Skip to content

A Study of Guselkumab in Participants With Active Lupus Nephritis

A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-group Study of Guselkumab in Subjects With Active Lupus Nephritis

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04376827
Acronym
ORCHID-LN
Enrollment
33
Registered
2020-05-06
Start date
2020-09-15
Completion date
2023-02-01
Last updated
2025-03-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Lupus Nephritis

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of guselkumab in participants with active lupus nephritis (LN).

Detailed description

Guselkumab is a monoclonal antibody (mAb) that binds to human interleukin (IL)-23 with high affinity and blocks binding of extracellular IL-23 to cell surface IL-23 receptor, inhibiting IL 23 specific intracellular signaling and subsequent activation and cytokine production. It is used in treatment of plaque psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis, generalized pustular psoriasis, erythrodermic psoriasis. Lupus is a heterogeneous autoimmune disease with lesions confined to skin (cutaneous lupus erythematosus \[CLE\]) to others that involve 1 or more vital internal organs (systemic lupus erythematosus \[SLE\]). Renal involvement due to SLE is termed lupus nephritis (LN). There is a high unmet need for new treatment options in LN that are safe and effective, especially new therapies that can provide improved long-term efficacy over currently available therapies. This study will evaluate safety and efficacy of guselkumab added to standard-of-care compared to placebo added to standard-of-care. Total duration of study is up to 68 weeks: a less than or equal to 8 week screening period, a 48 week double-blind treatment period, a 12 week safety follow-up period after last dose. Participants who complete the assessments at Week 52 and have achieved complete renal response (CRR) may have the option to participate in the long-term extension (LTE) of study through Week 152 and the 12-week safety follow-up visit. Hypothesis of this study is that guselkumab plus standard-of-care is superior to placebo plus standard-of-care in participants with active LN as measured by the proportion of participants inducing at least a 50 percentage reduction of proteinuria with protocol specified steroid tapering regimen at Week 24. Safety assessments include Adverse events (AEs), clinical laboratory tests (hematology and chemistry), systolic and diastolic blood pressures over time, monitoring for hypersensitivity reactions, AEs temporally associated with infusion, injection-site reactions, suicidality assessment, and early detection of active tuberculosis (TB).

Interventions

Participants will receive guselkumab Dose 1 via IV administration.

DRUGPlacebo

Participants will receive placebo IV at Weeks 0, 4 and 8 (that is, 3 IV doses) and placebo SC q4w from Week 12 through Week 48.

Participants will receive guselkumab Dose 2 via SC route.

Participants will receive standard of care treatment including MMF/MPA and glucocorticoids from Week 12 through Week 48.

Sponsors

Janssen Research & Development, LLC
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* At screening and randomization, must be receiving oral glucocorticoids at minimum prednisone equivalent dose of 10 milligrams per day (mg/day) and maximum 1 mg/kg/day or less than or equal to (\<=) 60 mg/day, whichever is lower. Treated for greater than or equal to (\>=) 6 weeks with stable dosing \>=2 weeks before randomization * If receiving angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor/angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARB), a stable dose for at least 2 weeks prior to randomization * Positive antinuclear antibody (ANA; \>= 1:80 titer by central laboratory test) or anti-double-stranded deoxyribonucleic acid (dsDNA) antibodies (\>=30 international units per milliliter (\[U/mL\] by central laboratory test) detected at screening * Kidney biopsy documentation of active International Society of Nephrology (ISN)/Renal Pathology Society (RPS) proliferative nephritis: Class III-IV (with or without class V membranous nephritis) within the last 6 months prior to screening or performed during screening * Urine Protein to Creatinine Ratio (UPCR) \>= 1.0 milligram/milligram (mg/mg) assessed on 2 first morning urine void specimens during screening. These 2 specimens do not need to be on consecutive days, however, 2 samples must be tested with UPCR \>= 1.0 mg/mg in a row. The UPCR requirement must be met after at least 8 weeks of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)/mycophenolic acid (MPA) treatment, and after stable glucocorticoid dosing is achieved at the dose intended at time of randomization

Exclusion criteria

* Comorbidities (other than lupus nephritis \[LN\], example, asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) which have required 3 or more courses of systemic glucocorticoids within the previous 12 months * Has other inflammatory diseases that might confound the evaluations of efficacy, including but not limited to rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), RA/lupus overlap, psoriasis, Crohn's disease, or active Lyme disease * Received PO (orally) or intravenously (IV) cyclophosphamide within 3 months prior to randomization * History of latent or active granulomatous infection, including histoplasmosis or coccidioidomycosis, before screening * History of being human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) antibody-positive, or tests positive for HIV at screening

