Weight Change, Body
Conditions
Keywords
Weight Gain Prevention, Cancer Prevention, Chronic Conditions, Obesity, Healthy Eating
Brief summary
This trial will evaluate a healthy eating and weight gain prevention intervention for delivery through calls to the 2-1-1 number.
Detailed description
It is now well-established that obesity and excess weight increase the risk of cancer (i.e., colorectal and post-menopausal breast cancer), as well as other chronic diseases including diabetes, stroke, coronary heart disease, and arthritis. The World Cancer Research Fund and the American Institute for Cancer Research state maintenance of a healthy weight throughout life may be one of the most important ways to protect against cancer. Unfortunately, adults generally gain weight as they age. Healthy Homes/Healthy Families (HH/HF) Intervention involves a tailored home environment profile and a health coach working with participants to select and implement a series of healthy actions to create a home environment more supportive of healthy eating and physical activity. The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) designated 2-1-1 as the 3-digit number to call for information and referrals to social services and other assistance in the United States. This study will evaluate a healthy eating and weight gain prevention intervention for delivery through 2-1-1 calls.
Interventions
The HH/HF Intervention involves coaching calls, text messages and intervention materials that are designed to increase behavioral capability, self-efficacy and behavioral intention to improve the home food environment for healthy eating and weight gain prevention. The intervention is delivered over a 12 week period.
Participants in the control condition will receive two mailings on healthy eating, the first from the Dietary Guidelines For Americans 2015-2020, 8th Edition and the second from Choose MyPlate. Additionally, both mailings will include a food diary from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Mailings will be sent to participants one and six-weeks post-baseline. These materials focus on the same dietary outcomes being targeted in the HH/HF intervention, but without the home environment emphasis. Control group participants will receive their home environment profile with a list of healthy actions upon completion of the study.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* 18 to 70 years of age * able to speak English * self-report BMI of 20 and above
Exclusion criteria
* pregnant women * only one member per household will be enrolled
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change in United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Healthy Eating Index (HEI) | Baseline, Month 4, Month 9 | Description: The USDA HEI measures diet quality and is calculated from two telephone administered 24-hr dietary recalls (one weekday, one weekend day). The HEI evaluates foods with a scoring system using 13 components for different food groups and the key recommendations of the 2015-2020 Dietary Guidelines for Americans. Scores range from 0 to 100 where a score of 100 is an ideal score indicating that a diet follows the key recommendations of the 2015-2020 Dietary Guidelines for Americans (higher scores indicate better diet quality). |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Self-reported Weight | Baseline, Month 4, Month 9 | Participants will self-report weight in pounds each time point |
| Changes to Food Environment: UNHEALTHY SNACKS/FOODS INVENTORY, OF 8 | Baseline, Month 4, Month 9 | Participants were asked about unhealthy snacks and foods, ranging from 0 to 8, in each survey of the household food inventory. The higher the number the more unhealthy snacks/foods were reported |
| Changes to Food Environment: PURCHASING FRUITS/VEGETABLES ≥1/WK | Baseline, Month 4, Month 9 | A home environment survey assessed the frequency of shopping for or bringing home fruits and vegetables in the past month. Response options were 1=less than once per week, 2=once per week, or 3=more than once per week. Anyone who purchased fruits or vegetables at least once a week was scored as 1, while all others were scored as zero. Reporting includes the percentage of participants who scored 1, i.e., purchased fruits or vegetables at least once a week. |
| Change in Kcal Per Day Intake | Baseline, Month 4, Month 9 | Kcal per day will be calculated and recorded. The most recent version of the Automated Self-Administered 24-hour dietary recall (ASA24) program prompts for food description details and automatically codes and calculates nutrient intakes using the USDA Food and Nutrient Database for Dietary Studies. The average of one weekday and one weekend day will be used to estimate Kcal per day at each time point. |
| Changes to Food Environment: FAMILY MEALS FROM NONHOME SOURCES, DAYS IN PAST WEEK | Baseline, Month 4, Month 9 | A home environment survey assessed non-home food sources. Participants were asked how many days in the last week (never, 1-7) they purchased a family meal from four non-home food sources (e.g. fast food, convenience store). The total score was calculated by adding the four types of meals with possible scores ranging from 0 to 28. A higher score indicated more family meals per week from non-home sources. |
| Changes to Food Environment: Family Eating and TV | Baseline, Month 4, Month 9 | A home environment survey included two items on meals/snacks eaten with the television on. Response options ranged: 1=never/rarely, 2=occasionally, 3=often, 4=very often. The score was calculated as the mean of both items. A higher score indicates more frequently eaten meals and snacks with the television on. |
