Skip to content

Validation of a Novel Foot Offloading Device

Validation of a Novel Foot Offloading Device

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04378270
Acronym
PopSole2
Enrollment
20
Registered
2020-05-07
Start date
2020-08-26
Completion date
2021-10-20
Last updated
2024-01-31

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Fat Pad Syndrome, Heel Pain Syndrome, Plantar Fasciitis, Chronic

Brief summary

Pressure offloading is often considered the most crucial aspect in healing after a foot injury. The investigators have devised a novel foot offloading device (PopSole™) which will allow for customization of the area where there is foot pain, as well as allow for customizable arch support and elevation of the metatarsals. This validation study is aimed to assess improvement of pain with use, ease of use, fit and feel, compliance, and durability over a 4 week period. Validated patient reported outcome measures will be used at baseline, 2 weeks and 4 weeks.

Detailed description

All subjects will receive the PopSole™ offloading device at the screening/baseline visit, be asked to wear it for 4 weeks, and will be asked to return for an in-person evaluation at week 2 and a completion study visit at week 4. Screening includes the following procedures: 1. Performance of a limited physical exam, inclusive of participant's foot exam with a gait and shoe gear evaluation. 2. Medical and surgical history collection 3. Vital signs, medication profile, allergies, height, weight, and BMI calculation. 4. Collection of demographic information 5. 2D Photographs of both feet will be performed Subjects will be asked to complete: 1. Questionnaires * Foot and Ankle Ability Measure questionnaire * Mayo Clinical Scoring System questionnaire * American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society questionnaire * Manchester Foot and Ankle Disability Index * Pittsburgh Foot Survey 2. Diary cards to document for the feet: pain, bruising, redness of the skin, itching, swelling, bleeding, and any concerns/issues not listed, as well as the location, date and day for each noted symptom. 3. Offload Device Distribution. Devices will be provided for both feet to maintain symmetry and gait stability between the two feet. One pair of devices will be given for use in shoe gear, and one pair will be given for use in a slide in the shower. Follow up visit procedures: Week 2 1. Collection of vital signs, medication profile, weight, and BMI calculation 2. Limited physical exam with a foot exam 3. Adverse Event Reporting 4. Collection and distribution of feet diary cards 5. 2D Photographs of both feet 6. Foot Assessment Questionnaires 7. Device survey - questions about the fit and feel of the device Week 4 The same procedures listed for week 2, with the addition of PopSole™ Device removal and final foot diary card collection.

Interventions

Specifically, the PopSole™ Offloading Device allows the provider to pop bubbles in the device (like popping paper or plastic bubble sheeting), thereby offloading the surgical area or area of pain. This customizable approach to offloading may increase compliance as it can easily fit in a normal walking shoe and is personalized for each patient. It can also be attached to a slide for use in the shower. Currently no post-operative devices for offloading the foot can be used in the shower.

Sponsors

Jeffrey A. Gusenoff, MD
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Aged 18 years or older and able to provide informed consent 2. Subjects with foot pain due to forefoot or heel fat pad atrophy or chronic plantar fasciitis as defined by heel pain for greater than 6 months and failed non-surgical therapy 3. Willing and able to comply with follow up examinations

Exclusion criteria

1. Concurrent injury to the lower extremity that would effect gait 2. Open foot ulcerations, fractures, or diagnosis of osteomyelitis of the feet 3. Surgical foot intervention in the last 6 months 4. Diagnosis of pregnancy or the intent of the participant to become pregnant during participation in this study 5. Neuropathy 6. Any issue that per the physician's determination would render the patient not appropriate to continue participation in the study (compliance, change in physical status, etc.)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Foot Pain From Screening/Baseline Visit to 4 Week Visit as Reported on the Mayo Clinical Scoring System Questionnaire.Four WeeksPain and function questionnaire. Pain scale from 0 (worst) to 50 (no pain). Activity limitations, orthotic requirements, antalgic gait, neuropathy and plantar heel tenderness are all graded 10 (best) to 10 (worst). Overall summation is excellent (90-100), good (80-89), fair (70-79), poor (\<70). Change in mean foot pain score on Mayo Clinical Scoring System Questionnaire from Screening/Baseline Visit to 4 Week Visit. Pain scale is the first question, 50 total points, with higher scores meaning less pain.
Change in Foot Pain From Screening/Baseline Visit to 4 Week Visit as Reported on the Pittsburgh Foot Survey.Four WeeksPain and function questionnaire measure. Scale for pain ranges from Very severe to Had no pain. Scale for pain interference ranges from Very much to not at all. Scale of functionality ranges from unable to do to without any difficulty in regards to a range of specified activities. Change is reported in mean foot reported pain score Screening/Baseline visit to 4 Week visit. Questions related to pain include items 1-5, total pain score possible is 25; higher scores indicate less pain reported.
Change in Foot Pain From Screening/Baseline Visit to 4 Week Visit as Reported on the Manchester Foot and Ankle Index.Four WeeksPain and function questionnaire assessment. Three responses to a variety of pain and specified activities raging from On most/every day(s) which is scored as 2 to none of the time which is scored as 0. Summation is made on Functional (0-20 with 20 being the lowest functioning), Personal appearance (0-4 with 4 being the worst), pain (0-10 with 10 being the worst), work/leisure (0-100 with 100 being the worst impact on work/leisure). Change in mean foot pain as reported on the Manchester Foot and Ankle Index from Screening/Baseline visit to 4 Week visit. Pain subscale is questions 13-17, range is 0-10 total points, lower scores indicate less pain.
Participant Compliance With DeviceFour WeeksDocumentation of the number of participants who did not wear a single device for the full 4 weeks of the participant's study participation.
Change in Foot Pain From Screening/Baseline Visit to 4 Week Visit as Reported on the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) Ankle-Hindfoot Scale.Four WeeksThis survey assesses pain (40 points possible, comprises pain subtotal), function (50 points possible, comprises function subtotal; which includes activity limitations, maximum walking distance, difficulty with walking surfaces, gait abnormality, sagittal motion, hindfoot motion and ankle/hindfoot stability, and alignment (10 possible points, comprises alignment subtotal). A total score is calculated out of 100, with higher scores indicating greater impairment. There are also calculated subtotals specific to pain, function and alignment. Change in mean foot pain score on AOFAS from Screening/Baseline Visit to 4 Week Visit. Pain scale is 40 total points, with higher scores meaning less pain.
Device DurabilityFour weeks.Documentation of the number of participants who wore a single device for first 4 weeks of the participant's study participation.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Participants' Reported Satisfaction and/or Difficulties With the DeviceFour WeeksAs measured by subject self report, using a device satisfaction measure questionnaire. Questions are answered yes/no in all cases except comfort (1-10 with 10 being the most comfortable), and ease of use (1-10 with 10 being most easy to use).

