Skip to content

Adjunct VR Pain Management in Acute Brain Injury

Adjunct Virtual Reality Pain Management in Acute Brain Injury

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04356963
Enrollment
60
Registered
2020-04-22
Start date
2020-09-05
Completion date
2022-04-30
Last updated
2023-04-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Headaches Posttraumatic, Pain, Acute, Trauma, Traumatic Brain Injury

Brief summary

Severe and refractory pain after acute injury is a known-risk factor for chronic opioid use disorder. In this study, the investigators will use Virtual Reality (VR) immersion as a non-pharmacological adjunct to treat pain associated with acute traumatic injuries, including traumatic brain injury. The investigators hypothesize that VR therapy will decrease pain and reduce opioid use in patients with acute traumatic injuries, including TBI.

Detailed description

Each participant will undergo one VR session and two control sessions. The VR session will take place in a commercially available VR environment, the Blu, and last 20-30 minutes (VR Blu). The control sessions will include a 2D-tablet based session that mimics the VR content (Tablet Blu) and a content-less placement of the VR headset (VR Blank). The order of these sessions will be randomized across participants are intended to complete all sessions. Each participant will complete a pre-study questionnaire to elicit their prior experience with the virtual reality as well as measures of gaming addiction/engagement, boredom, and expectancy. These scales will help us determine which patient-level factors predict response to VR. Before and after each session, participants will complete validated scales of pain, nausea, and anxiety.. Pre- and Post-VR opioid use will be recorded. Basic vital signs including heart rate, blood pressure, and respiratory rate, will be recorded before and after each session to monitor autonomic response. Advanced measures of autonomic response will include heart rate variability,,and pupillometry metrics. At the conclusion of all sessions, participants will complete another questionnaire to document their subjective experience of using VR (perceived effectiveness)

Interventions

BEHAVIORALVirtual Reality Session (VR Blu)

20-30 minute session of virtual reality immersive content.

BEHAVIORALTablet-based Session (Tablet Blu)

20-30 minute session of tablet-based content that mimics the content from virtual reality sessions.

BEHAVIORALUse of Virtual Reality Head Mounted Display without Content (VR Blank)

20-30 minutes session using head mounted display to reduce light and sound.

Sponsors

National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS)
CollaboratorNIH
University of Maryland, Baltimore
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Masking description

Interventions will take place in patient rooms with curtain pulled and sign to mask active intervention vs. control intervention from care providers.

Intervention model description

Within-Subjects Design. All participants (single group, 1 arm) intended to complete all three sessions (interventions) in randomized order. At least 4 hours were required to pass between each session to allow for washout.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of Traumatic Injury (including but not limited to traumatic brain injury) * Age greater than or equal to 18 years-old * Endorsing at least moderate pain as defined by documentation of at least one numeric rating pain scale score of 3 or more in the last 24 hours. * Glasgow Coma Scale of 15 * Expected to stay in the hospital for at least 12 hours after enrollment

Exclusion criteria

* Seizure prior to enrollment * Pregnancy * non-English speaking * Known intolerance of Virtual Reality * Patient unable to consent for themselves

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Pain ScorePre- and Post-Intervention (approximately 30 minutes)Pre- vs. Post-Intervention Ratings on Numeric Pain Rating Scale. Numeric Pain Rating scale range is from 0 (no pain) -10 (severe pain)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Opioid Administration4 hours post-intervention vs. 4 hours pre-interventionChange in amount of opioids received in the 4 hours post-intervention vs. the 4 hours pre-intervention in morphine equivalents