| Changes to Food Environment: HEALTHY FOOD PREPARATION | Baseline, Month 4, Month 9 | Participants were asked about 16 food preparation methods and 3 food serving practices focused on portion control (e.g., use of smaller plates) in the past month. Response options were 1=never/rarely, 2=occasionally, 3=often, and 4=very often. Unhealthy food prep items were reverse-coded, and then all items were averaged. The higher the number, the more frequently healthy food preparation methods were used, and unhealthy food preparation methods were used less frequently |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Recruitment details
Participants were recruited from the United Way of Greater Atlanta 2-1-1, United Way of Central Georgia, United Way of the Chattahoochee Valley 2-1-1, and United Way of Southwest Georgia as part of a hybrid effectiveness implementation trial testing an adapted version of the Healthy Homes/Healthy Families healthy eating and weight gain prevention intervention. Participant enrollment began in September 2020, and final follow-up assessments were completed in December 2022.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Healthy Homes/Healthy Families (HH/HF) Intervention Received a 12-week telephone-based healthy eating and weight gain prevention intervention, Healthy Homes/Healthy Families, that supports households in making changes in their home environment to promote healthy eating. | 253 |
| Control Received two mailings post baseline: first mailing included a food diary from the CDC, and healthy eating information from the Dietary Guidelines for Americans 2015-2020; Second mailing included the food diary and healthy eating information from Choose MyPlate | 257 |
| Total | 510 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Excluded | 2 | 0 |
| Overall Study | Lost to Follow-up | 37 | 32 |
| Overall Study | Refused at 4 months | 7 | 3 |
| Overall Study | Refused at 9 months | 1 | 2 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Control | Healthy Homes/Healthy Families (HH/HF) Intervention | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 43.0 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.7 | 43.8 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.2 | 43.4 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.4 |
| Employment status Employed | 138 Participants | 143 Participants | 281 Participants |
| Employment status Not Employed | 119 Participants | 110 Participants | 229 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Hispanic or Latino | 7 Participants | 3 Participants | 10 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Not Hispanic or Latino | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 250 Participants | 250 Participants | 500 Participants |
| Highest education College graduate or higher | 56 Participants | 64 Participants | 120 Participants |
| Highest education High school or GED | 86 Participants | 66 Participants | 152 Participants |
| Highest education Less than high school | 24 Participants | 20 Participants | 44 Participants |
| Highest education Some college/technical school | 91 Participants | 103 Participants | 194 Participants |
| Household income $10,000 and under | 70 Participants | 66 Participants | 136 Participants |
| Household income $10,001 - $20,000 | 67 Participants | 57 Participants | 124 Participants |
| Household income $20,001 - $35,000 | 67 Participants | 55 Participants | 122 Participants |
| Household income $35,001 - $50,000 | 27 Participants | 35 Participants | 62 Participants |
| Household income More than $50,000 | 15 Participants | 28 Participants | 43 Participants |
| Marital status Married/living with partner | 49 Participants | 63 Participants | 112 Participants |
| Marital status Not married | 152 Participants | 128 Participants | 280 Participants |
| Marital status Widowed/separated/divorced | 56 Participants | 62 Participants | 118 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Race American Indian, Alaska Native Asian | 0 Participants | 3 Participants | 3 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Race Black or African American | 210 Participants | 206 Participants | 416 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Race More than one race | 14 Participants | 8 Participants | 22 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Race Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Race Unknown or not reported | 7 Participants | 3 Participants | 10 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Race White | 21 Participants | 31 Participants | 52 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 237 Participants | 230 Participants | 467 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 20 Participants | 23 Participants | 43 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 253 | 0 / 257 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 0 / 253 | 0 / 257 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 253 | 0 / 257 |
Outcome results
Change in United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Healthy Eating Index (HEI)
Description: The USDA HEI measures diet quality and is calculated from two telephone administered 24-hr dietary recalls (one weekday, one weekend day). The HEI evaluates foods with a scoring system using 13 components for different food groups and the key recommendations of the 2015-2020 Dietary Guidelines for Americans. Scores range from 0 to 100 where a score of 100 is an ideal score indicating that a diet follows the key recommendations of the 2015-2020 Dietary Guidelines for Americans (higher scores indicate better diet quality).
