Skip to content

Study Assessing Efficacy and Safety of AKST4290 in Subjects With Parkinson's Disease on Stable Dopaminergic Treatment

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of AKST4290 in Subjects With Parkinson's Disease on Stable Dopaminergic Treatment

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04369430
Acronym
TEAL
Enrollment
110
Registered
2020-04-30
Start date
2020-01-16
Completion date
2021-03-10
Last updated
2022-10-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Parkinson Disease

Keywords

Brain Diseases, Central Nervous System Diseases, Nervous System Diseases, Neurodegenerative Diseases, Neurocognitive Disorders, Mental Disorders, Parkinson's Disease, Dementia, Movement Disorder, Shaking Palsy

Brief summary

This study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of AKST4290 in subjects with Parkinson's Disease who are currently on stable dopaminergic treatment.

Interventions

Oral AKST4290

DRUGPlacebo

Oral Placebo

Sponsors

Alkahest, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
50 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Key Inclusion Criteria: * Diagnosis of clinically established or clinically probable PD according to MDS-PD criteria with at least 1 year of PD symptoms. * Modified Hoehn and Yahr ≤2.5. * Have notable motor worsening during off-medication state. * Clear-cut improvement of motor response to levodopa medications, as assessed by the investigator. * Must be on stable dopaminergic therapy (e.g., levodopa, dopamine agonists, monoamine oxidase inhibitors, catechol-O-methyl transferase inhibitors, amantadine), for at least 8 weeks prior to enrollment and remain on stable dose during the 12-week treatment period. * Female subjects must not be pregnant or breastfeeding. Women of childbearing potential (WOCBP) must have a negative pregnancy test at Screening. WOCBP must agree to use highly effective contraception prior to study entry. Male subjects must be willing to use a barrier method of contraception. Key

Exclusion criteria

* Secondary or atypical parkinsonian syndromes, for example, patients with parkinsonism from encephalitis, metabolic disorders, vascular parkinsonism, drug-induced parkinsonism, multiple system atrophy, corticobasal ganglia degeneration, progressive supranuclear palsy, Lewy body dementia. * History of any brain surgery for PD (e.g., pallidotomy, deep brain stimulation, or fetal tissue transplant). * Conditions affecting the peripheral or central nervous system, unless related to PD, that would affect the ability to adequately perform the MDS-UPDRS and motor assessments: i.e., severe sensory neuropathy affecting arm or leg function, or stroke affecting motor or gait function. * Significant alcohol or drug abuse within past 2 years. * Based on ECG reading, subjects with a risk of QT prolongation. NOTE: Other protocol defined Inclusion/

