Skip to content

Low-chlorine Vs High-chlorine Crystalloids in Septic Shock Adults

Effects of Low-chlorine Vs High-chlorine Crystalloid Solutions in Septic Shock Adults

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04365010
Enrollment
100
Registered
2020-04-28
Start date
2020-05-31
Completion date
2021-12-31
Last updated
2020-04-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Septic Shock

Keywords

crystalloids, septic shock, MAKE30

Brief summary

Fluid resuscitation is an important treatment in septic shock patients, however whether crystalloid composition affects septic shock patients outcomes remains unclear. According to previous studies, low-chlorine crystalloids could significantly reduce the incidence of kidney injury and 30-day mortality compared with high-chlorine crystalloids in critically ill adults. Therefore, we hypothesized that the use of low-chlorine crystalloids would result in a lower incidence of major adverse kidney events within 30 days (MAKE 30: overall incidence of death, new renal-replacement therapy, and persistent renal dysfunction) than high-chlorine crystalloids in septic shock adults.

Interventions

For each month of the trial, participating ICUs were assigned to use either Sodium Bicarbonate Ringer's Injection or 0.9% Saline for any intravenous administration of isotonic crystalloid. ICUs were randomly assigned to use Sodium Bicarbonate Ringer's Injection during even-numbered months and 0.9% Saline during odd-numbered months, or vice versa.

DRUG0.9% Sodium Chloride Injection

For each month of the trial, participating ICUs were assigned to use either Sodium Bicarbonate Ringer's Injection or 0.9% Saline for any intravenous administration of isotonic crystalloid. ICUs were randomly assigned to use Sodium Bicarbonate Ringer's Injection during even-numbered months and 0.9% Saline during odd-numbered months, or vice versa.

Sponsors

Southeast University, China
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Prospective cluster-randomized, multiple-crossover trial

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. 18 years old \<age ≤ 85 years old; 2. Diagnosis of septic shock within 24 hours (sepsis 3.0); 3. Needing fluid resuscitation judged by clinicians; 4. The patient or the patient's legally acceptable representative signs the informed consent (signs within 24h of enrollment)

Exclusion criteria

1. Pregnant or lactating period; 2. Renal replacement therapy has been received or expected to receive within 6 hours; 3. Those who were previously enrolled in the study; 4. Estimated death within 24 hours; 5. Other situations that not suitable for enrollment judged by researchers.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
the composite of death and new receipt of renal-replacement therapy MAKE30up to 30 daysoverall incidence of death, new renal-replacement therapy, and persistent renal dysfunction within 30 days

Contacts

Primary ContactHaibo Qiu, MD, PhD
haiboq2000@163.com0086-13951965301
Backup ContactJianfeng Xie, MD, PhD
xie820405@126.com0086-13770332331

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026