Skip to content

Qualitative Analysis of Photoplethysmography Waveforms for the Detection of Cardiac Arrhythmias

Qualitative Analysis of Photoplethysmography Waveforms for the Detection of Cardiac Arrhythmias Using a Pulse-deriving Smartphone Application

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04374344
Acronym
INTERPRET-AF I
Enrollment
76
Registered
2020-05-05
Start date
2020-03-10
Completion date
2020-11-24
Last updated
2020-12-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cardiac Arrhythmia

Keywords

Qualitative analysis, Photoplethysmography, Single-lead electrocardiography

Brief summary

Single-lead electrocardiography (ECG) technologies and photoplethysmography (PPG) deriving smartphone apps are gaining interest in the heart rhythm detection space since these apps have the potential to capture and assess heart rhythms. Proprietary arrhythmia detection algorithms are proven to be reliable and accurate. However, insights into the readability of PPG waveforms by human reviewers remain limited. To the investigators' knowledge, there are no publications available regarding the readability of PPG waveforms by human reviewers. The objective of the study was to assess the readability of PPG and single-lead ECG analysis by medical professionals, with respect to the gold-standard 12-lead ECG diagnosis, and investigate whether additional information positively impacts PPG analysis.

Detailed description

During the study, the readability of PPG and single-lead ECG waveform analysis will be investigated. The objective of the study is to determine the readability of PPG and single-lead ECG measurements, with respect to the gold-standard 12-lead ECG, and investigate whether additional information positively impacts the readability of PPG. Medical professionals (cardiologists and cardiology residents), blinded for the patients' characteristics and history, are instructed to separately analyse the following signals, obtained from 30 patients. * 30 outputs with PPG waveforms * 30 outputs with PPG waveforms with tachogram and Poincaré * 30 outputs with PPG waveforms with tachogram, Poincaré, and algorithm interpretation * 30 outputs with single-lead ECG waveforms * 30 outputs with 12-lead ECG waveforms Participants report the results of the qualitative analysis via a digital questionnaire with multiple-choice questions. Medical professionals classify each rhythm trace as regular rhythm, one or more ectopic/missed heartbeats, atrial flutter, atrial fibrillation, unreadable, or other. The tachogram, Poincaré, and the algorithm interpretation are subsequently added to investigate whether the additional information improves the readability of PPG. Based on the provided answers, the study team will determine the readability of PPG and single-lead ECG analysis interpretation, with respect to the gold-standard 12-lead ECG diagnosis.

Interventions

OTHERQualitative analysis of PPG, single-lead ECG, and 12-lead ECG measurements

Participants are instructed to qualitatively analyse PPG, single-lead ECG, and 12-lead ECG heart rhythm traces.

Sponsors

Qompium NV
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL

Inclusion criteria

* Cardiologist or cardiology resident * Able to understand Dutch or English

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Diagnostic accuracy to discriminate between atrial fibrillation and non-atrial fibrillation rhythmsThrough study completion, an average of 3 monthsReadability assessment (sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy) of PPG and single-lead ECG signals to detect atrial fibrillation. The readability will be determined and compared with the gold-standard 12-lead ECG diagnosis.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Required elements to increase the readability of PPG measurementsThrough study completion, an average of 3 monthsReadability assessment (sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy) of PPG waveforms, PPG waveforms with tachogram and Poincaré, and PPG waveforms with tachogram, Poincaré and algorithm interpretation. The readability will be determined and compared with the gold-standard 12-lead ECG diagnosis.
Diagnostic accuracy of PPG analysis: experienced in PPG analysis vs inexperienced in PPG analysisThrough study completion, an average of 3 monthsReadability assessment (sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy) of PPG waveforms, PPG waveforms with tachogram and Poincaré, and PPG waveforms with tachogram, Poincaré and algorithm interpretation. The readability will be determined and compared with the gold-standard 12-lead ECG diagnosis.

Countries

Belgium

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026