Skip to content

Assessing the Utility of Peak Inspiratory Flow as a Predictor for COPD Exacerbations

Assessing the Utility of Peak Inspiratory Flow as a Predictor for COPD Exacerbations

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04360226
Enrollment
400
Registered
2020-04-24
Start date
2020-12-14
Completion date
2024-01-25
Last updated
2024-04-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Brief summary

This is an international, mulitcentre, observational, prospective study into Peak Inspiratory Flow in COPD patients that aims to: A) Determine the prevalence of suboptimal Peak Inspiratory Flow (PIF) and inadequate inhaler choice and assess the baseline characteristics of these groups. B) Assess the clinical role of PIF and inhaler choice in predicting COPD exacerbations and symptom burden. C) Assess the variability and correlation of PIF with other lung function measurements and CAT score in stable COPD. It is a 12 month study comprising one baseline assessment and 2 follow-up visits at 6 and 12 months.

Interventions

OTHERNon-interventional

Non-interventional, subjects will only have routine testing (blood biomarkers, spirometry, peak inspiratory flow measurements) and be asked to complete questionnaires.

Sponsors

Boehringer Ingelheim
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Respiratory Effectiveness Group
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Spirometry-defined COPD (i.e. post-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC\<0.7) 2. Age ≥40 years 3. Smokers or ex-smokers of at least 10 pack-years 4. Clinically stable COPD (no exacerbations in the last 4 weeks) 5. Capable of performing serial lung function tests 6. Prescribed inhaled medication for at least 6 months

Exclusion criteria

1. Occurrence of an COPD exacerbation during the previous 4 weeks 2. Have any concomitant chronic respiratory condition other than asthma or bronchiectasis (e.g. cystic fibrosis, lung fibrosis, tuberculosis) 3. Are unable to understand the instructions of the study or to fill the questionnaires 4. Are unwilling to sign the informed consent 5. Are participating in a clinical trial

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Prevalence of suboptimal PIF and inadequate inhaler choice.BaselineDetermine the prevalence of suboptimal PIF and inadequate inhaler choice.
Exacerbations12 monthsTime to first exacerbation associated with different levels of PIF.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
PIF and symptom burdenBaseline, 6 and 12 monthsPIF measurements will be correlated with COPD Assessment Test (CAT) Scores. CAT scores range from 0-40 depending on the severity of a persons symptoms; higher scores denote a more severe impact of COPD on a patient's life.
Mortality6 and 12 monthsAnnual mortality rate associated with different PIF levels.
Variability and correlation of PIFBaseline, 6 and 12 monthsVariability of PIF over time and the correlation between PIF and other lung function measures (including FEV1, FVC, Inspiratory capacity), CAT scores, T2 markers (nasal polyps and dermatitis) and where available blood biomarkers.
Exacerbation rate6 and 12 monthsAnnual rate of exacerbations associated with different PIF levels

Countries

Italy, Malta, Singapore, Slovenia, South Korea, Spain

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026