Skip to content

Assessing Dextenza Insert After SMILE Procedure

Assessing the Efficacy of DEXTENZA, Sustained Release Dexamethasone 0.4 mg Insert, When Placed Within the Lower Eye Lid Canaliculus in Comparison to Topical Prednisolone Acetate Following Bilateral Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04380857
Enrollment
20
Registered
2020-05-08
Start date
2020-06-18
Completion date
2021-06-21
Last updated
2023-10-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Post Procedural Infection

Brief summary

This three-month prospective, open-label, single-center, randomized investigator initiated clinical study seeks to investigate the efficacy of DEXTENZA when placed in the lower canaliculus (study eye) compared to topical corticosteroids (control eye) following bilateral SMILE surgery. In addition, the study will evaluate physician assessment of ease of DEXTENZA insertion

Detailed description

4.1 Study Population The study aims to enroll 20 patients undergoing bilateral SMILE. 4.1.1 Inclusion Criteria A patient's study eye must meet the following criteria to be eligible for inclusion in the study: * Age 18 years and older * Scheduled for bilateral SMILE surgery * Willing and able to comply with clinic visits and study related procedures * Willing and able to sign the informed consent form 4.1.2 Exclusion Criteria A patient who meets any of the following criteria will be excluded from the study: * Patients under the age of 18. * Pregnancy (must be ruled out in women of child-bearing age with pregnancy test) * Active infectious systemic disease * Active infectious ocular or extraocular disease * Obstructed nasolacrimal duct in the study eye(s) * Hypersensitivity to dexamethasone * Patients being treated with immunomodulating agents in the study eye(s) * Patients being treated with immunosuppressants and/or oral steroids Patients with severe disease that warrants critical attention, deemed unsafe for the study by the investigator

Interventions

DRUGDexamethasone ophthalmic insert 0.4 mg

intracanalicular dexamethasone insert

DRUGTopical Prednisolone Acetate Ophthalmic Drops

Topical Prednisolone acetate ophthalmic drops per standard of care: Every two hours on day of procedure, then four times a day for the first week, then two times a day for the second week, then discontinue

Sponsors

William Wiley, MD
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

First eye randomized for either topical prednisolone acetate (control eye) or lower eyelid canaliculus Dextenza insertion (study eye) and the contralateral eye receiving opposite treatment in the OR following SMILE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age 18 years and older * Scheduled for bilateral SMILE surgery * Willing and able to comply with clinic visits and study related procedures * Willing and able to sign the informed consent form

Exclusion criteria

* Patients under the age of 18. * Pregnancy (must be ruled out in women of child-bearing age with pregnancy test) * Active infectious systemic disease * Active infectious ocular or extraocular disease * Obstructed nasolacrimal duct in the study eye(s) * Hypersensitivity to dexamethasone * Patients being treated with immunomodulating agents in the study eye(s) * Patients being treated with immunosuppressants and/or oral steroids Patients with severe disease that warrants critical attention, deemed unsafe for the study by the investigator

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Change in PainChange is being assessed at Baseline, Day 1, Day 7, Day 30 and Day 90post-op pain as measured as scores on an Ocular Pain Assessment Scale from 0-10 (0 being no pain and 10 being the worst pain you could imagine)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Lines Lost From Best Corrected Visual AcuityBaseline through Day 90After manifest refraction all units assessed for best corrected distance visual acuity using ETDRS. Number of lines seen was then converted to LogMar score (on a scale of -0.30 to 1.00 where smaller numbers indicate better vision and larger numbers indicate worse vision) to measure changes in Best Corrected Distance Visual Acuity between Baseline and Day 90
Loss of Lines in Uncorrected Visual AcuityBaseline to Day 7, Day 30 and Day 90All units assessed for uncorrected visual acuity using ETDRS. Number of lines seen was then converted to LogMar to measure changes in uncorrected visual acuity between Baseline and Day 90.
Post op Pain Management Per EyeDay 0 to Day 90Count of participants requiring pain management from Day 0 to Day 90.
Patient Preference Between GroupsDay 7, Day 30 and Day 90As reported by patients choosing one of five options; Strongly preferred insert, preferred insert, no preference, preferred standard drop regimen, strongly preferred standard drop regimen.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

This prospective, randomized, fellow-eye controlled study was conducted at a single site (Clear Choice Custom LASIK Center) in 20 patients (40 eyes) with three surgeons between June 2020 and June 2021 and was performed according to guidelines established by the Declaration of Helsinki.

Pre-assignment details

Twenty-three patients were enrolled in the study. One patient failed screening and was not randomized. Two additional patients were randomized, but the Dextenza insert could not be successfully placed in the assigned eye at the time of surgery.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Enrolled Patients
Enrolled patients who underwent SMILE surgery in both eyes with investigational treatment in one eye and standard of care treatment in the fellow eye.
20
Total20

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up33

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicEnrolled Patients
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
20 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
17 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
20 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
11 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
9 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 200 / 20
other
Total, other adverse events
3 / 200 / 20
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 200 / 20

Outcome results

Primary

Mean Change in Pain

post-op pain as measured as scores on an Ocular Pain Assessment Scale from 0-10 (0 being no pain and 10 being the worst pain you could imagine)

Time frame: Change is being assessed at Baseline, Day 1, Day 7, Day 30 and Day 90