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Motor Function During Levodopa Withdrawal.Baseline to 12 weeksMovement Disorder Society's Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS), Part 3 Motor Examination has 33 scores based on 18 questions with several right, left, or both body distribution scores. Each Parkinsonian sign or symptom is rated on a 5-point Likert-type scale (ranging from 0 to 4), with higher scores indicating more severe impairment. The minimum score on the MDS-UPDRS Part 3 is 0 and the maximum is 132. Outcome is the mean change from Baseline in motor function during the practically defined off-medication state, defined as at least 12 hours off levodopa, at Week 12, with lower score representing better outcome.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Evaluation of Laboratory Changes.Baseline to week 14Incidence of of abnormalities or clinically significant changes from Baseline in laboratory test data (chemistry, hematology, coagulation, and urinalysis). Incidence was presented as number of subjects abnormal labs indicating serious condition occurred within the analysis population throughout study duration.
Evaluation of Vital Sign Changes.Baseline to week 12Incidence of abnormalities or clinically-significant changes from Baseline in Vital sign measurements (blood pressure as measured in mmHg, heart rate as measured in beats per minute, and temperature as measured in degrees Fahrenheit or Celsius). Incidence was presented as number of subjects with abnormalities or clinically-significant changes from Baseline in Vital sign measurements within the analysis group throughout study duration.
Evaluation of Electrocardiogram Changes.Baseline to week 12Incidence of abnormalities or clinically-significant changes from Baseline in 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) QT-interval. Incidence was presented as number of subject with ECG changes throughout study duration.
The Movement Disorder Society's Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) Parts 1-4, Change From Baseline During the On-medication State.Baseline to week 12The MDS-UPDRS has 4 components (details below). The rating for each item is from 0 (normal) to 4 (severe). The score for each Part is obtained from the sum of the corresponding item scores, with higher scores indicating more severe impairment. Part I, Non-Motor Aspects (Mentation, Behavior, and Mood) of Experiences of Daily Living (13 items), score range is 0-52. Part II, Motor Aspects of Experiences of Daily Living (13 items), score range is 0-52. Part III, Motor Examination (33 items), score range is 0-132. Part IV, Motor Complications (6 items), score range is 0-24. The outcome is the mean change from Baseline motor function during the on-medication state at Week 12, with lower value representing a better outcome.
The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), Change From Baseline in MoCA During the On-medication State.Baseline to week 12The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) is a neuropsychological tool that requires approximately 15 minutes to assess the following domains: attention, executive function, memory, language, visuoconstructional skills, and orientation. MoCA scores range between 0 and 30, with higher scores indicating more intact cognition. The MoCA is administered at Baseline and Week 12 in the on-medication state. The total score will be summarized at each scheduled time point. The outcome is mean change from baseline in MoCA during the on-medication state at Week 12, with higher value representing a better outcome.
Safety as Assessed by the Incidence, Seriousness and Severity of Adverse Events (AEs).Baseline to week 14Incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and serious TEAEs, grouped by severity, relationship to study treatment, and AEs leading to discontinuation of study participation. Incidence was presented as number of subject with TEAEs and serious TEAEs, grouped by severity, relationship to study treatment, and AEs leading to discontinuation of study participation, throughout study duration.
The Clinical Impression of Severity Index - PD (CISI-PD), Change From Baseline in CISI-PD During the On-medication State.Baseline to week 12The CISI-PD is a severity index formed by four items (motor signs, disability, motor complications, and cognitive status), rated 0 (not at all) to 6 (very severe or completely disabled). A total score is calculated by summing the item scores, total scores range from 0-24. The outcome is the mean change from baseline in CISI-PD during the on-medication state at Week 12, with lower score represents a better outcome.
The Parkinson's Disease Quality of Life Questionnaire-39 (PDQ-39), Change From Baseline in PDQ-39 During the On-medication State.Baseline to week 12The PDQ-39 is a patient-reported outcome of 39 questions relating to 8 key areas of health and daily activities, including both motor and non-motor symptoms. The eight dimensions include: mobility, activities of daily living, emotional well-being, stigma, social support, cognition, communication, and bodily discomfort. It is scored on a scale of 0-100 with lower scores indicating better health and high scores indicating more severe symptoms, applying to all dimensions reported in the data table. Outcome is the mean change from baseline in PDQ-39 during the on-medication state at Week 12, with lower score represents a better outcome.
The Sheehan-Suicidality Tracking Scale (S-STS), Change From Baseline in S-STS During the On-medication State.Baseline to week 12The standard version of the S-STS is a 16-item scale that assesses the seriousness of suicidality phenomena on a Likert-type scale (0-4) ranging from not at all (0) to extremely (4), where higher scores indicate more risk of suicidality. It also assesses the frequency of key phenomena and the overall time spent in suicidality. Total score is a sum of all items; total score ranges from 0-64. Outcome is the mean change from baseline in S-STS during the on-medication state at Week 12, with higher score represents a worse outcome.
10-meter Timed Walk, Change in Baseline 10-meter Timed Walk During the on and Off-medication StateBaseline to week 12The 10-meter walk test is a commonly used tool for assessing gait speed in individuals with gait limitations. Gait speed is positively correlated with the amount of community ambulation and quality of life, and it is an important measure of mobility in individuals with PD, with higher value corresponds to better mobility. Outcome is the mean change from baseline comfortable walking speed (gait), fast walking speed (gait), during the on and off-medication state at Week 12, with higher score represents a better outcome.
Hauser 3-Day Patient Diary, Change in Baseline Mean Time Spent With and Without Troublesome Dyskinesia as Measured by the Hauser 3-Day Patient DiaryBaseline to week 12The Hauser Patient Diary was developed to assess functional status over a period of time in patients with motor fluctuations and dyskinesia by recording patient motor state for half-hour intervals over a 24-hour period. The outcome is mean change of Mean Time Spent with and without troublesome dyskinesia from Baseline at Week 12. ON/OFF-time is time when medication is providing/not providing benefit with regard to mobility, slowness, and stiffness, respectively. Troublesome dyskinesia is defined as dyskinesia that interfere with function or causes meaningful discomfort. Bad time is defined as the sum of off time and on time with troublesome dyskinesia. Lower value represents a better outcome. Good time is defined as the on time without dyskinesia plus on time with non-troublesome dyskinesia. Higher value represents a better outcome.
The Schwab and England Activities of Daily Living (SE-ADL) Scale, Change From Baseline in SE-ADL During the On-medication State.Baseline to week 12The SE-ADL evaluates patients' perceptions of global functional capacity and dependence. Scoring is expressed in terms of percentage, in 10 steps from 100 to 0 (100% indicates completely independent, 0% indicates bedridden with impaired vegetative functions), so that the lower the score, the worse the functional status. Scores will be summarized descriptively at each scheduled time point (i.e. n, %) by treatment group. A Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE) for alternating logistic regression (ALR) with an exchangeable working correlation structure will be employed to analyze change from baseline. Outcome is mean change from baseline in SE-ADL during the on-medication state at Week 12, with higher values represents a better outcome.

