Skip to content

Economic Evaluation in Teledermatology

Economic Evaluation in Dermatology: Teledermatology Versus Conventional Monitoring of Patients in the Hospital

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04378296
Acronym
TELEDERMA
Enrollment
450
Registered
2020-05-07
Start date
2021-04-01
Completion date
2022-04-30
Last updated
2022-05-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Skin Diseases

Brief summary

Introduction: Previous studies confirm that teledermatology allows the generation of a quick response from the specialist's consultation, reduction of unnecessary travels, early diagnosis and priority in the attention to the most urgent cases. Despite these advantages and that teledermatology has experienced exponential growth since its introduction approximately 16 years ago in Spain, in Andalusia, its use is still very limited. The objective of this project will be to carry out an analysis of the quality of life related to health, costs, cost-utility and informal care of teledermatology services in Primary Care compared to conventional monitoring carried out at the Hospital de Poniente. Methodology: A randomized, controlled, unmasked, inter-level clinical trial (Primary Care-Hospital de Poniente) and multicentre (all health centers attached to the Poniente Health District of Almería) will be carried out with a 6-month follow-up. Patients will be assigned to the teledermatology group (experimental) or the conventional monitoring group in the hospital (control). The patients included in the experimental group will be monitored asynchronously. Baseline characteristics, number of visits to the hospital, health-related quality of life, costs, informal care and satisfaction from the perspective of the Andalusian Public Health System and patients and their caregivers will be analyzed. The generic EuroQol-5D questionnaire (EQ-5D) will be administered to assess health-related quality of life and the SKINDEX-29 quality of life dermatological questionnaire. A cost-utility analysis will be performed to assess whether tele-dermatology is cost-effective in terms of additional cost for additional quality-adjusted life years (QALYs).

Interventions

The experimental group will be made up of dermatological patients monitored asynchronously.

Sponsors

Universidad de Almeria
CollaboratorOTHER
Antonio Lopez Villegas
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* 1\. Be over 18 years old. * 2\. Having any skin disease. * 3\. Accept to participate in the study.

Exclusion criteria

* 1\. Non-dermatological disease. * 2\. Be participating in another study. * 3\. Refuse to participate in the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
EuroQol-5Dimensions questionnaire6 monthsFrom -1 \[the poorest imaginable health state\] to 1 \[perfect health\]

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Dermatological Quality of Life Questionnaire6 months0 (no effect on quality of life) up to 100 (maximum effect on quality of life)
Healthcare costs6 monthsCosts paid by the Public Health System
Clinical features6 monthsPatient's age; sex; diagnosis; origin; indication (type of dermatological problem); number of visits
In-depth interviews on the healthcare received in Primary Care centers6 months1\) healthcare center, 2) procedure to make an appointment, 3) medical consultation, 4) nursing consultation
Health Care Communication Questionnaire6 monthsThe 5-point Likert scale, ranging from 1 (not at all) to 5 (very much).
Informal cost6 monthsCosts paid by the patients

Countries

Spain

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026