Skip to content

Gas Tamponade for Prevention of Postoperative Vitreous Hemorrhage in Diabetics

Gas Tamponade for Prevention of Postoperative Vitreous Hemorrhage in Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy Patients Undergoing Vitrectomy: a Randomized Clinical Trial

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04380077
Enrollment
150
Registered
2020-05-08
Start date
2020-05-15
Completion date
2025-01-21
Last updated
2023-11-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy

Brief summary

Hypothesis: Patients undergoing pars plana vitrectomy for the indication of diabetic vitreous hemorrhage will have a lower incidence of postoperative vitreous hemorrhaging during the 6-month trial period when vitreous substitution with 20-30% sulfur hexafluoride gas is utilized compared to vitreous substitution with balanced salt solution.

Detailed description

Subjects enrolled into the study are randomized into one of the ensuing treatment cohorts: Group A patients undergo vitreous substitution with 20-30% sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) gas during PPV, whereas Group B patients undergo vitreous substitution with balanced salt solution (BSS) during PPV. Simple randomization allocates patients into treatment groups during PPV. Once all relevant maneuvers are completed by the surgeon prior to vitreous substitution, a simulated coin toss program decides the vitreous substitute, and therefore which group the patient enters. Randomization intraoperatively mitigates against selection bias of utilized surgical maneuvers such as endodiathermy on the part of the surgeon and allows for subjects to not undergo randomization in cases where intraoperative retinal breaks occur that would preclude the subject from receiving vitreous substitution with BSS. Subjects undergo data collection at 3 postoperative visits: 1) 15 +/- 5 days following PPV, 2) 40 +/- 10 days following PPV, and 3) 185 +/- 15 days following PPV. Study subjects are evaluated at non-study times at the judgment of the examiner.

Interventions

PROCEDUREvitrectomy with sulfur hexafluoride gas

vitreous substitution with 20-30% sulfur hexafluoride gas during vitrectomy

PROCEDUREvitrectomy with balanced salt solution

vitreous substitution with balances salt solution during vitrectomy

Sponsors

Rush Eye Associates
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Investigator)

Masking description

The operating surgeons did not participate in the preoperative or postoperative care of the patient, including the data collection.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion: 1. The patient has medically-managed type I or II diabetes mellitus. 2. The age of the patient is \> 18 years old, 3. Snellen best-corrected visual acuity is from 20/40 to hand motions at one foot in the subject's study eye 4. Proliferative diabetic retinopathy with a clinically evident vitreous hemorrhage of duration of at least one month by subjective history is present in the subject's study eye. 5. The vitreous hemorrhage is symptomatic and primarily responsible for the patient's reduced vision in the judgement of the examiner. 6. Grade 0 or I vitreoretinal adhesion according to the classification system described by Ahn et al \[@\] in the study eye is clinically present. * Ahn J, Woo SJ, Chung H, et al. The effect of adjunctive intravitreal bevacizumab for preventing postvitrectomy hemorrhage in proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Ophthalmology. 2011; 118: 2218-2226. Exclusion: 1. The subject's study eye previously underwent anterior or posterior vitrectomy. 2. A lens or cornea opacity is thought to be responsible for two or more lines of reduced visual acuity in the subject's study eye (cataract, corneal scar, ectasia, etc.). 3. Optic nerve or retina disease otherwise not related to diabetes mellitus is thought to be responsible for two or more lines of reduced visual acuity in the subject's study eye (optic neuritis, macular degeneration, glaucoma, epiretinal membrane, etc.). 4. A non-ocular cause (i.e. cerebrovascular accident) or amblyopia is thought to be responsible for two or more lines of reduced visual acuity in the subject's study eye 5. Neovascular glaucoma with a high intraocular pressure ( \> 30 mm Hg) is discovered in the subject's study eye. 6. Medically uncontrolled systemic hypertension (systolic \> 200 mmHg or diastolic \> 120 mmHg) is present.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
postoperative vitreous hemorrhage rate6 monthsincidence of postoperative vitreous hemorrhage between cohorts

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
unplanned vitrectomy rate6 monthsunplanned vitrectomy for the indication of postoperative vitreous hemorrhage between cohorts
visual acuity6 monthsSnellen best-corrected visual acuity

Countries

Mexico

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026