Skip to content

DSAP Treatment Comparison: 2% Lovastatin/ 2% Cholesterol vs 2% Lovastatin Alone

Topical Treatment for Superficial Disseminated Actinic Porokeratosis: A Single-Blinded Comparison Between Lovastatin/Cholesterol and Lovastatin

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04359823
Acronym
DSAP
Enrollment
31
Registered
2020-04-24
Start date
2020-08-24
Completion date
2021-04-23
Last updated
2023-12-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Actinic Porokeratosis

Brief summary

This study will analyze the effects of topical lovastatin/cholesterol vs topical lovastatin alone in patients with disseminated superficial actinic porokeratosis. Patients will be divided into two groups, topical lovastatin/cholesterol and topical lovastatin alone. Patients will apply topical treatment twice daily to lesions over the course of 12 weeks. Follow up will occur in the virtual setting and photographs will be used to document progress.

Detailed description

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of cholesterol/lovastatin versus lovastatin alone to treat porokeratosis. Our working hypothesis is that both topical cholesterol/lovastatin and lovastatin alone are helpful in treating patients with disseminated superficial actinic porokeratosis (DSAP). Potential subjects will be approached by their care team member to be made aware of the study at MUSC Dermatology clinics. Subsequently, members of the study team will approach their own patients to ask for participation in this study. Pertinent project information, risks, and time commitment will be relayed to subjects. If subjects show interest in participating, they will be given consent forms to either sign or bring home for consideration. If the patient is eligible for the study, he or she will be randomly assigned to one of two groups. They will have a 50/50 chance of being in either group. You will not make the choice to which group you are assigned. The two groups are Group A (cholesterol/lovastatin) and Group B (lovastatin only). The patient will not be informed of which group they are in and will not be informed of what their study medication is, allowing single-blinding. Researchers will not be masked. Initial enrollment will occur virtually. Enrolled subjects will be followed up at monthly intervals for three months via virtual check-in. At each visit, participants will undergo brief physical examination; additionally, clinical photographs of the lesion will be obtained. Photographs will be stored in the electronic medical record and stored in a departmental secure drive for further analysis of lesion features. At each visit the novel DSAP- General Assessment Scale and RAND36 QoL scale will be administered. Patients will be contacted via virtual check-in visits at weeks 4, 8, and 12. Patients will be asked about compliance and any adverse effects experienced. Participants will also be contacted by phone by study team member to assess for any adverse effects at weeks 2 and 6 of treatment. Compounded topical medication prescribed to subjects will be self-applied twice daily. These medications will be prepared by Tide Water Pharmacy Charleston, SC and Chemistry RX Philadelphia, PA. Chemistry Rx will ship the medications to the patients. They will be prepared so the study will remain single-blinded. The associated costs will not be covered by the research budget. Dermoscopic and clinical photographs will be subsequently analyzed for the presence of cornoid lamella. The team will record any additional dermoscopic or clinicals feature that may arise during the analyses. Frequency of dermoscopic and clinical features will be analyzed against clinical involution to find possible predictors.

Interventions

DRUGLovastatin 2%, 2% Cholesterol Cream

Patients selected to the study will be randomly assigned to this arm. They will have a 50% chance of being placed in this arm compared to the other arm.

DRUGLovastatin 2% Cream

Patients selected to the study will be randomly assigned to this arm. They will have a 50% chance of being placed in this arm compared to the other arm.

