Skip to content

Multicomponent Behavioral Sleep Intervention for Insomnia in Older Adults With Mild Cognitive Impairment

Multicomponent Behavioral Sleep Intervention for Insomnia in Older Adults With Mild Cognitive Impairment

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04364191
Acronym
MBSI-I
Enrollment
27
Registered
2020-04-28
Start date
2021-05-13
Completion date
2022-08-30
Last updated
2024-05-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Insomnia, Mild Cognitive Impairment

Brief summary

Insomnia symptoms in older adults with mild cognitive impairment represent a significant public health burden in terms of impaired quality of life, risks from untreated insomnia, and risks from pharmaceutical insomnia treatment. To address the limitations in the most effective non-pharmacological treatments for insomnia in older adults with mild cognitive impairment, a randomized pilot study will be conducted to test a brief (4 week), tablet-based, personalized, multicomponent behavioral sleep intervention for insomnia, compared to a sleep education control, in this at-risk group. The findings of the proposed project will inform future, larger scale clinical trials and may provide a novel and innovative way for older adults with mild cognitive impairment to achieve better sleep and health-related quality of life outcomes.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALMulticomponent Behavioral Sleep Intervention for Insomnia

The MBSI-I will include a meaningful activity protocol during the day and ART therapy at night.

BEHAVIORALActive Control

The sleep hygiene educational material represents an active control intervention and is recommended as part of the initial treatment of insomnia based on an NIH guide for sleep education.

Sponsors

National Institute of Nursing Research (NINR)
CollaboratorNIH
University of Pennsylvania
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
55 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* 1\) age 55 and older * 2\) mild cognitive impairment (MCI) The Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status 13-item modified (TICS-M) version will be used to screen participants for eligibility in the study. We will include participants with TICS-M scores of 28-36, based off ranges and optimal cutpoints determined in various studies. * 3\) have insomnia symptoms a)answer yes to Do you have trouble falling asleep, staying asleep, awakening too early, or have unrefreshing sleep and b) have subjective sleep diary evidence of insomnia, with an average sleep onset latency \>30 min or wakefulness after sleep onset of \>60 min during the one week pre-treatment assessment * 4\) live in the community * 5\) speak English as primary language

Exclusion criteria

* 1\) Presence of moderate to severe cognitive impairment defined as TICS score \<28 * 2\) Visual or manual dexterity impairment that prevents them from pressing yes/no buttons, or selecting a number at 24 point font * 3\) Current sedative-hypnotic or other sleep aid use on a regular or as needed schedule within the prior three months * 4\) Presence of an acute medical or psychiatric condition which, in the judgement of the research team, would interfere with the subject's ability to realistically follow the study protocol

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL)immediately post-intervention (4-5weeks after the start of the intervention)RAND Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36 (SF-36) is a multidomain scale that measures physical and mental components of HRQOL with eight subscales. The 8 subscales include physical functioning, bodily pain, role limitations due to physical health problems, role limitations due to personal or emotional problems, general mental health, social functioning, energy/fatigue, and general health. All sub scales range from 0 to 100 (lower scores indicate worse HRQOL). For this primary analysis, we are using the general health sub scale, ranging from 0 to 100, where lower scores indicate worse HRQOL.
Sleep Latencyimmediately post-intervention (4-5weeks after the start of the intervention)time it takes a person to fall asleep, starting from first intention to sleep, measured by sleep diary

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Wake After Sleep Onset (WASO)immediately post intervention (4-5weeks after the start of the intervention)time (in minutes) a person spends awake during the night, starting from the time the person falls asleep; derived from actigraphy monitoring; more WASO indicates worse sleep
Total Sleep Time (TST)immediately post interventionActual time (in minutes) a person is asleep during the nighttime sleep period; derived from actigraphy monitoring; normal sleep ranges from 420-480 minutes
Self-reported Sleep Qualityimmediately post interventionmeasured with Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index; score ranges from 0-21 with higher scores indicating poor sleep quality (worse outcomes)
Self- Reported Insomnia Symptomsimmediately post interventionmeasured with the Insomnia Severity Index; score ranges from 0-28, with higher scores indicating more insomnia symptoms (thus worse outcomes)
Sleep Efficiency (SE)immediately post interventionPercent of time spent in bed that a person is asleep; calculated from actigraphy (time asleep/ time in bed)x 100%; lower SE indicates worse sleep

