Skip to content

Intensive Rhythm Monitoring to Decrease Ischemic Stroke and Systemic Embolism - the Find-AF 2 Study

Intensive Heart Rhythm Monitoring to Decrease Ischemic Stroke and Systemic Embolism - the Find-AF 2 Study

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04371055
Acronym
Find-AF2
Enrollment
5227
Registered
2020-05-01
Start date
2020-07-07
Completion date
2027-12-31
Last updated
2026-08-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Atrial Fibrillation, Ischemic Stroke

Keywords

Atrial Fibrillation, Ischemic Stroke, ECG Monitoring, Secondary Prevention

Brief summary

Patients who have suffered a stroke are having an increased risk of having recurrent stroke in the future. This risk of stroke is increased by atrial fibrillation, which often "comes and goes" (called paroxysmal) and hence escapes routine diagnostics. The hypothesis of Find-AF 2 is that enhanced (evaluation in a ECG core lab), prolonged (at least 7 days of rhythm monitoring annually) and intensified (continuous rhythm monitoring in high risk patients) not only finds atrial fibrillation more often, but that changes in therapeutic management (e. g. start of anticoagulation after detection of atrial fibrillation) results in a decrease of cardioembolism (which can be either recurrent stroke or systemic embolism). To prove this hypothesis, patients will be randomised into two groups: the first group will receive the currently available standard care for patients with stroke. In the second group, cardiac rhythm monitoring adapted to the risk of the occurrence of atrial fibrillation is performed - either with a 7-day long-term ECG (at baseline, after 3 and 12 months and every 12 months thereafter) or with continuous monitoring using an implantable cardiac monitor. If atrial fibrillation is detected, this information will be given to the treating study physician. Any therapeutic decision is at the discretion of the treating physician, but should follow current guidelines.

Detailed description

The Find AF 2 study will investigate whether intensified rhythm monitoring in patients with recent ischemic stroke leads to a decrease in recurrent thromboembolism (defined as recurrent ischemic stroke or systemic embolism). This will be achieved by identifying patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and subsequently switching secondary prevention therapy from antiplatelet therapy to oral anticoagulation. The intensity of heart rhythm monitoring will be risk-adjusted: Patients with an estimated low risk of atrial fibrillation receive a 7-day Holter ECG, which is repeated after 3 and 12 months and annually thereafter. Patients with a high risk of atrial fibrillation (defined by increased supraventricular ectopic activity) receive continuous ECG monitoring using an implanted loop recorder. The control arm is treated according to local standards, which includes cardiac rhythm monitoring for at least 24 hours according to current guidelines. Prior to randomization, a 24-hour Holter ECG is performed in both study arms, ensuring minimal ECG monitoring for patients in the control arm and allowing risk stratification in the intervention arm. Additional ECG monitoring using stroke telemetry and/or additional Holter ECGs is possible according to local standards, provided it does not exceed 7 days. Patients in both study arms will be followed up for at least 24 months. It should be noted that this study only provides diagnostic information, the therapeutic decision is left to the treating physician.

Interventions

OTHER7-day Holter ECG

7-day Holter ECG at baseline and after 3 and 12 months and then annually until the end of the study or the first (in patients with low risk of atrial fibrillation)

Continuous rhythm monitoring using an implantable cardiac monitor

OTHERStandard of care

Usual care according to current guidelines (in patients with low and high risk of atrial fibrillation)

Sponsors

University of Leipzig
Lead SponsorOTHER
Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz
CollaboratorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

Randomised, parallel, multicenter interventional trial with blinded assessment of the primary endpoint

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
60 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Recent ischemic stroke (sudden focal neurologic deficit lasting \> 24h consistent with the territory of a major cerebral artery) and/or a corresponding lesion on brain imaging within the last 30 days 2. Age ≥ 60 years 3. Patient without or with only slight disability (modified Rankin Scale score ≤ 2) before onset of stroke-related symptoms. 4. Written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

1. Known history of atrial fibrillation/flutter or atrial fibrillation/flutter on admission ECG 2. Current indication or contraindication for oral anticoagulation at randomisation 3. Intracerebral bleeding in medical history 4. Patient scheduled for ECG-monitoring lasting \> 7 days (Holter-ECG, implanted loop recorder, etc.) 5. Implanted pacemaker device or cardioverter/ defibrillator 6. Patient not willing to be treated with oral anticoagulants 7. Carotid artery stenosis ipsilateral to the current ischemic stroke needing operation or intervention. 8. History of carotid endarterectomy or percutaneous intervention of cerebral artery within the last 30 days. 9. Life expectancy \<1 year for reasons other than stroke (e.g. metastatic cancer) 10. patients under legal supervision or guardianship 11. psychological/mental or other inabilities to supply required information (e.g. fill out the questionnaire due to dementia, language difficulties,...) or participate in the required tests 12. participation in other randomised interventional trials 13. suspected lack of compliance

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Primary efficacy endpoint: Time until recurrent ischemic stroke or systemic embolismfrom the date of randomization until the date of first documented ischemic stroke or date of first systemic embolism, whichever comes first, assessed up to 60 monthsThe trial will be event driven. The minimum follow-up in each patient is 24 months, but may be followed for up to 60 months.
Primary safety endpoint: Time until the first haemorrhagic strokefrom the date of randomization until the date of first documented haemorrhagic stroke, assessed up to 60 monthsTime until the first haemorrhagic stroke

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time until the combination of stroke, myocardial infarction and cardiovascular deathfrom the date of randomization until the date of first documented stroke, the date of myocardial infarction and the date of cardiovascular death, whichever comes first, assessed up to 60 monthsTime until the combination of stroke, myocardial infarction and cardiovascular death
Time until any strokefrom the date of randomization until the date of first documented any stroke, assessed up to 60 monthsTime until any stroke
Time until new onset of AFfrom the date of randomization until the date of first documented AF, assessed up to 60 monthsTime until new onset of Atrial Fibrillation
Time until all cause mortalityfrom the date of randomization until the date of all cause mortality assessed up to 60 monthsTime until all cause mortality
Time until myocardial infarctionfrom the date of randomization until the date of all myocardial infarction, assessed up to 60 monthsTime until myocardial infarction
Changes in quality of life (QoL), measured by the stroke impact scale (SIS-16)Mean change from baseline until study end assessed up to 60 months in both study armsChanges in quality of life (QoL), measured by the stroke impact scale (SIS-16). The SIS-16 ranges from 16 to 80, with higher scores showing better Quality of life.
Changes in the EQ-5D five dimensional Quality of Life (QoL)Mean change from baseline until study end assessed up to 60 months in both study armsChanges in the EQ-5D five dimensional Quality of Life (QoL)
Changes in the overall QoL visual analog scaleMean change from baseline until study end assessed up to 60 months in both study arms, ranging from 0 to 100, with higher values indicating better quality of lifeChanges in the overall QoL visual analog scale

Countries

Germany

Contacts

STUDY_CHAIRRolf Wachter, Prof. Dr.

University of Leipzig, Clinic and Policlinis for Cardiology

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORKlaus Gröschel, Prof. Dr.

University of Mainz, Clinic and Policlinis for Neurology

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Aug 29, 2026