Sponsors

Medical University of South Carolina
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* All patients 18 years and older with the diagnosis of disseminated superficial actinic porokeratosis.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with allergies or contraindications to lovastatin or cholesterol * Female patients currently pregnant or lactating. * Female patients with plans to become pregnant. * Patients actively taking approved forms of long-term contraception (oral contraceptives, implantable intrauterine devices, or other hormone eluting implants) will be allowed to participate as long as they have no plan to become pregnant during the course of the study. A urine pregnancy test will be administered to these patients to confirm that they can be included in the study. * Inability or unwillingness of subject or legal guardian/representative to give informed consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Measurement of Treatment Efficacy Determined by DSAP-GASI Score (Disseminated Actinic Porokeratosis General Assessment Severity Index)12 weeksThe primary endpoint was the percentage of lesion clearance after 12 weeks of therapy using an exploratory clinical measure modified from a validated psoriasis index. The Disseminated Actinic Porokeratosis General Assessment Severity Index (DSAP-GASI) included plaque/rim elevation, scaling, and color (0= clear, 1=almost clear, 2=mild, 3=moderate, and 4=severe). Lesions of each patient were graded by 2 blinded physicians before and after treatment.
Presence of Coronoid Lamella on Dermoscopy (or Photograph).12 weeksDermoscopic and clinical photographs will be subsequently analyzed for the presence of cornoid lamella (well circumscribed, erythematous macule with a peripheral rim of hyperkeratosis). The team will record any additional dermoscopic or clinicals feature that may arise during the analyses.
Actinic Keratosis Field Assessment Scale12 weeksThe Actinic Keratosis Field Assessment Scale measures the percent area covered by actinic keratosis on a scale of 0-4 (0 being 0% and 4 being \>50% total area on face or scalp), the severity of hyperkeratosis based upon size of lesion and degree of hyperkeratosis (considered positive findings if \>1 actinic keratosis with significant hyperkeratosis and \>5mm in diameter), and sun damage severity, measured positive (moderate or severe sun damage) or negative (none or mild damage), based upon severity of erythema, telangiectasia, inflammation, atrophy, and pigmentation disorders. This will be used to determine skin changes (described above) during treatment. A higher score would indicate a worse outcome.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Improvement in Overall Appearance of DSAP Lesions12 weeksPatients were asked if their overall appearance was better, unchanged, worse. The responses were collected at weeks 4, 8, and 12. Only the final visit (week 12) was used in analysis. Better overall improvement is reported in the data table.
Improvement in Size of DSAP Lesions12 weeksPatients were asked if their lesion size was smaller, unchanged, or larger. The responses were collected at weeks 4, 8, and 12. Only the final visit (week 12) was used in analysis. The number of participants reporting smaller lesions is reported in the data table.
Application Frequency Influence on Disseminated Actinic Porokeratosis General Assessment Severity Index12 weeksMeasure if applying once or twice a day had an affect on treatment efficacy using the DSAP-GASI described in the primary outcome. Factors included plaque/rim elevation, scaling, and color. (0= clear, 1=almost clear, 2=mild, 3=moderate, and 4=severe). Lower score indicates better outcome.
Improvement in Color of DSAP Lesions12 weeksPatients were asked if their color was lighter, unchanged, darker. The responses were collected at weeks 4, 8, and 12. Only the final visit (week 12) was used in analysis. Lighter coloring is reported in the data table.
Pain and Itch Associated With Treatment12 weeksPain and Itch were measured as increased or decreased at weeks 0, 4, 8, and 12. Week 12 findings reported.
Improvement in Dermatology Quality of Life Index Questionnaire12 weeksThe patient quality of life scale asks 10 questions gaging how the patient skin condition is currently impacting their life. This questionnaire is a common validated tool, available free online. DLQI interpretation: no effect (0-1), mild effect (2-5), moderate effect (6-10), very large effect (11-20), extreme large effect (21-30). Lower scores represent improved quality of life. This was given after every visit at weeks 0, 4, 8, and 12 to access if the cream has contributed to quality of life improvement. The mean difference between the first (week 0) and last score (week 12) was used as the final improvement score.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Statin/Cholesterol Combination Group
This arm will utilize 2% cholesterol and 2% lovastatin ointment. It will be compounded by a pharmacist. Ointment will be applied on lesional skin with occlusion twice daily for 12 weeks. Lovastatin 2%, 2% Cholesterol Cream: Patients selected to the study will be randomly assigned to this arm. They will have a 50% chance of being placed in this arm compared to the other arm.
17
Statin Alone Group
This arm will utilize 2% lovastatin ointment. It will be compounded by a pharmacist. Ointment will be applied on lesional skin with occlusion twice daily for 12 weeks. Lovastatin 2%: Patients selected to the study will be randomly assigned to this arm. They will have a 50% chance of being placed in this arm compared to the other arm.
14
Total31

