Skip to content

Is Fat in the Liver a Marker of Post-Pregnancy Glycaemic Deterioration in Women With Gestational Diabetes?

Is Fat in the Liver a Marker of Post-Pregnancy Glycaemic Deterioration in Women With Gestational Diabetes?

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04362540
Acronym
FLiP-GD2
Enrollment
189
Registered
2020-04-27
Start date
2019-05-05
Completion date
2026-12-30
Last updated
2026-03-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Gestational Diabetes

Brief summary

The aim of this study is to utilise ultrasound, using an established method for detecting NAFLD, to determine whether the presence of NAFLD in women with GDM, detected during routine scanning, is a marker of deterioration in glycaemic status post-partum. We propose to assess the relationship between NAFLD and surrogates for insulin resistance as well as glycaemic status, insulin sensitivity and β-cell function, after delivery. The study is not seeking to compare the incidence of T2DM between those with and without NAFLD. This would require a longer follow-up and larger cohort size. Instead, it aims to quantify the degree of early deterioration of glycaemic status in these groups using insulin resistance markers. This is a clinically important issue as a greater level of insulin resistance would in itself trigger clinical intervention, including vigilant follow-up and empowerment for proactive healthy life style changes, which have been shown to prevent diabetes development .

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTMRI scan

On attendance to antenatal clinic with confirmed diagnosis of gestational diabetes based on OGTT and following informed consent: Ultrasound scan: Those with positive OGTT results (i.e. GDM positive) will attend an appointment for an ultrasound scan, as per routine practice. These women will,at that appointment, be assessed for presence/absence of NAFLD as well as undergoing their routine foetal assessment. This is a simple addendum to the existing scan, taking no more than 5 minutes. Participants will have been informed during the consent process that the results (regarding the presence / absence of NAFLD) will be compared to MRI after delivery.

Sponsors

University Hospitals of North Midlands NHS Trust
Lead SponsorOTHER
Diabetes UK
CollaboratorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Aged 18 and over * Pregnant women diagnosed with GDM based on OGTT

Exclusion criteria

* Women with known type 1 or type 2 diabetes prior to pregnancy * Women with known history of liver disease including alcoholic liver disease * Women unable or unwilling to consent to be part of the study * Women with contraindication to MRI

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The primary outcome measure for the study will be the mean difference in values of the HOMA-IR (as a surrogate for insulin resistance) in those with NAFLD vs. those without NAFLD 6-12 weeks post partum6-12 weeks post partumTo determine whether the presence of NAFLD during pregnancy in women with gestational diabetes mellitus is a marker of worse metabolic profile (insulin resistance).

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Comparison of HbA1c and fasting glucose (standard markers of dysglycaemia) in those with NAFLD vs. those without NAFLD at 6-12 weeks post partum6-12 weeks post partum
Comparison of disposition index (marker of insulin resistance) in those with NAFLD vs. those without NAFLD at 6-12 weeks post partum6-12 weeks post partum
Comparison of QUICKI (marker of insulin resistance) in those with NAFLD vs. those without NAFLD at 6-12 weeks post partum6-12 weeks post partum
Comparison of insulin and nonesterified fatty acid levels (marker of insulin resistance) in those with NAFLD vs. those without NAFLD at 6-12 weeks post partum6-12 weeks post partum
Comparison of fasting levels from a 4 point OGTT (marker of insulin resistance) in those with NAFLD vs. those without NAFLD at 6-12 weeks post partum6-12 weeks post partum
Comparison of area-under-the-curve from 4 point OGTT (marker of insulin resistance) in those with NAFLD vs. those without NAFLD at 6-12 weeks post partum6-12 weeks post partum
Comparison of ELF blood test results (advanced marker of insulin resistance) in those with NAFLD vs. those without NAFLD at 6-12 weeks post partum6-12 weeks post partum
Comparison of liver function tests (as part of the Fatty Liver Index) in those with NAFLD vs. those without NAFLD at 6-12 weeks post partum6-12 weeks post partum
Comparison of Body Mass Index (as part of the Fatty Liver Index) in those with NAFLD vs. those without NAFLD at 6-12 weeks post partum6-12 weeks post partum
Comparison of waist circumference (as part of the Fatty Liver Index) in those with NAFLD vs. those without NAFLD at 6-12 weeks post partum6-12 weeks post partum
Comparison of alcohol history in those with NAFLD vs. those without NAFLD at 6-12 weeks post partum6-12 weeks post partum
The presence of fat in the liver using a liver ultrasound scan at baseline and 6-12 weeks post partum.6-12 weeks post partum
MRI scan to confirm the presence of NAFLD at 6-12 weeks post partum.6-12 weeks post partum

Countries

United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 31, 2026