Countries

Estonia, Germany, Poland, Slovakia, United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
AKST4290
Subjects will receive AKST4290, 400 mg twice daily, for 12 weeks. AKST4290: Oral AKST4290
55
Placebo
Subjects will receive placebo, twice daily, for 12 weeks. Placebo: Oral Placebo
55
Total110

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event23
Overall StudyCOVID concern, Sponsor's decision21
Overall StudyDeath10
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up01
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject43

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalPlaceboAKST4290
Age, Continuous64.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.45
64.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.74
63.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.07
Baseline BMI28.02 (kg/m^2)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.689
27.91 (kg/m^2)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.417
28.12 (kg/m^2)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.986
Disease Duration6.69 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.571
7.62 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.467
5.71 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.138
Education
Grade School
57 Participants27 Participants30 Participants
Education
Masters
18 Participants9 Participants9 Participants
Education
PhD/Medical School
2 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Education
University
33 Participants19 Participants14 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
110 Participants55 Participants55 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Modified Hoehn and Yahr
Bilateral disease, without impairment of balance
64 Participants32 Participants32 Participants
Modified Hoehn and Yahr
Mild bilateral disease, with recovery on pull test
25 Participants12 Participants13 Participants
Modified Hoehn and Yahr
No signs of disease
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Modified Hoehn and Yahr
Unilateral disease
10 Participants5 Participants5 Participants
Modified Hoehn and Yahr
Unilateral plus axial involvement
11 Participants6 Participants5 Participants
Movement Disorder Society's Unified PD Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) Part 3 in the off-medication state36.9 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.35
38.5 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.44
35.2 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.17
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
2 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
107 Participants53 Participants54 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
42 Participants21 Participants21 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
68 Participants34 Participants34 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
1 / 520 / 55
other
Total, other adverse events
8 / 5211 / 55
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 523 / 55

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Motor Function During Levodopa Withdrawal.

Movement Disorder Society's Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS), Part 3 Motor Examination has 33 scores based on 18 questions with several right, left, or both body distribution scores. Each Parkinsonian sign or symptom is rated on a 5-point Likert-type scale (ranging from 0 to 4), with higher scores indicating more severe impairment. The minimum score on the MDS-UPDRS Part 3 is 0 and the maximum is 132. Outcome is the mean change from Baseline in motor function during the practically defined off-medication state, defined as at least 12 hours off levodopa, at Week 12, with lower score representing better outcome.

Time frame: Baseline to 12 weeks

Population: Modified Intent-to-Treat/Evaluables (Subjects with nonmissing Baseline and primary endpoint data)

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
AKST4290Change in Motor Function During Levodopa Withdrawal.-4.210 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.1844
PlaceboChange in Motor Function During Levodopa Withdrawal.-5.114 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.1839
Secondary

10-meter Timed Walk, Change in Baseline 10-meter Timed Walk During the on and Off-medication State

The 10-meter walk test is a commonly used tool for assessing gait speed in individuals with gait limitations. Gait speed is positively correlated with the amount of community ambulation and quality of life, and it is an important measure of mobility in individuals with PD, with higher value corresponds to better mobility. Outcome is the mean change from baseline comfortable walking speed (gait), fast walking speed (gait), during the on and off-medication state at Week 12, with higher score represents a better outcome.

