Skip to content

Moxibustion Plus Cupping in Convalescent Patients With COVID-19

Moxibustion Plus Cupping in Convalescent Patients With COVID-19: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04374084
Enrollment
60
Registered
2020-05-05
Start date
2020-05-10
Completion date
2021-12-31
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Convalescence, COVID-19

Keywords

Moxibustion, COVID-19, Randomized Clinical Trial

Brief summary

This trial is designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of moxibustion plus cupping in the convalescence of COVID-19.

Detailed description

Moxibustion plus cupping may be effective and safe for convalescent patients with COVID-19, but evidence is limited. The randomized clinical trial may help to provide evidence-based factors for improving the patients' symptoms in the convalescence of COVID-19.

Interventions

OTHERMoxibustion plus Cupping

Moxibustion: The burning of a small, thimble sized, smoldering plug of dried leaves on the skin at an acupuncture point. Usually the plugs contain leaves of mugwort or moxa. Cupping takes the pot as a tool, uses the combustion to remove the air in the pot, causes a negative pressure, and makes it adsorb on the skin of the acupoints. UseBaixiaojiumoxibustion on each acupoint for 10-15 minutes, the temperature of moxibustion should be adjusted within patient's tolerance level. Use diameter of 5-6 cm acuum cupper to cupping on each acupoint for 5-8 minutes.

Sponsors

Hubei Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine
CollaboratorOTHER
Hubei Provincial Hospital of Integrated Chinese & Western Medicine
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Wuhan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine
CollaboratorOTHER
Wuhan Third Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Huangshi Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Yichang Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine
CollaboratorOTHER
Ezhou Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Hunan University of Traditional Chinese Medicine
CollaboratorOTHER
The Hospital of Jiangxi University of Chinese Medicine
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Guang'anmen Hospital of China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Clinical diagnosis of the convalescence of COVID-19 (defined by the Chinese Guideline for COVID-19 in 2020 Trial Version 7). 2. 18-70 years old; 3. chest tightness/fatigue/shortness of breath/cough, with at least 2 of the above symptoms and the average VAS score (last 48 hours) ≥ 40 points; 4. Volunteers with informed consent;

Exclusion criteria

1. Surgery in the lung that affects lung function; 2. Rely on mechanical ventilation to maintain lung function; 3. Chronic lung diseases affecting lung function; 4. Diseases affecting heart function; 5. Severe basic diseases; 6. Resting heart rate \> 120/min, systolic blood pressure \> 180mmHg, diastolic blood pressure \> 100mmHg; 7. Unstable angina or myocardial infarction in the past 1 month; 8. Severe obesity (BMI\>30kg/m2); 9. Allergic constitution; 10. Pregnant or lactating women; 11. Disabled patients; 12. Mentally ill Patients; 13. Participating in other clinical trials; 14. Poor compliance or other complicate conditions according to the researchers.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The proportion of responder at week 4baseline, week 4The responder is defined as the participants with ≥ 50% average VAS decrease of chest tightness and fatigue compared with baseline. The VAS ranges from 0 to 100.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The change in the average VAS score of main symptoms from baselinebaseline, week 4, week 8At the end of week 4 and week 8, the change in the average VAS score of main clinical symptoms (chest tightness, fatigue, short of breath and cough) will be assessed from baseline. VAS ranges from 0-100.
The change in the severity VAS score of main symptoms from baselinebaseline, week 4, week 8At the end of week 4 and week 8, the change in the severity VAS score of main clinical symptoms (chest tightness, fatigue, short of breath and cough) will be assessed from baseline. VAS score ranges from 0-100.
The change in the average VAS score of other symptoms from baselinebaseline, week 4, week 8At the end of week 4 and week 8, the change in the average VAS score of other symptoms (insomnia, sweating, mental fatigue, inappetence, mental stress) will be assessed from baseline. VAS score ranges from 0-100.
The change in mean frequency of diarrhea and spontaneous bowel movements from baselinebaseline, week 4, week 8At the end of week 4 and week 8, the change in mean frequency of diarrhea and spontaneous bowel movements in the past 1 week will be assessed from baseline.
The proportion of participants with ≥50%/75% improvement of VAS from baselinebaseline, week 4, week 8At the end of week 4 and week 8, the proportion of participants with ≥50%/75% VAS change of clinical symptoms (chest tightness, fatigue, short of breath, cough, insomnia, sweating, mental fatigue, inappetence, mental stress) will be assessed. VAS score ranges from 0-100.
The change of the walking distance of six-minute-walking test from baselinebaseline, week 4, week 8At the end of week 4 and week 8, the walking distance of six-minute-walking test changed from baseline.
The change of the lowest oxygen saturation of six-minute-walking test from baselinebaseline, week 4, week 8At the end of week 4 and week 8, the lowest oxygen saturation of six-minute-walking test changed from baseline.
The proportion of responder at week 8baseline, week 8The responder is defined as the participants with ≥ 50% average VAS decrease of chest tightness and fatigue compared with baseline. The VAS ranges from 0 to 100.
The proportion of patients whose lung CT return to normal at week 4baseline, week 4Lung CT shows complete absorption of inflammation.
The change of the WHO QOL-BREF score from baselinebaseline, week 4, week 8At the end of week 4 and week 8, the WHO Quality of Life-BREF (WHO QOL-BREF) score changed from baseline. WHO QOL-BREF ranged from 4 to 20 with higher scores as the better quality of life.
The change of the SAS score from baselinebaseline, week 4, week 8At the end of week 4 and week 8, the Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) score changed from baseline. The standard SAS ranged from 25 to 100 with higher score as the worse anxiety.
The change of the SDS score from baselinebaseline, week 4, week 8At the end of week 4 and week 8, the Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS) score changed from baseline.The standard SAS ranged from 25 to 100 with higher score as the worse depression.
The change of the blood CRP/LYMPH#/NEUT% value from baselinebaseline, week 4At the end of week 4, the blood C-reactive protein (CRP) value, blood lymphocyte count (LYMPH#) and the percentage of blood neutrophils (NEUT%) value will be assessed compared with baseline.
subtype analysisbaseline, week 4Subtype analysis of age (≤40 years old, \>40 years old), gender (male, female), and severity of the disease (mild, moderate, heavy, critical) will be performed in the primary outcome.
The proportion of patients in recovery of pulmonary function at week 4baseline, week 4At the end of week 4, the proportion of patients in recovery of pulmonary function in all participants.

Countries

China

Contacts

Primary ContactJiani Wu
handsom_mars@126.com+86 13426116653

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026