Skip to content

Healthy Homes/Healthy Families (HH/HF) Intervention in 2-1-1 Callers

A Hybrid Effectiveness-Implementation Study on Weight Gain Prevention Among 2-1-1 Callers

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04373434
Enrollment
512
Registered
2020-05-04
Start date
2020-09-18
Completion date
2023-08-28
Last updated
2025-10-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Weight Change, Body

Keywords

Weight Gain Prevention, Cancer Prevention, Chronic Conditions, Obesity, Healthy Eating

Brief summary

This trial will evaluate a healthy eating and weight gain prevention intervention for delivery through calls to the 2-1-1 number.

Detailed description

It is now well-established that obesity and excess weight increase the risk of cancer (i.e., colorectal and post-menopausal breast cancer), as well as other chronic diseases including diabetes, stroke, coronary heart disease, and arthritis. The World Cancer Research Fund and the American Institute for Cancer Research state maintenance of a healthy weight throughout life may be one of the most important ways to protect against cancer. Unfortunately, adults generally gain weight as they age. Healthy Homes/Healthy Families (HH/HF) Intervention involves a tailored home environment profile and a health coach working with participants to select and implement a series of healthy actions to create a home environment more supportive of healthy eating and physical activity. The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) designated 2-1-1 as the 3-digit number to call for information and referrals to social services and other assistance in the United States. This study will evaluate a healthy eating and weight gain prevention intervention for delivery through 2-1-1 calls.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALHealth Homes/Healthy Families (HH/HF) Intervention

The HH/HF Intervention involves coaching calls, text messages and intervention materials that are designed to increase behavioral capability, self-efficacy and behavioral intention to improve the home food environment for healthy eating and weight gain prevention. The intervention is delivered over a 12 week period.

BEHAVIORALControl

Participants in the control condition will receive two mailings on healthy eating, the first from the Dietary Guidelines For Americans 2015-2020, 8th Edition and the second from Choose MyPlate. Additionally, both mailings will include a food diary from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Mailings will be sent to participants one and six-weeks post-baseline. These materials focus on the same dietary outcomes being targeted in the HH/HF intervention, but without the home environment emphasis. Control group participants will receive their home environment profile with a list of healthy actions upon completion of the study.

Sponsors

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
CollaboratorFED
Emory University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* 18 to 70 years of age * able to speak English * self-report BMI of 20 and above

Exclusion criteria

* pregnant women * only one member per household will be enrolled

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Healthy Eating Index (HEI)Baseline, Month 4, Month 9Description: The USDA HEI measures diet quality and is calculated from two telephone administered 24-hr dietary recalls (one weekday, one weekend day). The HEI evaluates foods with a scoring system using 13 components for different food groups and the key recommendations of the 2015-2020 Dietary Guidelines for Americans. Scores range from 0 to 100 where a score of 100 is an ideal score indicating that a diet follows the key recommendations of the 2015-2020 Dietary Guidelines for Americans (higher scores indicate better diet quality).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Self-reported WeightBaseline, Month 4, Month 9Participants will self-report weight in pounds each time point
Changes to Food Environment: UNHEALTHY SNACKS/FOODS INVENTORY, OF 8Baseline, Month 4, Month 9Participants were asked about unhealthy snacks and foods, ranging from 0 to 8, in each survey of the household food inventory. The higher the number the more unhealthy snacks/foods were reported
Changes to Food Environment: PURCHASING FRUITS/VEGETABLES ≥1/WKBaseline, Month 4, Month 9A home environment survey assessed the frequency of shopping for or bringing home fruits and vegetables in the past month. Response options were 1=less than once per week, 2=once per week, or 3=more than once per week. Anyone who purchased fruits or vegetables at least once a week was scored as 1, while all others were scored as zero. Reporting includes the percentage of participants who scored 1, i.e., purchased fruits or vegetables at least once a week.
Change in Kcal Per Day IntakeBaseline, Month 4, Month 9Kcal per day will be calculated and recorded. The most recent version of the Automated Self-Administered 24-hour dietary recall (ASA24) program prompts for food description details and automatically codes and calculates nutrient intakes using the USDA Food and Nutrient Database for Dietary Studies. The average of one weekday and one weekend day will be used to estimate Kcal per day at each time point.
Changes to Food Environment: FAMILY MEALS FROM NONHOME SOURCES, DAYS IN PAST WEEKBaseline, Month 4, Month 9A home environment survey assessed non-home food sources. Participants were asked how many days in the last week (never, 1-7) they purchased a family meal from four non-home food sources (e.g. fast food, convenience store). The total score was calculated by adding the four types of meals with possible scores ranging from 0 to 28. A higher score indicated more family meals per week from non-home sources.
Changes to Food Environment: Family Eating and TVBaseline, Month 4, Month 9A home environment survey included two items on meals/snacks eaten with the television on. Response options ranged: 1=never/rarely, 2=occasionally, 3=often, 4=very often. The score was calculated as the mean of both items. A higher score indicates more frequently eaten meals and snacks with the television on.
Changes to Food Environment: HEALTHY FOOD PREPARATIONBaseline, Month 4, Month 9Participants were asked about 16 food preparation methods and 3 food serving practices focused on portion control (e.g., use of smaller plates) in the past month. Response options were 1=never/rarely, 2=occasionally, 3=often, and 4=very often. Unhealthy food prep items were reverse-coded, and then all items were averaged. The higher the number, the more frequently healthy food preparation methods were used, and unhealthy food preparation methods were used less frequently

