Skip to content

Zirconia Vs Titanium Implants in Deficient Ridges

Zirconia Vs Titanium Implants in Horizontally Deficient Ridges - A Clinical and Radiographic Outcome-Based Study

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04375839
Enrollment
24
Registered
2020-05-05
Start date
2020-03-06
Completion date
2021-11-30
Last updated
2020-05-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Alveolar Bone Loss, Periodontitis

Brief summary

The aim of this study is to evaluate clinically and radiographically soft tissue around single-implant crowns and peri-implant bone resorption respectively by using zirconia implants or titanium implants in horizontally deficient partially edentulous ridges.

Detailed description

Experimental: Main treatment group Zirconia implants will be placed in a prosthetically guided position in horizontally deficient ridges in main treatment group. Active Comparator: Control group Titanium implants will be placed in a prosthetically guided position in horizontally deficient ridges in control group.

Interventions

Following standard surgical protocol, Zirconia implant will be placed in horizontally deficient ridge.

Following standard surgical protocol, Titanium implant will be placed in horizontally deficient ridge.

Sponsors

SVS Institute of Dental Sciences
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
25 Years to 44 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

Based on the classification of alveolar ridge width given by Tolstunov, subjects with * partially edentulous (2/3 teeth missing) * systemically healthy subjects within the age group of 25-44 years * Class III ridges characterized by moderate i.e., 4-6mm of alveolar ridge width will be included.

Exclusion criteria

* Medically compromised patients -. Subjects who underwent radiotherapy or chemotherapy and with * Habit of smoking, tobacco and alcohol abuse * Subjects with active periodontal disease to residual dentition and lack of oral hygiene will be excluded from this study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Evaluation of the soft tissue around single implant crownsBaseline to 6 monthsPink Esthetic Score (0-2; increasing scores means improvement in clinical outcomes) is used to evaluate the soft tissue around single implant crowns that might change over time at 3 months and 6 months.
Peri-implant bone resorptionBaseline to 6 monthsmeasured in terms of vertical bone levels present mesial and distal to implant which will be measured by comparing CBCT

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Implant survival rateBaseline to 6 monthsImplant survival rate before and after prosthetic loading based on Criteria: A) Persistent pain or dysesthesia B) Peri-implant infection with suppuration C) Absence of mobility D) Absence of continuous peri-implant radiolucency, but with peri-implant bone resorption assessed using dichotomous scale.

Countries

India

Contacts

Primary ContactR V Chandra, MDS;DNB;PhD
viswachandra@hotmail.com9908183071

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026