Time frame: Baseline to week 12

Population: Modified Intent-to-Treat/Evaluables (All subjects with nonmissing Baseline and primary endpoint data)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
AKST429010-meter Timed Walk, Change in Baseline 10-meter Timed Walk During the on and Off-medication StateComfortable Walking Speed (On-medication)0.030 m/sStandard Error 0.0293
AKST429010-meter Timed Walk, Change in Baseline 10-meter Timed Walk During the on and Off-medication StateComfortable Walking Speed (Off-medication)0.091 m/sStandard Error 0.0326
AKST429010-meter Timed Walk, Change in Baseline 10-meter Timed Walk During the on and Off-medication StateFast Walking Speed (Off-medication)0.107 m/sStandard Error 0.0413
AKST429010-meter Timed Walk, Change in Baseline 10-meter Timed Walk During the on and Off-medication StateFast Walking Speed (On-medication)0.041 m/sStandard Error 0.0405
Placebo10-meter Timed Walk, Change in Baseline 10-meter Timed Walk During the on and Off-medication StateFast Walking Speed (On-medication)0.075 m/sStandard Error 0.0407
Placebo10-meter Timed Walk, Change in Baseline 10-meter Timed Walk During the on and Off-medication StateComfortable Walking Speed (Off-medication)0.084 m/sStandard Error 0.0329
Placebo10-meter Timed Walk, Change in Baseline 10-meter Timed Walk During the on and Off-medication StateComfortable Walking Speed (On-medication)0.041 m/sStandard Error 0.0295
Placebo10-meter Timed Walk, Change in Baseline 10-meter Timed Walk During the on and Off-medication StateFast Walking Speed (Off-medication)0.150 m/sStandard Error 0.0417
Secondary

Evaluation of Electrocardiogram Changes.

Incidence of abnormalities or clinically-significant changes from Baseline in 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) QT-interval. Incidence was presented as number of subject with ECG changes throughout study duration.

Time frame: Baseline to week 12

Population: Safety Population (all subjects who received at least one dose of the study medication)

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
AKST4290Evaluation of Electrocardiogram Changes.Normal35 Participants
AKST4290Evaluation of Electrocardiogram Changes.Abnormal, Not Clinically Significant10 Participants
AKST4290Evaluation of Electrocardiogram Changes.Abnormal, Clinically Significant0 Participants
PlaceboEvaluation of Electrocardiogram Changes.Normal26 Participants
PlaceboEvaluation of Electrocardiogram Changes.Abnormal, Not Clinically Significant16 Participants
PlaceboEvaluation of Electrocardiogram Changes.Abnormal, Clinically Significant5 Participants
Secondary

Evaluation of Laboratory Changes.

Incidence of of abnormalities or clinically significant changes from Baseline in laboratory test data (chemistry, hematology, coagulation, and urinalysis). Incidence was presented as number of subjects abnormal labs indicating serious condition occurred within the analysis population throughout study duration.

Time frame: Baseline to week 14

Population: Safety Population (all subjects who received at least one dose of the study medication).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
AKST4290Evaluation of Laboratory Changes.Abnormal Blood Chemistry Labs18 Participants
AKST4290Evaluation of Laboratory Changes.Abnormal Hematology Labs2 Participants
AKST4290Evaluation of Laboratory Changes.Abnormal Urinalysis Labs0 Participants
AKST4290Evaluation of Laboratory Changes.Abnormal Coagulation Labs2 Participants
PlaceboEvaluation of Laboratory Changes.Abnormal Coagulation Labs4 Participants
PlaceboEvaluation of Laboratory Changes.Abnormal Blood Chemistry Labs12 Participants
PlaceboEvaluation of Laboratory Changes.Abnormal Urinalysis Labs0 Participants
PlaceboEvaluation of Laboratory Changes.Abnormal Hematology Labs1 Participants
Secondary

Evaluation of Vital Sign Changes.

Incidence of abnormalities or clinically-significant changes from Baseline in Vital sign measurements (blood pressure as measured in mmHg, heart rate as measured in beats per minute, and temperature as measured in degrees Fahrenheit or Celsius). Incidence was presented as number of subjects with abnormalities or clinically-significant changes from Baseline in Vital sign measurements within the analysis group throughout study duration.

Time frame: Baseline to week 12

Population: Safety Population (all subjects who received at least one dose of the study medication); only Abnormal, Clinically Significant incidences were reported in the Outcome Measure Data Table.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
AKST4290Evaluation of Vital Sign Changes.0 Participants
PlaceboEvaluation of Vital Sign Changes.2 Participants
Secondary

Hauser 3-Day Patient Diary, Change in Baseline Mean Time Spent With and Without Troublesome Dyskinesia as Measured by the Hauser 3-Day Patient Diary

The Hauser Patient Diary was developed to assess functional status over a period of time in patients with motor fluctuations and dyskinesia by recording patient motor state for half-hour intervals over a 24-hour period. The outcome is mean change of Mean Time Spent with and without troublesome dyskinesia from Baseline at Week 12. ON/OFF-time is time when medication is providing/not providing benefit with regard to mobility, slowness, and stiffness, respectively. Troublesome dyskinesia is defined as dyskinesia that interfere with function or causes meaningful discomfort. Bad time is defined as the sum of off time and on time with troublesome dyskinesia. Lower value represents a better outcome. Good time is defined as the on time without dyskinesia plus on time with non-troublesome dyskinesia. Higher value represents a better outcome.

