Skip to content

Is Real-time CGM Superior to Flash Glucose Monitoring

Comparison of CGM in Randomised Study of Real-time and Intermittently-scanned Systems in T1D With Normal Awareness of Hypoglycemia (CORRIDA)

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04358263
Acronym
CORRIDA
Enrollment
60
Registered
2020-04-24
Start date
2018-09-01
Completion date
2020-11-30
Last updated
2020-04-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1

Keywords

Continuous Glucose Monitoring, Flash Glucose Monitoring, Hypoglycemia, Time in Range, Physical Activity

Brief summary

The aim of the investigator's study is to compare real-time continuous glucose monitoring and flash glucose monitoring in adult patients with Type 1 Diabetes during 4-day training program focused on physical activity and over 4 weeks of follow-up.

Interventions

DEVICEContinuous Glucose Monitoring Guardian Connect Mobile system (real-time continuous glucose monitoring)

rtCGM and isCGM are used in Type 1 diabetic patients to improve glucose control and to minimize or avoid severe hypoglycaemia.

DEVICEContinuous Glucose Monitoring FreeStyle Libre Flash system (intermittently-scanned continuous glucose monitoring)

rtCGM and isCGM are used in Type 1 diabetic patients to improve glucose control and to minimize or avoid severe hypoglycaemia.

Sponsors

Charles University, Czech Republic
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* patients with T1D naive to rtCGM and isCGM * Type 1 diabetes for \>2 years * ≥ 18 years old * CSII or MDI * GOLD score \< 4, no history of severe hypoglycemia within last 6 month * written informed consent prior to starting study related activity

Exclusion criteria

* severe noncompliance * severe diabetic retinopathy and/or macular edema * lactation, pregnancy, intending to become pregnant during study * condition likely to require MRI * use of acetaminophen-containing medication * unwillingness to use the study device for \>70% of time

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of time in hypoglycemic rangesUp to 2 months\<3,9 mmol/L (70 mg/dl) and \<3,0 mmol/L (54 mg/dl)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of time in hyperglycemic rangesUp to 2 months(\>10,0 mmol/L (180 mg/dl) and \>13,9 mmol/L (250 mg/dl)
Changes in glycemic variabilityUp to 2 monthsExpressed as the coefficient of variation
Mean sensor glucose concentrationUp to 2 monthsMeasured by rtCGM or isCGM
Percentage of time in target rangesUp to 2 months3,9-10,0 mmol/L (70-180 mg/dl)
Incidence of severe hypoglycaemiaUp to 2 monthsRequiring third-party assistance to treat
Changes in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c)Up to 2 monthsDifferences between HbA1c values in the initial period and after follow-up and differences of HbA1c between groups.
Changes in quality of life as assessed by validated questionnaireUp to 2 monthsAssessed by The World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHOQOL)-BREF (Field Trial Version). This questionnaire contains in total 26 questions in four Domains (Physical health, Psychological health, Social relationships, Environment). Scores in total range between 4-20 (each Domain 0-5), higher scores denote higher quality of life.

Countries

Czechia

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026