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants Achieving at Least 50 Percent (%) Decrease From Baseline in Proteinuria at Week 24Week 24Percentage of participants achieving at least 50% decrease in proteinuria from baseline at Week 24 was reported. Proteinuria analysis was based on urine protein creatinine ratio (UPCR) and was defined as the presence of an excess of serum proteins in the urine, which may be an early sign of kidney disease.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved CRR at Week 52Week 52Percentage of participants who achieved CRR at Week 52 were reported. CRR was defined as UPCR less than (\<) 0.5 mg/mg, eGFR \>= 60 mL/min/1.73m\^2 or no confirmed decrease \>=20% from baseline and prednisone dose \<= 10 mg/d. Participant was considered as achieved CRR who did not discontinue study intervention for any reason excluding COVID-19 related discontinuations or met the medication intercurrent event (exceeded baseline glucocorticoid dose, increase above 10 mg/d prednisone equivalent after Week 12, use of new or increased dose of concomitant medication related to LN or other immunosuppressive agents, within 8 weeks prior to the outcome measure time point (Week 52) or initiation of prohibited medications at any time prior to the outcome measure time point (Week 52).
Percentage of Participants Achieving a Sustained Reduction in Steroid Dose <=10 mg/d of Prednisone or Equivalent From Week 16 Through Week 24From Week 16 through Week 24Percentage of participants achieving a sustained reduction in steroid dose less than or equal to (\<=) 10 mg/day of prednisone or equivalent from week 16 through Week 24were reported.
Percentage of Participants Achieving at Least 50% Decrease in Proteinuria From Baseline at Week 52Week 52Percentage of participants achieving at least 50% decrease in proteinuria from baseline at Week 52 were reported. Proteinuria analysis was based on urine protein creatinine ratio (UPCR) and was defined as the presence of an excess of serum proteins in the urine, which may be an early sign of kidney disease.
Percentage of Participants With Urine Protein to Creatinine Ratio (UPCR) < 0.5 mg/mg at Week 24Week 24Percentage of participants with UPCR \<0.5 mg/mg at Week 24 were reported.
Percentage of Participants With UPCR < 0.75 mg/mg at Week 24Week 24Percentage of participants with UPCR less than 0.75 mg/mg at Week 24 were reported.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved CRR Through Week 24Up to Week 24Percentage of participants who achieved CRR through Week 24 was reported. CRR was defined as UPCR\<0.5 mg/mg, eGFR \>= 60 mL/min/1.73m\^2 or no confirmed decrease\>=20% from baseline and prednisone dose \<= 10 mg/d. Participant was considered as achieved CRR who did not discontinue study intervention for any reason excluding COVID-19 related discontinuations or met the medication intercurrent event (exceeded baseline glucocorticoid dose, increase above 10 mg/d prednisone equivalent after Week 12, use of new or increased dose of concomitant medication related to lupus nephritis (LN) or other immunosuppressive agents, within 8 weeks prior to the outcome measure time point (Week 24) or initiation of prohibited medications at any time prior to the outcome measure time point (Week 24).
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: MonocytesBaseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: monocytes was reported.
Percentage of Participants With Treatment Failure (TF) Through Week 52Up to Week 52Percentage of participants with TF through Week 52 was reported. TF was defined as time to the first occurrence of TF from baseline. Participant was considered to have treatment failure, who did not continue study intervention for any reason excluding COVID-19 related discontinuations or met the medication intercurrent event (exceeded baseline glucocorticoid dose, increase above 10 mg/d prednisone equivalent after Week 12, use of new or increased dose of concomitant medication related to LN or other immunosuppressive agents, within 8 weeks prior to the outcome measure time point (Week 52) or initiation of prohibited medications at any time prior to the outcome measure time point (Week 52).
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)Number of participants with AEs were reported. An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant administered a medicinal (investigational or non-investigational) product did not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. Therefore, it could be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not related to that medicinal product.
Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)Number of Participants with SAEs were reported. An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant administered a medicinal (investigational or non-investigational) product did not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. Therefore, it could be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not related to that medicinal product. A SAE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose resulted in death, was life-threatening, required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, was a congenital anomaly/birth defect, was a suspected transmission of any infectious agent via a medicinal product, or was medically important.
Number of Participants With Related AEsDB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)Number of participants with related AEs were reported. An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant administered a medicinal (investigational or non-investigational) product did not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. Therefore, it could be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not related to that medicinal product. Related AE was defined as the AE assessed by the investigator related to study agent.
Number of Participants With AEs Leading to Discontinuation of Study InterventionDB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)Number of participants with AEs leading to discontinuation of study intervention were reported.
Number of Participants With InfectionsDB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)Number of participants with infections as assessed by the investigator were reported.
Number of Participants With Serious InfectionsDB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)Number of participants with serious infections as assessed by the investigator were reported.
Number of Participants With Infections Requiring Oral or Parenteral Antimicrobial TreatmentDB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)Number of participants with infections requiring oral or parenteral antimicrobial treatment planned to be were reported.
Number of Participants With AEs Temporally Associated With an InfusionDB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)Number of participants with AEs temporally (a reaction that occurred during or within 1 hour after infusion) associated with an infusion were reported. AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant administered a medicinal (investigational or non-investigational) product does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. Therefore, it can be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not related to that medicinal product.
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Urine ProteinBaseline (Week 0), Weeks 24 and 52Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: urine protein was reported.
Number of Participants With AEs With Injection-site ReactionsDB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)Number of participants with injection-site reactions as assessed by the investigator were reported. An injection-site reaction is any adverse reaction at a SC study intervention injection-site.
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Activated Partial Thromboplastin TimeBaseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: activated partial thromboplastin time was reported.
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: BasophilsBaseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: basophils was reported.
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: EosinophilsBaseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: eosinophils was reported.
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Erythrocytes Mean Corpuscular HemoglobinBaseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: erythrocytes mean corpuscular hemoglobin was reported.
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Erythrocytes Mean Corpuscular VolumeBaseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: erythrocytes mean corpuscular volume was reported.
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: ErythrocytesBaseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: erythrocytes was reported.
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: HematocritBaseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52Change from baseline in clinical Laboratory parameter: hematocrit was reported.
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: HemoglobinBaseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: hemoglobin was reported.
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter LeukocytesBaseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: leukocytes was reported.
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: LymphocytesBaseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: lymphocytes was reported.
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Hematology Parameter: Segmented NeutrophilsBaseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: segmented neutrophils was reported.
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: PlateletsBaseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: platelets was reported.
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Prothrombin International Normalized RatioBaseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: prothrombin international normalized ratio was reported.
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Prothrombin TimeBaseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: prothrombin time was reported.
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Reticulocytes/ErythrocytesBaseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52Change from baseline in clinical laboratory hematology parameter:reticulocytes/erythrocytes was reported.
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Alanine AminotransferaseBaseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: alanine aminotransferase was reported.
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: AlbuminBaseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: albumin was reported.
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Alkaline PhosphataseBaseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: alkaline phosphatase was reported.
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Aspartate AminotransferaseBaseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: aspartate aminotransferase was reported.
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: BicarbonateBaseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: bicarbonate was reported.
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: BilirubinBaseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: bilirubin was reported.
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters: CalciumBaseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: calcium was reported.
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: ChlorideBaseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: chloride was reported.
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters: CholesterolBaseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: cholesterol was reported.
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Creatine KinaseBaseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: creatine kinase was reported.
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: CreatinineBaseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: creatinine was reported.
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: ProteinBaseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: protein was reported.
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: PhosphateBaseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: phosphate was reported.
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: SodiumBaseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: sodium was reported.
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters: PotassiumBaseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: potassium was reported.
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters: Urea NitrogenBaseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: urea nitrogen was reported.
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) From Creatinine Adjusted for Body Surface Area (BSA)Baseline (Week 0), Weeks 24 and 52Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: GFR from Creatinine Adjusted for BSA was reported.
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Gamma Glutamyl and Transferase Lactate DehydrogenaseBaseline (Week 0), Weeks 24 and 52Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: gamma glutamyl transferase and lactate dehydrogenase were reported.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Complete Renal Response (CRR) at Week 24Week 24Percentage of participants who achieved CRR at Week 24 were reported. CRR was defined as UPCR less than (\<) 0.5 milligrams per milligrams (mg/mg), estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) greater than or equal to (\>=) 60 milliliter per minute per 1.73 meter square (mL/min/1.73m\^2) or no confirmed decrease \>=20% from baseline and prednisone dose less than or equal to (\<=) 10 milligrams per day (mg/d). Participant was considered as achieved CRR who did not discontinue study intervention for any reason excluding COVID-19 related discontinuations or met the medication intercurrent event (exceeded baseline glucocorticoid dose, increase above 10 mg/d prednisone equivalent after Week 12, use of new or increased dose of concomitant medication related to LN or other immunosuppressive agents, within 8 weeks prior to the outcome measure (OM) time point (Week 24) or initiation of prohibited medications at any time prior to the endpoint time point (Week 24).
Change From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters: Protein/CreatinineBaseline, Weeks 24 and 52Change from baseline in chemistry parameter: protein/creatinine was reported.
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: UrateBaseline, Weeks 24, 52Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: urate was reported.
Number of Participants With Maximum US National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) Toxicity Grade (Grade 4) in Clinical Laboratory Parameters: Hematology and ChemistryDB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)Number of participants with maximum US NCI-CTCAE toxicity grade (Grade 4) in clinical laboratory parameters: hematology and chemistry were reported. Toxicity were graded as Grade 1: Mild, Grade 2: Moderate; Grade 3: Severe. Grade 4: Life-threatening and Grade 5: Death.
Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs: Systolic and Diastolic Blood PressureUp to Week 60Percentage of participants with abnormal vital signs: Systolic and Diastolic blood pressure were reported.
Serum Concentration of GuselkumabPredose: Weeks 0,4,8,12,16,20,24, 36; Post-dose: Week 0 (1 hour after intravenous administration), Day 2, Week 52 and 60Serum Concentration of guselkumab were reported.
Number of Participants With Treatment-boosted Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) ResponseFrom Baseline (Week 0) through Week 24 and Week 60Treatment-boosted ADA positive participants: participants who were positive at baseline and whose titers increased 2-fold at any time after treatment. Titer values were categorized as\<=1:10, 10 to 100, 100 to 1000, \>1000.
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Glucose and MagnesiumBaseline, Weeks 24, 52Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: glucose and magnesium were reported.

Countries

Argentina, Mexico, Poland, Russia, Spain, Taiwan, Thailand, Ukraine, United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

Randomization was stratified by geographic region (North America, Latin America, Asia Pacific and Europe) and Urine Protein to Creatinine Ratio (UPCR) level (less than \[\<\] 3 milligrams per milligram \[mg/mg\] and greater than or equal to \[\>=\] 3 mg/mg).

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo
In double-blind period, participants received placebo matched to guselkumab (400 milligrams \[mg\]) intravenous (IV) infusion at Weeks 0, 4 and 8 and placebo matched to guselkumab (200 mg) subcutaneous (SC) injection every 4 weeks (q4w) from Week 12 through Week 48 along with standard-of-care treatment of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)/mycophenolic acid (MPA) and glucocorticoids. Participants who achieved complete renal response (CRR) at Week 48 and 52, and completed the Week 52 assessments entered the long-term extension (LTE) phase and continued to receive placebo matched to guselkumab SC injection q4w from Week 52 through Week 84 (that is., up to LTE phase treatment termination).
16
Guselkumab
In double-blind period, participants received guselkumab 400 mg IV infusion at Weeks 0, 4, and 8 and guselkumab 200 mg SC injection q4w from Week 12 through Week 48 along with standard-of-care treatment of MMF/MPA and glucocorticoids. Participants who achieved CRR at Week 48 and 52, and completed the Week 52 assessments entered LTE phase and continued to receive guselkumab 200 mg SC injection q4w from Week 52 through Week 84 (that is., up to LTE phase treatment termination).
17
Total33

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Double Blind Period: Week 0 to Week 52Study Terminated by Sponsor68
Double Blind Period: Week 0 to Week 52Withdrawal by Subject11
LTE Phase:Week 52 to 96(LTE Termination)Protocol-specified withdrawal criterion met10
LTE Phase:Week 52 to 96(LTE Termination)Study Terminated by Sponsor30
LTE Phase:Week 52 to 96(LTE Termination)Withdrawal by Subject01

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlaceboTotalGuselkumab
Age, Continuous38.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.69
37 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.86
35.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.07
Age, Customized
< 55 years
15 Participants31 Participants16 Participants
Age, Customized
>= 55 years
1 Participants2 Participants1 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
4 Participants11 Participants7 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
12 Participants22 Participants10 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
1 Participants3 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
3 Participants4 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
12 Participants26 Participants14 Participants
Region of Enrollment
ARGENTINA
5 Participants9 Participants4 Participants
Region of Enrollment
MEXICO
1 Participants4 Participants3 Participants
Region of Enrollment
RUSSIAN FEDERATION
2 Participants3 Participants1 Participants
Region of Enrollment
TAIWAN
3 Participants3 Participants0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
THAILAND
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Region of Enrollment
UKRAINE
5 Participants12 Participants7 Participants
Region of Enrollment
UNITED STATES
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
14 Participants29 Participants15 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
2 Participants4 Participants2 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 160 / 17
other
Total, other adverse events
12 / 1612 / 17
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 161 / 17

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants Achieving at Least 50 Percent (%) Decrease From Baseline in Proteinuria at Week 24

Percentage of participants achieving at least 50% decrease in proteinuria from baseline at Week 24 was reported. Proteinuria analysis was based on urine protein creatinine ratio (UPCR) and was defined as the presence of an excess of serum proteins in the urine, which may be an early sign of kidney disease.

