Skip to content

Temperature Monitoring in Cardiac Surgery: Agreement Between Different Clinical Methods

Temperature Monitoring in Cardiac Surgery: Clinical Study of Agreement Between Different Measurement Methods

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04355013
Enrollment
48
Registered
2020-04-21
Start date
2016-09-28
Completion date
2017-11-22
Last updated
2025-05-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Temperature Change, Body

Keywords

Core temperature, Cardiac surgery

Brief summary

Observational study to compare core temperatures obtained by 6 methods in patients undergoing cardiac surgery under cardiopulmonary bypass.

Detailed description

This study compares the core temperatures obtained by means of different probes placed in nasopharinx, pulmonary artery, arterial outlet, venous inlet, bladder and forehead in patients undergoing cardiac surgery under cardiopulmonary bypass.

Interventions

DEVICECore emperature monitoring

Monitoring core temperatures with probes placed in the arterial outlet and venous inlet of extracorporeal pump, pulmonary artery, bladder, nasopharinx and forehead using a doublé-sensor probe

Sponsors

Fundación Instituto de Estudios de Ciencias de la Salud de Castilla y León
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_CROSSOVER
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Only patients requiring a pulmonary artery catheter were included.

Exclusion criteria

* Sepsis or previous fever. * Previous bladder catheter without termistor * Deep hypothermic circulatory arrest.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Agreement Between Different Core Temperature Methods24 temperature measures per patient recorded at 5-min intervals for each method and averaged using the Bland-Altman method for repeated measuresAgreement between core temperatures obtained in arterial CPB output versus venous inlet of CPB, bladder, pulmonary artery, nasopharynx and forehead (Tcore). The measurements were compared between the different methods using the Bland-Altman method of repeated measures and expressed as mean difference (reference method-alternative method) plus CI95%.

Countries

Spain

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery using cardiopulmonary bypass and requiring hemodynamic monitoring by means of a pulmonary artery catheter.

Pre-assignment details

Exclusion criteria were sepsis or previous fever, presence of a previous standard urinary bladder catheter (without thermistor) inserted prior to surgery, moderate hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass, or deep hypothermic circulatory arrest.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Patients Undergoing CPB Cardiac Surgery.
Adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery using cardiopulmonary bypass and requiring hemodynamic monitoring by means of a pulmonary artery catheter.
48
Total48

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPatients Undergoing CPB Cardiac Surgery.
Age, Continuous66 years
Height165 centimeters
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected— Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
48 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
17 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
31 Participants
Weight70 kilograms

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 0
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 0
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 0

Outcome results

Primary

Agreement Between Different Core Temperature Methods

Agreement between core temperatures obtained in arterial CPB output versus venous inlet of CPB, bladder, pulmonary artery, nasopharynx and forehead (Tcore). The measurements were compared between the different methods using the Bland-Altman method of repeated measures and expressed as mean difference (reference method-alternative method) plus CI95%.

Time frame: 24 temperature measures per patient recorded at 5-min intervals for each method and averaged using the Bland-Altman method for repeated measures

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Arterial OutletAgreement Between Different Core Temperature Methods35.0 celsius degrees (mean difference)
NasopharyngealAgreement Between Different Core Temperature Methods35.2 celsius degrees (mean difference)
BladderAgreement Between Different Core Temperature Methods35.6 celsius degrees (mean difference)
TcoreAgreement Between Different Core Temperature Methods34.8 celsius degrees (mean difference)
Venous InflowAgreement Between Different Core Temperature Methods34.8 celsius degrees (mean difference)
Comparison: Arterial outlet-nasopharyngeal temperatures95% CI: [-1.1, 0.77]
Comparison: Arterial-venous inflow temperatures95% CI: [-0.63, 0.95]Bland-Altman
Comparison: Arterial outlet-bladder95% CI: [-1.98, 0.74]Bland-Altman
Comparison: Arterial outlet- Tcore95% CI: [-1.38, 1.54]Bland-Altman
Comparison: Nasopharyngeal-venous inflow temperatures95% CI: [-0.73, 1.38]
Comparison: Nasopharyngeal-bladder temperatures95% CI: [-1.5, 0.59]
Comparison: Nasopharyngeal-Tcore temperatures95% CI: [-0.9, 1.39]

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026