Skip to content

Prone Positioning and Regional Ventilation in Mechanically Ventilated COVID-19 Patients

The Effect of Prone Positioning on Lung Aeration and Ventilation-perfusion Matching in Mechanically Ventilated Patients With Coronavirus Disease Related Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04359407
Acronym
COVID-19_EIT
Enrollment
29
Registered
2020-04-24
Start date
2020-04-27
Completion date
2021-05-10
Last updated
2021-07-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Electric Impedance, Prone Positioning, Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2

Brief summary

The consensus therapeutic strategy implies that COVID patients with acute lung injury due to coronavirus are routinely placed in prone position in an attempt to improve oxygenation by increasing ventilation homogeneity. The purpose of the study is to quantify with the electrical impedance tomography (EIT) the changes in the ventilation and aeration in the dorsal regions of the lung when the patient is placed in prone position.

Detailed description

Patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) frequently develop atelectasis in dorsal lung regions because of gravity and the compression by the heart and the diaphragm. Since lung perfusion is predominantly distributed in lower lung regions, a reduction of ventilation in these areas results in further ventilation-perfusion mismatch, called shunt. The development of atelectatic lung regions necessitate the use of higher ventilation pressures, which in turn results in excessive transpulmonary pressures and ventilation-induced lung injury in the ventral regions. Therefore it is common to promote the prone position in patients with ARDS in order to improve ventilation-perfusion matching and thus, protect the ventral regions from hyperinflation. In patients with COVID-19-related ARDS, the value of such therapeutic strategy based on placing in prone position has not been completely elucidated. The aims of the study are to determine whether prone positioning improves dorsal regional ventilation when compared to supine position. Moreover, another aim is to assess the changes in intrapulmonary shunt following patient position changes.

Interventions

OTHERProne positioning

Change the positioning of the COVID patients who are intubated and mechanically ventilated from supine to prone

Sponsors

Walid HABRE
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_ONLY
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Patients fulfilling all the following criteria are eligible for the study: * Mechanically ventilated * Fit the Berlin Definition for moderate or severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (arterial oxygen partial pressure over inspiratory fraction of oxygen less than 200 mmHg) * Infection with coronavirus confirmed * Scheduled to undergo prone positioning

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with pacemakers, defibrillators or other electrically active implants * Patients with damaged skin or impaired skin contact of the electrodes due to wound dressings * Patients with chest tubes * History of thoracic surgery or lung resection

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Tidal electrical ImpedanceOne hour before turning to prone or supine positioningChange in the ratio of tidal electrical impedance variation in the dorsal and total lung areas

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Intrapulmonary shuntOne hour before turning to prone or supine positioningChanges in intrapulmonary shunt fraction
Volumetric capnographyOne hour before turning to prone or supine positioningChanges in the phase three slope of the volumetric capnogram

Countries

Switzerland

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 17, 2026