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up01
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject01

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicStatin Alone GroupTotalStatin/Cholesterol Combination Group
Age, Continuous57.3 years58.3 years59.2 years
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
14 participants31 participants17 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
13 Participants26 Participants13 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
1 Participants5 Participants4 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 170 / 14
other
Total, other adverse events
3 / 170 / 14
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 170 / 14

Outcome results

Primary

Actinic Keratosis Field Assessment Scale

The Actinic Keratosis Field Assessment Scale measures the percent area covered by actinic keratosis on a scale of 0-4 (0 being 0% and 4 being \>50% total area on face or scalp), the severity of hyperkeratosis based upon size of lesion and degree of hyperkeratosis (considered positive findings if \>1 actinic keratosis with significant hyperkeratosis and \>5mm in diameter), and sun damage severity, measured positive (moderate or severe sun damage) or negative (none or mild damage), based upon severity of erythema, telangiectasia, inflammation, atrophy, and pigmentation disorders. This will be used to determine skin changes (described above) during treatment. A higher score would indicate a worse outcome.

Time frame: 12 weeks

Population: Unable to accurately assess due to lack of in person visits during the covid 19 pandemic.

Primary

Measurement of Treatment Efficacy Determined by DSAP-GASI Score (Disseminated Actinic Porokeratosis General Assessment Severity Index)

The primary endpoint was the percentage of lesion clearance after 12 weeks of therapy using an exploratory clinical measure modified from a validated psoriasis index. The Disseminated Actinic Porokeratosis General Assessment Severity Index (DSAP-GASI) included plaque/rim elevation, scaling, and color (0= clear, 1=almost clear, 2=mild, 3=moderate, and 4=severe). Lesions of each patient were graded by 2 blinded physicians before and after treatment.

Time frame: 12 weeks

Population: Treatment efficacy was based on investigator-standardized patient-documented photographs. Repeat photo documentation was obtained if image quality was inadequate or angle, lighting or location was not standardized to prior photos. Thirty-one subjects enrolled in the study, of which 24 provided clear pictures across all four visits (i.e. \~77%) and were considered in the efficacy analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Statin/Cholesterol Combination GroupMeasurement of Treatment Efficacy Determined by DSAP-GASI Score (Disseminated Actinic Porokeratosis General Assessment Severity Index)50.0 Percent decrease in mean DSAP-GASI score
Statin Alone GroupMeasurement of Treatment Efficacy Determined by DSAP-GASI Score (Disseminated Actinic Porokeratosis General Assessment Severity Index)51.4 Percent decrease in mean DSAP-GASI score
Primary

Presence of Coronoid Lamella on Dermoscopy (or Photograph).

Dermoscopic and clinical photographs will be subsequently analyzed for the presence of cornoid lamella (well circumscribed, erythematous macule with a peripheral rim of hyperkeratosis). The team will record any additional dermoscopic or clinicals feature that may arise during the analyses.

Time frame: 12 weeks

Population: unable to complete due to COVID 19 pandemic causing virtual visits for most patients.

Secondary

Application Frequency Influence on Disseminated Actinic Porokeratosis General Assessment Severity Index

Measure if applying once or twice a day had an affect on treatment efficacy using the DSAP-GASI described in the primary outcome. Factors included plaque/rim elevation, scaling, and color. (0= clear, 1=almost clear, 2=mild, 3=moderate, and 4=severe). Lower score indicates better outcome.

