Skip to content

Low-doses Melphalan Inhalation in Patients With COVID-19 (CoronavIrus Disease 2019) Pneumonia

Single-center, Prospective, Open-label, Comparator Study, Blind for Central Accessor to Access the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Inhalations of Low-doses of Melphalan in Patients With Pneumonia With Confirmed or Suspected COVID-19

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04380376
Acronym
MICOV
Enrollment
60
Registered
2020-05-08
Start date
2020-04-30
Completion date
2020-10-30
Last updated
2020-05-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

COVID-19, Viral Pneumonia

Keywords

COVID, treatment, inhalation, alkylating drug, pneumonia

Brief summary

This single-center, prospective, open-label, comparator study, blind for central accessor evaluates the efficacy, safety of inhalations of low-doses of melphalan in patients with pneumonia with confirmed or suspected COVID-19. All patients will receive 0,1 mg of melphalan in 7-10 daily inhalations 1 time per day.

Detailed description

It was previously shown that in ultra-low (more than 100 times lower than conventional therapeutic) doses inhalations of alkylating drug (melphalan) are effective in severe steroid-resistant bronchial asthma, a form of the disease often characterised by neutrophilic type of inflammation. The exacerbation frequency reduced after the treatment, steroid-sparing effect was shown, morphological signs of bronchial epithelial regeneration were revealed and quality of life of asthmatic patients, treated with ultra-low doses of melphalan, improved. In preclinical studies and studies with volunteers, it was found that inhalations of ultra-low doses of melphalan do not have cytotoxic properties, but have local and systemic anti-inflammatory effects and decrease the activation of lymphocytes due to blockade of heavy β-chain of the interleukin (IL)-2 surface receptor. In addition, in ultra-low concentrations, alkylating agents are able to disrupt the cell signalling through the receptor for tumor necrosis factor (TNF), thereby exerting a protective effect from the cytotoxic activity of TNF-α, which leads to the anti-inflammatory response. Taking into account, that severe cases of COVID are characterised with hyperergic inflammatory response (and in some cases even with the development of cytokine storm) it can be assumed that the inhalation use of low-doses of melphalan due to its anti-inflammatory properties can be effective treatment for patients with COVID-associated pneumonia.

Interventions

DRUGMelphalan

Inhalations with low doses of Melphalan for 7-10 consequent days

OTHERStandard of care

the patients will receive only SOC (standard of care) treatment

Sponsors

Medsi Clinic #1, Moscow
CollaboratorOTHER
Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry
CollaboratorOTHER
Federal State Budgetary Institution, Pulmonology Scientific Research Institute
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

An independent central blinded assessor will be blinded to study treatment and will review the clinical response assessments. In case of a discrepancy with the Investigator's assignment of clinical response, the adjudication committee's assessment will prevail.

Intervention model description

Prospective, Single-center, Open-Label, Central Assessor Blinded, Comparative Study

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Age ≥18 years 2. A patient must have confirmed the diagnosis of bi-lateral moderate / severe pneumonia ( viral or viral-bacterial with confirmed of suspected COVID-19). 3. Presence new infiltrates or increase already available infiltrates of pulmonary infiltrates on lung CT within 48 hours before baseline. 4. A patient has as minimum one of the following symptoms: fever \>38 degrees Celsius, cough, dyspnea, SaO2 (arterial oxygen saturation) \<95% (with room air)

Exclusion criteria

1. Informed consent is withdrawn by the patient. 2. The patient doesn't follow the instructions of the research staff regarding the requirements of the research protocol. 3. Unable to contact the patient. 4. The researcher believes that participation in the study is not in the interests of the patient and / or further participation in the study is unsafe for the patient's health. 5. There is a violation of the criteria for inclusion and / or non-inclusion in the study. 6. The patient has developed an adverse event, which, according to the researcher, makes further participation in the study unsafe for the patient. 7. The licensing authority or ethics committee, for any reason, decides to discontinue the entire study or close this research center. 8. A female patient becomes pregnant, is planning a pregnancy, or is breastfeeding while participating in this study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The changes of COVID Ordinal Outcomes Scalebaseline vs Day 14, day 28The number of patients with the clinical improvement is defined as an improvement of two points (from the status at baseline) on an ordinal scale of clinical improvement on day 28 or discharge from hospital ( whatever occurs earlier) 1. Death 2. Hospitalized with Invasive mechanical ventilation plus additional organ support - ECMO / pressors / RRT 3. Hospitalized with intubation and mechanical ventilation 4. Hospitalized on non-invasive ventilation or high flow oxygen. 5. Hospitalized on a mask or nasal prongs. 6. Hospitalized no oxygen therapy. 7. Ambulatory, with limitation of activities. 8. Ambulatory, no limitation of activities. I. No clinical or virological evidence of infection.
Percentage of the patients with Clinical Recoverybaseline vs day 7, day 14, day 28Percentage of the patients with clinical recovery which is defined as a normalisation of fever, respiratory rate, and oxygen saturation, and improvement of cough, sustained for at least 72 hours, or live hospital discharge, whichever comes first. Normalization and improvement criteria: * Fever - \<37°C, * Respiratory rate - ≤24/minute on room air, * Oxygen saturation - \>94% on room air, * Cough - mild or absent on a patient reported scale of severe, moderate, mild, absent.
The changes of the Borg's scaleBaseline vs day 7, day 14, day 28The evaluation of changes in modified Borg dyspnea scale. From 0 to 10 units.A lower score means a better clinical result (0 is the absence of dyspnea, and 10 - is maximal dyspnea). Minimal clinically important difference is 1 unit.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
IL-6baseline, day 7, Day 14, Day 28Change in peripheral blood IL-6 level from baseline. A lower level of IL-6 means a better clinical result.
CRP levelbaseline, day 7, Day 14, Day 28Change in C-reactive protein (CRP) level from baseline in mg/ml. A lower level of CRP means a better clinical result.
Percentage of patients without artificial lung ventilationbaseline, day 7, Day 14, Day 28Percentage of patients without artificial lung ventilation during the study. A lower percentage of patients means a better clinical result.
Lymphocyte countbaseline, day 7, Day 14, Day 28Change in blood absolute lymphocyte count from baseline. A higher number of lymphocytes means a better clinical result.
D-dimerbaseline, day 7, Day 14, Day 28Change in blood D-dimer level from baseline. A lower level of D-dimer means a better clinical result.

Countries

Russia

Contacts

Primary ContactKiril A Zykov, Prof
kirillaz@inbox.ru+79257729462
Backup ContactEvgeny Sinitsyn
sinymlad@list.ru+79269490744

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026