Skip to content

Perceptual Abnormalities and Their Malleability in BDD

Neural Mechanisms of Perceptual Abnormalities and Their Malleability in Body Dysmorphic Disorder

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04373629
Enrollment
146
Registered
2020-05-04
Start date
2020-12-01
Completion date
2026-06-01
Last updated
2025-11-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Body Dysmorphic Disorder

Brief summary

A core symptom of body dysmorphic disorder (BDD) is perceptual distortions for appearance, which contributes to poor insight and delusionality, limits engagement in treatment, and puts individuals at risk for relapse. Results from this study will provide a comprehensive mechanistic model of brain, behavioral, and emotional contributors to abnormal perceptual processing, as well as how malleable it is with visual modulation techniques. This will lay the groundwork for next-step translational perceptual retraining approaches.

Detailed description

Individuals with body dysmorphic disorder (BDD) misperceive specific aspects of one's own appearance to be conspicuously flawed or defective, despite these being unnoticeable or appearing minuscule to others. With convictions of disfigurement and ugliness, individuals with BDD typically have poor insight or delusional beliefs, obsessive thoughts and compulsive behaviors, anxiety, and depression. These result in significant difficulties in functioning, depression, suicide attempts (25%), and psychiatric hospitalization (50%). Despite this, relatively few studies of the neurobiology, and few treatment studies, have been conducted. This underscores a critical need for research to identify novel targets for intervention based on a comprehensive understanding of the pathophysiological mechanisms. Neuropsychological, behavioral, and neurobiological research by investigators have uncovered mechanisms that may contribute to perceptual distortions, including prominent abnormalities in visual processing systems. These have contributed to a model of diminished global/holistic processing and enhanced local/detailed processing, attributed to bottom-up and top-down disturbances in perception. Using psychophysical experiments and novel visual modulation techniques, investigators have probed the brain's visual systems responsible for global and local processing and found early evidence that they may be modifiable in BDD. These techniques include a top-down attentional modulation and a bottom-up perceptual modulation strategy. Abnormal eye gaze and emotional arousal when viewing faces may further contribute to abnormal perception. Whether these brain and behavior abnormalities are directly linked to abnormal perception remains to be understood. Accordingly, this study will determine a) if abnormalities in neural activation and connectivity in BDD when viewing one's own appearance are directly associated with abnormalities in perceptual functioning; and b) if changes in neural activation and connectivity from these visual modulation strategies are linked to changes in perceptual functioning, thus representing potential biomarkers. Investigators will also determine how attentional systems, eye gaze behaviors and emotional arousal interact with brain functioning in visual systems, and with global and local perceptual functioning. Investigators will enroll participants with BDD, with subclinical BDD, and healthy controls who will undergo functional magnetic resonance imaging while viewing photographs of own, and others' faces. Investigators will obtain measures of global and local visual processing, emotional arousal while participants view own face, and eye gaze behaviors using eye tracking. To understand the malleability of global/local perception, and the neural mechanisms of these changes, investigators will determine whether repeated visual modulation using top-down and bottom-up strategies results in alterations of perceptual functioning and brain activity/connectivity, and relationships between them. Results will provide a comprehensive mechanistic model of abnormal visual information processing underlying the core symptom domain of misperceptions of appearance. This will lay the groundwork for next-step translational approaches.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALattentional modulation

Attentional instructions when viewing faces will be given

OTHERperceptual modulation

Faces will be presented of varying durations

OTHERnaturalistic viewing

Faces will be viewed without specific instructions

Sponsors

National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
CollaboratorNIH
University of Alabama at Birmingham
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Toronto
CollaboratorOTHER
Centre for Addiction and Mental Health
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 40 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

Body dysmorphic disorder: Inclusion: * males or females * ages 18-40 * meet Diagnostic and Statistical Manual-5 (DSM-5) criteria for Body Dysmorphic Disorder * have a Body Dysmorphic Disorder version of the Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder Scale (BDD-YBOCS) score of ≥20 * primary appearance concerns of the face or head area * medication naïve or medication free for at least 8 weeks prior to enrollment Inclusion Criteria: Subclinical body dysmorphic disorder: Inclusion: * males or females * ages 18-40 * have a score on the Dysmorphic Concern Questionnaire of ≥8 \[1 standard deviation (STD) above population norms\] - primary appearance concerns of the face or head area * medication naïve or medication free for at least 8 weeks prior to enrollment Inclusion Criteria: Healthy controls: Inclusion * Healthy males and females from any racial or ethnic background - ages 18-40 * have a score on the Dysmorphic Concern Questionnaire of \<8