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants Who Completed the Dried Blood Spot Sample for Inflammatory Biomarker AnalysisImmediately post interventionSystemic inflammatory markers will be assayed using dried blood spots (DBS). DBS provides an easy to obtain, transport, and analyze blood source. Our Translational Core Laboratory utilizes a matrix independent platform (Mesoscale Discovery, Rockville MD), to support the assay of DBS for systemic inflammatory markers. Participants who have trouble with the finger prick will be provided with verbal assistance at sample pick-up while the researcher maintains physical distance. The outcome measure used for this study will be number of participants who complete the dried blood spot sample, as a measure of feasibility.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Screened 180 participants

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Intervention Arm
Meaningful activity protocol during the day and Assisted Relaxation Therapy (ART) at night; includes 1) Sleep Hygiene Education; 2) Meaningful Activity Modules a) Physical Activity b) Cognitive Activity and c) Social engagement; 3) ART, a breath-based relaxation intervention that is coupled with a physical anchoring task. Participants will complete a daily sleep diary, use the activity modules daily as pre-determined times personalized to the participant, use the ART software when they get in bed to help with insomnia symptoms, and wear an actiwatch for a four-week period. Participants will have weekly to biweekly phone consultation with the research nurse. Multicomponent Behavioral Sleep Intervention for Insomnia: The MBSI-I will include a meaningful activity protocol during the day and ART therapy at night.
13
Control Arm
Study participants in the control group will also receive a tablet and watch, but the meaningful activity modules and ART software will not be accessible to them. The sleep hygiene educational material represents an active control intervention and is recommended as part of the initial treatment of insomnia based on an NIH guide for sleep education. This approach provides staff and technology interaction/attention that is comparable to the intervention arm, and thereby promotes adherence; it has been used as a placebo comparator for many insomnia treatment studies and has low attrition rates. Control subjects will also be asked to complete electronic sleep diaries and wear the actiwatch on the non-dominant wrist to monitor sleep/wake patterns. For both arms, participants will be asked to complete baseline assessments, 4-week (post-intervention) and 12-week (follow-up). Active Control: The sleep hygiene educational material represents an active control intervention and is recommended as part of the initial treatment of insomnia based on an NIH guide for sleep education.
14
Total27

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalIntervention ArmControl Arm
36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36)59.07 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 27.63
59.23 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 34.02
58.93 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 21.41
Age, Continuous65.63 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.39
65.93 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.13
65.31 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.75
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
26 Participants13 Participants13 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Insomnia Severity Index13.89 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.47
13.23 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.17
14.5 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.8
Number of Participants who Completed the Dried Blood Spot Sample for Inflammatory Biomarker Analysis20 Participants11 Participants9 Participants
Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index10.37 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.62
9.85 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.61
10.86 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.63
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
12 Participants5 Participants7 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
14 Participants8 Participants6 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
22 Participants10 Participants12 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
5 Participants3 Participants2 Participants
subjective sleep efficiency67.90 percentage
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.94
70 percentage
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12
65 percentage
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11
subjective sleep latency44.09 minutes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 29.95
41.42 minutes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 33.1
46.57 minutes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 27.73
subjective total sleep time341.14 minutes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 74.36
346.27 minutes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 85.42
336.00 minutes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 64.54
subjective wake after sleep onset45.63 minutes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 34.79
44.85 minutes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 28.38
46.30 minutes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 40.56

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 130 / 14
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 130 / 14
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 130 / 14

Outcome results

Primary

Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL)

RAND Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36 (SF-36) is a multidomain scale that measures physical and mental components of HRQOL with eight subscales. The 8 subscales include physical functioning, bodily pain, role limitations due to physical health problems, role limitations due to personal or emotional problems, general mental health, social functioning, energy/fatigue, and general health. All sub scales range from 0 to 100 (lower scores indicate worse HRQOL). For this primary analysis, we are using the general health sub scale, ranging from 0 to 100, where lower scores indicate worse HRQOL.