Time frame: Week 24

Population: Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study intervention.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving at Least 50 Percent (%) Decrease From Baseline in Proteinuria at Week 2456.3 percentage of participants
GuselkumabPercentage of Participants Achieving at Least 50 Percent (%) Decrease From Baseline in Proteinuria at Week 2435.3 percentage of participants
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters: Protein/Creatinine

Change from baseline in chemistry parameter: protein/creatinine was reported.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 24 and 52

Population: SAS population. Here 'n' (number analyzed) signifies the number of participants evaluable at each specified timepoints. Here 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies the number of participants with available data for this outcome measure. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE phase than the planned enrollment count, the planned analysis of change from baseline for the safety parameters was not performed for the LTE phase for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters: Protein/CreatinineWeek 24-1.509 mg/mgStandard Deviation 1.9494
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters: Protein/CreatinineWeek 52-1.586 mg/mgStandard Deviation 1.7966
GuselkumabChange From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters: Protein/CreatinineWeek 24-0.821 mg/mgStandard Deviation 2.425
GuselkumabChange From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters: Protein/CreatinineWeek 52-0.352 mg/mgStandard Deviation 1.696
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time

Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: activated partial thromboplastin time was reported.

Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52

Population: SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of study intervention. Here 'n' (number analyzed) signifies the number of participants evaluable at specified timepoints. Here 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies number of participants with available data for this OM. Since a small number of participants only entered LTE phase than planned enrollment count, planned analysis of change from baseline for the safety parameters was not performed for the LTE phase for this OM.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Activated Partial Thromboplastin TimeWeek 240.78 SecondsStandard Deviation 1.734
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Activated Partial Thromboplastin TimeWeek 520.88 SecondsStandard Deviation 1.387
GuselkumabChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Activated Partial Thromboplastin TimeWeek 240.96 SecondsStandard Deviation 3.869
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Alanine Aminotransferase

Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: alanine aminotransferase was reported.

Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52

Population: SAS population. Here 'n' (number analyzed) signifies the number of participants evaluable at specified timepoints. Here 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies the number of participants with available data for this outcome measure. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE phase than the planned enrollment count, the planned analysis of change from baseline for the safety parameters was not performed for the LTE phase for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Alanine AminotransferaseWeek 242.6 Enzyme units per literStandard Deviation 10.98
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Alanine AminotransferaseWeek 522.3 Enzyme units per literStandard Deviation 4.92
GuselkumabChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Alanine AminotransferaseWeek 24-3.1 Enzyme units per literStandard Deviation 6.57
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Albumin

Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: albumin was reported.

Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52

Population: SAS population. Here 'n' (number analyzed) signifies the number of participants evaluable at specified timepoints. Here 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies the number of participants with available data for this outcome measure. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE phase than the planned enrollment count, the planned analysis of change from baseline for the safety parameters was not performed for the LTE phase for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: AlbuminWeek 242.4 Grams per Liter (g/L)Standard Deviation 5.57
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: AlbuminWeek 523.5 Grams per Liter (g/L)Standard Deviation 5.32
GuselkumabChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: AlbuminWeek 241.9 Grams per Liter (g/L)Standard Deviation 4.58
GuselkumabChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: AlbuminWeek 52-3.0 Grams per Liter (g/L)
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Alkaline Phosphatase

Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: alkaline phosphatase was reported.

Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52

Population: SAS population. Here 'n' (number analyzed) signifies the number of participants evaluable at specified timepoints. Here 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies the number of participants with available data for this outcome measure. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE phase than the planned enrollment count, the planned analysis of change from baseline for the safety parameters was not performed for the LTE phase for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Alkaline PhosphataseWeek 241.9 Enzyme units per literStandard Deviation 16.75
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Alkaline PhosphataseWeek 526.5 Enzyme units per literStandard Deviation 5
GuselkumabChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Alkaline PhosphataseWeek 241.7 Enzyme units per literStandard Deviation 8.07
GuselkumabChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Alkaline PhosphataseWeek 526.0 Enzyme units per liter
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Aspartate Aminotransferase

Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: aspartate aminotransferase was reported.

Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52

Population: SAS population. Here 'n' (number analyzed) signifies the number of participants evaluable at specified timepoints. Here 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies the number of participants of both with available data for this outcome measure. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE phase than the planned enrollment count, the planned analysis of change from baseline for the safety parameters was not performed for the LTE phase for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Aspartate AminotransferaseWeek 240.0 Enzyme units per literStandard Deviation 4.97
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Aspartate AminotransferaseWeek 521.5 Enzyme units per literStandard Deviation 2.38
GuselkumabChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Aspartate AminotransferaseWeek 24-0.7 Enzyme units per literStandard Deviation 5.41
GuselkumabChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Aspartate AminotransferaseWeek 521.0 Enzyme units per liter
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Basophils

Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: basophils was reported.

Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52

Population: SAS included all subjects who received at least one dose of study intervention. Here 'n' (number analyzed) signifies number of participants evaluable at specified timepoints. Here 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies to number of participants with available data for this OM. Since a small number of participants only entered LTE phase than planned enrollment count, the planned analysis of change from baseline for the safety parameters was not performed for the LTE phase for this OM.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: BasophilsWeek 24-0.009 10^9 cells per literStandard Deviation 0.0512
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: BasophilsWeek 52-0.070 10^9 cells per literStandard Deviation 0.099
GuselkumabChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: BasophilsWeek 24-0.009 10^9 cells per literStandard Deviation 0.0502
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Bicarbonate

Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: bicarbonate was reported.

Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52

Population: SAS population. Here 'n' (number analyzed) signifies the number of participants evaluable at specified timepoints. Here 'N' number of participants analyzed) signifies the number of participants with available data for this outcome measure. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE phase than the planned enrollment count, the planned analysis of change from baseline for the safety parameters was not performed for the LTE phase for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: BicarbonateWeek 24-0.78 mmol/LStandard Deviation 4.97
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: BicarbonateWeek 52-2.20 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2.38
GuselkumabChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: BicarbonateWeek 240.21 mmol/LStandard Deviation 5.41
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Bilirubin

Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: bilirubin was reported.

Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52

Population: SAS population. Here 'n' (number analyzed) signifies the number of participants evaluable at specified timepoints. Here 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies the number of participants with available data for this outcome measure. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE phase than the planned enrollment count, the planned analysis of change from baseline for the safety parameters was not performed for the LTE phase for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: BilirubinWeek 240.1 micromole per literStandard Deviation 1.98
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: BilirubinWeek 52-0.3 micromole per literStandard Deviation 2.06
GuselkumabChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: BilirubinWeek 240.3 micromole per literStandard Deviation 2.46
GuselkumabChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: BilirubinWeek 524.0 micromole per liter
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Chloride

Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: chloride was reported.

Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52

Population: SAS population. Here 'n' (number analyzed) signifies the number of participants evaluable at specified timepoints. Here 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies the number of participants with available data for this outcome measure. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE phase than the planned enrollment count, the planned analysis of change from baseline for the safety parameters was not performed for the LTE phase for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: ChlorideWeek 240.1 mmol/LStandard Deviation 4.5
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: ChlorideWeek 522.0 mmol/LStandard Deviation 4.83
GuselkumabChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: ChlorideWeek 522.0 mmol/L
GuselkumabChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: ChlorideWeek 240.7 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.0958
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Creatine Kinase

Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: creatine kinase was reported.

Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52

Population: SAS population. Here 'n' (number analyzed) signifies the number of participants evaluable at specified timepoints. Here 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies the number of participants with available data for this outcome measure. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE phase than the planned enrollment count, the planned analysis of change from baseline for the safety parameters was not performed for the LTE phase for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Creatine KinaseWeek 243.3 Enzyme units per literStandard Deviation 42.22
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Creatine KinaseWeek 52-8.8 Enzyme units per literStandard Deviation 36.65
GuselkumabChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Creatine KinaseWeek 24-0.5 Enzyme units per literStandard Deviation 53.94
GuselkumabChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Creatine KinaseWeek 52-2.0 Enzyme units per liter
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Creatinine

Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: creatinine was reported.

Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52

Population: SAS population. Here 'n' (number analyzed) signifies the number of participants evaluable at specified timepoints. Here 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies the number of participants with available data for this outcome measure. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE phase than the planned enrollment count, the planned analysis of change from baseline for the safety parameters was not performed for the LTE phase for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: CreatinineWeek 240.6 micromole per literStandard Deviation 18.3
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: CreatinineWeek 52-3.3 micromole per literStandard Deviation 7.54
GuselkumabChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: CreatinineWeek 246.7 micromole per literStandard Deviation 16.78
GuselkumabChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: CreatinineWeek 52-5.0 micromole per liter
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Eosinophils

Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: eosinophils was reported.

Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52

Population: SAS population. Here 'n' (number analyzed) signifies the number of participants evaluable at specified timepoints. Here 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies the number of participants with available data for this outcome measure. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE phase than the planned enrollment count, the planned analysis of change from baseline for the safety parameters was not performed for the LTE phase for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: EosinophilsWeek 240.022 10^9 cells per literStandard Deviation 0.0472
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: EosinophilsWeek 520.000 10^9 cells per literStandard Deviation 0.0283
GuselkumabChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: EosinophilsWeek 24-0.041 10^9 cells per literStandard Deviation 0.162
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Erythrocytes

Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: erythrocytes was reported.

Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52

Population: SAS included all subjects who received at least one dose of study intervention. Here 'n' (number analyzed) signifies number of participants evaluable at specified timepoints. Here 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies the number of participants with available data for this OM. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE phase than planned enrollment count, planned analysis of change from baseline for the safety parameters was not performed for the LTE phase for this OM.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: ErythrocytesWeek 24-0.16 10^12 cells per literStandard Deviation 0.582
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: ErythrocytesWeek 52-0.40 10^12 cells per literStandard Deviation 0.566
GuselkumabChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: ErythrocytesWeek 240.12 10^12 cells per literStandard Deviation 0.577
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Erythrocytes Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin

Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: erythrocytes mean corpuscular hemoglobin was reported.

Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52

Population: SAS population. Here 'n' (number analyzed) signifies the number of participants evaluable at specified timepoints. Here 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies the number of participants with available data for this outcome measure. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE phase than the planned enrollment count, the planned analysis of change from baseline for the safety parameters was not performed for the LTE phase for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Erythrocytes Mean Corpuscular HemoglobinWeek 240.1 petagram (pg)Standard Deviation 1.38
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Erythrocytes Mean Corpuscular HemoglobinWeek 52-1.5 petagram (pg)Standard Deviation 2.12
GuselkumabChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Erythrocytes Mean Corpuscular HemoglobinWeek 24-0.8 petagram (pg)Standard Deviation 1.06
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Erythrocytes Mean Corpuscular Volume

Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: erythrocytes mean corpuscular volume was reported.

Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52

Population: SAS population. Here 'n' (number analyzed) signifies the number of participants evaluable at specified timepoints. Here 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies the number of participants with available data for this outcome measure. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE phase than the planned enrollment count, the planned analysis of change from baseline for the safety parameters was not performed for the LTE phase for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Erythrocytes Mean Corpuscular VolumeWeek 240.5 femtoliter (fL)Standard Deviation 6.35
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Erythrocytes Mean Corpuscular VolumeWeek 52-4.0 femtoliter (fL)Standard Deviation 0
GuselkumabChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Erythrocytes Mean Corpuscular VolumeWeek 24-3.3 femtoliter (fL)Standard Deviation 5.37
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Gamma Glutamyl and Transferase Lactate Dehydrogenase

Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: gamma glutamyl transferase and lactate dehydrogenase were reported.

Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Weeks 24 and 52

Population: SAS population. Here 'n' (number analyzed) refers to the number of participants evaluable at each specified timepoints. Here 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies the number of participants of both with available data for this outcome measure. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE phase than the planned enrollment count, the planned analysis of change from baseline for the safety parameters was not performed for the LTE phase for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Gamma Glutamyl and Transferase Lactate DehydrogenaseLactate dehydogenase: Week 52-62.5 Enzyme units per literStandard Deviation 40.31
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Gamma Glutamyl and Transferase Lactate Dehydrogenasegamma glutamyl transferase: Week 521.0 Enzyme units per literStandard Deviation 8.6
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Gamma Glutamyl and Transferase Lactate Dehydrogenasegamma glutamyl transferase: Week 24-0.6 Enzyme units per literStandard Deviation 15.01
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Gamma Glutamyl and Transferase Lactate DehydrogenaseLactate dehydogenase: Week 24-14.5 Enzyme units per literStandard Deviation 47.9
GuselkumabChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Gamma Glutamyl and Transferase Lactate DehydrogenaseLactate dehydogenase: Week 527.0 Enzyme units per liter
GuselkumabChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Gamma Glutamyl and Transferase Lactate DehydrogenaseLactate dehydogenase: Week 24-2.5 Enzyme units per literStandard Deviation 17.52
GuselkumabChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Gamma Glutamyl and Transferase Lactate Dehydrogenasegamma glutamyl transferase: Week 24-3.0 Enzyme units per literStandard Deviation 9.7
GuselkumabChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Gamma Glutamyl and Transferase Lactate Dehydrogenasegamma glutamyl transferase: Week 52-2.0 Enzyme units per liter
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) From Creatinine Adjusted for Body Surface Area (BSA)

Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: GFR from Creatinine Adjusted for BSA was reported.

Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Weeks 24 and 52

Population: SAS population. Here 'n' (number analyzed) refers to the number of participants evaluable at each specified timepoints. Here 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies the number of participants of both with available data for this outcome measure. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE phase than the planned enrollment count, the planned analysis of change from baseline for the safety parameters was not performed for the LTE phase for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) From Creatinine Adjusted for Body Surface Area (BSA)Week 240.44 milliliter/minute/1.73 meter squareStandard Deviation 21.639
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) From Creatinine Adjusted for Body Surface Area (BSA)Week 526.75 milliliter/minute/1.73 meter squareStandard Deviation 22.588
GuselkumabChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) From Creatinine Adjusted for Body Surface Area (BSA)Week 24-5.87 milliliter/minute/1.73 meter squareStandard Deviation 17.15
GuselkumabChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) From Creatinine Adjusted for Body Surface Area (BSA)Week 525.60 milliliter/minute/1.73 meter square
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Glucose and Magnesium

Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: glucose and magnesium were reported.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 24, 52

Population: SAS population. Here 'n' (number analyzed) signifies the number of participants evaluable at each specified timepoints. Here 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies the number of participants of both with available data for this outcome measure. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE phase than the planned enrollment count, the planned analysis of change from baseline for the safety parameters was not performed for the LTE phase for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Glucose and MagnesiumGlucose: Week 24-0.23 millimoles per liter (mmol/L)Standard Deviation 1.041
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Glucose and MagnesiumGlucose:: Week 52-0.03 millimoles per liter (mmol/L)Standard Deviation 0.126
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Glucose and MagnesiumMagnesium: Week 24-0.024 millimoles per liter (mmol/L)Standard Deviation 0.0696
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Glucose and MagnesiumMagnesium: Week 52-0.068 millimoles per liter (mmol/L)Standard Deviation 0.0842
GuselkumabChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Glucose and MagnesiumMagnesium: Week 52-0.010 millimoles per liter (mmol/L)
GuselkumabChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Glucose and MagnesiumGlucose: Week 24-0.04 millimoles per liter (mmol/L)Standard Deviation 0.908
GuselkumabChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Glucose and MagnesiumMagnesium: Week 24-0.022 millimoles per liter (mmol/L)Standard Deviation 0.0607
GuselkumabChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Glucose and MagnesiumGlucose:: Week 520.20 millimoles per liter (mmol/L)
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Hematocrit

Change from baseline in clinical Laboratory parameter: hematocrit was reported.

Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52

Population: SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of study intervention. Here 'n' refers to the number of participants evaluable at specified timepoints. Here 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies the number of participants with available data for this OM. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE phase than the planned enrollment count, the planned analysis of change from baseline for the safety parameters was not performed for the LTE phase for this OM.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: HematocritWeek 24-0.013 percentage of blood cellsStandard Deviation 0.0411
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: HematocritWeek 52-0.055 percentage of blood cellsStandard Deviation 0.0495
GuselkumabChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: HematocritWeek 24-0.004 percentage of blood cellsStandard Deviation 0.0356
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Hematology Parameter: Segmented Neutrophils

Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: segmented neutrophils was reported.

Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52

Population: SAS population. Here 'n' (number analyzed) signifies the number of participants evaluable at specified timepoints. Here 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies the number of participants with available data for this outcome measure. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE phase than the planned enrollment count, the planned analysis of change from baseline for the safety parameters was not performed for the LTE phase for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Hematology Parameter: Segmented NeutrophilsWeek 24-0.630 10^9 cells per literStandard Deviation 3.2494
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Hematology Parameter: Segmented NeutrophilsWeek 52-3.990 10^9 cells per literStandard Deviation 5.8548
GuselkumabChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Hematology Parameter: Segmented NeutrophilsWeek 24-1.074 10^9 cells per literStandard Deviation 2.9652
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Hemoglobin

Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: hemoglobin was reported.

Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52

Population: SAS population. Here 'n' (number analyzed) signifies the number of participants evaluable at specified timepoints. Here 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies the number of participants with available data for this outcome measure. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE phase than the planned enrollment count, the planned analysis of change from baseline for the safety parameters was not performed for the LTE phase for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: HemoglobinWeek 24-5.2 grams per liter (g/L)Standard Deviation 15.57
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: HemoglobinWeek 52-17.0 grams per liter (g/L)Standard Deviation 22.63
GuselkumabChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: HemoglobinWeek 24-0.3 grams per liter (g/L)Standard Deviation 14.82
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter Leukocytes

Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: leukocytes was reported.

Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52

Population: SAS population. Here 'n' (number analyzed) signifies the number of participants evaluable at specified timepoints. Here 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies the number of participants of both with available data for this outcome measure. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE phase than the planned enrollment count, the planned analysis of change from baseline for the safety parameters was not performed for the LTE phase for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter LeukocytesWeek 52-5.120 10^9 cells per literStandard Deviation 7.7499
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter LeukocytesWeek 24-0.622 10^9 cells per literStandard Deviation 3.8729
GuselkumabChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter LeukocytesWeek 24-1.157 10^9 cells per literStandard Deviation 3.1246
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Lymphocytes

Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: lymphocytes was reported.

Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52

Population: SAS population. Here 'n' (number analyzed) signifies to number of participants evaluable at specified timepoints. Here 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies the number of participants of both with available data for this outcome measure. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE phase than the planned enrollment count, the planned analysis of change from baseline for the safety parameters was not performed for the LTE phase for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: LymphocytesWeek 240.006 10^9 cells per LiterStandard Deviation 0.5213
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: LymphocytesWeek 52-0.545 10^9 cells per LiterStandard Deviation 1.096
GuselkumabChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: LymphocytesWeek 24-0.032 10^9 cells per LiterStandard Deviation 0.386
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Monocytes

Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: monocytes was reported.

Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52

Population: SAS population. Here 'n' (number analyzed) signifies to the number of participants evaluable at specified timepoints. Here 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies the number of participants with available data for this outcome measure. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE phase than the planned enrollment count, the planned analysis of change from baseline for the safety parameters was not performed for the LTE phase for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: MonocytesWeek 24-0.014 10^9 cells per literStandard Deviation 0.3277
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: MonocytesWeek 52-0.510 10^9 cells per literStandard Deviation 0.7354
GuselkumabChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: MonocytesWeek 24-0.002 10^9 cells per literStandard Deviation 0.1268
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Phosphate

Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: phosphate was reported.

Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52

Population: SAS population. Here 'n' (number analyzed) signifies the number of participants evaluable at specified timepoints. Here 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies the number of participants with available data for this outcome measure. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE phase than the planned enrollment count, the planned analysis of change from baseline for the safety parameters was not performed for the LTE phase for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: PhosphateWeek 240.060 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.1498
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: PhosphateWeek 52-0.035 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.2213
GuselkumabChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: PhosphateWeek 240.030 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.2916
GuselkumabChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: PhosphateWeek 520.220 mmol/L
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Platelets

Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: platelets was reported.

Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52

Population: SAS population. Here 'n' (number analyzed) signifies the number of participants evaluable at specified timepoints. Here 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies the number of participants with available data for this outcome measure. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE phase than the planned enrollment count, the planned analysis of change from baseline for the safety parameters was not performed for the LTE phase for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: PlateletsWeek 24-36.7 10^9 cells per literStandard Deviation 61.43
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: PlateletsWeek 52-70.5 10^9 cells per literStandard Deviation 67.18
GuselkumabChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: PlateletsWeek 24-17.8 10^9 cells per literStandard Deviation 61.89
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Protein

Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: protein was reported.

Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Weeks 24 and 52

Population: SAS population. Here 'n' (number analyzed) signifies the number of participants evaluable at specified timepoints. Here 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies the number of participants with available data for this outcome measure. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE phase than the planned enrollment count, the planned analysis of change from baseline for the safety parameters was not performed for the LTE phase for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: ProteinWeek 243.0 gram per Liter (g/L)Standard Deviation 8.83
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: ProteinWeek 527.0 gram per Liter (g/L)Standard Deviation 7.39
GuselkumabChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: ProteinWeek 242.9 gram per Liter (g/L)Standard Deviation 6.55
GuselkumabChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: ProteinWeek 521.0 gram per Liter (g/L)
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Protein

Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: protein was reported.

Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52

Population: SAS population. Here 'n' (number analyzed) signifies the number of participants evaluable at specified timepoints. Here 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies the number of participants with available data for this outcome measure. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE phase than the planned enrollment count, the planned analysis of change from baseline for the safety parameters was not performed for the LTE phase for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: ProteinWeek 243.0 g/LStandard Deviation 8.83
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: ProteinWeek 527.0 g/LStandard Deviation 7.39
GuselkumabChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: ProteinWeek 242.9 g/LStandard Deviation 16.78
GuselkumabChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: ProteinWeek 521.0 g/L
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Prothrombin International Normalized Ratio

Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: prothrombin international normalized ratio was reported.

Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52

Population: SAS population. Here 'n' (number analyzed) signifies the number of participants evaluable at specified timepoints. Here 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies the number of participants with available data for this outcome measure. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE phase than the planned enrollment count, the planned analysis of change from baseline for the safety parameters was not performed for the LTE phase for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Prothrombin International Normalized RatioWeek 240.02 RatioStandard Deviation 0.09
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Prothrombin International Normalized RatioWeek 520.00 RatioStandard Deviation 0
GuselkumabChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Prothrombin International Normalized RatioWeek 240.01 RatioStandard Deviation 0.064
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Prothrombin Time

Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: prothrombin time was reported.

Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52

Population: SAS population. Here 'n' (number analyzed) signifies the number of participants evaluable at specified timepoints. Here 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies the number of participants with available data for this outcome measure. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE phase than the planned enrollment count, the planned analysis of change from baseline for the safety parameters was not performed for the LTE phase for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Prothrombin TimeWeek 240.18 secondStandard Deviation 0.766
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Prothrombin TimeWeek 52-0.03 secondStandard Deviation 0.359
GuselkumabChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Prothrombin TimeWeek 240.16 secondStandard Deviation 0.425
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Reticulocytes/Erythrocytes

Change from baseline in clinical laboratory hematology parameter:reticulocytes/erythrocytes was reported.

Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52

Population: SAS population. Here 'n' (number analyzed) signifies the number of participants evaluable at specified timepoints. Here 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies the number of participants with available data for this outcome measure. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE phase than the planned enrollment count, the planned analysis of change from baseline for the safety parameters was not performed for the LTE phase for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Reticulocytes/ErythrocytesWeek 24-0.0007 percentage of blood cellsStandard Deviation 0.00485
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Reticulocytes/ErythrocytesWeek 520.0000 percentage of blood cellsStandard Deviation 0.01414
GuselkumabChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Reticulocytes/ErythrocytesWeek 24-0.0001 percentage of blood cellsStandard Deviation 0.00541
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters: Calcium

Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: calcium was reported.

Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52

Population: SAS population. Here 'n' (number analyzed) signifies the number of participants evaluable at specified timepoints. Here 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies the number of participants with available data for this outcome measure. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE phase than the planned enrollment count, the planned analysis of change from baseline for the safety parameters was not performed for the LTE phase for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters: CalciumWeek 240.039 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.1172
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters: CalciumWeek 520.000 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.1871
GuselkumabChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters: CalciumWeek 240.073 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.0958
GuselkumabChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters: CalciumWeek 520.010 mmol/L
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters: Cholesterol

Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: cholesterol was reported.

Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52

Population: SAS population. Here 'n' (number analyzed) signifies the number of participants evaluable at specified timepoints. Here 'N' number of participants analyzed) signifies the number of participants with available data for this outcome measure. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE phase than the planned enrollment count, the planned analysis of change from baseline for the safety parameters was not performed for the LTE phase for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters: CholesterolWeek 24-1.325 mmol/LStandard Deviation 1.3026
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters: CholesterolWeek 52-2.235 mmol/LStandard Deviation 1.6588
GuselkumabChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters: CholesterolWeek 240.017 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.7818
GuselkumabChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters: CholesterolWeek 520.210 mmol/L
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Sodium

Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: sodium was reported.

Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52

Population: SAS population. Here 'n' (number analyzed) signifies the number of participants evaluable at specified timepoints. Here 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies the number of participants with available data for this outcome measure. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE phase than the planned enrollment count, the planned analysis of change from baseline for the safety parameters was not performed for the LTE phase for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: SodiumWeek 24-0.7 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2.3
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: SodiumWeek 521.0 mmol/LStandard Deviation 1.41
GuselkumabChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: SodiumWeek 240.4 mmol/LStandard Deviation 4.24
GuselkumabChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: SodiumWeek 523.0 mmol/L
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters: Potassium

Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: potassium was reported.

Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52

Population: SAS population. Here 'n' (number analyzed) signifies the number of participants evaluable at specified timepoints. Here 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies the number of participants with available data for this outcome measure. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE phase than the planned enrollment count, the planned analysis of change from baseline for the safety parameters was not performed for the LTE phase for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters: PotassiumWeek 240.19 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.704
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters: PotassiumWeek 520.03 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.457
GuselkumabChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters: PotassiumWeek 240.13 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.402
GuselkumabChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters: PotassiumWeek 520.00 mmol/L
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters: Urea Nitrogen

Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: urea nitrogen was reported.

Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52

Population: SAS population. Here 'n' (number analyzed) signifies the number of participants evaluable at specified timepoints. Here 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies the number of participants with available data for this outcome measure. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE phase than the planned enrollment count, the planned analysis of change from baseline for the safety parameters was not performed for the LTE phase for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters: Urea NitrogenWeek 24-1.23 mmol/LStandard Deviation 3.106
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters: Urea NitrogenWeek 52-1.60 mmol/LStandard Deviation 1.564
GuselkumabChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters: Urea NitrogenWeek 240.71 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2.177
GuselkumabChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters: Urea NitrogenWeek 520.50 mmol/L
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Urate

Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: urate was reported.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 24, 52

Population: SAS population. Here 'n' (number analyzed) signifies the number of participants evaluable at each specified timepoints. Here 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies the number of participants with available data for this outcome measure. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE phase than the planned enrollment count, the planned analysis of change from baseline for the safety parameters was not performed for the LTE phase for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: UrateWeek 24-73.4 micromole per literStandard Deviation 104.11
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: UrateWeek 52-79.5 micromole per literStandard Deviation 79.38
GuselkumabChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: UrateWeek 248.4 micromole per literStandard Deviation 48.61
GuselkumabChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: UrateWeek 52-2.0 micromole per liter
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Urine Protein

Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: urine protein was reported.

Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Weeks 24 and 52

Population: SAS population.Here 'n' (number analyzed) signifies the number of participants evaluable at each specified timepoints. Here 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies the number of participants of both with available data for this outcome measure. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE phase than the planned enrollment count, the planned analysis of change from baseline for the safety parameters was not performed for the LTE phase for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Urine ProteinWeek 24-1322.1 milligram per literStandard Deviation 1865.82
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Urine ProteinWeek 52-1821.7 milligram per literStandard Deviation 2334.78
GuselkumabChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Urine ProteinWeek 24-310.3 milligram per literStandard Deviation 1494.58
GuselkumabChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Urine ProteinWeek 52-166.4 milligram per literStandard Deviation 1099.54
Secondary

Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)

Number of participants with AEs were reported. An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant administered a medicinal (investigational or non-investigational) product did not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. Therefore, it could be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not related to that medicinal product.

Time frame: DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)

Population: Safety analysis set (SAS) included all participants who received at least one dose of study intervention. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE phase than the planned enrollment count, no separate adverse events analysis was performed for the LTE phase participants and thus, data of both DB period and LTE phase were presented together for this outcome measure under the arms: placebo and guselkumab.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)12 Participants
GuselkumabNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)12 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With AEs Leading to Discontinuation of Study Intervention

Number of participants with AEs leading to discontinuation of study intervention were reported.

Time frame: DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)

Population: SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of study intervention. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE phase than the planned enrollment count, no separate adverse events analysis was performed for the LTE phase participants and thus, data of both DB period and LTE phase were presented together for this outcome measure under the arms: placebo and guselkumab.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With AEs Leading to Discontinuation of Study Intervention1 Participants
GuselkumabNumber of Participants With AEs Leading to Discontinuation of Study Intervention2 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With AEs Temporally Associated With an Infusion

Number of participants with AEs temporally (a reaction that occurred during or within 1 hour after infusion) associated with an infusion were reported. AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant administered a medicinal (investigational or non-investigational) product does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. Therefore, it can be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not related to that medicinal product.

Time frame: DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)

Population: SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of study intervention. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE phase than the planned enrollment count, no separate adverse events analysis was performed for the LTE phase participants and thus, data of both DB period and LTE phase were presented together for this outcome measure under the arms: placebo and guselkumab.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With AEs Temporally Associated With an Infusion1 Participants
GuselkumabNumber of Participants With AEs Temporally Associated With an Infusion0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With AEs With Injection-site Reactions

Number of participants with injection-site reactions as assessed by the investigator were reported. An injection-site reaction is any adverse reaction at a SC study intervention injection-site.

Time frame: DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)

Population: SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of study intervention. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE phase than the planned enrollment count, no separate adverse events analysis was performed for the LTE phase participants and thus, data of both DB period and LTE phase were presented together for this outcome measure under the arms: placebo and guselkumab.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With AEs With Injection-site Reactions1 Participants
GuselkumabNumber of Participants With AEs With Injection-site Reactions0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Infections

Number of participants with infections as assessed by the investigator were reported.

Time frame: DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)

Population: SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of study intervention. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE phase than the planned enrollment count, no separate adverse events analysis was performed for the LTE phase participants and thus, data of both DB period and LTE phase were presented together for this outcome measure under the arms: placebo and guselkumab.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Infections5 Participants
GuselkumabNumber of Participants With Infections6 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Infections Requiring Oral or Parenteral Antimicrobial Treatment

Number of participants with infections requiring oral or parenteral antimicrobial treatment planned to be were reported.

Time frame: DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)

Population: SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of study intervention. For this outcome measure, no data was collected and analyzed due to premature termination of the study.

Secondary

Number of Participants With Maximum US National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) Toxicity Grade (Grade 4) in Clinical Laboratory Parameters: Hematology and Chemistry

Number of participants with maximum US NCI-CTCAE toxicity grade (Grade 4) in clinical laboratory parameters: hematology and chemistry were reported. Toxicity were graded as Grade 1: Mild, Grade 2: Moderate; Grade 3: Severe. Grade 4: Life-threatening and Grade 5: Death.

Time frame: DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)