Exclusion criteria

Body dysmorphic disorder: Exclusion * concurrent major Axis I disorders including substance use disorders, aside from anxiety disorders or depressive disorders, as these comorbidities are very common and the sample would otherwise be non-representative; however BDD must be the primary diagnosis. * lifetime: bipolar disorder or psychotic disorder. * psychotropic medications, aside from a short half-life sedative/hypnotic for insomnia, or a short half-life benzodiazepine as needed for anxiety but not exceeding a frequency of 3 doses in one week and not to be taken on the days of the training or MRI scan * current cognitive-behavioral therapy Exclusion: Subclinical body dysmorphic disorder: Exclusion * meet full DSM-5 criteria for Body Dysmorphic Disorder * current Axis I disorders including substance use disorders * lifetime: bipolar disorder or psychotic disorder * psychotropic medications, aside from a short half-life sedative/hypnotic for insomnia, or a short half-life benzodiazepine as needed for anxiety but not exceeding a frequency of 3 doses in one week and not to be taken on the days of the training or MRI scan * current cognitive-behavioral therapy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in emotional valenceWithin a week after baselineInvestigators will use automated facial emotional recognition software to calculate valence based on the activity of specific facial landmarks automatically read from video capture of participants while viewing one's own face. The data will be collected simultaneously with the eye-tracking data collection while viewing own faces. The dependent variable of emotional is calculated as the mean, across the entire face viewing, of the intensity of positive emotional expressions minus the intensity of the negative expression with the highest intensity.
Brain connectivity and activation in the dorsal and ventral visual streamBaselineInvestigators will obtain functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data while participants view photographs of one's face. After preprocessing and analysis investigators will be able to determine: a) baseline associations between brain activity and connectivity and global/ local processing (face inversion effect), and b) associations between changes in brain activity and connectivity with changes in global/local processing (face inversion effect)
Eye gaze behaviorBaselineInvestigators will use eye-tracking for behavioral assessments related to viewing photos of one's face. The primary dependent variable will be mean fixation duration, defined as the mean time that eye gaze is limited to one area (using k-means clustering) across the total viewing duration. We will use an eye-tracker camera to collect data while individuals view photos of one's face. Each face will be 3.5 sec.
Emotional valenceBaselineInvestigators will use automated facial emotional recognition software to calculate valence based on the activity of specific facial landmarks automatically read from video capture of participants while viewing one's own face. The data will be collected simultaneously with the eye-tracking data collection while viewing own faces. The dependent variable of emotional is calculated as the mean, across the entire face viewing, of the intensity of positive emotional expressions minus the intensity of the negative expression with the highest intensity.
Change in face inversion effectWithin a week after baselineIn a force-choice recognition task, participants will view sets of upright target faces
Change in brain connectivity and activation in the dorsal and ventral visual streamWithin a week after baselineInvestigators will obtain functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data while participants view photographs of one's own face. After preprocessing and analysis investigators will be able to determine: a) baseline associations between brain activity and connectivity and global/ local processing (face inversion effect), and b) associations between changes in brain activity and connectivity with changes in global/local processing (face inversion effect)
Change in eye gaze behaviorWithin a week after baselineInvestigators will use eye-tracking for behavioral assessments related to viewing photos of one's face. The primary dependent variable will be mean fixation duration, defined as the mean time that eye gaze is limited to one area (using k-means clustering) across the total viewing duration. Investigators will use an eye-tracker camera to collect data while individuals view photos of one's own face. Each face will be 3.5 sec.
Face inversion effectBaselineIn a force-choice recognition task, participants will view sets of upright target faces followed by 2 upright selection faces, and sets of inverted target faces followed by 2 inverted selection faces. Participants will be instructed to select one of the two faces that is the same as the target face, as quickly and as accurately as possible. The dependent variable is the difference in response times for upright vs. inverted faces.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The Brown Assessment of Beliefs Scale 0-24 values higher score= worse outcomeBaselineThis clinician-rated scale assesses insight and delusionality related to specific beliefs. It consists of six items that probe one's convictions about their beliefs, if others' agree with their beliefs, attempts to disprove their beliefs, and if their beliefs have psychological or psychiatric causes.
Body Image States Scale 1-9 values higher the score= better outcomeBaselineThis scale consists of six items to assess domains of current body experiences
Change in the body dysmorphic version of the Yale-Brown Obsessive- Compulsive Scale 0-48 values higher score= worse outcome7-10 days after baselineThis is the most widely used scale to measure BDD symptom severity cross-sectionally, and as a measure of symptom change in treatment studies. It is a clinician-rated scale that consists of 12 items assessing appearance-related obsessions, compulsive behaviors, insight, and avoidance.
Change in the Brown Assessment of Beliefs Scale 0-24 values higher score= worse outcome7-10 days after baselineThis clinician-rated scale assesses insight and delusionality related to specific beliefs. It consists of six items that probe one's convictions about their beliefs, if others' agree with their beliefs, attempts to disprove their beliefs, and if their beliefs have psychological or psychiatric causes.
Change in the Body Image States Scale 1-9 values higher the score= better outcome7-10 days after baselineThis scale consists of six items to assess domains of current body experiences
The body dysmorphic version of the Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale 0-48 values higher score= worse outcomeBaselineThis is the most widely used scale to measure BDD symptom severity cross-sectionally, and as a measure of symptom change in treatment studies. It is a clinician-rated scale that consists of 12 items assessing appearance-related obsessions, compulsive behaviors, insight, and avoidance.

Countries

Canada

Contacts

Primary ContactResearch Analyst
bdd.research@camh.ca(416) 535-8501

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026