Skip to content

Improving Working Memory in Older Adults

Improving Working Memory in Older Adults by Restoring Large-Scale Cortical Interactions

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04362696
Enrollment
964
Registered
2020-04-27
Start date
2019-09-01
Completion date
2026-04-30
Last updated
2026-07-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Memory Disorders in Old Age

Keywords

aged-related memory, cognitive decline, transcranial electrical current stimulation

Brief summary

The research program will evaluate the theoretical claim that age-related memory and cognitive decline in humans result from the inefficient orchestration of rhythmic activity within large-scale cortical networks. The results will contribute to the basic science groundwork for developing future non-pharmacological interventions aimed at boosting memory and cognition in aging and clinical populations.

Detailed description

The investigators hypothesize that aged-related memory and cognitive impairments emerge from large-scale functional dysconnectivity and by stimulating the brain noninvasively with extremely weak levels of electrical current, it may be possible to re-synchronize connectivity and stabilize or improve memory and cognitive function, measured behaviorally. The experiments of this project are proposed as between-subjects, sham-controlled, and double-blind in design, and use noninvasive electroencephalographic (EEG) measurements of rhythmic brain activity. The experimental intervention involves the application of low-intensity, high-definition, transcranial electrical current stimulation while subjects perform a variety of computer-based tasks that probe memory and cognitive function.

Interventions

Low-intensity and safe, noninvasive application of electrical current to the human scalp with the goal of gradually modulating levels of neuronal excitability.

Sponsors

Boston University Charles River Campus
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* For Experiment 1, 18-30 years * For Experiment 2, 60-80 years * Normal or corrected-to-normal vision * Has color vision.

Exclusion criteria

* Metal implants in the head * Implanted electronic devices * A history of neurological problems or head injury * Skin sensitivity * Claustrophobia * Dementia \[Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) score of 23 or lower; Montreal Cognitive Assessment score of \<26) * Depression \[Beck Depression Inventory II score of 14 or higher; Geriatric Depression Scale score of 10 or higher\] * Taking any psychoactive medication

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Memory performance success (sham stimulation condition)During sham interventionThe accuracy of task performance (in percentage correct units) in the delayed-match-to-sample working memory paradigm
Memory performance success (active stimulation condition)During active interventionThe accuracy of task performance (in percentage correct unit) in the delayed-match-to-sample working memory paradigm
Memory performance speed (sham stimulation condition)During sham interventionThe reaction time of task performance (in millisecond units) in the delayed-match-to-sample working memory paradigm
Memory performance speed (active stimulation condition)During active interventionThe reaction time of task performance (in millisecond units) in the delayed-match-to-sample working memory paradigm

Countries

United States

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORRobert MG Reinhart, PhD

Boston University Charles River Campus

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jul 24, 2026