Skip to content

Efficacy and Safety of Two Regimens of Anti-VEGF Therapy in Chinese Patients With Polypoidal Choroidal Vasculopathy

A Random, Open-label Multicenter, Phase IV Study Assessing the Efficacy and Safety of Two Regimens of Anti-VEGF Therapy in Chinese Patients With Polypoidal Choroidal Vasculopathy

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04380974
Enrollment
102
Registered
2020-05-08
Start date
2020-06-30
Completion date
2022-09-30
Last updated
2020-05-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Polypoidal Choroidal Vasculopathy

Keywords

Polypoidal Choroidal Vasculopathy, Optical coherence tomography angiography, Optical coherence tomography

Brief summary

The study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of two different regimens of anti-VEGF Therapy (OCTA plus OCT guided 3+PRN vs. OCT guided 3+PRN) in Chinese patients with PCV. This study is to provide long-term safety data in the treatment of Chinese patients with PCV.

Interventions

PROCEDUREOCTA plus OCT guided 3+PRN regimen

For the OCTA plus OCT guided 3+PRN regimen, we recorded patients' data after retreatment by 3 monthly intravitreal injections of anti-VEGF drug. Subsequent reinjections were given as needed according to the changes in patients' visual acuity, activity of PCV lesions shown by OCTA and/or the exudation shown by OCT. Four weeks after the third and last injection, all patients in this group underwent an examination, including ETDRS visual acuity, fundus photography, OCTA and OCT. In case of BVN increased or polypoidal lesion progressed on OCTA scans, persistent subfoveal or perifoveal fluid, macular intraretinal edema on OCT scans, or visual loss of \>5 letters, or the occurrence of a new hemorrhage, patients were retreated. The persistence of hemorrhage without evidence of fluid was not considered a criterion for retreatment. In the absence of retreatment criteria, no further injections were given and another examination was proposed usually 4 weeks later.

PROCEDUREOCT guided 3+PRN regimen

For the OCT guided 3+PRN group, we recorded patients'data after retreatment by 3 monthly intravitreal injections of Anti-VEGF drugs. Subsequent reinjections were given as needed according to the changes in patients'visual acuity and/or the exudation shown by OCT. Four weeks after the third and last injection, all patients in this group underwent an examination, including ETDRS visual acuity, fundus photography, and OCT. In case of persistent subfoveal or perifoveal fluid, macular intraretinal edema, visual loss of \>5 letters, or the occurrence of a new hemorrhage, patients were retreated. The persistence of hemorrhage without evidence of fluid was not considered a criterion for retreatment. In the absence of retreatment criteria, no further injections were given and another examination was proposed usually 4 weeks later.

Conbercept or other anti-VEGF drugs

Sponsors

Eye & ENT Hospital of Fudan University
CollaboratorOTHER
Shanghai Zhongshan Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Xiaodong Sun
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
50 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Written informed-consent before any evaluation * Visual impairment due to PCV, including type 1 PCV and type 2 PCV. * 50 years old and older * Chinese * For study eye: BCVA between 20/30 and 20/320 on electronic visual acuity texting at the time point of both screening and baseline.

Exclusion criteria

* Have Stroke and myocardial infarction within 3 months before screening * Any active periocular and ocular infection and inflammation (including blepharitis, conjunctivitis, keratitis, scleritis, uveitis, intraocular inflammation) while screening and baseline. * Uncontrolled glaucoma (under treatment \[IOP\] ≥ 30 mm Hg or depend on researchers) while screening and baseline * Neovascularization of iris and neovascular glaucoma while screening and baseline * Any causes led to choroidal neovascularization except PCV (including ICNV, central serous chorioretinopathy, ocular histoplazmoza and pathologic myopia) while screening and baseline * With structure injury (including vitreous macular traction,epiretinal membrane involving in central fovea,subretinal fibroplasia,laser scar and central fovea atrophy) within 0.5 optic disc diameter to the central of macula while screening and baseline, which may harm the improvement of vision by treatment according to researchers * Any systemic anti-VEGF medication(as Avastin) use within 3 months before screening * Any medication systemic use toxic to lens, retina and optic nerve, including iron amine, chloroquine/chloroquine (Plaquenil ®), tamoxifen, phenothiazine and ethambutol * For study eye: Used to accept following treatments for PCV within 3 months or accept following treatments more than three times before baseline: 1. Anti-angiogenesis drugs (pegaptanib, ranibizumab, bevacizumab),VEGF-Trap; 2. Anecortave acetate corticosteroids; 3. Protein kinase C inhibitors, squalamine, siRNA; 4. PDT, Visudyne® treatment, external beam radiotherapy, local laser photocoagulation, vitrectomy, submacular surgery and transpupillary thermotherapy * Any intraocular surgery (including YAG laser) within 3 months before baseline or predicated within 6 months after baseline * Intraocular or periocular treatment of corticosteroids within 3 months before baseline * For follow eye: Any anti-angiogenesis treatment (including anti-VEGF, like Lucentis, Avastin and KH902 ) within 3 months before baseline

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
PCV lesion recurrence24 monthsPCV lesion recurrence is defined as the reappearance of new exudative biomakers (such as IRF, SRF, PED) or new hemorrhage detected on OCT or fundus examination in subsequent visits from the last visit showing clinical stability. PCV lesion recurrence rate will be compared at 24months between the two groups to assess the efficacy of OCTA plus OCT guided 3+PRN regimen.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Snellen BCVA at every visit or treatment24 monthsCompare of mean Snellen Best-Corrected-visual-acuity at every visit or treatment between the two groups to assess the efficacy of OCTA plus OCT guided 3+PRN regimen.
Number of participants with treatment-related adverse events24 monthsCompare of Number of participants with treatment-related adverse events between the two groups to assess the safety of OCTA plus OCT guided 3+PRN regimen
Mean number of injections after the initial three loading dose monthly injections21 monthsCompare of mean number of injections after the initial three loading dose monthly injections between the two groups to assess the efficacy of OCTA plus OCT guided 3+PRN regimen.
Mean central macular thickness at every visit or treatment by OCT24 monthsCompare of mean central macular thickness by OCT at every visit or treatment between the two groups to assess the efficacy of OCTA plus OCT guided 3+PRN regimen.

Countries

China

Contacts

Primary ContactXiaodong Sun
xdsun@sjtu.edu.cn+86-02163240090

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026