Population: All subjects were seen through week 1; three were lost to follow up thereafter.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Dexamethasone Ophthalmic Insert 0.4 mgMean Change in PainDay 10.95 Score on a scale from 0-10Standard Deviation 1.36
Dexamethasone Ophthalmic Insert 0.4 mgMean Change in PainDay 300.41 Score on a scale from 0-10Standard Deviation 1.7
Dexamethasone Ophthalmic Insert 0.4 mgMean Change in PainDay 70.47 Score on a scale from 0-10Standard Deviation 0.94
Dexamethasone Ophthalmic Insert 0.4 mgMean Change in PainDay 900 Score on a scale from 0-10Standard Deviation 0
Dexamethasone Ophthalmic Insert 0.4 mgMean Change in PainPre-operative0.15 Score on a scale from 0-10Standard Deviation 0.5
Topical Prednisolone Acetate Ophthalmic DropsMean Change in PainDay 900 Score on a scale from 0-10Standard Deviation 0
Topical Prednisolone Acetate Ophthalmic DropsMean Change in PainPre-operative0.20 Score on a scale from 0-10Standard Deviation 0.5
Topical Prednisolone Acetate Ophthalmic DropsMean Change in PainDay 10.90 Score on a scale from 0-10Standard Deviation 1.12
Topical Prednisolone Acetate Ophthalmic DropsMean Change in PainDay 70.37 Score on a scale from 0-10Standard Deviation 0.67
Topical Prednisolone Acetate Ophthalmic DropsMean Change in PainDay 300.06 Score on a scale from 0-10Standard Deviation 0.24
Secondary

Loss of Lines in Uncorrected Visual Acuity

All units assessed for uncorrected visual acuity using ETDRS. Number of lines seen was then converted to LogMar to measure changes in uncorrected visual acuity between Baseline and Day 90.

Time frame: Baseline to Day 7, Day 30 and Day 90

Population: All subjects were seen through week 1; three were lost to follow up thereafter.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Dexamethasone Ophthalmic Insert 0.4 mgLoss of Lines in Uncorrected Visual Acuity1 week-0.010 logMARStandard Deviation 0.0114
Dexamethasone Ophthalmic Insert 0.4 mgLoss of Lines in Uncorrected Visual Acuity1 month-0.014 logMARStandard Deviation 0.181
Dexamethasone Ophthalmic Insert 0.4 mgLoss of Lines in Uncorrected Visual Acuity3 months-0.071 logMARStandard Deviation 0.108
Topical Prednisolone Acetate Ophthalmic DropsLoss of Lines in Uncorrected Visual Acuity1 week0.013 logMARStandard Deviation 0.183
Topical Prednisolone Acetate Ophthalmic DropsLoss of Lines in Uncorrected Visual Acuity1 month-0.026 logMARStandard Deviation 0.16
Topical Prednisolone Acetate Ophthalmic DropsLoss of Lines in Uncorrected Visual Acuity3 months-0.068 logMARStandard Deviation 0.156
Secondary

Number of Lines Lost From Best Corrected Visual Acuity

After manifest refraction all units assessed for best corrected distance visual acuity using ETDRS. Number of lines seen was then converted to LogMar score (on a scale of -0.30 to 1.00 where smaller numbers indicate better vision and larger numbers indicate worse vision) to measure changes in Best Corrected Distance Visual Acuity between Baseline and Day 90

Time frame: Baseline through Day 90

Population: All subjects were seen through week 1; three were lost to follow up thereafter.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Dexamethasone Ophthalmic Insert 0.4 mgNumber of Lines Lost From Best Corrected Visual Acuity0 Score on a scale
Topical Prednisolone Acetate Ophthalmic DropsNumber of Lines Lost From Best Corrected Visual Acuity0 Score on a scale
Secondary

Patient Preference Between Groups

As reported by patients choosing one of five options; Strongly preferred insert, preferred insert, no preference, preferred standard drop regimen, strongly preferred standard drop regimen.

Time frame: Day 7, Day 30 and Day 90

Population: All subjects were seen through week 1; three were lost to follow up thereafter.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Dexamethasone Ophthalmic Insert 0.4 mgPatient Preference Between GroupsDay 3011 Participants
Dexamethasone Ophthalmic Insert 0.4 mgPatient Preference Between GroupsDay 714 Participants
Dexamethasone Ophthalmic Insert 0.4 mgPatient Preference Between GroupsDay 909 Participants
Topical Prednisolone Acetate Ophthalmic DropsPatient Preference Between GroupsDay 303 Participants
Topical Prednisolone Acetate Ophthalmic DropsPatient Preference Between GroupsDay 72 Participants
Topical Prednisolone Acetate Ophthalmic DropsPatient Preference Between GroupsDay 903 Participants
No PreferencePatient Preference Between GroupsDay 74 Participants
No PreferencePatient Preference Between GroupsDay 905 Participants
No PreferencePatient Preference Between GroupsDay 303 Participants
Secondary

Post op Pain Management Per Eye

Count of participants requiring pain management from Day 0 to Day 90.

Time frame: Day 0 to Day 90

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_UNITS)
Dexamethasone Ophthalmic Insert 0.4 mgPost op Pain Management Per Eye0 Eyes
Topical Prednisolone Acetate Ophthalmic DropsPost op Pain Management Per Eye0 Eyes

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026