Skip to content

A Comparative Clinical Investigation of Two Hearing Instrument Digital Signal Processing

A Comparative Clinical Investigation of Two Hearing Instrument Digital Signal Processing Strategies and Their Effect on Speech Understanding

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04374851
Enrollment
19
Registered
2020-05-05
Start date
2020-08-03
Completion date
2020-11-30
Last updated
2021-01-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hearing Loss

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to show that the performance of the new digital signal processing system is better than the system used in the currently CE marked devices. Speech in narrowband noise and acceptable levels of noise should be improved with the new system, and speech understanding overall should not be negatively affected. There should be no artefacts or unwanted noises caused by the new system.

Detailed description

This is a controlled, double-blinded, comparative clinical evaluation conducted monocentric at the premised of Bernafon AG in Bern, Switzerland. For this study, Bernafon AG will carry out testing with participants with hearing loss to validate the performance of a new digital signal processing (DSP). System testing of the DSP shows an improved signal, yet it must be tested with humans to be sure of an improvement in real-life situations. The current study will compare the new DSP to the one that is used in the Bernafon hearing aids that are CE- marked and currently available on the market. The goal is to determine whether the new DSP is better in real-life situations than the current system. Primary Endpoint: The primary objective is to assess the new DSP system with various hearing losses and levels of amplification. Speech testing will be used to analyse the speech perception of participants. Secondary Endpoint: The secondary objective is to verify the overall performance of the new device. Acceptable noise levels will be measured as well as further speech testing. Questionnaires will be used to measure subjective responses to the performance. Other Endpoints: The subjective performance of an optimized fitting versus a standard fitting and the acceptance of new domes will be measured with questionnaires. Safety Endpoint: The study aims to identify any new risk factors and to ensure the safety of the device with the newly implemented DSP system before releasing it to the market.

Interventions

DEVICEPolaris miniRITE BTE

The Polaris device is programmed with computer software to match the Hearing loss of the participant.

DEVICEViron miniRiTE BTE

The Viron Hearing device is programmed with computer software to match the Hearing loss of the participant.

Sponsors

Bernafon AG
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Masking description

The subjects will not know which device they are using in each period (new or current) because they look exactly the same. The PI will also not know which device is used as they will be prepared for the PI before the Appointments.

Intervention model description

Subjects will randomly wear the new device or the current device for the first period and then switch to the other device for the second period.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Hearing loss (sensorineural, conductive, mixed-must have doctor approval for mixed and conductive Hearing loss) * Severity of Hearing loss ranging from mild to profound * German speaking * Current Hearing aid users * Ability and willingness to sign the consent form

Exclusion criteria

* Contraindications for amplification * New Hearing aid users * Inability to follow the procedures * Inability to attend Weekly study Appointments * Strongly reduced dexterity * Central Hearing disorders * Bernafon employees * Family members of Bernafon employees

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Speech perception with narrowband noiseWeek 1Speech perception is tested using a standardized speech test that requires subjects to repeat sentences presented among narrowband background noise. The test is adaptive with the background noise getting louder or softer so that the subject answers 50% correct. The scores are measured in dB SNR (signal-to-noise ratio) and a lower score is better. The lowest possible score is -15 dB SNR and the highest is +20 dB SNR. It is measured in the unaided condition.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Speech perception with broadband noiseWeek 1Speech perception is tested using a standardized speech test that requires subjects to repeat sentences presented among broadband background noise. The test is adaptive with the background noise getting louder or softer so that the subject answers 50% correct. The scores are measured in dB SNR (signal-to-noise ratio) and a lower score is better. The lowest possible score is -15 dB SNR and the highest is +20 dB SNR. It is measured in the unaided condition.
Acceptance of noiseWeek 1Acceptance of noise is tested using a standardized noise test that requires the subjects to adjust the background noise to the maximum Levels that they can tolerate it and to the Levels at which they can understand speech. It is measured in dB SNR (signal-to-noise ratio) and a lower score is better. The lowest score possible is -25 dB SNR and the highest is +20 dB SNR. It is measured in the unaided condition.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Preference for Standard or Optimized FittingWeek 5The Hearing aids will be programmed with a standard or default Fitting from the software and with an optimized Fitting based on questions answered by the subjects. At the end of a field test using both Fittings they will answer a questionnaire asking them to choose a preferred Fitting. They will have a scale from 1 to 10 to say how sure they are about their choice (1 being unsure and 10 being completely sure). They will also choose from a list of options reasons for giving their choice (i.e., speech intelligibility, Sound Quality, feedback).

Countries

Switzerland

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026