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in AnxietyPre- and Post-Intervention (approximately 30 minutes)Pre- vs. Post-Intervention Anxiety Ratings from Short-Form State Anxiety Inventory. Scores Range from 6 (Not at all anxious) - 24 (Very much amxious)
Change in PupillometryPre- and Post-Intervention (approximately 30 minutes)Pre- vs. Post-Intervention Pupillary Maximum Constriction Velocity. Reduced pupillary maximum constriction velocity is representative of decreased parasympathetic nervous system activity.
Subjective Measures of VR ExperiencePre- and Post-study (approximately 2-3 days)A Likert-Scale questionnaire was used to assess participant's subjective ratings of how effective the interventional sessions were. The scale ranged from 0 (not at all) to 5 (very much).
Change Heart Rate VariabilityMean NN from last 15 minutes of each intervention compared to mean NN from 15 minutes immediately prior to interventionPre- vs. Post-Intervention Heart Rate Variability as measured by normal-to-normal (NN) means. Decreasing NN means are associated with the activity of sympathetic system, while increasing NN means means are associated with the activity of parasympathetic nervous system
Change in NauseaPre- and Post-Intervention (approximately 30 minutes)Pre- vs. Post-Intervention Ratings on Numeric Rating Scale for Nausea. Numeric Rating Scale for Nausea ranges from 0 (no nausea) - 10 (worst nausea possible)

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

2083 patients were screened for eligibility between October 2020 and January 2022 in a dedicated trauma hospital. 1885 patients were excluded. 138 patients declined to participate in the study. 60 patients were enrolled in the study. All patients were intended to participate in all conditions (in randomized order) including: VR Blu, Tablet Blu, VR Blank.

Pre-assignment details

All 60 patients were intended to participate in all 3 conditions in randomized order. 60 of 60 patients had session order randomized.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
All Patients
Patients engaged in three different 20 min sessions run by research coordinators and spaced a minimum of 4 hours apart, including 1) a commercially available, immersive VR environment, theBlu (WEVR, Inc, Venice, California, USA) delivered via Oculus Rift (Oculus VR, Irvine, California, USA) headset, 2) a non-immersive two-dimensional mimic delivered via a tablet computer, and 3) a VR control session delivered via a content-less Oculus Rift headset. The three sessions were run by research coordinators and spaced a minimum of 4 hours apart. The intervention order was counterbalanced using a randomized sequence generator.
60
Total60

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
First SessionWithdrawal by Subject1
Second SessionLost to Follow-up1
Second SessionWithdrawal by Subject3
Third SessionLost to Follow-up6
Third SessionWithdrawal by Subject1

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAll Patients
Acute Injury Scale > 0
Abdominal
29 participants
Acute Injury Scale > 0
Face
20 participants
Acute Injury Scale > 0
Head
29 participants
Acute Injury Scale > 0
Head with Traumatic Brain Injury
20 participants
Acute Injury Scale > 0
Lower Extremity
35 participants
Acute Injury Scale > 0
Neck
8 participants
Acute Injury Scale > 0
Spine
15 participants
Acute Injury Scale > 0
Thoracic
26 participants
Acute Injury Scale > 0
Upper Extremity
28 participants
Age, Continuous53 years
Health Insurance
Medicaid
5 Participants
Health Insurance
Medicare
16 Participants
Health Insurance
Private
39 Participants
Past Medical History
Alcohol Abuse
13 participants
Past Medical History
Anxiety
16 participants
Past Medical History
Chronic Pain
13 participants
Past Medical History
Depression
18 participants
Past Medical History
Positive Toxicology Screen
32 participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
19 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
37 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
18 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
42 Participants
Type of Traumatic Brain Injury
Epidural hematoma
1 participants
Type of Traumatic Brain Injury
Intracerebral Hemorrhage
13 participants
Type of Traumatic Brain Injury
Subarachnoid hemorrhage
8 participants
Type of Traumatic Brain Injury
Subdural hematoma
10 participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 54
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 54
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 54

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Pain Score

Pre- vs. Post-Intervention Ratings on Numeric Pain Rating Scale. Numeric Pain Rating scale range is from 0 (no pain) -10 (severe pain)

Time frame: Pre- and Post-Intervention (approximately 30 minutes)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
All PatientsChange in Pain ScoreVR Blu Intervention Pain Reduction-0.92 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.33
All PatientsChange in Pain ScoreTablet Blu Intervention Pain Reduction-0.16 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.29
All PatientsChange in Pain ScoreVR Blank Intervention Pain Reduction-1.24 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.33
Secondary

Opioid Administration

Change in amount of opioids received in the 4 hours post-intervention vs. the 4 hours pre-intervention in morphine equivalents