Population: SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of study intervention. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE phase than the planned enrollment count, no separate adverse events analysis was performed for the LTE phase participants and thus, data of both DB period and LTE phase were presented together for this outcome measure under the arms: placebo and guselkumab.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Maximum US National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) Toxicity Grade (Grade 4) in Clinical Laboratory Parameters: Hematology and ChemistryCreatinine Increase0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Maximum US National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) Toxicity Grade (Grade 4) in Clinical Laboratory Parameters: Hematology and ChemistryHypokalemia0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Maximum US National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) Toxicity Grade (Grade 4) in Clinical Laboratory Parameters: Hematology and ChemistryAlkaline Phosphatase Increased0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Maximum US National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) Toxicity Grade (Grade 4) in Clinical Laboratory Parameters: Hematology and ChemistryHypomagnesemia0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Maximum US National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) Toxicity Grade (Grade 4) in Clinical Laboratory Parameters: Hematology and ChemistryGGT Increased0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Maximum US National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) Toxicity Grade (Grade 4) in Clinical Laboratory Parameters: Hematology and ChemistryHyponatremia0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Maximum US National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) Toxicity Grade (Grade 4) in Clinical Laboratory Parameters: Hematology and ChemistryBlood Bilirubin Increased0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Maximum US National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) Toxicity Grade (Grade 4) in Clinical Laboratory Parameters: Hematology and ChemistryActivated Partial Thromboplastin Time Prolonged0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Maximum US National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) Toxicity Grade (Grade 4) in Clinical Laboratory Parameters: Hematology and ChemistryHypermagnesemia0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Maximum US National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) Toxicity Grade (Grade 4) in Clinical Laboratory Parameters: Hematology and ChemistryAnemia0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Maximum US National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) Toxicity Grade (Grade 4) in Clinical Laboratory Parameters: Hematology and ChemistryCPK Increased0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Maximum US National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) Toxicity Grade (Grade 4) in Clinical Laboratory Parameters: Hematology and ChemistryHemoglobin Increased0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Maximum US National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) Toxicity Grade (Grade 4) in Clinical Laboratory Parameters: Hematology and ChemistryHypernatremia0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Maximum US National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) Toxicity Grade (Grade 4) in Clinical Laboratory Parameters: Hematology and ChemistryLeukocytosis0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Maximum US National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) Toxicity Grade (Grade 4) in Clinical Laboratory Parameters: Hematology and ChemistryAlanine Aminotransferase Increased0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Maximum US National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) Toxicity Grade (Grade 4) in Clinical Laboratory Parameters: Hematology and ChemistryLymphocyte Count Decreased0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Maximum US National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) Toxicity Grade (Grade 4) in Clinical Laboratory Parameters: Hematology and ChemistryHypertriglyceridemia0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Maximum US National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) Toxicity Grade (Grade 4) in Clinical Laboratory Parameters: Hematology and ChemistryLymphocyte Count Increased0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Maximum US National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) Toxicity Grade (Grade 4) in Clinical Laboratory Parameters: Hematology and ChemistryCholesterol High0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Maximum US National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) Toxicity Grade (Grade 4) in Clinical Laboratory Parameters: Hematology and ChemistryNeutrophil Count Decreased0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Maximum US National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) Toxicity Grade (Grade 4) in Clinical Laboratory Parameters: Hematology and ChemistryHypoalbuminemia0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Maximum US National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) Toxicity Grade (Grade 4) in Clinical Laboratory Parameters: Hematology and ChemistryPlatelet Count Decreased0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Maximum US National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) Toxicity Grade (Grade 4) in Clinical Laboratory Parameters: Hematology and ChemistryAspartate Aminotransferase Increased0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Maximum US National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) Toxicity Grade (Grade 4) in Clinical Laboratory Parameters: Hematology and ChemistryWhite Blood Cell Decreased0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Maximum US National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) Toxicity Grade (Grade 4) in Clinical Laboratory Parameters: Hematology and ChemistryHypoglycemia0 Participants
GuselkumabNumber of Participants With Maximum US National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) Toxicity Grade (Grade 4) in Clinical Laboratory Parameters: Hematology and ChemistryWhite Blood Cell Decreased0 Participants
GuselkumabNumber of Participants With Maximum US National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) Toxicity Grade (Grade 4) in Clinical Laboratory Parameters: Hematology and ChemistryAlanine Aminotransferase Increased0 Participants
GuselkumabNumber of Participants With Maximum US National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) Toxicity Grade (Grade 4) in Clinical Laboratory Parameters: Hematology and ChemistryAlkaline Phosphatase Increased0 Participants
GuselkumabNumber of Participants With Maximum US National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) Toxicity Grade (Grade 4) in Clinical Laboratory Parameters: Hematology and ChemistryAspartate Aminotransferase Increased0 Participants
GuselkumabNumber of Participants With Maximum US National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) Toxicity Grade (Grade 4) in Clinical Laboratory Parameters: Hematology and ChemistryCPK Increased0 Participants
GuselkumabNumber of Participants With Maximum US National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) Toxicity Grade (Grade 4) in Clinical Laboratory Parameters: Hematology and ChemistryCholesterol High0 Participants
GuselkumabNumber of Participants With Maximum US National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) Toxicity Grade (Grade 4) in Clinical Laboratory Parameters: Hematology and ChemistryCreatinine Increase0 Participants
GuselkumabNumber of Participants With Maximum US National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) Toxicity Grade (Grade 4) in Clinical Laboratory Parameters: Hematology and ChemistryGGT Increased0 Participants
GuselkumabNumber of Participants With Maximum US National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) Toxicity Grade (Grade 4) in Clinical Laboratory Parameters: Hematology and ChemistryHypermagnesemia0 Participants
GuselkumabNumber of Participants With Maximum US National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) Toxicity Grade (Grade 4) in Clinical Laboratory Parameters: Hematology and ChemistryHypernatremia0 Participants
GuselkumabNumber of Participants With Maximum US National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) Toxicity Grade (Grade 4) in Clinical Laboratory Parameters: Hematology and ChemistryHypertriglyceridemia0 Participants
GuselkumabNumber of Participants With Maximum US National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) Toxicity Grade (Grade 4) in Clinical Laboratory Parameters: Hematology and ChemistryHypoalbuminemia0 Participants
GuselkumabNumber of Participants With Maximum US National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) Toxicity Grade (Grade 4) in Clinical Laboratory Parameters: Hematology and ChemistryHypoglycemia0 Participants
GuselkumabNumber of Participants With Maximum US National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) Toxicity Grade (Grade 4) in Clinical Laboratory Parameters: Hematology and ChemistryHypokalemia0 Participants
GuselkumabNumber of Participants With Maximum US National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) Toxicity Grade (Grade 4) in Clinical Laboratory Parameters: Hematology and ChemistryHypomagnesemia0 Participants
GuselkumabNumber of Participants With Maximum US National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) Toxicity Grade (Grade 4) in Clinical Laboratory Parameters: Hematology and ChemistryHyponatremia0 Participants
GuselkumabNumber of Participants With Maximum US National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) Toxicity Grade (Grade 4) in Clinical Laboratory Parameters: Hematology and ChemistryActivated Partial Thromboplastin Time Prolonged0 Participants
GuselkumabNumber of Participants With Maximum US National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) Toxicity Grade (Grade 4) in Clinical Laboratory Parameters: Hematology and ChemistryAnemia0 Participants
GuselkumabNumber of Participants With Maximum US National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) Toxicity Grade (Grade 4) in Clinical Laboratory Parameters: Hematology and ChemistryHemoglobin Increased0 Participants
GuselkumabNumber of Participants With Maximum US National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) Toxicity Grade (Grade 4) in Clinical Laboratory Parameters: Hematology and ChemistryLeukocytosis0 Participants
GuselkumabNumber of Participants With Maximum US National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) Toxicity Grade (Grade 4) in Clinical Laboratory Parameters: Hematology and ChemistryLymphocyte Count Decreased0 Participants
GuselkumabNumber of Participants With Maximum US National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) Toxicity Grade (Grade 4) in Clinical Laboratory Parameters: Hematology and ChemistryLymphocyte Count Increased0 Participants
GuselkumabNumber of Participants With Maximum US National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) Toxicity Grade (Grade 4) in Clinical Laboratory Parameters: Hematology and ChemistryNeutrophil Count Decreased0 Participants
GuselkumabNumber of Participants With Maximum US National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) Toxicity Grade (Grade 4) in Clinical Laboratory Parameters: Hematology and ChemistryPlatelet Count Decreased0 Participants
GuselkumabNumber of Participants With Maximum US National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) Toxicity Grade (Grade 4) in Clinical Laboratory Parameters: Hematology and ChemistryBlood Bilirubin Increased0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Related AEs

Number of participants with related AEs were reported. An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant administered a medicinal (investigational or non-investigational) product did not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. Therefore, it could be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not related to that medicinal product. Related AE was defined as the AE assessed by the investigator related to study agent.

Time frame: DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)

Population: SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of study intervention. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE phase than the planned enrollment count, no separate adverse events analysis was performed for the LTE phase participants and thus, data of both DB period and LTE phase were presented together for this outcome measure under the arms: placebo and guselkumab.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Related AEs2 Participants
GuselkumabNumber of Participants With Related AEs2 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

Number of Participants with SAEs were reported. An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant administered a medicinal (investigational or non-investigational) product did not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. Therefore, it could be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not related to that medicinal product. A SAE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose resulted in death, was life-threatening, required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, was a congenital anomaly/birth defect, was a suspected transmission of any infectious agent via a medicinal product, or was medically important.

Time frame: DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)

Population: SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of study intervention. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE phase than the planned enrollment count, no separate adverse events analysis was performed for the LTE phase participants and thus, data of both DB period and LTE phase were presented together for this outcome measure under the arms: placebo and guselkumab.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)1 Participants
GuselkumabNumber of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)1 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Serious Infections

Number of participants with serious infections as assessed by the investigator were reported.

Time frame: DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)

Population: SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of study intervention. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE phase than the planned enrollment count, no separate adverse events analysis was performed for the LTE phase participants and thus, data of both DB period and LTE phase were presented together for this outcome measure under the arms: placebo and guselkumab.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Serious Infections0 Participants
GuselkumabNumber of Participants With Serious Infections0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Treatment-boosted Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) Response

Treatment-boosted ADA positive participants: participants who were positive at baseline and whose titers increased 2-fold at any time after treatment. Titer values were categorized as\<=1:10, 10 to 100, 100 to 1000, \>1000.

Time frame: From Baseline (Week 0) through Week 24 and Week 60

Population: Immunogenecity analysis set inlcuded all participants who received at least 1 administration of guselkumab and had at least one post-dose sample collection. Here 'n' (number analyzed) signifies the number of participants evaluable at specified timepoints. Data for this outcome measure was not planned to be collected and analyzed for the placebo arm.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Treatment-boosted Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) ResponseWeek 241 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Treatment-boosted Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) ResponseWeek 601 Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Achieving a Sustained Reduction in Steroid Dose <=10 mg/d of Prednisone or Equivalent From Week 16 Through Week 24

Percentage of participants achieving a sustained reduction in steroid dose less than or equal to (\<=) 10 mg/day of prednisone or equivalent from week 16 through Week 24were reported.

Time frame: From Week 16 through Week 24

Population: FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study intervention.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving a Sustained Reduction in Steroid Dose <=10 mg/d of Prednisone or Equivalent From Week 16 Through Week 2487.5 percentage of participants
GuselkumabPercentage of Participants Achieving a Sustained Reduction in Steroid Dose <=10 mg/d of Prednisone or Equivalent From Week 16 Through Week 2494.1 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Achieving at Least 50% Decrease in Proteinuria From Baseline at Week 52

Percentage of participants achieving at least 50% decrease in proteinuria from baseline at Week 52 were reported. Proteinuria analysis was based on urine protein creatinine ratio (UPCR) and was defined as the presence of an excess of serum proteins in the urine, which may be an early sign of kidney disease.