Time frame: Baseline to week 12

Population: Modified Intent-to-Treat/Evaluables (All subjects with nonmissing Baseline and primary endpoint data)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
AKST4290Hauser 3-Day Patient Diary, Change in Baseline Mean Time Spent With and Without Troublesome Dyskinesia as Measured by the Hauser 3-Day Patient DiaryMean Bad Time-1.1 hoursStandard Error 1.06
AKST4290Hauser 3-Day Patient Diary, Change in Baseline Mean Time Spent With and Without Troublesome Dyskinesia as Measured by the Hauser 3-Day Patient DiaryMean Good time1.7 hoursStandard Error 1.24
PlaceboHauser 3-Day Patient Diary, Change in Baseline Mean Time Spent With and Without Troublesome Dyskinesia as Measured by the Hauser 3-Day Patient DiaryMean Bad Time-1.3 hoursStandard Error 1.06
PlaceboHauser 3-Day Patient Diary, Change in Baseline Mean Time Spent With and Without Troublesome Dyskinesia as Measured by the Hauser 3-Day Patient DiaryMean Good time0.4 hoursStandard Error 1.24
Secondary

Safety as Assessed by the Incidence, Seriousness and Severity of Adverse Events (AEs).

Incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and serious TEAEs, grouped by severity, relationship to study treatment, and AEs leading to discontinuation of study participation. Incidence was presented as number of subject with TEAEs and serious TEAEs, grouped by severity, relationship to study treatment, and AEs leading to discontinuation of study participation, throughout study duration.

