Skip to content

Augmented Reality Medical Simulation

Augmented Reality Medical Simulation: A Multi-Collaborative Study of Acceptance and Usability

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04376255
Enrollment
101
Registered
2020-05-06
Start date
2020-08-18
Completion date
2024-08-16
Last updated
2024-09-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Educational Problems

Keywords

Augmented Reality, Simulation, Education

Brief summary

In order to improve the quality of care we provide to patients, medical trainees need to experience low incident, high mortality events in a safe learning environment. There is a selection bias for predisposing characteristics of health care providers, as most people who have pursued a career in medicine are motivated to learn how to manage medical emergencies. Resources have been traditionally enabled with conventional simulation centers or mobile simulation units. However, these are costly and difficult to access. The purpose of this study is to evaluate a mixed reality alternative to conventional simulation. The need for this is inherent in becoming a medical provider and use of these resources will improve health practices and health services.

Interventions

AR headset - a device that the participants will wear over their head and eyes and will add holographic elements to a live view of workplace training scenario

Sponsors

Stanford University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Trainees or personnel working and/or volunteering at Lucile Packard Children's Hospital Stanford / Stanford Health Care facilities * 18 years and older

Exclusion criteria

* Have a history of severe motion sickness * Currently have nausea * History of seizures * Are clinically unstable * Currently using corrective glasses (not compatible with AR headset)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Qualitative Interview Assessment of Remote SimulationsPost-Simulation, Approximate time duration (3-5 minutes)Primary Aim: The primary aim is to study the acceptance of AR simulation among anesthesia residents using the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
System Usability Scale (SUS) QuestionnairePost-Simulation, Approximate time duration (3-5 minutes)The first secondary aim is to evaluate AR simulation usability via the System Usability Scale (SUS) and ISO 9241-400 Assessment of human-ergonomic factors.
Ergonomic SurveyPost-Simulation, Approximate time duration (3-5 minutes): The final secondary aim will evaluate the ergonomics of the headset via the ISO 9241-400 Assessment of human-ergonomic factors.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026