Skip to content

Kinesiotaping Versus Pilate Exercises

Kinesiotaping Versus Pilate Exercises on Primary Dysmenorrhea

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04359381
Enrollment
60
Registered
2020-04-24
Start date
2019-12-24
Completion date
2020-03-30
Last updated
2020-04-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dysmenorrhea, Exercise

Keywords

kinesiotaping, pilate exercises, primary dysmenorrhea

Brief summary

Sixty girls participated in this study and their main complaints were pain and cramping during menstruation. They were divided randomly into two equal groups.

Detailed description

Group (A) (30 girls) treated by kinesiotaping during menstruation for 3 successive menstruation. Group (B) (30 girls) treated by pilate exercises, 3 sessions per week for 3 months except the days of menstruation. Visual analogue scale to assess pain intensity, Quality of life enjoyment and satisfaction questionnaire, Menstrual Distress Questionnaire, WALIDD score, Spielberger questionnaire and blood sample analysis to estimate plasma prostaglandin level were applied for each girl in both groups before and after the treatment course.

Interventions

kinesiotaping was applied once the menstrual pain begins (one day before menstruation) for periods of 4 to 5 days until the pain disappears and then removed it. Kinesiotaping was used for 3 successive menstruations.

OTHERPilate exercises program

Each girl in group (B) was engaged in a supervised pilate exercises program for 30 minutes per session for 3 days/week for 12 weeks except days of menstruation. Participants would be oriented to wear comfortable clothes .

Sponsors

Amira Hassan Abdelaziz
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Soheir Mahmoud El-Kosery
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Cairo University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Investigator)

Masking description

An independent person randomly assigned to all participated subjects to either group (A) (n=30) or group (B) (n=30) by chosen numbers from closed envelopes having numbers that the number generator were chosen randomly.

Intervention model description

The study was designed as a randomized controlled trial.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
14 Years to 20 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Their ages ranged from 14 to 20 years old * their body mass index (BMI) would be less than 25 Kg/m2 * having primary dysmenorrhoea

Exclusion criteria

* skin diseases or cardiac diseases * irregular or infrequent menstrual cycles * previous abdominal or back operations

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Weight and height scalethree monthsWas used to measure the weight and height of each girl before starting the study and to calculate BMI according to the following formula: BMI = weight (kg) / height square (m)2

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Visual analog scalethree monthsFor determining pain intensity before and after the treatment course for each girl in both groups (A&B). VAS is a-10 cms line, at one end was written (no pain = zero) and at the other end was written (worst pain the patient ever felt = 10)

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026