Time frame: immediately post-intervention (4-5weeks after the start of the intervention)

Population: lost one intervention participant and one control participant to immediate follow up

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Intervention ArmHealth Related Quality of Life (HRQOL)60.83 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 31.1
Control ArmHealth Related Quality of Life (HRQOL)58.08 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.97
Primary

Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL)

RAND Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36 (SF-36) is a multidomain scale that measures physical and mental components of HRQOL with eight subscales. The 8 subscales include physical functioning, bodily pain, role limitations due to physical health problems, role limitations due to personal or emotional problems, general mental health, social functioning, energy/fatigue, and general health. All sub scales range from 0 to 100 (lower scores indicate worse HRQOL). For this primary analysis, we are using the general health sub scale, ranging from 0 to 100, where lower scores indicate worse HRQOL.

Time frame: 3 months post intervention

Population: Lost one participant to immediate follow-up in intervention group and one to immediate follow-up in control and one at 3 mo follow up in control group.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Intervention ArmHealth Related Quality of Life (HRQOL)55.83 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 29.99
Control ArmHealth Related Quality of Life (HRQOL)54.58 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.71
Primary

Sleep Latency

time it takes a person to fall asleep, starting from first intention to sleep, measured by sleep diary

Time frame: immediately post-intervention (4-5weeks after the start of the intervention)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Intervention ArmSleep Latency28.51 minutesStandard Deviation 31.18
Control ArmSleep Latency47.06 minutesStandard Deviation 34.61
Primary

Sleep Latency

time it takes a person to fall asleep, starting from first intention to sleep; measured by sleep diary

Time frame: 3 months post intervention

Population: Lost one participant in intervention to follow-up; lost two participants in control arm to follow up and one had missing sleep diary data at follow up

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Intervention ArmSleep Latency25.39 minutesStandard Deviation 27.02
Control ArmSleep Latency35.92 minutesStandard Deviation 32.44
Secondary

Self- Reported Insomnia Symptoms

measured with the Insomnia Severity Index; score ranges from 0-28, with higher scores indicating more insomnia symptoms (thus worse outcomes)

Time frame: immediately post intervention

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Intervention ArmSelf- Reported Insomnia Symptoms12 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.67
Control ArmSelf- Reported Insomnia Symptoms12.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.75
Secondary

Self- Reported Insomnia Symptoms

measured with the Insomnia Severity Index; score ranges from 0-28, with higher scores indicating more insomnia symptoms (thus worse outcomes)

Time frame: 3 months post intervention

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Intervention ArmSelf- Reported Insomnia Symptoms9.42 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.21
Control ArmSelf- Reported Insomnia Symptoms11.83 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.86
Secondary

Self-reported Sleep Quality

measured with Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index; score ranges from 0-21 with higher scores indicating poor sleep quality (worse outcomes)

Time frame: 3 months post intervention

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Intervention ArmSelf-reported Sleep Quality8.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.68
Control ArmSelf-reported Sleep Quality10.17 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.75
Secondary

Self-reported Sleep Quality

measured with Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index; score ranges from 0-21 with higher scores indicating poor sleep quality (worse outcomes)

Time frame: immediately post intervention

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Intervention ArmSelf-reported Sleep Quality8.83 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.68
Control ArmSelf-reported Sleep Quality10.29 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.76
Secondary

Sleep Efficiency (SE)

Percent of time spent in bed that a person is asleep; calculated from actigraphy (time asleep/ time in bed)x 100%; lower SE indicates worse sleep

Time frame: immediately post intervention

Population: lost one intervention participant and one control participant to immediate follow up

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Intervention ArmSleep Efficiency (SE)77 percentage of time asleepStandard Deviation 12
Control ArmSleep Efficiency (SE)68 percentage of time asleepStandard Deviation 14
Secondary

Sleep Efficiency (SE)

Percent of time spent in bed that a person is asleep; calculated from actigraphy (time asleep/ time in bed)x 100%; lower SE indicates worse sleep

