment arms at a significance level (alpha) of 0.05 using a two-sided z-testNA, assuming a 10% dropout. These results assume that 3 sequential tests are made using the O'Brien-Fleming spending function to determine the test boundaries. All analyses will be performed on an intention-to-treat basis. The trial could be stop early for efficacy (primary end-point) if the observed two-sided P value is \<0.0002 at the first interim analysis (after 1/3 of patients have been enrolled) or is \<0.012 at second interim analysis (after 2/3 of patients have been enrolled), favoring aggressive fluid resuscitation. At final analysis, the hypothesis that the incidence of moderate-to-severe pancreatitis is similar in the two treatment arms will be rejected if p\<0.046

Interventions

Comparison of aggressive versus moderate Lactated Ringer-based fluid resuscitation

Sponsors

Instituto de Salud Carlos III
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
Asociación Española de Gastroenterología
CollaboratorOTHER
Asociación Española de Pancreatología
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Enrique de-Madaria
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients age greater or equal to 18 presenting to one of the collaborating centers * Diagnosis of acute pancreatitis according to the revised Atlanta classification which requires 2 of the following 3 criteria: A) Typical abdominal pain; B) Increase in serum amylase or lipase levels higher than 3 times the upper limit of normality; and C) Signs of AP in imaging.

Exclusion criteria

* Uncontrolled arterial hypertension (systolic blood pressure \>180 and/or diastolic blood pressure 100 mmHg); * New York Heart Association Class II hear failure (slight limitation of physical activity; fatigue, palpitations or dyspnea with ordinal physical activity) or worse, or ejection fraction\<50% in the last echocardiography; * Decompensated cirrhosis (Child's Class B or C); * Hyper or hyponatremia (\<135 or \>145 mEq/l); * Hyperkalemia (\>5 mEq/l); * Hypercalcemia (albumin or protein-corrected calcium\>10.5 mg/dl); * Chronic kidney failure (basal glomerular filtration rate \<60 mL/min/1.73m2); * Clinical signs or symptoms of volume overload or heart failure at recruitment (dyspnea, peripheral edema, pulmonary rales, or evident increased jugular ingurgitation at 45º); * Shock or respiratory failure according to the revised Atlanta classification at recruitment (non-fluid responding systolic blood pressure\< 90 mmHg, PaO2/FIO2≤300 mmHg); * Time from pain onset to arrival to emergency room \>24h; * Time from confirmation of pancreatitis to randomization \>8h; * Severe comorbidity associated with an estimated life expectancy \<1 year; * Confirmed chronic pancreatitis (in case of recurrent alcoholic pancreatitis a recent (\<6 months) CT scan/MRI or endoscopic ultrasound is needed to rule out chronic pancreatitis

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Moderate-to-severe acute pancreatitisFrom admission to discharge, up to 24 weeksModerate or severe category of the Revised Atlanta Classification (Banks et al, Gut 2013)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Fluid overloadFrom admission to discharge, up to 24 weeksFluid overload is defined by the absence of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome and at least 2 of the following 3 criteria (based on Sharma et al, Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2016, with modifications): Criteria 1. Hemodynamic-imaging evidence (≥1): * Non-invasive diagnostic evidence of heart failure (i.e., echocardiographic, cardiac MRI) * Radiographic evidence of pulmonary congestion * Invasive cardiac catheterization suggesting evidence of heart failure (i.e., pulmonary capillary wedge pressure \[or left ventricular end-diastolic pressure\] \>18 mm Hg, right arterial pressure \[or central venous pressure\] \>12 mm Hg, or cardiac index \< 2·2 L/min per m2) Criteria 2. Heart failure symptoms (1): \- Dyspnea Criteria 3. Heart failure signs (≥1): * Peripheral edema * Pulmonary rales or crackles, or crepitation * Increased jugular venous pressure, hepatojugular reflux, or both
ShockFrom admission to discharge, up to 24 weeksSystolic blood pressure \<90 mmHg after fluid resuscitation
Respiratory failureFrom admission to discharge, up to 24 weeksPaO2/FIO2\<300
Kidney failureFrom admission to discharge, up to 24 weeksCreatinine \>1.9 mg/dL
Local complications (acute peripancreatic fluid collections/ pancreatic necrosis/peripancreatic necrosis)From admission to discharge, up to 24 weeksAs described on the revised Atlanta classification, Banks et al, Gut 2013
Length of hospital stayFrom admission to discharge, up to 24 weeks
Death and/or persistent organ failure and/or infection of pancreatic necrosisFrom admission to discharge, up to 24 weeksAnalyzed as a composite endpoint and each of its components, includes in-hospital mortality, persistent organ failure (according to the revised Atlanta classification, Banks et al, Gut 2013) or infection of pancreatic necrosis
Need for invasive treatmentFrom admission to discharge, up to 24 weeksEndoscopic, percutaneous or surgical treatment of acute pancreatitis complications
Need for nutritional supportFrom admission to discharge, up to 24 weeksNeed for enteral/parenteral feeding
PAN-PROMISE scaleAt 12, 24, 48 and 72 hoursScore on an acute pancreatitis Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement
C-reactive protein48 and 72 hoursBlood levels of C-reactive protein
Systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS)Baseline, 12, 24, 48 and 72 hoursSIRS at the different checkpoints. Presence of persistent (\>48h) SIRS
Intensive care unit stayFrom admission to discharge, up to 24 weeksNeed for intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and days admitted in the ICU

Countries

Spain

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 11, 2026