Skip to content

Early Surgeon Experience With Robotic-Assisted Inguinal Hernia Repair

PROGRESS: A PROspective Evaluation of the Early surGeon expeRiencE With Robotic-aSSisted (RA) Inguinal Hernia Repair (IHR)

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04353687
Enrollment
6
Registered
2020-04-20
Start date
2020-03-17
Completion date
2024-06-30
Last updated
2024-03-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hernia, Inguinal

Brief summary

The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the progression of surgeon efficiency and proficiency of traditionally open or laparoscopic surgeons performing robotic-assisted inguinal hernia repair throughout their learning curve.

Detailed description

This is a prospective, multi-center, observational pilot study evaluating surgeon efficiency and proficiency of traditionally open or laparoscopic surgeons performing robotic-assisted inguinal hernia repair. The study will focus on surgeon intraoperative efficiency and technical performance outcomes as well as conversions, intraoperative complications, and mental and cognitive workload. Surgeon subjects will be assessed for technical proficiency through a study specific technical proficiency form and the GEARS scale by independent surgeons.

Interventions

Each surgeon will perform the robotic-assisted inguinal hernia procedure per their standard practice. Surgeon subjects will consent to prospectively provide selected procedure and case data.

Sponsors

Intuitive Surgical
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Signed and dated informed consent by adult surgeon subject 2. Practicing general surgeon with no or limited robotic assisted experience 3. Full access to the da Vinci surgical system at hospital and ability to perform robotic cases as needed 4. Willingness to participate in all aspects of the study

Exclusion criteria

1\. Condition(s) that, in the opinion of the investigator, may prevent completion of the study or protocol requirements

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change of surgeon efficiencyAssessed intraoperatively (all cases)Change of skin to skin procedure time, dissection time, time to establish critical view of the myopectineal orifice (MPO), and mesh fixation time through the assessment of intraoperative tasks
Change of surgeon proficiency/performanceWithin one month following surgery (every 12th case ± 2 cases)Change of technical proficiency scores and Global Evaluative Assessment of Robotic Skills (GEARS) scores cases as assessed by independent video review.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Conversion to OpenIntraoperativeIncidence of conversions of the robotic-assisted procedure
Change in cognitive and mental workload (SURG-TLX)With one hour following surgery (every 5th case ± 1 case)Change in cognitive and mental workload as assessed by the Surgery Task Load Index (SURG-TLX)
Length of hospital stay (LOS)Arrival of the patient in the operating room to the time of patient discharge, up to an approximate of one weekThe length of patient admission to the hospital
Number of ComplicationsIntraoperative and 30 days following discharge from hospitalIntraoperative and post-operative complications related to the inguinal hernia repair
Change of surgeon efficiencyAssessed intraoperatively (all cases)Change of console time, docking time, and operative room time through the assessment of intraoperative tasks

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026