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

10 participants were recruited to a 1 month cohort, and 10 participants to a 3 month cohort.

Pre-assignment details

1 participant was a screen failure and was not found eligible to continue to intervention.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
PopSole™ Offloading Device
This is an external insole device that fits into a shoe and is reusable for a given subject, not for one-time use. It is comparable to other off-the-shelf insoles readily available and presents minimal risk to the participant during the four weeks of study participation. PopSole™ Offloading Device: Specifically, the PopSole™ Offloading Device allows the provider to pop bubbles in the device (like popping paper or plastic bubble sheeting), thereby offloading the surgical area or area of pain. This customizable approach to offloading may increase compliance as it can easily fit in a normal walking shoe and is personalized for each patient. It can also be attached to a slide for use in the shower. Currently no post-operative devices for offloading the foot can be used in the shower.
20
Total20

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy1
Overall StudyScreen Failure1
Overall StudyUniversity Required, Research Covid Shut Down2
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject1

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPopSole™ Offloading Device
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
8 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
12 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
20 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Number of participants who received PopSole device at baseline19 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
19 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
20 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
13 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
7 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 20
other
Total, other adverse events
1 / 20
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 20

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Foot Pain From Screening/Baseline Visit to 4 Week Visit as Reported on the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) Ankle-Hindfoot Scale.

This survey assesses pain (40 points possible, comprises pain subtotal), function (50 points possible, comprises function subtotal; which includes activity limitations, maximum walking distance, difficulty with walking surfaces, gait abnormality, sagittal motion, hindfoot motion and ankle/hindfoot stability, and alignment (10 possible points, comprises alignment subtotal). A total score is calculated out of 100, with higher scores indicating greater impairment. There are also calculated subtotals specific to pain, function and alignment. Change in mean foot pain score on AOFAS from Screening/Baseline Visit to 4 Week Visit. Pain scale is 40 total points, with higher scores meaning less pain.

Time frame: Four Weeks

Population: 19 participants received the study device. 15 completed a 4 Week visit.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
PopSole™ Offloading DeviceChange in Foot Pain From Screening/Baseline Visit to 4 Week Visit as Reported on the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) Ankle-Hindfoot Scale.16.67 score on a scale
p-value: 0.000695% CI: [7.8069, 25.5331]t-test, 2 sided
Primary

Change in Foot Pain From Screening/Baseline Visit to 4 Week Visit as Reported on the Manchester Foot and Ankle Index.

Pain and function questionnaire assessment. Three responses to a variety of pain and specified activities raging from On most/every day(s) which is scored as 2 to none of the time which is scored as 0. Summation is made on Functional (0-20 with 20 being the lowest functioning), Personal appearance (0-4 with 4 being the worst), pain (0-10 with 10 being the worst), work/leisure (0-100 with 100 being the worst impact on work/leisure). Change in mean foot pain as reported on the Manchester Foot and Ankle Index from Screening/Baseline visit to 4 Week visit. Pain subscale is questions 13-17, range is 0-10 total points, lower scores indicate less pain.