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants were recruited from the United Way of Greater Atlanta 2-1-1, United Way of Central Georgia, United Way of the Chattahoochee Valley 2-1-1, and United Way of Southwest Georgia as part of a hybrid effectiveness implementation trial testing an adapted version of the Healthy Homes/Healthy Families healthy eating and weight gain prevention intervention. Participant enrollment began in September 2020, and final follow-up assessments were completed in December 2022.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Healthy Homes/Healthy Families (HH/HF) Intervention
Received a 12-week telephone-based healthy eating and weight gain prevention intervention, Healthy Homes/Healthy Families, that supports households in making changes in their home environment to promote healthy eating.
253
Control
Received two mailings post baseline: first mailing included a food diary from the CDC, and healthy eating information from the Dietary Guidelines for Americans 2015-2020; Second mailing included the food diary and healthy eating information from Choose MyPlate
257
Total510

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyExcluded20
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up3732
Overall StudyRefused at 4 months73
Overall StudyRefused at 9 months12

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicControlHealthy Homes/Healthy Families (HH/HF) InterventionTotal
Age, Continuous43.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.7
43.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.2
43.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.4
Employment status
Employed
138 Participants143 Participants281 Participants
Employment status
Not Employed
119 Participants110 Participants229 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
7 Participants3 Participants10 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
250 Participants250 Participants500 Participants
Highest education
College graduate or higher
56 Participants64 Participants120 Participants
Highest education
High school or GED
86 Participants66 Participants152 Participants
Highest education
Less than high school
24 Participants20 Participants44 Participants
Highest education
Some college/technical school
91 Participants103 Participants194 Participants
Household income
$10,000 and under
70 Participants66 Participants136 Participants
Household income
$10,001 - $20,000
67 Participants57 Participants124 Participants
Household income
$20,001 - $35,000
67 Participants55 Participants122 Participants
Household income
$35,001 - $50,000
27 Participants35 Participants62 Participants
Household income
More than $50,000
15 Participants28 Participants43 Participants
Marital status
Married/living with partner
49 Participants63 Participants112 Participants
Marital status
Not married
152 Participants128 Participants280 Participants
Marital status
Widowed/separated/divorced
56 Participants62 Participants118 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
American Indian, Alaska Native Asian
0 Participants3 Participants3 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
Black or African American
210 Participants206 Participants416 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
More than one race
14 Participants8 Participants22 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
Unknown or not reported
7 Participants3 Participants10 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
White
21 Participants31 Participants52 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
237 Participants230 Participants467 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
20 Participants23 Participants43 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 2530 / 257
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 2530 / 257
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 2530 / 257

Outcome results

Primary

Change in United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Healthy Eating Index (HEI)

Description: The USDA HEI measures diet quality and is calculated from two telephone administered 24-hr dietary recalls (one weekday, one weekend day). The HEI evaluates foods with a scoring system using 13 components for different food groups and the key recommendations of the 2015-2020 Dietary Guidelines for Americans. Scores range from 0 to 100 where a score of 100 is an ideal score indicating that a diet follows the key recommendations of the 2015-2020 Dietary Guidelines for Americans (higher scores indicate better diet quality).

