Skip to content

A Retrospective Study on the Outcome of Different Fixation Methods After Olecranon Osteotomy

A Retrospective Study on the Outcome of Different Fixation Methods After Olecranon Osteotomy

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04376801
Enrollment
100
Registered
2020-05-06
Start date
2012-12-01
Completion date
2021-03-31
Last updated
2020-05-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Distal Humerus Fractures, Fixation Device; Complications, Osteotomy

Keywords

Distal Humerus Fractures, Olecranon Osteotomy, Plate Fixation, Tension-band Fixation

Brief summary

Humeral intercondylar fractures are very challenging in clinical treatment. There are many problems not clear. One of the important problems remained to be solved is which fixation method can achieve the best effects after olecranon osteotomy. Therefore, the investigators are going to perform a retrospective analysis of patients with distal humerus fractures admitted to their hospital in 2012-2017 to compare the functional outcomes of elbow joints with tension-band fixation and plate fixation after olecranon osteotomy.

Detailed description

Humeral intercondylar fractures are very challenging in clinical treatment. Because the humeral intercondylar fracture is comminuted and often occurs in elderly patients with osteoporosis, it is difficult to achieve rigid fixation during the operation and failure of fixation occurs from time to time after the operation. Nonunion and reoperation have brought great sufferings to the patients.In recent years, both surgical methods and technique of internal fixation have been greatly improved, but there are still many problems not clear. Olecranon osteotomy has been proven to be an effective approach for comminuted intercondylar fractures and there are different fixation methods to fix the proximal ulna after intercondylar fixation. However, it is not clear which method can achieve the best effects. Therefore, the investigators are going to perform a retrospective analysis of patients with distal humerus fractures admitted to their hospital in 2012-2017 to compare the functional outcomes of elbow joints with tension-band fixation and plate fixation after olecranon osteotomy.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Beijing Jishuitan Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Patients over 18 years old; 2. Distal humerus fractures.

Exclusion criteria

1. Pathological fractures; 2. Combined with fractures of ipsilateral upper limb; 3. Fracture over 2 weeks; 4. Patients who refused surgical treatment; 5. Patients who were unable to obtain the 1 year follow-up data after the operation.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Functional result of elbow (objective)1 year post-opAssess function of patients' affected elbow by MEPS (Mayo elbow performance score)
Functional result of elbow (subjective)1 year post-opAssess function of patients' affected elbow by and DASH (Disabilities of arm, shoulder and hand)
Range of motion of elbow1 year post-opMeasure and record the ROM of the affected elbow,including flexion, extension, pronation and supination degree.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Complication: failure of internal fixation1 year post-opRecord whether the patients have gone through internal fixation failure
Complication: post-traumatic arthritis1 year post-opRecord if the patients have developed into post-traumatic arthritis, if any, record the degree.
Complication: infection1 year post-opRecord patients' information about infection if any, including superficial and deep infection.
severity of pain1 year post-opAssess severity of pain by VAS (Visual analogue scale)
nounion1 year post-opRecord if there is nonunion of the olecranon (evaluated by X-ray or CT scan)
severity of ulnar nerve injury1 year post-opAssess and record severity of ulnar nerve injury (paralysis or weakness of intrinsic muscle of hand or parathesia of ring and little finger)
Complication:stiffness1 year post-opRecord whether the patients had elbow stiffness (ROM\<100° or arthrolysis having been performed)
Complication: internal fixation irritation1 year post-opRecord whether there were internal fixation irritations

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026