Time frame: Baseline to week 14

Population: Safety Population (all subjects who received at least one dose of the study medication). Subjects with different severity or relationship to study treatment will be counted only once at the highest grade of event.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
AKST4290Safety as Assessed by the Incidence, Seriousness and Severity of Adverse Events (AEs).Subjects with any TEAEs - Severity : Moderate6 participants
AKST4290Safety as Assessed by the Incidence, Seriousness and Severity of Adverse Events (AEs).Subjects with any Serious TEAEs - Severity : Severe1 participants
AKST4290Safety as Assessed by the Incidence, Seriousness and Severity of Adverse Events (AEs).Subjects with any TEAEs - Relationship to Study Treatment: Unrelated9 participants
AKST4290Safety as Assessed by the Incidence, Seriousness and Severity of Adverse Events (AEs).Subjects with any TEAEs - Relationship to Study Treatment: Possibly Related10 participants
AKST4290Safety as Assessed by the Incidence, Seriousness and Severity of Adverse Events (AEs).Subjects with any TEAEs - Relationship to Study Treatment: Definitely Related0 participants
AKST4290Safety as Assessed by the Incidence, Seriousness and Severity of Adverse Events (AEs).Subjects with any Serious TEAEs - Relationship to Study Treatment: Unrelated1 participants
AKST4290Safety as Assessed by the Incidence, Seriousness and Severity of Adverse Events (AEs).Subjects with any TEAEs - Severity : Mild12 participants
AKST4290Safety as Assessed by the Incidence, Seriousness and Severity of Adverse Events (AEs).Subjects with any TEAEs - Severity : Severe1 participants
AKST4290Safety as Assessed by the Incidence, Seriousness and Severity of Adverse Events (AEs).Subjects with any Serious TEAEs - Severity : Mild0 participants
AKST4290Safety as Assessed by the Incidence, Seriousness and Severity of Adverse Events (AEs).Subjects with any Serious TEAEs - Severity : Moderate0 participants
AKST4290Safety as Assessed by the Incidence, Seriousness and Severity of Adverse Events (AEs).Subjects with any Serious TEAEs - Relationship to Study Treatment: Possibly Related0 participants
AKST4290Safety as Assessed by the Incidence, Seriousness and Severity of Adverse Events (AEs).Subjects with any Serious TEAEs - Relationship to Study Treatment: Definitely Related0 participants
AKST4290Safety as Assessed by the Incidence, Seriousness and Severity of Adverse Events (AEs).Subjects with any TEAEs - AEs leading to discontinuation of study participation2 participants
AKST4290Safety as Assessed by the Incidence, Seriousness and Severity of Adverse Events (AEs).Subjects with any Serious TEAEs - AEs leading to discontinuation of study participation0 participants
PlaceboSafety as Assessed by the Incidence, Seriousness and Severity of Adverse Events (AEs).Subjects with any Serious TEAEs - Relationship to Study Treatment: Possibly Related0 participants
PlaceboSafety as Assessed by the Incidence, Seriousness and Severity of Adverse Events (AEs).Subjects with any TEAEs - Severity : Severe0 participants
PlaceboSafety as Assessed by the Incidence, Seriousness and Severity of Adverse Events (AEs).Subjects with any Serious TEAEs - Severity : Severe0 participants
PlaceboSafety as Assessed by the Incidence, Seriousness and Severity of Adverse Events (AEs).Subjects with any TEAEs - AEs leading to discontinuation of study participation2 participants
PlaceboSafety as Assessed by the Incidence, Seriousness and Severity of Adverse Events (AEs).Subjects with any TEAEs - Relationship to Study Treatment: Unrelated14 participants
PlaceboSafety as Assessed by the Incidence, Seriousness and Severity of Adverse Events (AEs).Subjects with any Serious TEAEs - Severity : Mild0 participants
PlaceboSafety as Assessed by the Incidence, Seriousness and Severity of Adverse Events (AEs).Subjects with any TEAEs - Relationship to Study Treatment: Possibly Related11 participants
PlaceboSafety as Assessed by the Incidence, Seriousness and Severity of Adverse Events (AEs).Subjects with any Serious TEAEs - Relationship to Study Treatment: Definitely Related3 participants
PlaceboSafety as Assessed by the Incidence, Seriousness and Severity of Adverse Events (AEs).Subjects with any TEAEs - Relationship to Study Treatment: Definitely Related1 participants
PlaceboSafety as Assessed by the Incidence, Seriousness and Severity of Adverse Events (AEs).Subjects with any Serious TEAEs - Severity : Moderate3 participants
PlaceboSafety as Assessed by the Incidence, Seriousness and Severity of Adverse Events (AEs).Subjects with any Serious TEAEs - Relationship to Study Treatment: Unrelated3 participants
PlaceboSafety as Assessed by the Incidence, Seriousness and Severity of Adverse Events (AEs).Subjects with any Serious TEAEs - AEs leading to discontinuation of study participation1 participants
PlaceboSafety as Assessed by the Incidence, Seriousness and Severity of Adverse Events (AEs).Subjects with any TEAEs - Severity : Mild17 participants
PlaceboSafety as Assessed by the Incidence, Seriousness and Severity of Adverse Events (AEs).Subjects with any TEAEs - Severity : Moderate9 participants
Secondary

The Clinical Impression of Severity Index - PD (CISI-PD), Change From Baseline in CISI-PD During the On-medication State.

The CISI-PD is a severity index formed by four items (motor signs, disability, motor complications, and cognitive status), rated 0 (not at all) to 6 (very severe or completely disabled). A total score is calculated by summing the item scores, total scores range from 0-24. The outcome is the mean change from baseline in CISI-PD during the on-medication state at Week 12, with lower score represents a better outcome.

Time frame: Baseline to week 12

Population: Modified Intent-to-Treat/Evaluables (All subjects with nonmissing Baseline and primary endpoint data)

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
AKST4290The Clinical Impression of Severity Index - PD (CISI-PD), Change From Baseline in CISI-PD During the On-medication State.-0.662 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.2867
PlaceboThe Clinical Impression of Severity Index - PD (CISI-PD), Change From Baseline in CISI-PD During the On-medication State.-0.271 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.2867
Secondary

The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), Change From Baseline in MoCA During the On-medication State.

The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) is a neuropsychological tool that requires approximately 15 minutes to assess the following domains: attention, executive function, memory, language, visuoconstructional skills, and orientation. MoCA scores range between 0 and 30, with higher scores indicating more intact cognition. The MoCA is administered at Baseline and Week 12 in the on-medication state. The total score will be summarized at each scheduled time point. The outcome is mean change from baseline in MoCA during the on-medication state at Week 12, with higher value representing a better outcome.