Time frame: Baseline, Month 4, Month 9

Population: Some participants were lost to follow-up. For the exact breakdown, kindly refer to the baseline characteristics above

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Healthy Homes/Healthy Families (HH/HF) InterventionChange in United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Healthy Eating Index (HEI)Baseline51.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.3
Healthy Homes/Healthy Families (HH/HF) InterventionChange in United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Healthy Eating Index (HEI)Month 4 (Mean change from baseline )3.38 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.45
Healthy Homes/Healthy Families (HH/HF) InterventionChange in United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Healthy Eating Index (HEI)Month 9 (Mean change from baseline )2.74 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.57
ControlChange in United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Healthy Eating Index (HEI)Baseline52.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.9
ControlChange in United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Healthy Eating Index (HEI)Month 4 (Mean change from baseline )0.92 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.06
ControlChange in United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Healthy Eating Index (HEI)Month 9 (Mean change from baseline )-0.27 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.1
Secondary

Change in Kcal Per Day Intake

Kcal per day will be calculated and recorded. The most recent version of the Automated Self-Administered 24-hour dietary recall (ASA24) program prompts for food description details and automatically codes and calculates nutrient intakes using the USDA Food and Nutrient Database for Dietary Studies. The average of one weekday and one weekend day will be used to estimate Kcal per day at each time point.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 4, Month 9

Population: Some participants were lost to follow-up. For the exact breakdown, kindly refer to the baseline characteristics above.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Healthy Homes/Healthy Families (HH/HF) InterventionChange in Kcal Per Day IntakeBaseline1736 Kcal/dayStandard Deviation 863
Healthy Homes/Healthy Families (HH/HF) InterventionChange in Kcal Per Day IntakeMonth 4 (Mean change)-206 Kcal/dayStandard Deviation 757
Healthy Homes/Healthy Families (HH/HF) InterventionChange in Kcal Per Day IntakeMonth 9 (Mean change)-155 Kcal/dayStandard Deviation 908
ControlChange in Kcal Per Day IntakeBaseline1718 Kcal/dayStandard Deviation 784.5
ControlChange in Kcal Per Day IntakeMonth 4 (Mean change)-80 Kcal/dayStandard Deviation 743
ControlChange in Kcal Per Day IntakeMonth 9 (Mean change)-93 Kcal/dayStandard Deviation 763
Secondary

Change in Self-reported Weight

Participants will self-report weight in pounds each time point

Time frame: Baseline, Month 4, Month 9

Population: Some participants were lost to follow-up. For the exact breakdown, kindly refer to the baseline characteristics above

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Healthy Homes/Healthy Families (HH/HF) InterventionChange in Self-reported WeightBaseline202.3 weight in pounds (lbs)Standard Deviation 53.1
Healthy Homes/Healthy Families (HH/HF) InterventionChange in Self-reported WeightMonth 9 (Mean change from baseline)-4.5 weight in pounds (lbs)Standard Deviation 20.64
Healthy Homes/Healthy Families (HH/HF) InterventionChange in Self-reported WeightMonth 4 (Mean change from baseline )-6.5 weight in pounds (lbs)Standard Deviation 21.74
ControlChange in Self-reported WeightMonth 4 (Mean change from baseline )-2.9 weight in pounds (lbs)Standard Deviation 19.31
ControlChange in Self-reported WeightMonth 9 (Mean change from baseline)-2.5 weight in pounds (lbs)Standard Deviation 21.17
ControlChange in Self-reported WeightBaseline204.1 weight in pounds (lbs)Standard Deviation 51.9
Secondary