Time frame: 3 months post intervention

Population: Lost one participant to immediate follow-up in intervention group and one to immediate follow-up in control and one at 3 mo follow up in control group.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Intervention ArmSleep Efficiency (SE)77 percentage of time spent asleepStandard Deviation 13
Control ArmSleep Efficiency (SE)66 percentage of time spent asleepStandard Deviation 17
Secondary

Total Sleep Time (TST)

Actual time (in minutes) a person is asleep during the nighttime sleep period; derived from actigraphy monitoring; normal sleep ranges from 420-480 minutes

Time frame: 3 months post intervention

Population: Lost one participant to immediate follow-up in intervention group and one to immediate follow-up in control and one at 3 mo follow up in control

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Intervention ArmTotal Sleep Time (TST)381.38 minutesStandard Deviation 70.46
Control ArmTotal Sleep Time (TST)340.38 minutesStandard Deviation 90.11
Secondary

Total Sleep Time (TST)

Actual time (in minutes) a person is asleep during the nighttime sleep period; derived from actigraphy monitoring; normal sleep ranges from 420-480 minutes

Time frame: immediately post intervention

Population: lost one intervention participant and one control participant to immediate follow up

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Intervention ArmTotal Sleep Time (TST)368.78 minutesStandard Deviation 90.03
Control ArmTotal Sleep Time (TST)361.43 minutesStandard Deviation 70.86
Secondary

Wake After Sleep Onset (WASO)

time (in minutes) a person spends awake during the night, starting from the time the person falls asleep; derived from actigraphy monitoring; more WASO indicates worse sleep

Time frame: 3 months post intervention

Population: Lost one participant to immediate follow-up in intervention group and one to immediate follow-up in control and one at 3 mo follow up in control group.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Intervention ArmWake After Sleep Onset (WASO)29.30 minutesStandard Deviation 33.06
Control ArmWake After Sleep Onset (WASO)35.21 minutesStandard Deviation 43.57
Secondary

Wake After Sleep Onset (WASO)

time (in minutes) a person spends awake during the night, starting from the time the person falls asleep; derived from actigraphy monitoring; more WASO indicates worse sleep

Time frame: immediately post intervention (4-5weeks after the start of the intervention)

Population: lost one intervention participant and one control participant to immediate follow up

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Intervention ArmWake After Sleep Onset (WASO)29.57 minutesStandard Deviation 33.7
Control ArmWake After Sleep Onset (WASO)37.25 minutesStandard Deviation 32.49
Other Pre-specified

Number of Participants Who Completed the Dried Blood Spot Sample for Inflammatory Biomarker Analysis

Systemic inflammatory markers will be assayed using dried blood spots (DBS). DBS provides an easy to obtain, transport, and analyze blood source. Our Translational Core Laboratory utilizes a matrix independent platform (Mesoscale Discovery, Rockville MD), to support the assay of DBS for systemic inflammatory markers. Participants who have trouble with the finger prick will be provided with verbal assistance at sample pick-up while the researcher maintains physical distance. The outcome measure used for this study will be number of participants who complete the dried blood spot sample, as a measure of feasibility.

Time frame: Immediately post intervention

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Intervention ArmNumber of Participants Who Completed the Dried Blood Spot Sample for Inflammatory Biomarker Analysis10 Participants
Control ArmNumber of Participants Who Completed the Dried Blood Spot Sample for Inflammatory Biomarker Analysis4 Participants
Other Pre-specified

Number of Participants Who Completed the Dried Blood Spot Sample for Inflammatory Biomarker Analysis

Systemic inflammatory markers will be assayed using dried blood spots (DBS). DBS provides an easy to obtain, transport, and analyze blood source. Our Translational Core Laboratory utilizes a matrix independent platform (Mesoscale Discovery, Rockville MD), to support the assay of DBS for systemic inflammatory markers. Participants who have trouble with the finger prick will be provided with verbal assistance at sample pick-up while the researcher maintains physical distance.

Time frame: 3 months post intervention

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Intervention ArmNumber of Participants Who Completed the Dried Blood Spot Sample for Inflammatory Biomarker Analysis8 Participants
Control ArmNumber of Participants Who Completed the Dried Blood Spot Sample for Inflammatory Biomarker Analysis6 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026