Skip to content

Management of Occlusal Caries Using Silver Modified Atraumatic Restorative Treatment Versus Atraumatic Restorative Treatment

Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation After the Use of Silver Modified Atraumatic Restorative Treatment Versus Atraumatic Restorative Treatment in the Management of Occlusal Caries of Primary Molars in Preschool Children: Randomized Clinical Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04354636
Enrollment
50
Registered
2020-04-21
Start date
2021-09-01
Completion date
2023-10-11
Last updated
2024-12-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Occlusal Caries

Brief summary

Silver modified atraumatic restorative treatment (intervention) or atraumatic restorative treatment (Control) will be used to manage occlusal caries in preschool children then the molars will be evaluated at the interval of 3,6 and 12 months clinically and 6 and 12 months radiographically

Detailed description

Aim of the study: To evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes after the use of silver modified atraumatic restorative treatment versus atraumatic restorative treatment in the management of occlusal caries in primary molars in preschool children. PICO: Population: Preschool children (4-6 years) with occlusal caries in second primary molars. Intervention: Silver modified atraumatic restorative treatment Comparator/Control: Atraumatic restorative treatment. Outcomes: Pain (provoked or spontaneous) OHRQoL(oral health related to quality of life) Parental esthetic perception Failure of restoration Caries density in radiograph Time: 3, 6 and 12 months Study design: A randomized clinical trial

Interventions

DRUGSilver modified atraumatic restorative treatment

Silver diamine fluoride that will be applied during atraumatic restorative treatment

Using atraumatic restorative treatment without applying silver diamine fluoride

Sponsors

Cairo University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
4 Years to 6 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* • Patient and parent cooperation and compliance. * Children aged 4 - 6 years * Second primary molars with occlusal caries. * No clinical signs and symptoms of pulp involvement * No radiographic abnormalities

Exclusion criteria

* • Uncooperative children or parents * Children with systemic diseases * Children with previous allergies to any of the used materials

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Questioning parent about whether the child have pain between follow up intervals (provoked or spontaneous)12 monthsPain reported-Pain history that occurs after treatment at any point (will be recorded at the follow up intervals) Outcome will be binary (yes/no)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
OHRQoL(oral health related to quality of life)3 monthsThe Early Childhood Oral Health Impact Scale (A-ECOHIS) Score 0-52. There will be 13 questions each question with a score 0-5 where 0 = excellent, 1=very good, 2=good, 3=fair , 4=poor and 5= unknown so the less the score the better is the oral health related to quality of life.
Questioning parents about their aesthetic perception3 monthsParent reported (parent is asked whether he/she is accepting the tooth appearance or not) Outcome will be binary (yes/no)
ART assessment criteria (Codes 00-90)12 monthsFailure of restoration according to the code in the ART assessment criteria (Codes 00-90). Code 00 or 10 are considered successful, codes 11-40 are classified as failures, and codes 50-90 are assigned in case the tooth was unavailable for evaluation
Caries density in radiograph12 monthsPixel grey value

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026