Time frame: Baseline, Month 4, Month 9
Population: Some participants were lost to follow-up. For the exact breakdown, kindly refer to the baseline characteristics above
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Healthy Homes/Healthy Families (HH/HF) Intervention | Change in United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Healthy Eating Index (HEI) | Baseline | 51.0 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 12.3 |
| Healthy Homes/Healthy Families (HH/HF) Intervention | Change in United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Healthy Eating Index (HEI) | Month 4 (Mean change from baseline ) | 3.38 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 14.45 |
| Healthy Homes/Healthy Families (HH/HF) Intervention | Change in United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Healthy Eating Index (HEI) | Month 9 (Mean change from baseline ) | 2.74 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 14.57 |
| Control | Change in United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Healthy Eating Index (HEI) | Baseline | 52.6 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 12.9 |
| Control | Change in United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Healthy Eating Index (HEI) | Month 4 (Mean change from baseline ) | 0.92 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 14.06 |
| Control | Change in United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Healthy Eating Index (HEI) | Month 9 (Mean change from baseline ) | -0.27 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 14.1 |
Change in Kcal Per Day Intake
Kcal per day will be calculated and recorded. The most recent version of the Automated Self-Administered 24-hour dietary recall (ASA24) program prompts for food description details and automatically codes and calculates nutrient intakes using the USDA Food and Nutrient Database for Dietary Studies. The average of one weekday and one weekend day will be used to estimate Kcal per day at each time point.
Time frame: Baseline, Month 4, Month 9
Population: Some participants were lost to follow-up. For the exact breakdown, kindly refer to the baseline characteristics above.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Healthy Homes/Healthy Families (HH/HF) Intervention | Change in Kcal Per Day Intake | Baseline | 1736 Kcal/day | Standard Deviation 863 |
| Healthy Homes/Healthy Families (HH/HF) Intervention | Change in Kcal Per Day Intake | Month 4 (Mean change) | -206 Kcal/day | Standard Deviation 757 |
| Healthy Homes/Healthy Families (HH/HF) Intervention | Change in Kcal Per Day Intake | Month 9 (Mean change) | -155 Kcal/day | Standard Deviation 908 |
| Control | Change in Kcal Per Day Intake | Baseline | 1718 Kcal/day | Standard Deviation 784.5 |
| Control | Change in Kcal Per Day Intake | Month 4 (Mean change) | -80 Kcal/day | Standard Deviation 743 |
| Control | Change in Kcal Per Day Intake | Month 9 (Mean change) | -93 Kcal/day | Standard Deviation 763 |
Change in Self-reported Weight
Participants will self-report weight in pounds each time point
Time frame: Baseline, Month 4, Month 9
Population: Some participants were lost to follow-up. For the exact breakdown, kindly refer to the baseline characteristics above
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Healthy Homes/Healthy Families (HH/HF) Intervention | Change in Self-reported Weight | Baseline | 202.3 weight in pounds (lbs) | Standard Deviation 53.1 |
| Healthy Homes/Healthy Families (HH/HF) Intervention | Change in Self-reported Weight | Month 9 (Mean change from baseline) | -4.5 weight in pounds (lbs) | Standard Deviation 20.64 |
| Healthy Homes/Healthy Families (HH/HF) Intervention | Change in Self-reported Weight | Month 4 (Mean change from baseline ) | -6.5 weight in pounds (lbs) | Standard Deviation 21.74 |
| Control | Change in Self-reported Weight | Month 4 (Mean change from baseline ) | -2.9 weight in pounds (lbs) | Standard Deviation 19.31 |
| Control | Change in Self-reported Weight | Month 9 (Mean change from baseline) | -2.5 weight in pounds (lbs) | Standard Deviation 21.17 |
| Control | Change in Self-reported Weight | Baseline | 204.1 weight in pounds (lbs) | Standard Deviation 51.9 |
Changes to Food Environment: Family Eating and TV
A home environment survey included two items on meals/snacks eaten with the television on. Response options ranged: 1=never/rarely, 2=occasionally, 3=often, 4=very often. The score was calculated as the mean of both items. A higher score indicates more frequently eaten meals and snacks with the television on.
