Skip to content

Effectiveness and Safety of Convalescent Plasma Therapy on COVID-19 Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Effectiveness and Safety of Convalescent Plasma Therapy on COVID-19 Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Referral Hospitals in Indonesia

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 2Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04380935
Enrollment
60
Registered
2020-05-08
Start date
2020-05-18
Completion date
2020-10-31
Last updated
2020-08-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome, COVID

Brief summary

Corona virus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been declared as a Pandemic by the World Health Organization (WHO). According to WHO report on March 31st 2020, globally COVID-19 have infected over 750,000 people and caused over 36,000 deaths with case fatality rate of 4.85%. In Indonesia, COVID-19 have infected 1,414 people and caused 122 deaths with case fatality rate of 8.63%. In severe cases, COVID-19 causes complications, such as acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), sepsis, septic shock, and multi-organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS), where age and comorbid illnesses as a major factor to these complications. Up to this point there are several promising therapies for COVID-19 but is not yet recommended and in need of further research. The use of convalescent plasma has been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) through the scheme of emergency investigational new drug (eIND). This method has been used as the treatment in several outbreak or plague cases over the years, such as the flu epidemic in 1918, polio, measles, mumps, SARS (severe acute respiratory syndrome), EVD (Ebola virus disease) and MERS (middle-eastern respiratory syndrome) and this treatment shows better outcome. Several case report on the use of convalescent plasma for COVID-19 patients with ARDS and mechanical ventilation has been reported and shows promising outcome. Nevertheless, larger and multicenter research need to be done to assess and evaluate the effectiveness and safety of convalescent plasma therapy on for COVID-19 patients with ARDS.

Interventions

BIOLOGICALConvalescent plasma

Convalescent plasma of recovered COVID-19 patients (donor)

DRUGStandard of care

According to national or hospital guidelines COVID-19 Management Protocol

Sponsors

Dr Cipto Mangunkusumo General Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Indonesia
CollaboratorOTHER
Indonesia University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients aged more than equal to 18 years. * COVID-19 confirmed by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) * Having severe pneumonia. * PAO2 / FIO2 \<300.

Exclusion criteria

* Contraindication to blood transfusions (fluid overload, history of anaphylaxis of blood products) * Multiple and severe organ failure, hemodynamically unstable * Other uncontrolled infections * Disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) which requires a replacement factor/FFP * Hemodialysis patients or CRRT (continuous renal replacement therapy) * Active intracranial bleeding * Significant myocardial ischemia * Receiving tocilizumab treatment

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
All-cause mortalityup to 28 daysProportion of all-cause mortality

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Duration of mechanical ventilationup to 28 daysMean duration of mechanical ventilation
Body temperature (degree in Celsius)Day 1, 3, 5, and 7 after administration of therapyMean change from baseline using time series analysis
The Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) ScoreDay 1, 3, 5, and 7 after administration of therapyMean change from baseline using time series analysis
PAO2/FIO2 ratioDay 1, 3, 5, and 7 after administration of therapyMean change from baseline using time series analysis
C-Reactive Protein (CRP) in mg/LDay 1, 3, 5, and 7 after administration of therapyMean change from baseline using time series analysis
D-Dimer in ng/mLDay 1, 3, 5, and 7 after administration of therapyMean change from baseline using time series analysis
Length of stay in intensive care unitup to 28 daysMean length of stay in intensive care unit
Interleukin 6 (IL-6) in pg/mLDay 1, 3, 5, and 7 after administration of therapyMean change from baseline using time series analysis
Allergic/ anaphylaxis transfusion reaction24 hours post-transfusionNumber of participants with allergic/ anaphylaxis transfusion reaction
Hemolytic transfusion reaction24 hours post-transfusionNumber of participants with Hemolytic transfusion reaction
Transfusion Related Acute Lung Injury24 hours post-transfusionNumber of participants with Transfusion Related Acute Lung Injury
Transfusion associated Circulatory Overload24 hours post-transfusionNumber of participants with Transfusion associated Circulatory Overload
Procalcitonin in ng/mLDay 1, 3, 5, and 7 after administration of therapyMean change from baseline using time series analysis

Countries

Indonesia

Contacts

Primary ContactRobert Sinto, MD
rsinto@yahoo.com+628158835432

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026