Skip to content

Evaluation of Two Different Grafting Techniques After Mandibular Impacted Third Molar Surgery

Evaluation of the Effectiveness of the Mineralized Plasmatic Matrix and Tricalcium Phosphate Graft Application After Mandibular Impacted Third Molar Surgery in Terms of Periodontal and Osseous Healing Distal to the Second Molar

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04366635
Enrollment
36
Registered
2020-04-29
Start date
2020-04-27
Completion date
2020-08-20
Last updated
2020-05-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Impacted Teeth With Abnormal Position, Impacted Third Molar Tooth, Periodontal Pocket

Keywords

Mineralized Plasmatic Matrix, Beta-tricalcium phosphate

Brief summary

This study evaluates the effectiveness of using Mineralized Plasmatic Matrix and β-tricalcium phosphate that placed to extraction socket as a graft material in terms of periodontal damage occurred in the distal aspect of the second molar after mandibular impacted third molar surgery.

Interventions

PROCEDUREImpacted third molar surgery

Under local anesthesia, flap will be raised and mesioangular or horizontal impacted third molar tooth will be removed with routine technique. And then extraction socket will be irrigated with salin and will be primarily closed.

PROCEDUREApplication of mineralised plasmatic matrix

After extraction of impacted third molar tooth, Mineralized Plasmatic Matrix will be placed to the socket as a graft material and will be covered with Platelet Rich Fibrin membrane. Then wound will be primarily closed.

PROCEDUREApplication of β-tricalcium phosphate

After extraction of impacted third molar tooth, β-tricalcium phosphate will be placed to the socket as a graft material and will be covered with Platelet Rich Fibrin membrane. Then wound will be primarily closed.

Sponsors

Konya Necmettin Erbakan Üniversitesi
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 40 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Medically healthy. * Periodontally healthy patients. * Patients with mesioangular or horizontal impacted teeth that will cause periodontal damage at the distal part of the second molar after surgery.

Exclusion criteria

* Crowns on second molar teeth. * Poor oral hygiene. * Patients with a systemic disease affecting periodontal healing. * Pregnancy or lactation period. * Patients undergoing orthodontic treatment. * Smokers. * The cases where the buccal or lingual cortical bone didn't remain intact following the extraction were also excluded.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Periodontal pocket depthAt 0 dayInitial periodontal pocket depth measurement at the distal aspect of second molar tooth before extraction.
Alveolar bone levelAt 0 dayInitial bone level measurement at the distal aspect of second molar tooth before extraction.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Periodontal pocket depthAt 6th monthSecondary measurement of periodontal pocket depth after extraction
Alveolar bone levelAt 6th monthSecondary measurement of bone level after extraction

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Contacts

Primary ContactAli Kılınç
dtalikilinc@gmail.com03322230025
Backup ContactKubilay Işık

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026