Time frame: Baseline, Month 4, Month 9
Population: Some participants were lost to follow-up. For the exact breakdown, kindly refer to the baseline characteristics above
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Healthy Homes/Healthy Families (HH/HF) Intervention | Changes to Food Environment: Family Eating and TV | Baseline | 2.65 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.02 |
| Healthy Homes/Healthy Families (HH/HF) Intervention | Changes to Food Environment: Family Eating and TV | Month 4 (mean change from baseline) | -0.55 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.08 |
| Healthy Homes/Healthy Families (HH/HF) Intervention | Changes to Food Environment: Family Eating and TV | Month 9 (mean change from baseline) | -0.45 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.1 |
| Control | Changes to Food Environment: Family Eating and TV | Baseline | 2.58 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.09 |
| Control | Changes to Food Environment: Family Eating and TV | Month 4 (mean change from baseline) | -0.16 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.03 |
| Control | Changes to Food Environment: Family Eating and TV | Month 9 (mean change from baseline) | -0.17 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.04 |
Changes to Food Environment: FAMILY MEALS FROM NONHOME SOURCES, DAYS IN PAST WEEK
A home environment survey assessed non-home food sources. Participants were asked how many days in the last week (never, 1-7) they purchased a family meal from four non-home food sources (e.g. fast food, convenience store). The total score was calculated by adding the four types of meals with possible scores ranging from 0 to 28. A higher score indicated more family meals per week from non-home sources.
Time frame: Baseline, Month 4, Month 9
Population: Some participants were lost to follow-up. For the exact breakdown, kindly refer to the baseline characteristics above
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Healthy Homes/Healthy Families (HH/HF) Intervention | Changes to Food Environment: FAMILY MEALS FROM NONHOME SOURCES, DAYS IN PAST WEEK | Baseline | 3.27 meals per week | Standard Deviation 3.5 |
| Healthy Homes/Healthy Families (HH/HF) Intervention | Changes to Food Environment: FAMILY MEALS FROM NONHOME SOURCES, DAYS IN PAST WEEK | Month 4 (mean change from baseline) | -0.59 meals per week | Standard Deviation 3.59 |
| Healthy Homes/Healthy Families (HH/HF) Intervention | Changes to Food Environment: FAMILY MEALS FROM NONHOME SOURCES, DAYS IN PAST WEEK | Month 9 (mean change from baseline) | -0.67 meals per week | Standard Deviation 4.3 |
| Control | Changes to Food Environment: FAMILY MEALS FROM NONHOME SOURCES, DAYS IN PAST WEEK | Baseline | 2.88 meals per week | Standard Deviation 2.94 |
| Control | Changes to Food Environment: FAMILY MEALS FROM NONHOME SOURCES, DAYS IN PAST WEEK | Month 4 (mean change from baseline) | -0.12 meals per week | Standard Deviation 3.02 |
| Control | Changes to Food Environment: FAMILY MEALS FROM NONHOME SOURCES, DAYS IN PAST WEEK | Month 9 (mean change from baseline) | -0.01 meals per week | Standard Deviation 3.44 |
Changes to Food Environment: HEALTHY FOOD PREPARATION
Participants were asked about 16 food preparation methods and 3 food serving practices focused on portion control (e.g., use of smaller plates) in the past month. Response options were 1=never/rarely, 2=occasionally, 3=often, and 4=very often. Unhealthy food prep items were reverse-coded, and then all items were averaged. The higher the number, the more frequently healthy food preparation methods were used, and unhealthy food preparation methods were used less frequently
Time frame: Baseline, Month 4, Month 9
Population: Some participants were lost to follow-up. For the exact breakdown, kindly refer to the baseline characteristics above
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Healthy Homes/Healthy Families (HH/HF) Intervention | Changes to Food Environment: HEALTHY FOOD PREPARATION | Baseline | 2.10 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.44 |
| Healthy Homes/Healthy Families (HH/HF) Intervention | Changes to Food Environment: HEALTHY FOOD PREPARATION | Month 4 (mean change from baseline) | 0.21 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.49 |
| Healthy Homes/Healthy Families (HH/HF) Intervention | Changes to Food Environment: HEALTHY FOOD PREPARATION | Month 9 (mean change from baseline) | 0.20 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.48 |
| Control | Changes to Food Environment: HEALTHY FOOD PREPARATION | Baseline | 2.12 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.45 |
| Control | Changes to Food Environment: HEALTHY FOOD PREPARATION | Month 4 (mean change from baseline) | -0.02 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.4 |
| Control | Changes to Food Environment: HEALTHY FOOD PREPARATION | Month 9 (mean change from baseline) | 0.05 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.4 |
Changes to Food Environment: PURCHASING FRUITS/VEGETABLES ≥1/WK
A home environment survey assessed the frequency of shopping for or bringing home fruits and vegetables in the past month. Response options were 1=less than once per week, 2=once per week, or 3=more than once per week. Anyone who purchased fruits or vegetables at least once a week was scored as 1, while all others were scored as zero. Reporting includes the percentage of participants who scored 1, i.e., purchased fruits or vegetables at least once a week.