Time frame: 4 hours post-intervention vs. 4 hours pre-intervention

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
All PatientsOpioid AdministrationChanges in opioid dose received after VR Blu condition-0.159 morphine milligram equivalentsStandard Error 1.392
All PatientsOpioid AdministrationChange in opioid dose received after Tablet Blu-0.89 morphine milligram equivalentsStandard Error 1.175
All PatientsOpioid AdministrationChange in opioid dose received after VR Blank-0.059 morphine milligram equivalentsStandard Error 1.341
Other Pre-specified

Change Heart Rate Variability

Pre- vs. Post-Intervention Heart Rate Variability as measured by normal-to-normal (NN) means. Decreasing NN means are associated with the activity of sympathetic system, while increasing NN means means are associated with the activity of parasympathetic nervous system

Time frame: Mean NN from last 15 minutes of each intervention compared to mean NN from 15 minutes immediately prior to intervention

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
All PatientsChange Heart Rate VariabilityVR Blu induced change in mean NN (NN from last 15 min of session minus NN 15 min pre-session)874.64 msStandard Error 15.36
All PatientsChange Heart Rate VariabilityTablet Blu induced change in mean NN (NN from last 15 min of session minus NN 15 min pre-session)834.78 msStandard Error 1.93
All PatientsChange Heart Rate VariabilityVR Blank induced change in mean NN (NN from last 15 min of session minus NN 15 min pre-session)867.64 msStandard Error 10.37
Other Pre-specified

Change in Anxiety

Pre- vs. Post-Intervention Anxiety Ratings from Short-Form State Anxiety Inventory. Scores Range from 6 (Not at all anxious) - 24 (Very much amxious)

Time frame: Pre- and Post-Intervention (approximately 30 minutes)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
All PatientsChange in Anxietychanges in STAI score after VR Blue-.061 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.311
All PatientsChange in AnxietyChanges in STAI score after Tablet Blue-0.401 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.32
All PatientsChange in AnxietyChanges in STAI score after VR Blank-0.675 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.501
Other Pre-specified

Change in Nausea

Pre- vs. Post-Intervention Ratings on Numeric Rating Scale for Nausea. Numeric Rating Scale for Nausea ranges from 0 (no nausea) - 10 (worst nausea possible)

Time frame: Pre- and Post-Intervention (approximately 30 minutes)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
All PatientsChange in NauseaChange in nausea after VR Blu-0.116 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.304
All PatientsChange in NauseaChange in nausea after Tablet Blu-0.395 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.248
All PatientsChange in NauseaChange in nausea after VR Blank-0.093 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.057
Other Pre-specified

Change in Pupillometry

Pre- vs. Post-Intervention Pupillary Maximum Constriction Velocity. Reduced pupillary maximum constriction velocity is representative of decreased parasympathetic nervous system activity.

Time frame: Pre- and Post-Intervention (approximately 30 minutes)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
All PatientsChange in PupillometryVR Blue change in maximum constriction velocity0.187 mm/sStandard Error 0.112
All PatientsChange in PupillometryTablet Blue change in maximum constriction velocity-0.047 mm/sStandard Error 0.097
All PatientsChange in PupillometryVR Blank change in maximum constriction velocity-0.299 mm/sStandard Error 0.149
Other Pre-specified

Subjective Measures of VR Experience

A Likert-Scale questionnaire was used to assess participant's subjective ratings of how effective the interventional sessions were. The scale ranged from 0 (not at all) to 5 (very much).

Time frame: Pre- and Post-study (approximately 2-3 days)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
All PatientsSubjective Measures of VR ExperienceTablet Blu Perceived Effectiveness on Likert Scale (0-5, not at all effective - very effective)2.68 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.23
All PatientsSubjective Measures of VR ExperienceVR Blank Perceived Effectiveness on Likert Scale (0-5, not at all effective - very effective)1.52 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.29
All PatientsSubjective Measures of VR ExperienceVR Blu Perceived Effectiveness on Likert Scale (0-5, not at all effective - very effective)3.63 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.23

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 14, 2026