Skip to content

Pain After Proximal Digital Amputation Prevention

Pain After Proximal Digital Amputation Prevention

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04378062
Acronym
PAPDAP
Enrollment
39
Registered
2020-05-07
Start date
2020-03-01
Completion date
2023-02-01
Last updated
2023-08-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Amputation, Amputation Neuroma, Pain

Keywords

Pain, Amputation Neuroma, Finger Amputation

Brief summary

Finger amputations are common and may be complicated by debilitating nerve pain. This study seeks to determine if nerve pain after digital amputation can be more effectively prevented with either of two new surgical techniques-targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR) or regenerative peripheral nerve interfaces (RPNI)-compared to standard treatment by traction neurectomy (TN).

Detailed description

Patients who require proximal amputations will have the opportunity to enroll in the study, will be randomized intraoperatively to receiving one of the aforementioned treatments, and will be followed at 3 and 6 month for outcome measures.

Interventions

PROCEDUREDigital nerve procedure

The type of procedure performed on the digital nerve at the time of amputation

Sponsors

American Society for Surgery of the Hand
CollaboratorOTHER
Indiana University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients requiring single finger amputations at the level of the proximal interphalangeal joint or proximal (i.e., closer to the body than this joint). * Patients have the capacity to complete the informed consent process

Exclusion criteria

* Patients less than 18 years of age, prisoner, or other vulnerable population * Patients with significant concomitant ipsilateral extremity injuries that would confound study * Patients requiring emergent, staged (guillotine-type) amputations of any kind

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
bMHQ3 months postop minus preop; 6 months postop minus preopBreif Michigan Hand Questionnaire Score difference

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
NPS3 months postop minus preop; 6 months postop minus preopNumerical Pain Score difference
Grip strength3 months postop minus preop; 6 months postop minus preopGrip strength score difference

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Tinel's signTinel's sign at 3 months; Tinel's sign at 6 monthsTinel's sign at amputation site

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026