Time frame: 12 weeks

Population: Data was analyzed against DSAP-GASI scores that had n=12 for each treatment arm. Frequency was also analyzed in the 24 participants selected for the DSAP-GASI. 8 of those participants happened to be once a day and 16 twice a day.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Statin/Cholesterol Combination GroupApplication Frequency Influence on Disseminated Actinic Porokeratosis General Assessment Severity Index1.42 score on a scale
Statin Alone GroupApplication Frequency Influence on Disseminated Actinic Porokeratosis General Assessment Severity Index1.54 score on a scale
Secondary

Improvement in Color of DSAP Lesions

Patients were asked if their color was lighter, unchanged, darker. The responses were collected at weeks 4, 8, and 12. Only the final visit (week 12) was used in analysis. Lighter coloring is reported in the data table.

Time frame: 12 weeks

Population: The numbers in each group do not equal the total number of analyzed participants because some declined to answer.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Statin/Cholesterol Combination GroupImprovement in Color of DSAP Lesions13 participants denoting a score of lighter
Statin Alone GroupImprovement in Color of DSAP Lesions12 participants denoting a score of lighter
Secondary

Improvement in Dermatology Quality of Life Index Questionnaire

The patient quality of life scale asks 10 questions gaging how the patient skin condition is currently impacting their life. This questionnaire is a common validated tool, available free online. DLQI interpretation: no effect (0-1), mild effect (2-5), moderate effect (6-10), very large effect (11-20), extreme large effect (21-30). Lower scores represent improved quality of life. This was given after every visit at weeks 0, 4, 8, and 12 to access if the cream has contributed to quality of life improvement. The mean difference between the first (week 0) and last score (week 12) was used as the final improvement score.

Time frame: 12 weeks

Population: 3/31 participants did not return a questionnaire at visit 1 or 4. In the statin group 12/14 returned a questionnaire and 16/17 in the combination group.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Statin/Cholesterol Combination GroupImprovement in Dermatology Quality of Life Index Questionnaire48 Percent improvement in quality of life
Statin Alone GroupImprovement in Dermatology Quality of Life Index Questionnaire38 Percent improvement in quality of life
Secondary

Improvement in Overall Appearance of DSAP Lesions

Patients were asked if their overall appearance was better, unchanged, worse. The responses were collected at weeks 4, 8, and 12. Only the final visit (week 12) was used in analysis. Better overall improvement is reported in the data table.

Time frame: 12 weeks

Population: The numbers in each group do not equal the total number of analyzed participants because some declined to answer.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Statin/Cholesterol Combination GroupImprovement in Overall Appearance of DSAP Lesions14 participants denoting a score of better
Statin Alone GroupImprovement in Overall Appearance of DSAP Lesions12 participants denoting a score of better
Secondary

Improvement in Size of DSAP Lesions

Patients were asked if their lesion size was smaller, unchanged, or larger. The responses were collected at weeks 4, 8, and 12. Only the final visit (week 12) was used in analysis. The number of participants reporting smaller lesions is reported in the data table.

Time frame: 12 weeks

Population: The numbers in each group do not equal the total number of analyzed participants because some declined to answer.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Statin/Cholesterol Combination GroupImprovement in Size of DSAP Lesions12 participants denoting smaller size
Statin Alone GroupImprovement in Size of DSAP Lesions11 participants denoting smaller size
Secondary

Pain and Itch Associated With Treatment

Pain and Itch were measured as increased or decreased at weeks 0, 4, 8, and 12. Week 12 findings reported.

Time frame: 12 weeks

Population: Two participants did not complete the study from the statin group, thus were not allowed in final analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Statin/Cholesterol Combination GroupPain and Itch Associated With Treatment5 Participants
Statin Alone GroupPain and Itch Associated With Treatment1 Participants
Statin Alone Group Itch DecreasePain and Itch Associated With Treatment1 Participants
Statin Alone Group Itch IncreasePain and Itch Associated With Treatment1 Participants
Statin/Cholesterol Combination Group Pain DecreasePain and Itch Associated With Treatment2 Participants
Statin/Cholesterol Combination Group Pain IncreasePain and Itch Associated With Treatment0 Participants
Statin Alone Group Pain DecreasePain and Itch Associated With Treatment0 Participants
Statin Alone Group Pain IncreasePain and Itch Associated With Treatment0 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 9, 2026