Changes to Food Environment: Family Eating and TV

A home environment survey included two items on meals/snacks eaten with the television on. Response options ranged: 1=never/rarely, 2=occasionally, 3=often, 4=very often. The score was calculated as the mean of both items. A higher score indicates more frequently eaten meals and snacks with the television on.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 4, Month 9

Population: Some participants were lost to follow-up. For the exact breakdown, kindly refer to the baseline characteristics above

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Healthy Homes/Healthy Families (HH/HF) InterventionChanges to Food Environment: Family Eating and TVBaseline2.65 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.02
Healthy Homes/Healthy Families (HH/HF) InterventionChanges to Food Environment: Family Eating and TVMonth 4 (mean change from baseline)-0.55 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.08
Healthy Homes/Healthy Families (HH/HF) InterventionChanges to Food Environment: Family Eating and TVMonth 9 (mean change from baseline)-0.45 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.1
ControlChanges to Food Environment: Family Eating and TVBaseline2.58 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.09
ControlChanges to Food Environment: Family Eating and TVMonth 4 (mean change from baseline)-0.16 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.03
ControlChanges to Food Environment: Family Eating and TVMonth 9 (mean change from baseline)-0.17 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.04
Secondary

Changes to Food Environment: FAMILY MEALS FROM NONHOME SOURCES, DAYS IN PAST WEEK

A home environment survey assessed non-home food sources. Participants were asked how many days in the last week (never, 1-7) they purchased a family meal from four non-home food sources (e.g. fast food, convenience store). The total score was calculated by adding the four types of meals with possible scores ranging from 0 to 28. A higher score indicated more family meals per week from non-home sources.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 4, Month 9

Population: Some participants were lost to follow-up. For the exact breakdown, kindly refer to the baseline characteristics above

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Healthy Homes/Healthy Families (HH/HF) InterventionChanges to Food Environment: FAMILY MEALS FROM NONHOME SOURCES, DAYS IN PAST WEEKBaseline3.27 meals per weekStandard Deviation 3.5
Healthy Homes/Healthy Families (HH/HF) InterventionChanges to Food Environment: FAMILY MEALS FROM NONHOME SOURCES, DAYS IN PAST WEEKMonth 4 (mean change from baseline)-0.59 meals per weekStandard Deviation 3.59
Healthy Homes/Healthy Families (HH/HF) InterventionChanges to Food Environment: FAMILY MEALS FROM NONHOME SOURCES, DAYS IN PAST WEEKMonth 9 (mean change from baseline)-0.67 meals per weekStandard Deviation 4.3
ControlChanges to Food Environment: FAMILY MEALS FROM NONHOME SOURCES, DAYS IN PAST WEEKBaseline2.88 meals per weekStandard Deviation 2.94
ControlChanges to Food Environment: FAMILY MEALS FROM NONHOME SOURCES, DAYS IN PAST WEEKMonth 4 (mean change from baseline)-0.12 meals per weekStandard Deviation 3.02
ControlChanges to Food Environment: FAMILY MEALS FROM NONHOME SOURCES, DAYS IN PAST WEEKMonth 9 (mean change from baseline)-0.01 meals per weekStandard Deviation 3.44
Secondary

Changes to Food Environment: HEALTHY FOOD PREPARATION

Participants were asked about 16 food preparation methods and 3 food serving practices focused on portion control (e.g., use of smaller plates) in the past month. Response options were 1=never/rarely, 2=occasionally, 3=often, and 4=very often. Unhealthy food prep items were reverse-coded, and then all items were averaged. The higher the number, the more frequently healthy food preparation methods were used, and unhealthy food preparation methods were used less frequently

Time frame: Baseline, Month 4, Month 9

Population: Some participants were lost to follow-up. For the exact breakdown, kindly refer to the baseline characteristics above

