Skip to content

Endovascular Versus Medical Treatment for the Pelvic Congestion Syndrome

Endovascular Versus Medical Treatment for the Pelvic Congestion Syndrome

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04358497
Acronym
ENDPCS
Enrollment
120
Registered
2020-04-24
Start date
2020-10-01
Completion date
2022-10-01
Last updated
2020-04-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pelvic Congestive Syndrome, Pelvic Varices, Venous Disease

Keywords

pelvic congestion syndrome, sclerosis, coil embolization

Brief summary

Compare the efficacy and safety of endovascular treatment with sandwich technique (controlled release coils and 2% polidocanol foam) associated with diosmin-hisperidine and ibuprofen medical treatment and only the best chronic medical treatment available diosmin-hisperidine and ibuprofen for 3 months, in women of active gynecological age carrying pelvic congestion syndrome in public assistance in Montevideo, Uruguay.

Detailed description

Pelvic congestion syndrome (PCS) is a recognized and frequent cause of Chronic Pelvic Pain (10% to 30%). It is defined as the presence of chronic symptoms, which may include pelvic pain, perineal heaviness, urinary urgency and postcoital pain, caused by reflux and / or obstruction of the gonadic and / or pelvic veins, and that may be associated with vulvar, perineal and lower limbs varicose veins. There is no standard approach to managing PCS. According to expert recommendations, therapies should be individualized according to the patient's symptoms and needs. Medical treatment options include progestagens, danazol, combined oral hormonal contraceptives, phlebotonics such as hisperidine-added diosmin, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists Currently, the only accepted chronic medical treatment is the association of non-steroidal and phlebotonic anti-inflammatories, but they have shown a poor symptomatic benefit in reducing pain. Surgical treatment has evolved over time mainly in the hands of laparoscopic techniques, currently the endovascular option is the most widely accepted for presenting excellent long-term results with abolition of pain in up to 90% at 2 years. HYPOTHESIS Endovascular treatment of pelvic congestion syndrome is better in terms of pain control and quality of life compared to drug treatment. General objective Compare the efficacy and safety of endovascular treatment with sandwich technique (controlled release coils and 2% polidocanol foam) associated with diosmin-hisperidine and ibuprofen medical treatment and only the best chronic medical treatment available diosmin-hisperidine and ibuprofen for 3 months, in women of active gynecological age carrying pelvic congestion syndrome in public assistance in Montevideo, Uruguay. Specific objectives • Compare pain in patients undergoing endovascular treatment with the best medical treatment. * Evaluate the persistence of pelvic varices in patients undergoing endovascular treatment of SCP. * Compare the Female Sexual Satisfaction Index in both groups.

Interventions

DEVICEMedtronic® Concerto® detachable coil system

coil embolization of the reflux pathways

PROCEDUREsclerosis

Pelvic varices sclerosis with polidocanol foam

Best chronic medial treatment

DRUGIbuprofen 400 mg

NSAID treatment

Sponsors

University of the Republic, Uruguay
CollaboratorOTHER
Centro Cardiovascular Universitario
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Centro Hospitalario Pereyra Rossell
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Hospital de Clínicas Dr. Manuel Quintela
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Phlebography will be performed to both groups. On the experimental group, the treatment of the pelvic congestion will be performed, while the procedure will be stopped on the control group. Neither the patient or the reference gynecologist will be informed if the treatment took place.

Intervention model description

Blind randomized clinical trial designed to compare the efficacy and safety of endovascular treatment of Pelvic congestion syndrome.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Active gynecological age * Chronic pelvic pain diagnosed by gynecologist of at least 6 months of evolution. * Transvaginal duplex ultrasound: presence of periuterine varicose veins defined by veins larger than 5mm in diameter with reflux greater than 0.5 seconds on Valsava maneuvers.

Exclusion criteria

* Presence of other causes of chronic pelvic pain: endometriosis, pelvic inflammatory disease, postoperative adhesions, uterine myoma, adenomyosis, ovarian tumors, polycystic ovary. * Fibromyalgia * BMI greater than 35 * Chronic kidney disease * thrombophilia * Alterationof coagulation. * Allergy to iodinated contrast medium.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
McGill Pain Questionnaire30 dayssubjective pain experience assessment
visual analogue scale (VAS)30 daysPain assessment 1-10 from no pain to severe
Lattinen index30 dayschronic pain assessment 2-22 from low to high

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
varicose and reflux persistance by transvaginal duplex scan3 monthstransabdominal duplex scan: varicose permeability, prescience of gonadic or iliac reflux
varicose persistance assesment by tomography3 monthsangiotomography: Varicose and conadic Patency
Female sexual function index30 daysquestionnaire that assesses different domains of sexual function. 0-48 from no sexual distress to high level of sexual distress
varicose and reflux persistance by transabdominal duplex scan30 daystransabdominal duplex scan: varicose permeability, prescience of gonadic or iliac reflux

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Deep venous thrombosis by duplex ultrasound30 daysDeep venous thrombosis of the iliac or femoral axis will be reported

Contacts

Primary ContactSebastian Sarutte, VS
ssarutte1@hotmail.com+59899533449
Backup ContactMauricio Volpi, VS
mavolpi@yahoo.com+59899605556

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026