Time frame: Baseline to week 12

Population: Modified Intent-to-Treat/Evaluables (All subjects with nonmissing Baseline and primary endpoint data)

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
AKST4290The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), Change From Baseline in MoCA During the On-medication State.0.0 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.23
PlaceboThe Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), Change From Baseline in MoCA During the On-medication State.-0.2 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.23
Secondary

The Movement Disorder Society's Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) Parts 1-4, Change From Baseline During the On-medication State.

The MDS-UPDRS has 4 components (details below). The rating for each item is from 0 (normal) to 4 (severe). The score for each Part is obtained from the sum of the corresponding item scores, with higher scores indicating more severe impairment. Part I, Non-Motor Aspects (Mentation, Behavior, and Mood) of Experiences of Daily Living (13 items), score range is 0-52. Part II, Motor Aspects of Experiences of Daily Living (13 items), score range is 0-52. Part III, Motor Examination (33 items), score range is 0-132. Part IV, Motor Complications (6 items), score range is 0-24. The outcome is the mean change from Baseline motor function during the on-medication state at Week 12, with lower value representing a better outcome.

Time frame: Baseline to week 12

Population: Modified Intent-to-Treat/Evaluables (All subjects with nonmissing Baseline and primary endpoint data)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
AKST4290The Movement Disorder Society's Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) Parts 1-4, Change From Baseline During the On-medication State.MDS-UPDRS Part 1-0.412 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.4581
AKST4290The Movement Disorder Society's Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) Parts 1-4, Change From Baseline During the On-medication State.MDS-UPDRS Part 2-0.929 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.4552
AKST4290The Movement Disorder Society's Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) Parts 1-4, Change From Baseline During the On-medication State.MDS-UPDRS Part 4-0.130 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.3129
AKST4290The Movement Disorder Society's Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) Parts 1-4, Change From Baseline During the On-medication State.MDS-UPDRS Part 3-1.340 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.0729
PlaceboThe Movement Disorder Society's Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) Parts 1-4, Change From Baseline During the On-medication State.MDS-UPDRS Part 4-0.160 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.3129
PlaceboThe Movement Disorder Society's Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) Parts 1-4, Change From Baseline During the On-medication State.MDS-UPDRS Part 1-0.827 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.4581
PlaceboThe Movement Disorder Society's Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) Parts 1-4, Change From Baseline During the On-medication State.MDS-UPDRS Part 20.023 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.4552
PlaceboThe Movement Disorder Society's Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) Parts 1-4, Change From Baseline During the On-medication State.MDS-UPDRS Part 3-1.300 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.0728
Secondary

The Parkinson's Disease Quality of Life Questionnaire-39 (PDQ-39), Change From Baseline in PDQ-39 During the On-medication State.

The PDQ-39 is a patient-reported outcome of 39 questions relating to 8 key areas of health and daily activities, including both motor and non-motor symptoms. The eight dimensions include: mobility, activities of daily living, emotional well-being, stigma, social support, cognition, communication, and bodily discomfort. It is scored on a scale of 0-100 with lower scores indicating better health and high scores indicating more severe symptoms, applying to all dimensions reported in the data table. Outcome is the mean change from baseline in PDQ-39 during the on-medication state at Week 12, with lower score represents a better outcome.

