Skip to content

Imagery Vividness and Arousal Responses to Prospective Imagery

Imagery Vividness and Arousal Responses to Prospective Imagery

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04370613
Enrollment
60
Registered
2020-05-01
Start date
2020-10-05
Completion date
2021-10-15
Last updated
2021-10-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Healthy

Keywords

Mental Imagery, Skin conductance

Brief summary

Research has shown that mental imagery appears to carry emotion better than verbal communication. One way this can be noted is that emotional mental imagery trigger physiological arousal responses. These may be important for treatment techniques using mental imagery, such as imaginal exposure and imagery re-scripting. However, as the development of clinical applications increasingly considers the use of flashpoint imagery, i.e. mental imagery of short duration, it is of interest to examine whether also flashpoint imagery trigger arousal responses. This study examines the arousal response to flashpoint imagery of different valence (positive, negative, and neutral). Moreover, emerging evidence suggest that depressed individuals find it more difficult to produce mental imagery of positive future events (less accessible and vivid) than healthy controls. In addition, individuals with clinical anxiety appear to be able to produce imagery of negative future events more easily than healthy controls. This study explores whether these results can be noted also in sub-clinical symptoms of depression and anxiety, and if so, if they are accompanied with corresponding changes in arousal responses.

Detailed description

This study takes part in a single session. Participants will produce flashpoint imagery of future events while skin conductance responses, imagery vividness ratings, valence and arousal ratings are collected. Participants will also fill in questionnaires on depression and anxiety symptoms, as well as a questionnaire measuring general propensity for mental imagery.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALProspective Imagery visualization task

Participant visualizes brief mental imagery of prospective situations of different valence (neutral, positive, negative).

Sponsors

Uppsala University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
CROSS_SECTIONAL

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Age 18 or over * Fluent in Swedish * Willing and able to provide informed consent and complete study procedures

Exclusion criteria

* Current psychiatric disorder * Current use of psychotropic medication

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Imagery vividness ratingsDay 1Scale: 1-5; no image at all - image as clear and vivd as real life
Skin conductance response (SCR)Day 1SCR is used to measure physiological arousal response to the mental imagery production. The study evaluates differences in SCR between valences of prospective imagery (neutral, negative, positive) and possible covariation with self-rated anxiety or depression symptoms.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Subjective Arousal RatingsDay 1Subjective Arousal Ratings for each produced mental imagery (0-100; 0=no arousal, 100=maximum arousal)
The Vividness of Visual Imagery QuestionnaireDay 1This is a self-rated questionnaire measuring vividness of visual mental imagery. Higher scores indicate higher level of vividness (range 0-80)
Time in seconds it takes to construct a situation to visualizeDay 1Measured as the time period from the presentation of the instruction until the participant reports a constructed situation.
Formulär för patienthälsa (PHQ-9)Day 1This is a self-rated questionnaire for measuring depression symptoms. Higher scores indicate more symptoms of depression (range 0-27 + specific question of how disabling the symptoms are)
State-Trait Anxiety InventoryDay 1This is a self-rated questionnaire measuring trait anxiety. Higher scores indicate higher level of trait anxiety (range 20-80)
Subjective Valence RatingsDay 1Subjective Valence Ratings for each produced mental imagery (0-100; negative to positive)

Countries

Sweden

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026