Time frame: Baseline, Month 4, Month 9
Population: Some participants were lost to follow-up. For the exact breakdown, kindly refer to the baseline characteristics above
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Healthy Homes/Healthy Families (HH/HF) Intervention | Changes to Food Environment: PURCHASING FRUITS/VEGETABLES ≥1/WK | Baseline | 76.19 percentage of participants |
| Healthy Homes/Healthy Families (HH/HF) Intervention | Changes to Food Environment: PURCHASING FRUITS/VEGETABLES ≥1/WK | Month 4 | 10.8 percentage of participants |
| Healthy Homes/Healthy Families (HH/HF) Intervention | Changes to Food Environment: PURCHASING FRUITS/VEGETABLES ≥1/WK | Month 9 | 7.2 percentage of participants |
| Control | Changes to Food Environment: PURCHASING FRUITS/VEGETABLES ≥1/WK | Baseline | 72.37 percentage of participants |
| Control | Changes to Food Environment: PURCHASING FRUITS/VEGETABLES ≥1/WK | Month 4 | 4.7 percentage of participants |
| Control | Changes to Food Environment: PURCHASING FRUITS/VEGETABLES ≥1/WK | Month 9 | 5.5 percentage of participants |
Changes to Food Environment: UNHEALTHY SNACKS/FOODS INVENTORY, OF 8
Participants were asked about unhealthy snacks and foods, ranging from 0 to 8, in each survey of the household food inventory. The higher the number the more unhealthy snacks/foods were reported
Time frame: Baseline, Month 4, Month 9
Population: Some participants were lost to follow-up. For the exact breakdown, kindly refer to the baseline characteristics above
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Healthy Homes/Healthy Families (HH/HF) Intervention | Changes to Food Environment: UNHEALTHY SNACKS/FOODS INVENTORY, OF 8 | Baseline | 4.29 number of unhealthy snacks in the home | Standard Deviation 1.71 |
| Healthy Homes/Healthy Families (HH/HF) Intervention | Changes to Food Environment: UNHEALTHY SNACKS/FOODS INVENTORY, OF 8 | Month 4 | -1.12 number of unhealthy snacks in the home | Standard Deviation 2.05 |
| Healthy Homes/Healthy Families (HH/HF) Intervention | Changes to Food Environment: UNHEALTHY SNACKS/FOODS INVENTORY, OF 8 | Month 9 | -0.75 number of unhealthy snacks in the home | Standard Deviation 2.18 |
| Control | Changes to Food Environment: UNHEALTHY SNACKS/FOODS INVENTORY, OF 8 | Baseline | 4.45 number of unhealthy snacks in the home | Standard Deviation 1.72 |
| Control | Changes to Food Environment: UNHEALTHY SNACKS/FOODS INVENTORY, OF 8 | Month 4 | -0.18 number of unhealthy snacks in the home | Standard Deviation 1.9 |
| Control | Changes to Food Environment: UNHEALTHY SNACKS/FOODS INVENTORY, OF 8 | Month 9 | -0.39 number of unhealthy snacks in the home | Standard Deviation 2.1 |