Time frame: Baseline to week 12

Population: Modified Intent-to-Treat/Evaluables (All subjects with nonmissing Baseline and primary endpoint data)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
AKST4290The Parkinson's Disease Quality of Life Questionnaire-39 (PDQ-39), Change From Baseline in PDQ-39 During the On-medication State.Stigma-6.372 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.491
AKST4290The Parkinson's Disease Quality of Life Questionnaire-39 (PDQ-39), Change From Baseline in PDQ-39 During the On-medication State.Social Support-3.996 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.7285
AKST4290The Parkinson's Disease Quality of Life Questionnaire-39 (PDQ-39), Change From Baseline in PDQ-39 During the On-medication State.Cognition-5.415 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.5881
AKST4290The Parkinson's Disease Quality of Life Questionnaire-39 (PDQ-39), Change From Baseline in PDQ-39 During the On-medication State.Activities of Daily Living-5.557 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.6972
AKST4290The Parkinson's Disease Quality of Life Questionnaire-39 (PDQ-39), Change From Baseline in PDQ-39 During the On-medication State.Communication-5.736 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.5486
AKST4290The Parkinson's Disease Quality of Life Questionnaire-39 (PDQ-39), Change From Baseline in PDQ-39 During the On-medication State.PDQ-39 Single Index-5.649 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.1485
AKST4290The Parkinson's Disease Quality of Life Questionnaire-39 (PDQ-39), Change From Baseline in PDQ-39 During the On-medication State.Bodily Discomfort-5.660 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.2787
AKST4290The Parkinson's Disease Quality of Life Questionnaire-39 (PDQ-39), Change From Baseline in PDQ-39 During the On-medication State.Emotional Well-Being-7.299 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.7185
AKST4290The Parkinson's Disease Quality of Life Questionnaire-39 (PDQ-39), Change From Baseline in PDQ-39 During the On-medication State.Mobility-5.021 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.8531
PlaceboThe Parkinson's Disease Quality of Life Questionnaire-39 (PDQ-39), Change From Baseline in PDQ-39 During the On-medication State.PDQ-39 Single Index-3.107 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.1484
PlaceboThe Parkinson's Disease Quality of Life Questionnaire-39 (PDQ-39), Change From Baseline in PDQ-39 During the On-medication State.Mobility-0.744 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.8531
PlaceboThe Parkinson's Disease Quality of Life Questionnaire-39 (PDQ-39), Change From Baseline in PDQ-39 During the On-medication State.Activities of Daily Living-3.022 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.6972
PlaceboThe Parkinson's Disease Quality of Life Questionnaire-39 (PDQ-39), Change From Baseline in PDQ-39 During the On-medication State.Emotional Well-Being-4.602 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.7184
PlaceboThe Parkinson's Disease Quality of Life Questionnaire-39 (PDQ-39), Change From Baseline in PDQ-39 During the On-medication State.Social Support-0.788 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.7285
PlaceboThe Parkinson's Disease Quality of Life Questionnaire-39 (PDQ-39), Change From Baseline in PDQ-39 During the On-medication State.Cognition-5.693 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.5881
PlaceboThe Parkinson's Disease Quality of Life Questionnaire-39 (PDQ-39), Change From Baseline in PDQ-39 During the On-medication State.Communication-1.826 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.5488
PlaceboThe Parkinson's Disease Quality of Life Questionnaire-39 (PDQ-39), Change From Baseline in PDQ-39 During the On-medication State.Bodily Discomfort-5.594 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.2786
PlaceboThe Parkinson's Disease Quality of Life Questionnaire-39 (PDQ-39), Change From Baseline in PDQ-39 During the On-medication State.Stigma-2.602 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.4912
Secondary

The Schwab and England Activities of Daily Living (SE-ADL) Scale, Change From Baseline in SE-ADL During the On-medication State.

The SE-ADL evaluates patients' perceptions of global functional capacity and dependence. Scoring is expressed in terms of percentage, in 10 steps from 100 to 0 (100% indicates completely independent, 0% indicates bedridden with impaired vegetative functions), so that the lower the score, the worse the functional status. Scores will be summarized descriptively at each scheduled time point (i.e. n, %) by treatment group. A Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE) for alternating logistic regression (ALR) with an exchangeable working correlation structure will be employed to analyze change from baseline. Outcome is mean change from baseline in SE-ADL during the on-medication state at Week 12, with higher values represents a better outcome.

Time frame: Baseline to week 12

Population: Modified Intent-to-Treat/Evaluables (All subjects with nonmissing Baseline and primary endpoint data)

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
AKST4290The Schwab and England Activities of Daily Living (SE-ADL) Scale, Change From Baseline in SE-ADL During the On-medication State.1.7 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.91
PlaceboThe Schwab and England Activities of Daily Living (SE-ADL) Scale, Change From Baseline in SE-ADL During the On-medication State.1.7 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.92
Secondary

The Sheehan-Suicidality Tracking Scale (S-STS), Change From Baseline in S-STS During the On-medication State.

The standard version of the S-STS is a 16-item scale that assesses the seriousness of suicidality phenomena on a Likert-type scale (0-4) ranging from not at all (0) to extremely (4), where higher scores indicate more risk of suicidality. It also assesses the frequency of key phenomena and the overall time spent in suicidality. Total score is a sum of all items; total score ranges from 0-64. Outcome is the mean change from baseline in S-STS during the on-medication state at Week 12, with higher score represents a worse outcome.

Time frame: Baseline to week 12

Population: Modified Intent-to-Treat/Evaluables (All subjects with nonmissing Baseline and primary endpoint data)

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
AKST4290The Sheehan-Suicidality Tracking Scale (S-STS), Change From Baseline in S-STS During the On-medication State.0.0 score on a scaleStandard Error 0
PlaceboThe Sheehan-Suicidality Tracking Scale (S-STS), Change From Baseline in S-STS During the On-medication State.0.0 score on a scaleStandard Error 0

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026