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Healthy Homes/Healthy Families (HH/HF) InterventionChanges to Food Environment: HEALTHY FOOD PREPARATIONBaseline2.10 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.44
Healthy Homes/Healthy Families (HH/HF) InterventionChanges to Food Environment: HEALTHY FOOD PREPARATIONMonth 4 (mean change from baseline)0.21 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.49
Healthy Homes/Healthy Families (HH/HF) InterventionChanges to Food Environment: HEALTHY FOOD PREPARATIONMonth 9 (mean change from baseline)0.20 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.48
ControlChanges to Food Environment: HEALTHY FOOD PREPARATIONBaseline2.12 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.45
ControlChanges to Food Environment: HEALTHY FOOD PREPARATIONMonth 4 (mean change from baseline)-0.02 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.4
ControlChanges to Food Environment: HEALTHY FOOD PREPARATIONMonth 9 (mean change from baseline)0.05 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.4
Secondary

Changes to Food Environment: PURCHASING FRUITS/VEGETABLES ≥1/WK

A home environment survey assessed the frequency of shopping for or bringing home fruits and vegetables in the past month. Response options were 1=less than once per week, 2=once per week, or 3=more than once per week. Anyone who purchased fruits or vegetables at least once a week was scored as 1, while all others were scored as zero. Reporting includes the percentage of participants who scored 1, i.e., purchased fruits or vegetables at least once a week.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 4, Month 9

Population: Some participants were lost to follow-up. For the exact breakdown, kindly refer to the baseline characteristics above

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Healthy Homes/Healthy Families (HH/HF) InterventionChanges to Food Environment: PURCHASING FRUITS/VEGETABLES ≥1/WKBaseline76.19 percentage of participants
Healthy Homes/Healthy Families (HH/HF) InterventionChanges to Food Environment: PURCHASING FRUITS/VEGETABLES ≥1/WKMonth 410.8 percentage of participants
Healthy Homes/Healthy Families (HH/HF) InterventionChanges to Food Environment: PURCHASING FRUITS/VEGETABLES ≥1/WKMonth 97.2 percentage of participants
ControlChanges to Food Environment: PURCHASING FRUITS/VEGETABLES ≥1/WKBaseline72.37 percentage of participants
ControlChanges to Food Environment: PURCHASING FRUITS/VEGETABLES ≥1/WKMonth 44.7 percentage of participants
ControlChanges to Food Environment: PURCHASING FRUITS/VEGETABLES ≥1/WKMonth 95.5 percentage of participants
Secondary

Changes to Food Environment: UNHEALTHY SNACKS/FOODS INVENTORY, OF 8

Participants were asked about unhealthy snacks and foods, ranging from 0 to 8, in each survey of the household food inventory. The higher the number the more unhealthy snacks/foods were reported

Time frame: Baseline, Month 4, Month 9

Population: Some participants were lost to follow-up. For the exact breakdown, kindly refer to the baseline characteristics above

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Healthy Homes/Healthy Families (HH/HF) InterventionChanges to Food Environment: UNHEALTHY SNACKS/FOODS INVENTORY, OF 8Baseline4.29 number of unhealthy snacks in the homeStandard Deviation 1.71
Healthy Homes/Healthy Families (HH/HF) InterventionChanges to Food Environment: UNHEALTHY SNACKS/FOODS INVENTORY, OF 8Month 4-1.12 number of unhealthy snacks in the homeStandard Deviation 2.05
Healthy Homes/Healthy Families (HH/HF) InterventionChanges to Food Environment: UNHEALTHY SNACKS/FOODS INVENTORY, OF 8Month 9-0.75 number of unhealthy snacks in the homeStandard Deviation 2.18
ControlChanges to Food Environment: UNHEALTHY SNACKS/FOODS INVENTORY, OF 8Baseline4.45 number of unhealthy snacks in the homeStandard Deviation 1.72
ControlChanges to Food Environment: UNHEALTHY SNACKS/FOODS INVENTORY, OF 8Month 4-0.18 number of unhealthy snacks in the homeStandard Deviation 1.9
ControlChanges to Food Environment: UNHEALTHY SNACKS/FOODS INVENTORY, OF 8Month 9-0.39 number of unhealthy snacks in the homeStandard Deviation 2.1

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026