Time frame: Week 52

Population: FASC52 included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of any study intervention and had the opportunity to complete the Week 52 visit prior to study termination. Here 'N' (number of participants analysed) signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving at Least 50% Decrease in Proteinuria From Baseline at Week 5225.0 percentage of participants
GuselkumabPercentage of Participants Achieving at Least 50% Decrease in Proteinuria From Baseline at Week 5227.3 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Complete Renal Response (CRR) at Week 24

Percentage of participants who achieved CRR at Week 24 were reported. CRR was defined as UPCR less than (\<) 0.5 milligrams per milligrams (mg/mg), estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) greater than or equal to (\>=) 60 milliliter per minute per 1.73 meter square (mL/min/1.73m\^2) or no confirmed decrease \>=20% from baseline and prednisone dose less than or equal to (\<=) 10 milligrams per day (mg/d). Participant was considered as achieved CRR who did not discontinue study intervention for any reason excluding COVID-19 related discontinuations or met the medication intercurrent event (exceeded baseline glucocorticoid dose, increase above 10 mg/d prednisone equivalent after Week 12, use of new or increased dose of concomitant medication related to LN or other immunosuppressive agents, within 8 weeks prior to the outcome measure (OM) time point (Week 24) or initiation of prohibited medications at any time prior to the endpoint time point (Week 24).

Time frame: Week 24

Population: FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study intervention.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who Achieved Complete Renal Response (CRR) at Week 2418.8 percentage of participants
GuselkumabPercentage of Participants Who Achieved Complete Renal Response (CRR) at Week 2417.6 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved CRR at Week 52

Percentage of participants who achieved CRR at Week 52 were reported. CRR was defined as UPCR less than (\<) 0.5 mg/mg, eGFR \>= 60 mL/min/1.73m\^2 or no confirmed decrease \>=20% from baseline and prednisone dose \<= 10 mg/d. Participant was considered as achieved CRR who did not discontinue study intervention for any reason excluding COVID-19 related discontinuations or met the medication intercurrent event (exceeded baseline glucocorticoid dose, increase above 10 mg/d prednisone equivalent after Week 12, use of new or increased dose of concomitant medication related to LN or other immunosuppressive agents, within 8 weeks prior to the outcome measure time point (Week 52) or initiation of prohibited medications at any time prior to the outcome measure time point (Week 52).

Time frame: Week 52

Population: The Full Analyses Set for Week 52 (FASC52) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of any study intervention and had the opportunity to complete the Week 52 visit prior to study termination. Here 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who Achieved CRR at Week 5225.0 percentage of participants
GuselkumabPercentage of Participants Who Achieved CRR at Week 529.1 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved CRR Through Week 24

Percentage of participants who achieved CRR through Week 24 was reported. CRR was defined as UPCR\<0.5 mg/mg, eGFR \>= 60 mL/min/1.73m\^2 or no confirmed decrease\>=20% from baseline and prednisone dose \<= 10 mg/d. Participant was considered as achieved CRR who did not discontinue study intervention for any reason excluding COVID-19 related discontinuations or met the medication intercurrent event (exceeded baseline glucocorticoid dose, increase above 10 mg/d prednisone equivalent after Week 12, use of new or increased dose of concomitant medication related to lupus nephritis (LN) or other immunosuppressive agents, within 8 weeks prior to the outcome measure time point (Week 24) or initiation of prohibited medications at any time prior to the outcome measure time point (Week 24).

Time frame: Up to Week 24

Population: FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of any study intervention.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who Achieved CRR Through Week 2437.5 Percentage of participants
GuselkumabPercentage of Participants Who Achieved CRR Through Week 2423.5 Percentage of participants
p-value: 0.780780% CI: [0.27, 1.41]log-rank test
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs: Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure

Percentage of participants with abnormal vital signs: Systolic and Diastolic blood pressure were reported.

Time frame: Up to Week 60

Population: SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of study intervention.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs: Systolic and Diastolic Blood PressureSystolic Blood Pressure: <85 mmHg0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs: Systolic and Diastolic Blood PressureSystolic Blood Pressure::>180 mmHg6.3 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs: Systolic and Diastolic Blood PressureDiastolic Blood Pressure: <55 mmHg6.3 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs: Systolic and Diastolic Blood PressureDiastolic Blood Pressure: >115 mmHg6.3 percentage of participants
GuselkumabPercentage of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs: Systolic and Diastolic Blood PressureDiastolic Blood Pressure: >115 mmHg0 percentage of participants
GuselkumabPercentage of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs: Systolic and Diastolic Blood PressureSystolic Blood Pressure: <85 mmHg0 percentage of participants
GuselkumabPercentage of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs: Systolic and Diastolic Blood PressureDiastolic Blood Pressure: <55 mmHg0 percentage of participants
GuselkumabPercentage of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs: Systolic and Diastolic Blood PressureSystolic Blood Pressure::>180 mmHg5.9 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Treatment Failure (TF) Through Week 52

Percentage of participants with TF through Week 52 was reported. TF was defined as time to the first occurrence of TF from baseline. Participant was considered to have treatment failure, who did not continue study intervention for any reason excluding COVID-19 related discontinuations or met the medication intercurrent event (exceeded baseline glucocorticoid dose, increase above 10 mg/d prednisone equivalent after Week 12, use of new or increased dose of concomitant medication related to LN or other immunosuppressive agents, within 8 weeks prior to the outcome measure time point (Week 52) or initiation of prohibited medications at any time prior to the outcome measure time point (Week 52).

Time frame: Up to Week 52

Population: FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of any study intervention.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Treatment Failure (TF) Through Week 5218.8 Percentage of participants
GuselkumabPercentage of Participants With Treatment Failure (TF) Through Week 5235.3 Percentage of participants
p-value: 0.465480% CI: [0.62, 3.85]long-rank test
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With UPCR < 0.75 mg/mg at Week 24

Percentage of participants with UPCR less than 0.75 mg/mg at Week 24 were reported.

Time frame: Week 24

Population: FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study intervention.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With UPCR < 0.75 mg/mg at Week 2437.5 percentage of participants
GuselkumabPercentage of Participants With UPCR < 0.75 mg/mg at Week 2435.3 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Urine Protein to Creatinine Ratio (UPCR) < 0.5 mg/mg at Week 24

Percentage of participants with UPCR \<0.5 mg/mg at Week 24 were reported.

Time frame: Week 24

Population: FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study intervention.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Urine Protein to Creatinine Ratio (UPCR) < 0.5 mg/mg at Week 2425.0 percentage of participants
GuselkumabPercentage of Participants With Urine Protein to Creatinine Ratio (UPCR) < 0.5 mg/mg at Week 2429.4 percentage of participants
Secondary

Serum Concentration of Guselkumab

Serum Concentration of guselkumab were reported.

Time frame: Predose: Weeks 0,4,8,12,16,20,24, 36; Post-dose: Week 0 (1 hour after intravenous administration), Day 2, Week 52 and 60

Population: Pharmacokinetic analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 administration of guselkumab and had at least one post-dose sample collection. Here 'n' (number analyzed) signifies number of participants evaluable at specified timepoints. Data for this OM was not planned to be collected and analyzed for placebo arm. Since small number of participants only entered LTE phase than the planned enrollment, planned serum concentration analysis was not performed for LTE phase for this OM.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboSerum Concentration of GuselkumabWeek 12, predose18.17 microgram/milliliterStandard Deviation 11.784
PlaceboSerum Concentration of GuselkumabWeek 16, pre-dose9.89 microgram/milliliterStandard Deviation 5.016
PlaceboSerum Concentration of GuselkumabWeek 20, predose7.63 microgram/milliliterStandard Deviation 4.689
PlaceboSerum Concentration of GuselkumabWeek 24, predose6.42 microgram/milliliterStandard Deviation 3.447
PlaceboSerum Concentration of GuselkumabWeek 36, predose6.57 microgram/milliliterStandard Deviation 1.827
PlaceboSerum Concentration of GuselkumabWeek 0, predose0.00 microgram/milliliterStandard Deviation 0
PlaceboSerum Concentration of GuselkumabWeek 0, 1h after IV administration146.20 microgram/milliliterStandard Deviation 41.273
PlaceboSerum Concentration of GuselkumabDay 2, post-dose96.55 microgram/milliliterStandard Deviation 33.805
PlaceboSerum Concentration of GuselkumabWeek 4, predose11.20 microgram/milliliterStandard Deviation 7.175
PlaceboSerum Concentration of GuselkumabWeek 8, predose12.85 microgram/milliliterStandard Deviation 9.549
PlaceboSerum Concentration of GuselkumabWeek 52, post-dose6.13 microgram/milliliterStandard Deviation 3.262
PlaceboSerum Concentration of GuselkumabWeek 60, post-dose0.39 microgram/milliliterStandard Deviation 0.641

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 5, 2026