Skip to content

Comparison of VieScope vs. Macintosh Laryngoscope for Intubation in Level Cpersonal Protective Equipment Conditions

Comparison of VieScope Versus Macintosh Laryngoscope for Emergency Intubation Under Level C Personal Protective Equipment Conditions

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04363775
Enrollment
35
Registered
2020-04-27
Start date
2020-01-20
Completion date
2020-02-25
Last updated
2020-04-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Infection, Projection, Tracheal Intubation

Keywords

SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19, tracheal intubation, laryngoscope, personal protective equipment

Brief summary

The current COVID-19 pandemic, this is especially since the transmission of SARS-CoV-2 is thought to occur mainly through respiratory droplets generated by coughing and sneezing, by direct contact with contaminated surfaces and because in a large number of patients COVID-19 disease may be asymptomatic. As recommended by the CDC for aerosol-generating procedures (AGP), medical personnel should be equipped with full personal protective equipment (PPE) for AGP. Therefore, it is reasonable to search for the most effective methods of intubation in those conditions.

Interventions

DEVICEThe standard Macintosh laryngoscope

intubation with the standard Macintosh laryngoscope and endotracheal tube 7.0 internal diameter with standard tube stylet

DEVICEThe Vie Scope laryngoscope

intubation with the Vie Scope laryngoscope with bougie stylet and endotracheal tube 7.0 internal diameter

Sponsors

Poznan University of Medical Sciences
CollaboratorOTHER
Wroclaw Medical University
CollaboratorOTHER
Medical University of Bialystok
CollaboratorOTHER
Lazarski University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* paramedic * consent voluntary participation in the study * none experience in Vie Scope * none experience in intubation with personal protective equipment

Exclusion criteria

* refusal to participate in the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
time to intubation1 daytime from pick up device to the final placement tube in trachea

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
success of intubation1 dayA failed intubation attempt was defined as an attempt in which the trachea was not intubated, or which required more than 120 seconds to perform
Number of optimalization maneuvers1 daythe number of optimization maneuvers required (re-adjustment of head position, second assistant) to aid endotracheal intubation
Procedure Ease of use1 dayself-reported percentage the vocal cord visualization. A 100% score is a extremely difficult procedure. A Ease of use score of 1% means that procedure is extremely easy
the degree of visibility of the glottis1 dayThe POGO score describes how much glottic opening is visible. A POGO score of 100% indicates visualization of the entire glottic opening from the anterior commissure of the vocal cords to the interarytenoid notch. A POGO score of 0% corresponds with no visualization of laryngeal structures.
Cormack - Lehane grade1 dayself-reported percentage the vocal cord visualization using the Cormack-Lehane grading (grade 1-4)

Countries

Poland

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026