Skip to content

Evaluating the Effectiveness of an Individualized Nutrition and Physical Activity Counseling Program

Evaluating the Effectiveness of an Individualized Nutrition and Physical Activity Counseling Program on Body Weight, Composition, Cardiovascular Function and Quality of Life in Breast Cancer Survivors

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04365569
Enrollment
78
Registered
2020-04-28
Start date
2021-01-06
Completion date
2024-05-16
Last updated
2025-09-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Breast Cancer

Brief summary

More than 65% of breast cancer survivors are overweight and less than one-third participate in recommended levels of physical exercise. Obese breast cancer survivors have been found to have greater than a two-fold increase in mortality compared to women with normal body mass index (BMI). The current standard for weight loss interventions involves in-person counseling. However, this incurs costs related to travel for counseling sessions, potentially limiting program participation, compliance and sustainability.This is a pilot study of an individualized in-person and telephone-based nutrition and exercise counseling program.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALNutrition and physical activity counseling program

6-month interventional, counseling program based on nutrition and physical activity consisting of: 1\. Nutritional counseling by a Registered Dietitian (RD) 2) Implementation of an adequate physical activity program

Sponsors

Case Comprehensive Cancer Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Breast cancer diagnosis (stage 0-III) * Body mass index of 25mg/k2 or greater * Actively being followed by medical oncologist, radiation oncologist, and/or breast surgeon at Maroone Cancer Center * Able and willing to participate in nutrition counseling at Maroone Cancer Center * Able (cleared by participant's primary oncologist) and willing to perform cardiopulmonary exercise testing * Participants must have the ability to understand and the willingness to sign a written informed consent document * Performance status 0 or 1 as per ECOG scale \[see Appendix IV\]

Exclusion criteria

* Body mass index below 25kg/m2 * No prior history of breast cancer * History of metastatic disease * Not being followed by medical oncologist, radiation oncologist, and/or breast surgeon at Maroone Cancer Center * Unable or unwilling to participate in nutrition counseling at Maroone Cancer Center * Participants with uncontrolled intercurrent illness including, but not limited to ongoing or active infection, symptomatic congestive heart failure, unstable angina pectoris, cardiac arrhythmia, or psychiatric illness/social situations that would limit compliance with study requirements. * Participants actively undergoing chemotherapy, immunotherapy or radiation treatment. However, participants currently taking hormonal therapy, such as selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMS), or aromatase inhibitors, may be included in the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percent of participants achieving 10% weight lossAt baselineEfficacy of intervention as assessed by percent of participants achieving 10% weight loss
Compliance to physical activity goalAt 6 monthsPercent of participants complying with proposed activity goal of 150 minutes of moderate intensity physical activity or 75 minutes of vigerous intensity physical activity (or a combination of both) per week over six months
Compliance to the recommended dietary patternAt 3 monthsAssess compliance to the recommended dietary pattern, diet quality scores will be calculated by the RD after monthly telephone consults or in-person at 3 months and 6 months into the intervention. Each of the 3 elements will be scored from 0-3, resulting in a total score range from 0-9

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Low density lipoproteinAt 3 monthsEffect of the intervention on lipid profile as measured by low density lipoprotein levels
CholesterolAt 3 monthsEffect of the intervention on lipid profile as measured by high density cholesterol levels
high density lipoproteinAt 3 monthsEffect of the intervention on lipid profile as measured by high density lipoprotein levels
TriglyceridesAt 3 monthsEffect of the intervention on lipid profile as measured by triglyceride levels
Serum vitamin DAt 3 monthsEffect of the intervention on serum vitamin D
Serum C-reactive protein (CRP)At 3 monthsEffect of the intervention on CRP
Maximum oxygen uptake as measured by VO2 maxBaselineMaximum oxygen uptake as measured by VO2 max
Body fat percentageBaselineBody fat percentage measured by the registered dietitian (RD) using bioelectrical impedance analysis
Glycemic control as measured by HbA1cAt 3 monthsGlycemic control as measured by HbA1c

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Quality of life as measured by NCCN Distress ThermometerBaseline, 3 months and 6 monthsQuality of life as measured by NCCN Distress Thermometer, which measures distress on a scale of 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating worse distress
Factors associated with adherence to the programAt 6 monthsFactors to be assessed include age, race, time since diagnosis, time since last chemotherapy, medical comorbidities and other lifestyle factors such as alcohol consumption and smoking
Quality of life as measured by Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7)Baseline, 3 months and 6 monthsQuality of life as measured by Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7), a 7-item self-report questionnaire measuring anxiety which uses a four-point rating scale (ranging from 0 to 3) asking how often in the last two weeks participants have experienced symptoms pertaining to feeling anxious, worried, difficulty relaxing, and irritability. Higher scores indicate higher distress. with a possible score range of 0 to 21 with higher scores indicating worse anxiety.
Quality of life as measured by Brief Pain Inventory (BPI)Baseline, 3 months and 6 monthsQuality of life as measured by Brief Pain Inventory (BPI), a 9-item self-administered questionnaire that can evaluate the effect of an individual's pain on their daily functioning. This is a 10-point scale with 0 being the best possible score, meaning no pain, and 10 being the worst possible score, meaning pain as bad as you can imagine
Quality of life as measured by Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)Baseline, 3 months and 6 monthsQuality of life as measured by Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), which objectifies degree of depression severity with a possible score range of 0 to 27 and higher scores indicating worse outcomes
Quality of life as measured by Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Breast Cancer (FACT-B)Baseline, 3 months and 6 monthsQuality of life as measured by Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Breast Cancer (FACT-B), a 36-item self-report questionnaire to assess the quality of life as reported by breast cancer survivors with scores ranging from 0 to 123, and lower scores indicating better health.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 12, 2026