Time frame: Four Weeks

Population: 19 participants received the study device, 15 completed a 4 week visit.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
PopSole™ Offloading DeviceChange in Foot Pain From Screening/Baseline Visit to 4 Week Visit as Reported on the Manchester Foot and Ankle Index.-1.7 Score on a scale.
Comparison: This procedure calculates the difference between the observed means in two independent samples (two collected assessment timepoints, screening and 4 week follow up visits). A significance value (P-value) and 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of the difference is reported. The P-value is the probability of obtaining the observed difference between the samples if the null hypothesis were true. The null hypothesis is the hypothesis that the difference is 0.p-value: 0.063495% CI: [-3.5014, 0.1014]t-test, 2 sided
Primary

Change in Foot Pain From Screening/Baseline Visit to 4 Week Visit as Reported on the Mayo Clinical Scoring System Questionnaire.

Pain and function questionnaire. Pain scale from 0 (worst) to 50 (no pain). Activity limitations, orthotic requirements, antalgic gait, neuropathy and plantar heel tenderness are all graded 10 (best) to 10 (worst). Overall summation is excellent (90-100), good (80-89), fair (70-79), poor (\<70). Change in mean foot pain score on Mayo Clinical Scoring System Questionnaire from Screening/Baseline Visit to 4 Week Visit. Pain scale is the first question, 50 total points, with higher scores meaning less pain.

Time frame: Four Weeks

Population: 19 participants received the study device. 15 completed a 4 Week visit.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
PopSole™ Offloading DeviceChange in Foot Pain From Screening/Baseline Visit to 4 Week Visit as Reported on the Mayo Clinical Scoring System Questionnaire.18.7 score on a scale
Comparison: This procedure calculates the difference between the observed means in two independent samples (two collected assessment timepoints, screening and 4 week follow up visits). A significance value (P-value) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of the difference is reported. The P value is the probability of obtaining the observed difference between the samples if the null hypothesis were true. The null hypothesis is the hypothesis that the difference is 0.p-value: 0.00295% CI: [7.4498, 29.9502]t-test, 2 sided
Primary

Change in Foot Pain From Screening/Baseline Visit to 4 Week Visit as Reported on the Pittsburgh Foot Survey.

Pain and function questionnaire measure. Scale for pain ranges from Very severe to Had no pain. Scale for pain interference ranges from Very much to not at all. Scale of functionality ranges from unable to do to without any difficulty in regards to a range of specified activities. Change is reported in mean foot reported pain score Screening/Baseline visit to 4 Week visit. Questions related to pain include items 1-5, total pain score possible is 25; higher scores indicate less pain reported.

Time frame: Four Weeks

Population: 19 participants received the study device, 15 completed a 4 week visit.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
PopSole™ Offloading DeviceChange in Foot Pain From Screening/Baseline Visit to 4 Week Visit as Reported on the Pittsburgh Foot Survey.2.930 Score on a scale
Comparison: This procedure calculates the difference between the observed means in two independent samples (two collected assessment timepoints, screening and 4 week follow up visits). A significance value (P-value) and 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of the difference is reported. The P-value is the probability of obtaining the observed difference between the samples if the null hypothesis were true. The null hypothesis is the hypothesis that the difference is 0.p-value: 0.079695% CI: [-0.3687, 6.2287]t-test, 2 sided
Primary

Device Durability

Documentation of the number of participants who wore a single device for first 4 weeks of the participant's study participation.

Time frame: Four weeks.

Population: 19 participants received the study device at baseline. 1 participant withdrew prior to the four week, 2 participants were withdrawn from the study due to the University of Pittsburgh's ordered research shutdown due to Covid, and one participant missed the four week visit.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PopSole™ Offloading DeviceDevice Durability15 Participants
Primary

Participant Compliance With Device

Documentation of the number of participants who did not wear a single device for the full 4 weeks of the participant's study participation.

Time frame: Four Weeks

Population: 19 participants received the study device at baseline. 1 participant withdrew prior to the four week, 2 participants were withdrawn from the study due to the University of Pittsburgh's ordered research shutdown due to Covid, and one participant missed the four week visit.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PopSole™ Offloading DeviceParticipant Compliance With Device4 Participants
Secondary

Participants' Reported Satisfaction and/or Difficulties With the Device

As measured by subject self report, using a device satisfaction measure questionnaire. Questions are answered yes/no in all cases except comfort (1-10 with 10 being the most comfortable), and ease of use (1-10 with 10 being most easy to use).

Time frame: Four Weeks

Population: Participants reported comfort with the PopSole Device on a 1-10 scale, 1= very uncomfortable and 10=very comfortable. Participants reported on the ease of using the PopSole Device on 1-10 scale, 1=very difficult and 10=very easy. 20 total points possible, higher score indicates increased satisfaction.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PopSole™ Offloading DeviceParticipants' Reported Satisfaction and/or Difficulties With the Device17.87 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.39
Comparison: This procedure calculates the difference of an observed mean (from the assessment collected at the 4 week visit) with a hypothesized mean value (10, a mid level scale score). A significance value (P-value) and 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of the observed mean is reported. The P-value is the probability of obtaining the observed mean in the sample if the null hypothesis value were the true value.p-value: 0.000195% CI: [16.5465, 19.1935]t-test, 2 sided

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026